Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: St. Louis' nigger activist prosecutor says she's charging couple who flashed guns at crowd marching to mayor's office
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Walter Duerson
Nov 28, 2021, 9:38:57 PM11/28/21
to
On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <notg...@gmail.com> posted some
news:vzxoJ.46310$Gco3....@fx01.iad:
> On 11/27/2021 1:31 PM, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant
lied:
>
>> On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <j...@phendrie.con> posted some
>> news:SZvoJ.164192$I%1.11...@fx36.iad:
>>
>>> On 7/21/2020 5:39 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/20/20 9:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/20/2020 7:52 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/20/20 8:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> David Hartung <d_ha...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:4dedncUHzeOjrovC...@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 7:08 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 21/07/2020 9:56 am, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 5:49 PM, hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mark and Patricia McCloskey say they were defending themselves
>>>>>>>>>>> against violent demonstrators
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner said Monday she's
>>>>>>>>>>> charging the couple who flashed guns at a crowd marching to
>>>>>>>>>>> the mayor's office last month, further igniting the gun-rights
>>>>>>>>>>> debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gardner, the city's top prosecutor, said Mark and Patricia
>>>>>>>>>>> McCloskey will be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon
>>>>>>>>>>> following the June 28 incident.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner -- that
>>>>>>>>>>> is unlawful in the city of St. Louis," Gardner said in a
>>>>>>>>>>> statement. She added that she was recommending a diversion
>>>>>>>>>>> program as an alternative to jail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The McCloskeys have said many times they were defending
>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, with tensions high in St. Louis and other cities
>>>>>>>>>>> over race and law enforcement. They said that the crowd of
>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrators broke an iron gate marked with "No Trespassing"
>>>>>>>>>>> and "Private Street" signs, and that some violently threatened
>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In a statement to Fox News, the couple's attorney, Joel
>>>>>>>>>>> Schwartz, called the charges "disheartening."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "I, along with my clients, support the First Amendment right
>>>>>>>>>>> of every citizen to have their voice and opinion heard.,"
>>>>>>>>>>> Schwartz said. "This right, however, must be balanced with the
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Amendment and Missouri law, which entitle each of us to
>>>>>>>>>>> protect our home and family from potential threats."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The husband and wife told "Hannity" earlier this month they
>>>>>>>>>>> were preparing to sit down for dinner on their porch when "300
>>>>>>>>>>> to 500 people" stormed their community gate and began marching
>>>>>>>>>>> toward them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The couple, both attorneys, displayed weapons as Black Lives
>>>>>>>>>>> Matter activists walked onto the private street in their
>>>>>>>>>>> community. They were headed to the home of St. Louis Mayor
>>>>>>>>>>> Lyda Krewson.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "[They said] that they were going to kill us," Patricia
>>>>>>>>>>> McCloskey recalled at the time. "They were going to come in
>>>>>>>>>>> there. They were going to burn down the house. They were going
>>>>>>>>>>> to be living in our house after I was dead, and they were
>>>>>>>>>>> pointing to different rooms and said, 'That’s going to
>>>>>>>>>>> be my bedroom and that’s going to be the living room
>>>>>>>>>>> and I’m going to be taking a shower in that room.'"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The husband and wife maintained they were protecting their
>>>>>>>>>>> home. St. Louis police seized the rifle from the home pursuant
>>>>>>>>>>> to a search warrant.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No shots were fired but the incident quickly went viral and
>>>>>>>>>>> fueled the debate over what rights do property owners have
>>>>>>>>>>> when confronted with perceived threats.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Missouri Gov. Mike Parson, a Republican, said Friday he would
>>>>>>>>>>> consider pardoning the couple should they be criminally
>>>>>>>>>>> charged.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "A mob does not have the right to charge your property," he
>>>>>>>>>>> told Parson told 97.1 FM. "They had every right to protect
>>>>>>>>>>> themselves."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Parson.s office did not immediately respond to a Fox News
>>>>>>>>>>> request for comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Last week, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., urged Attorney General Bil
>>>>>>>>>>> Barr to investigate Gardner over her decision to investigate
>>>>>>>>>>> the couple, saying the prosecutor has been hostile to gun
>>>>>>>>>>> rights in the past.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "This is an unacceptable abuse of power and threat to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Amendment, and I urge you to consider a federal civil
>>>>>>>>>>> rights investigations," Hawley wrote in a letter to Barr. "No
>>>>>>>>>>> family should face the threat of harassment or malicious
>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution for exercising that right."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Associated Press contributed to this report.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-mccloskey-charged-
prosecuto
>>>>>>>>>>> r- gardner-guns
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is going to get ugly. The McCloskey's were within their
>>>>>>>>>> rights, the city prosecutor is in violation of the US
>>>>>>>>>> Constitution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is for the Courts, all the way to SCOTUS, to deciede
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As an American cirtizen, I have the liberty to make my own
>>>>>>>> decisions, and no matter what the courts decide, the McCoskey's
>>>>>>>> are in the right.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a right to point guns at people walking
>>>>>>> down the street?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If they are a threat, absolutely.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was *NO* threat. The peaceful protesters never made a move
>>>>> toward the racist right-wingnuts or their house.
