Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Urgent Notice, Marika Confused Again-Caught Eating Feces

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Richard P. Reasin

unread,
Feb 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/23/00
to
Well it appears, the gray haired AR Queenie known to all as Marika
Bushburger, at least it looks like it sounds that way, has gone off the
beam again. Slanting and tilting the true perspective, the poor old
confused battle-ax, now thinks she is a legal expert, instead of a
billing clerk. She is telling the world, via the internet, that I
committed assaults on 2 people. She is such a smart and all knowing
person, NOT!!!, she is able to make such statements, without any
documentation, witnesses, or knowledge of the event. Actually, her
proven track record indicates she is a compulsive liar and is dumber
than kiwi possum feces. No insult to the feces intended, at least it
has useful purposes. In fact, she is so positive of herself she makes
the claim, that I assaulted 2 people, despite the fact that the great
state of California found enough evidence in my favor, to totally
exonerate me of any charges, and to award me damages from the people she
alleges I assaulted. Go figure. Could it have been the seventeen
witnesses that came forward to my defense, or the fact that the AR,
paint throwing scum couple, admitted they had done what I claimed and
that all further events had happened like I said?

Now Marika, in what part of my posting did I admit to assaulting
anyone? All I did was tell you the final outcome, of what was started
by the ARAs, and finished by me. This is to keep you from looking
dumber than kiwi feces in the future-see I told you nothing I could do
would prevent that from reoccurring-and to extend the life of your part
time legal advice practice, for an assault to have occurred I would have
had to initiate the attack. That's the law! All I did was to make an
arrest, and defend myself while doing so. You really should bone up on
this stuff, before you open your feces spewing yap.

Speaking of legal advice, and if someone would please clarify this for
me, I would appreciate it. I thought that the goings on in a doctors
office were privileged. That what happens there, stays there. Is there
some sort of law against posting medical facts and history of private
individuals on the internet, for the world to see? Maybe Marika could
help us out. According to her actions, i.e. by gleaning private
information from her workplace, a medical facility where she is employed
as a billing clerk, about some poor unfortunate child caught in a trap,
and posting it on the internet, she is indicating no laws have been
violated. Marika, now would be a good time for you to give us your two
cents worth. You are, at least in your own minds eye, quite the legal
brain. I'm sure all of the membership would enjoy hearing your
response. And we'll be sure to send your friendly Senators, and other
political types, copies, so as to keep them up to date on your
admirable efforts. If you can't respond, due to pressures at work, like
getting fired and sued if your dirty little secret comes out, we will
understand. Hell, we may even intervene on your behalf and send the
business manager of your office a preemptive first strike letter,
telling that person that in all probability, someone stole your e-mail
password, and is forging your alleged postings. And explain how to
check past postings, via deja vu, to verify any questions for
themselves. After all, we are here to help you in your time of need.
You do treat us all with respect and dignity, and deserve some back. A
quick recap of your child caught in a trap original posting, indicates
you personally witnessed this event while working at your billing clerk
job, and then you posted the private information to the internet. I
just want to get the facts straight. Now, when they brought the child
into the doctors office, was the trap still attached? Or was the child
just there for injuries? If the child was so badly hurt, why did the
irresponsible parents take him to the doctors office, instead of a
trauma center? Is the best place to take a severely injured child YOUR
workplace perhaps? Like I said, any comments you may have, we will be
glad to entertain.

On a more personal level, when I kicked the guys knee and heard it pop,
I felt sorry for him, crippled for life for such a stupid act. But any
feelings of regret were soon gone, when I had a 150 lb AR Queenie riding
my back, trying to gouge my eyes out. I took great satisfaction when I
backed her up into the front of a building as hard as I could, and heard
the rush of air being expelled from her lungs. My satisfaction was
further enhanced when I slammed my head back, and felt her nose
cartilage crush beneath my skull. She just flopped to the ground,
bleeding like the pig she was. That's the trouble with you ARAs, you
just can't take it! But, if you wish to play contact sports, you had
better be prepared for contact. I suffered some minor wounds, mostly to
the face-one cut ,through the eyebrow, took 4 stitches, but no long term
stuff. I gave that AR Queenie a break. I could have sent her to jail,
but not wanting to have to hang around until a trial took place, I let
her plead to a lesser charge, a non felony. If I had had more
experience with the likes of her, or you, I would have gone for the
max. No mercy for the ARA dumber than feces crowd, from now on. BTW,
Marika, you ARE part of that crowd.

