Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: The Anonymous Bitmessage Broadcast Feature
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Nomen Nescio
Mar 10, 2023, 12:25:22 AM3/10/23
to
In article <3c3d716833939b68...@dizum.com>
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> In article <tue456$25e3$1...@news.cyber23.de>
> Bitmessage Broadcast <bitme...@broadcast.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > The Anonymous Bitmessage Broadcast Feature
> > ==========================================
> >
> > (site link: https://bitmessage.org)
> >
> > The Bitmessage broadcast feature is a strongly anonymous broadcast or
> > blogging method. It is highly resistant to any level of nation-state
> > censorship effort. When used over a anonymizing network like Tor or I2P,
> > the Bitmessage broadcast is significantly more secure than Freenet, I2P,
> > or a Tor hidden service alone.
>
> I don't use Tor any longer. Lordy only knows how many Tor servers the
> governents alone, not to mention the the Black Hats, have introduced
> into the network.
All the better for the rest of us. More bandwidth.
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> In article <tue456$25e3$1...@news.cyber23.de>
> Bitmessage Broadcast <bitme...@broadcast.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > The Anonymous Bitmessage Broadcast Feature
> > ==========================================
> >
> > (site link: https://bitmessage.org)
> >
> > The Bitmessage broadcast feature is a strongly anonymous broadcast or
> > blogging method. It is highly resistant to any level of nation-state
> > censorship effort. When used over a anonymizing network like Tor or I2P,
> > the Bitmessage broadcast is significantly more secure than Freenet, I2P,
> > or a Tor hidden service alone.
>
> I don't use Tor any longer. Lordy only knows how many Tor servers the
> governents alone, not to mention the the Black Hats, have introduced
> into the network.
All the better for the rest of us. More bandwidth.
0 new messages