You will definately notice a difference at 90m ( well everyone that I know
who have swaped from ACC to ACE's has), and you may even get an additional
gain from X10's if you can afford them.
Leave the ACC's for the field shoots ( <70M)
GrrnArrow wrote:
> Are the ACE arrows really worth the price difference? I shoot FITA style
> recurve(46lb with 28 inch arrow)
Yes. Absoulutely. No question. Get them.
You won't find a single top recurve FITA shooter using ACCs, and there's a reason
for it. ACE's are far superior for that purpose.
--
Ewan Oughton
chr...@eircom.net
www.archery2000.cjb.net
www.cyberarmy.com
Archeryking
Ewan <chr...@archery2000.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:6mIP4.9699$sB3....@news.indigo.ie...
A friend has just got some and is extoling the virutues of the X10's over
ACE's. A bit of a B(*&(er for me as I have just set up 2 doz ACE's
If you are an advanced archer and understand how to tune your setup,
then you shouldn't have any serious problems getting your X10s
shooting well.
Are they forgiving? I'm not sure how to measure this, but anecdotally
I had no problems shooting them, and I was often surprised by where
the shot landed given a less than perfect (often much less than
perfect) shot execution.
Will the X10s make a difference? Who knows.
Lots of top shots use X10s. Lots of top shots still use ACEs.
Unfortunately the best way to find out is to try it yourself. You
won't know whether X10s are better than ACEs unless you try them both
and experiment with the tuning.
Here's where being sponsored (or being rich) is really handy. After
consulting with the experts at Easton, you could get several dozen
arrows of various sizes and types and try them out. That's the only
way to know for sure.
You might also consider the CT McKinney's. They are new enough that
there aren't that many folks shooting them, so the collected
experience is small. However the results seem promising, at least
that's what the folks at CT say. They are also less expensive.
Good luck.
Marty Sasaki