Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Friends of Animals and CARE Sue to Stop National Park Service Deer Control Plans

0 views
Skip to first unread message

FoA_Media

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 1:52:20 AM11/19/09
to
Friends of Animals and CARE Sue to Stop National Park Service Deer
Control Plans
Suit challenges plan to kill nearly 80 percent of deer living at
Valley Forge

For Immediate Release:

Contacts:

Lee Hall, Legal Director, Friends of Animals
E-mail: leehall[AT]friendsofanimals.org
Internet: www.friendsofanimals.org
Local (Pennsylvania) Internet: www.foaphilly.org

Michael Harris, Director of the Environmental Law Clinic, University
of Denver Sturm College of Law
E-mail: mharris[AT]law.du.edu

Philadelphia, PA — Friends of Animals, an advocacy organization
founded in 1957, is suing the U.S. National Park Service to stop a
proposed deer-control plan for Valley Forge National Historical Park.

Just a few minutes west of Philadelphia, Valley Forge Park is
historically known as a six-month headquarters for George Washington
during the Continental Army’s encampment in 1777. Today, it is known
as a five-mile spot of peace and safety for animal life in the midst
of suburban shopping malls and road works.

Under the government’s “White-Tailed Deer Management Plan,” however,
rifle-toting agents would enter the park to kill the vast majority of
the deer this winter, continuing the same way for at least four years.

Were this to occur, hundreds of deer would die and be dragged out of
the park this winter, and the deer, following their nature, would
rebound with extra fawns in spring, turning the plan into a long-term
cycle of violence.

“The government’s desire to deploy a rifle team to war on the deer
lacks biological, ecological, and ethical sense,” said Lee Hall, legal
director for Friends of Animals.

“That park officials would actually encourage local residents to
believe deer have no business on the land the minute they do something
inconvenient — even including the ingestion of ornamental plants — is
not responsible leadership.”

Allison Memmo Geiger, president of co-plaintiff CARE (Compassion for
Animals, Respect for the Environment), said, “Valley Forge National
Historic Park’s managers and the National Park Service have displayed
a lack of respect for nature, for those of us who enjoy and pass
through the park, and for the deer whose habitat is the park.”

Noting that the government proposal includes spending future years
controlling the deer with a lab-created birth control substance,
Geiger stated, “I’m not sure which is worse — shooting deer or
wreaking havoc on their biology and their social and reproductive
interactions by imposing birth control on them.”

Additionally, the suit charges that shooting the deer endangers public
safety and ignores local laws. Eerie Insurance Company research shows
that cars hit deer the most when the deer are being hunted, with the
opening day of hunting season and the first Saturday of hunting season
being the highest days for these accidents.

“The park has decided it’s OK to discharge firearms in this small park
so close to roads and developments — adding to the mix a population of
suddenly frightened deer? This is unacceptable,” said Geiger.

The deer are not responsible for the park’s manicured lawns, for
deliberate removals of natural vegetation over the years and the
planting of non-native foliage, for a lack of respect for the animals
comprising the park’s natural food web, for paved areas and buildings,
for more than a million visitors per year, vehicle exhaust, or for the
constant presence of (often speeding) cars. These factors must be
addressed directly to address the pressure on the deer, Friends of
Animals and CARE have urged.

The lawsuit alleges the Park Service’s White-tailed Deer Management
Plan for the Valley Forge National Historical Park violates federal
law, including the National Environmental Policy Act, the Organic Act
and the park’s enabling legislation.

“Decisions under the National Environmental Policy Act cannot be based
simply on seizing upon the apparently easiest answer to a perceived
problem, said Hall. “Killing deer is not the answer to the decline of
plant life in a sprawling, concrete-covered suburb.”

“Like any conscious beings, moreover, deer need special concern in
decisions involving the ecological balance of a space; and our
government needs to stop disregarding common sense and ethics.”

The suit names Mike Caldwell, Superintendent of Valley Forge National
Historical Park, the National Park Service, Secretary of the Interior
Ken Salazar, National Park Service Director Jon Jarvis, and National
Park Service Regional Director for the Northeast Dennis R. Reidenbach.

On behalf of Friends of Animals and CARE, Lee Hall expressed
appreciation for the outstanding legal work on the case by the
University of Denver - Sturm College of Law Environmental Law Clinic,
directed by Professor Michael Harris. The lawsuit is being filed in
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

0 new messages