Oh, and on an even more personal note, yesterdays game farm results,
golden pheasants-0, Rich Reasin-6. As I was dispatching them in a
humane way, I told each one, Marika loves you. Funny thing, they didn't
seem to care. The new dog worked great. It is just so smart, smarter
than all the ARAs put together. Well, that's not saying much, but the
dog is smart. I'm teaching it to take a Marika in the same part of the
yard every day. It seems to grasp the concept without any difficulty.

Now as to the subject of this posting, eating feces, Marika must have
ingested some in order for it to spew from her mouth so copiously. It's
an old ARA motto, FiFo. Feces in, feces out. If we, the ARA's, can't
dazzle them with brilliance, that's obvious, them we will confound them
with bullshit.

The AR Queenie, Marika, goes down in defeat. She only accomplished
making herself look stupid again.

Wondering why debating Marika is no fun, is answered by the old adage, a
battle of the wits with the unarmed.

Rich Reasin

Richard P. Reasin

unread,
Feb 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/23/00
to

Someone please send to Marika a copy of the preceding post. I'm really
interested in what she has to say for herself.


Gordy

unread,
Feb 23, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/23/00
to
Richard P. Reasin <rpre...@computer-connection.net> wrote in message
news:38B3DE77...@computer-connection.net...

Rich, next time I wish you would tell us how you REALLY feel, enough beating
around the bush ;)

Marika E. Buchberger

unread,
Feb 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/24/00
to

OK, you admit here that they did throw paint at you, but in another post, you
denied that paint was throw at you, in fact I can tell you from your own post,
the color was red and it was thrown all over your motorcycle and leather (it
wears so well, barf) jacket which you claimed to still have in your possession.

You claimed to have kicked the knees out from under the man, and beat up his
girlfriend. That's not assault?

I'm still awaiting the county in which this occurred so I can look up the docket
number and get the trial information. All court cases are public information so
if you're not making all this up, (and I think you are) the information should
be available, even from 25-30 years ago.

<snipped to save bandwidth>


Marika E. Buchberger

unread,
Feb 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/24/00
to

As for the medical information that was posted about the child in the trap, had
you read the post, (which you obviously didn't) you would have noticed it was
written by a doctor, published in the JAMA, and no patient information was
revealed whatsoever....In fact, I NEVER revealed any information about any
patient and for THAT reason, I was called a liar by the furtrappers and
pro-animal killers on this newsgroup.

Thank you for making me look good, Richard!!

I think you should try to bone up on your facts a bit before you open your feces
spewing mouth, Richard.

<snipped to save bandwidth>


Richard P. Reasin

unread,
Feb 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/24/00
to

"Marika E. Buchberger" wrote:

> OK, you admit here that they did throw paint at you, but in another post, you
> denied that paint was throw at you, in fact I can tell you from your own post,
> the color was red and it was thrown all over your motorcycle and leather (it
> wears so well, barf) jacket which you claimed to still have in your possession.

Marika, at least make an effort to get some of your facts correct. Not
one thing in
the opening paragraph of your post is true. This lying compulsion of
yours, is
getting out of hand.

First, I never "admitted" to anything. I simply made a statement of
fact. There is
a huge difference between admitting and stating. Why you wish to change
my words is
beyond me. Must be some sort of legal trick you are trying out.

Secondly, and if you do this, you win the brass ring, I'll tell you the
information
you so desperately seek about "what county in CA", show me, and the rest
of the NG,
my posting where, as you put it, I "denied that paint was throw at" me.
Even spell
checkers miss grammar mistakes Marika. Another way to keep from looking
dumber than
feces is to reread your posts, just a friendly tip. Anyway, that is all
you have to
do. But if you can't, you leave the NG. Do we have a deal?

Thirdly, I realize you love to add new things and titles to your job
resume, but
clairvoyant? I think you are reaching. I never stated the color of the
paint. You
will be able to learn what it happened to be, when you obtain my court
records.