>>>>
>>>> They were trespassing on private property, they were a threat.
>>>
>>> The comma is wrong.
>>>
>>> The peaceful protesters were not a threat. They never presented *any*
>>> kind of threat to the white supremacist ambulance-chaser couple. They
>>> didn't threaten them orally, and they never moved toward the racists.
>>> The peaceful protesters were no threat. Stop lying.
>>
>> Yes Rudy, you should stop lying.
>
> But i won't, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant.
>
>>
>> The colored savages broke down a gate and
>
> No gate was broken down. It was unlocked, and they walked right in.
The protesters broke it down and trespassed.
<https://co-a2.freetls.fastly.net/co-uploads/2020/06/Broken-gate--
768x445.jpg>
Anders Walker, a constitutional law professor at St. Louis University,
told the Post-Dispatch that under Missouri’s “Castle Doctrine,” homeowners
can use deadly force to remove unwanted people from their property,
including the lawn.
“There’s no right to protest on those streets,” Walker said. “The
protesters thought they had a right to protest, but as a technical matter,
they were not allowed to be there. … It’s essentially a private estate. If
anyone was violating the law, it was the protesters. In fact, if [the
McCloskeys] have photos of the protesters, they could go after them for
trespassing.”
<https://www.crimeonline.com/2020/06/30/assault-investigation-underway-
against-protesters-after-lawyer-brandishes-ar-15-at-group-on-private-
estate-report/>
news:vzxoJ.46310$Gco3....@fx01.iad:
> On 11/27/2021 1:31 PM, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant
lied:
>
>> On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <j...@phendrie.con> posted some
>> news:SZvoJ.164192$I%1.11...@fx36.iad:
>>
>>> On 7/21/2020 5:39 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>> On 7/20/20 9:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>>>>> On 7/20/2020 7:52 PM, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/20/20 8:57 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>> David Hartung <d_ha...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:4dedncUHzeOjrovC...@giganews.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 7:08 PM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 21/07/2020 9:56 am, David Hartung wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/20/20 5:49 PM, hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mark and Patricia McCloskey say they were defending themselves
>>>>>>>>>>> against violent demonstrators
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner said Monday she's
>>>>>>>>>>> charging the couple who flashed guns at a crowd marching to
>>>>>>>>>>> the mayor's office last month, further igniting the gun-rights
>>>>>>>>>>> debate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gardner, the city's top prosecutor, said Mark and Patricia
>>>>>>>>>>> McCloskey will be charged with felony unlawful use of a weapon
>>>>>>>>>>> following the June 28 incident.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "It is illegal to wave weapons in a threatening manner -- that
>>>>>>>>>>> is unlawful in the city of St. Louis," Gardner said in a
>>>>>>>>>>> statement. She added that she was recommending a diversion
>>>>>>>>>>> program as an alternative to jail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The McCloskeys have said many times they were defending
>>>>>>>>>>> themselves, with tensions high in St. Louis and other cities
>>>>>>>>>>> over race and law enforcement. They said that the crowd of
>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrators broke an iron gate marked with "No Trespassing"
>>>>>>>>>>> and "Private Street" signs, and that some violently threatened
>>>>>>>>>>> them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In a statement to Fox News, the couple's attorney, Joel
>>>>>>>>>>> Schwartz, called the charges "disheartening."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "I, along with my clients, support the First Amendment right
>>>>>>>>>>> of every citizen to have their voice and opinion heard.,"
>>>>>>>>>>> Schwartz said. "This right, however, must be balanced with the
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Amendment and Missouri law, which entitle each of us to
>>>>>>>>>>> protect our home and family from potential threats."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The husband and wife told "Hannity" earlier this month they
>>>>>>>>>>> were preparing to sit down for dinner on their porch when "300
>>>>>>>>>>> to 500 people" stormed their community gate and began marching
>>>>>>>>>>> toward them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The couple, both attorneys, displayed weapons as Black Lives
>>>>>>>>>>> Matter activists walked onto the private street in their
>>>>>>>>>>> community. They were headed to the home of St. Louis Mayor
>>>>>>>>>>> Lyda Krewson.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "[They said] that they were going to kill us," Patricia
>>>>>>>>>>> McCloskey recalled at the time. "They were going to come in
>>>>>>>>>>> there. They were going to burn down the house. They were going
>>>>>>>>>>> to be living in our house after I was dead, and they were
>>>>>>>>>>> pointing to different rooms and said, 'That’s going to
>>>>>>>>>>> be my bedroom and that’s going to be the living room
>>>>>>>>>>> and I’m going to be taking a shower in that room.'"
