Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: BREAKING NEWS: Legal Scholars Confirm That Trump Is Eligible To Run for President

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Borgman

unread,
Jan 3, 2024, 5:19:57 PMJan 3
to
On 03 Jan 2024, Michael A Terrell <mike.am...@earthlink.nut> posted
some news:1OilN.108892$Ama9....@fx12.iad:

> On 1/3/2024 9:30 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted
> child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>
>> In article <qvglN.13184$Wbff...@fx37.iad>,
>> mike.am...@earthlink.nut says...
>>>
>>> On 1/3/2024 8:41 AM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell,
>>> convicted child molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
>>>
>>>> In article <un41bk$38iol$1...@dont-email.me>, patr...@protonmail.com
>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> The Constitution is clear about who can run for president and who
>>>>> cannot. It says any American citizen can run for president, with
>>>>> four big exceptions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Article II of the Constitution lays down the first three. Anybody
>>>>> can run for president as long as they are at least 35 years old,
>>>>> are a natural-born citizen and have lived in the United States for
>>>>> at least 14 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> After the Civil War, members of Congress added a fourth test. Not
>>>>> wanting this country to fear that federal officials might again
>>>>> attempt to overthrow the government, they added the 14th Amendment
>>>>> which, among other provisions, disqualifies as a candidate for any
>>>>> federal office anybody who swore to uphold the Constitution and
>>>>> then sought to overturn it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The language of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is clear: ?No
>>>>> person shall?hold an office, civil or military, under the United
>>>>> States?who, having previously taken an oath?to support the
>>>>> Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in
>>>>> insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
>>>>> comfort to the enemies thereof.?
>>>>>
>>>>> Then Congress added an important final clause: ?But Congress may
>>>>> by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.?
>>>>>
>>>>> Which leaves only three questions. First: Did Donald Trump ?engage
>>>>> in insurrection? and/or ?give comfort to? those who did?
>>>>> Absolutely. Even though not yet convicted of doing so (which the
>>>>> Constitution does not require), we know from multiple sources,
>>>>> including his own words on tape, that Trump summoned an armed mob
>>>>> to Washington to attack the U.S. Capitol; called state officials
>>>>> to find him more votes; called members of the Electoral College to
>>>>> persuade them to change their votes; pressured Vice President
>>>>> Pence not to certify the Electoral College results; and has
>>>>> promised to pardon those convicted in the Jan. 6 attack.
>>>>>
>>>>> Second question: Has Congress by a two-thirds vote given Donald
>>>>> Trump a free pass? No.
>>>>>
>>>>> Third question: Do we believe in the Constitution or not? If so,
>>>>> there?s only one answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Banning Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot does not
>>>>> deprive the people from their right to vote. It simply affirms the
>>>>> United States Constitution. Case closed.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOCK HIM UP
>>>>
>>>> They don't get to decide. The constitution does.
>>>
>>> The Constitution *has* decided. 14.3 says Trump is ineligible.
>>
>> Nope.
>
>
Yep.

Actually it permits him to run in direct opposition to what you illiterate
leftnut bags say.
0 new messages