Fourthly, your powers of clairvoyance are already starting to ebb. The
paint was
thrown on me, my motorcycle, jacket, and hat. Had the paint been thrown
just on
material property, the entire outcome may have been different. But I
took exception
to the oil based make-up, and pursued the assailants. Unfortunately for
them, they
decided to just walk away. The ARAs were dumb as feces back then too.
They should
of run.

Fifthly, I claimed to still have the replacement leather gear, not the
paint stained
originals.

And lastly, after all these years, I still wear that same leather gear.
I've had to
reline the jacket several times, but that was an all natural material.
The leather
itself has gotten softer and more comfortable with age. Like I said,
nothing wears
like leather and fur.

It just occurred to me, Jerry Springer could do a show about you. Gray
haired,
clairvoyant, old AR battle-axes, who are dumber than rocks and
compulsive liars.
Maybe not. Even Jerry Springer fans have to draw the line some where.

> You claimed to have kicked the knees out from under the man, and beat up his
> girlfriend. That's not assault?

I stated I kicked a knee. And that was only after the punk tried to
clobber me with
a gallon of Sherwin-Williams. The AR Queenie attacked me. I just
defended
myself. The state of California decided that that was not assault.

>
> I'm still awaiting the county in which this occurred so I can look up the docket
> number and get the trial information. All court cases are public information so
> if you're not making all this up, (and I think you are) the information should
> be available, even from 25-30 years ago.

I told you what you have to do in order to obtain the information you
request. A
very simple task. One even a moron could accomplish, so I gave you an
even chance
of winning this little contest. So I guess it's put up or shut up
time. Isn't it
Marika?


Rich Reasin

smiley492

unread,
Feb 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/24/00
to
If its true why didnt you get permission to post the article. Not by sending
everyone to the library. Furthermore Mr. I will sue you isnt taken to be
much more honest than you.
As for making you look good, No matter how much you wash a dog its still a
dog.
The gates are down. The bells are clanging but the train still isnt coming
now is it.
As for your proof the bullshit proof was given by Mack not you.
It wasnt even the same incident now was it?
There is another saying. Dont talk the talk if you dont (or cant) walk the
walk.
In all of your posts you claim to have or have had proof. You yourself
showed nothing. If I remember correctly you were always "working on it.".
You should of tried out for the leading role in the movie Liar Liar.
Now why dont you show your true self to Mr. Bunny hugger/skinner.
He is clueless as to what sort of repulsive individual you are and as for
you making a derrogatory statement about leather, It must be another lie as
you yourself said," that it is ok to eat and use the animal if killed
humanely."
Why dont you leave and come back under a more credible alias and save us all
from your lies and twisted truths. You have twisted everyones words to make
them seem worse than you are. That is also lying.
You have researched to find out who people are and then posted it yet you
called other people stalkers. HYPOCRITE
Before you get too carried away again why dont you research your own posts
and see how ludicrous you sound. Show them to a shrink (I am sure you have
one and ask them their honest opinion of your mentality.
You are obviously as was previously stated in not so many words, Morally
and mentally challenged.
I usually accept people for who and what they are, but I hate liars as much
as the next person.
As for you being a deer hunter as you had at one time stated I personally
think you were lying there too. what model weatherby and what calliber was
it again?
Get a grip on your lies and ya all come back now yhear.
Smiley :)


Smiley


Marika E. Buchberger <M_E...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:38B524F3...@prodigy.net...


>
> As for the medical information that was posted about the child in the
trap, had
> you read the post, (which you obviously didn't) you would have noticed it
was
> written by a doctor, published in the JAMA, and no patient information was
> revealed whatsoever....In fact, I NEVER revealed any information about any
> patient and for THAT reason, I was called a liar by the furtrappers and
> pro-animal killers on this newsgroup.
>
> Thank you for making me look good, Richard!!
>

> I think you should try to bone up on your facts a bit before you open your
feces

Marika E. Buchberger

unread,
Feb 24, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/24/00
to

The article was posted, I even offered to mail the article to anyone who wanted
a copy of it. So what is the problem?

I purchased my copy of the article directly from JAMA and paid all the necessary
fees.