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The husband and wife maintained they were protecting their
>>>>>>>>>>> home. St. Louis police seized the rifle from the home pursuant
>>>>>>>>>>> to a search warrant.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No shots were fired but the incident quickly went viral and
>>>>>>>>>>> fueled the debate over what rights do property owners have
>>>>>>>>>>> when confronted with perceived threats.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Missouri Gov. Mike Parson, a Republican, said Friday he would
>>>>>>>>>>> consider pardoning the couple should they be criminally
>>>>>>>>>>> charged.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "A mob does not have the right to charge your property," he
>>>>>>>>>>> told Parson told 97.1 FM. "They had every right to protect
>>>>>>>>>>> themselves."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Parson.s office did not immediately respond to a Fox News
>>>>>>>>>>> request for comment.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Last week, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., urged Attorney General Bil
>>>>>>>>>>> Barr to investigate Gardner over her decision to investigate
>>>>>>>>>>> the couple, saying the prosecutor has been hostile to gun
>>>>>>>>>>> rights in the past.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "This is an unacceptable abuse of power and threat to the
>>>>>>>>>>> Second Amendment, and I urge you to consider a federal civil
>>>>>>>>>>> rights investigations," Hawley wrote in a letter to Barr. "No
>>>>>>>>>>> family should face the threat of harassment or malicious
>>>>>>>>>>> prosecution for exercising that right."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The Associated Press contributed to this report.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/us/st-louis-mccloskey-charged-
prosecuto
>>>>>>>>>>> r- gardner-guns
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is going to get ugly. The McCloskey's were within their
>>>>>>>>>> rights, the city prosecutor is in violation of the US
>>>>>>>>>> Constitution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That is for the Courts, all the way to SCOTUS, to deciede
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As an American cirtizen, I have the liberty to make my own
>>>>>>>> decisions, and no matter what the courts decide, the McCoskey's
>>>>>>>> are in the right.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a right to point guns at people walking
>>>>>>> down the street?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If they are a threat, absolutely.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was *NO* threat. The peaceful protesters never made a move
>>>>> toward the racist right-wingnuts or their house.
>>>>
>>>> They were trespassing on private property, they were a threat.
>>>
>>> The comma is wrong.
>>>
>>> The peaceful protesters were not a threat. They never presented *any*
>>> kind of threat to the white supremacist ambulance-chaser couple. They
>>> didn't threaten them orally, and they never moved toward the racists.
>>> The peaceful protesters were no threat. Stop lying.
>>
>> Yes Rudy, you should stop lying.
>
> But i won't, morbidly obese lying fat fuck Chadlee Bryant.
>
>>
>> The colored savages broke down a gate and
>
> No gate was broken down. It was unlocked, and they walked right in.
The protesters broke it down and trespassed.
<https://co-a2.freetls.fastly.net/co-uploads/2020/06/Broken-gate--
768x445.jpg>
Anders Walker, a constitutional law professor at St. Louis University,
told the Post-Dispatch that under Missouri’s “Castle Doctrine,” homeowners
can use deadly force to remove unwanted people from their property,
including the lawn.
“There’s no right to protest on those streets,” Walker said. “The
protesters thought they had a right to protest, but as a technical matter,
they were not allowed to be there. … It’s essentially a private estate. If
anyone was violating the law, it was the protesters. In fact, if [the
McCloskeys] have photos of the protesters, they could go after them for
trespassing.”
<https://www.crimeonline.com/2020/06/30/assault-investigation-underway-
against-protesters-after-lawyer-brandishes-ar-15-at-group-on-private-
estate-report/>
0 new messages