The reason Mack took the time to type the article was because I mailed it to
him. He volunteered to type the article for the newsgroup and I verified that
he typed it accurately, changed nothing and omitted nothing.

You guys screwed up and now it's coming back at ya!!!!!!!!!!!

smiley492 wrote:

> If its true why didnt you get permission to post the article. Not by sending
> everyone to the library. Furthermore Mr. I will sue you isnt taken to be
> much more honest than you.
> As for making you look good, No matter how much you wash a dog its still a
> dog.

Nice cliche', means nothing.....

>
> The gates are down. The bells are clanging but the train still isnt coming
> now is it.

Nice cliche', means nothing.....

>
> As for your proof the bullshit proof was given by Mack not you.
> It wasnt even the same incident now was it?

Yes it was the same incident...don't try to twist the facts...

>
> There is another saying. Dont talk the talk if you dont (or cant) walk the
> walk.

Nice cliche', means nothing.....

>
> In all of your posts you claim to have or have had proof. You yourself
> showed nothing.

I showed the proof only because Mack physically typed it for me. I mailed it to
him.

> If I remember correctly you were always "working on it.".

Yes, and when I received the copy from JAMA, I mailed it to Mack who typed it...

>
> You should of tried out for the leading role in the movie Liar Liar.

Nice cliche', means nothing.....

>
> Now why dont you show your true self to Mr. Bunny hugger/skinner.
> He is clueless as to what sort of repulsive individual you are and as for
> you making a derrogatory statement about leather, It must be another lie as
> you yourself said," that it is ok to eat and use the animal if killed
> humanely."
> Why dont you leave and come back under a more credible alias and save us all
> from your lies and twisted truths.

I don't need an alias...unlike some folks I see here...

> You have twisted everyones words to make
> them seem worse than you are.

The truth is never twisted....

> That is also lying.
> You have researched to find out who people are and then posted it yet you
> called other people stalkers.

When I'm threatened, I have a right to react. That's not being a hypocrite,
that's letting someone know that I know who they are.

> HYPOCRITE
> Before you get too carried away again why dont you research your own posts
> and see how ludicrous you sound.

According to many folks who read these posts, I'm the only one who makes sense
around here.

Caroline Crell

unread,
Feb 25, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/25/00
to

smiley492 <smil...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uIit4.7360$JQ.4...@monger.newsread.com...

> You should of tried out for the leading role in the movie Liar Liar.


no, no, no, you're thinking of dumb and dumber!!

noe...@noemail.com

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:19:37 -0500, "Marika E. Buchberger"
<M_E...@prodigy.net> wrote:

>
>The article was posted, I even offered to mail the article to anyone who wanted
>a copy of it. So what is the problem?

It did nothing to provide proof of your original claim.

(from 11/20/99)
"I worked for doctors..."

(yeah, as an anethesiologist biller)

" I've seen the damage that your traps do to children and their pets."

(you were asked to provide verifiable proof of what you personally
have seen... you have not, so that puts the second statement in a
similar catagory as the first one--half truth or less.)

" But I'm sure your warped, white (trash) supremacist minds are busy
thinking up a rebuttal based upon blaming the parents for their
child's injury!! "

(Not even going to comment on this bit, was left for posterity)

" The lucky kids end up with only cracked bones....the not so lucky
end up losing a portion of their limb. The other injuries range from
gangrene to massive blood clots, crushed bones, destroyed tendons and
a lifetime of surgery and pain for the child."

(Again, you were asked to provide proof of what you claim you
personally have witnessed, so far you have not)


>
>I purchased my copy of the article directly from JAMA and paid all the necessary
>fees.

And this verifies what you claimed you witnessed in what way?
[...]


>You guys screwed up and now it's coming back at ya!!!!!!!!!!!

No, just your lies that have come back to roost.
[...]


>According to many folks who read these posts, I'm the only one who makes sense
>around here.

ROTFLMAO!!
Does "many" equal more than 2?

Marika E. Buchberger

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to

You really need to go back and re-read all the posts before you open your big mouth.

Gordy

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to

Marika E. Buchberger <M_E...@prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:38B7C998...@prodigy.net...

>
> You really need to go back and re-read all the posts before you open your
big mouth.
>
>

We've all read it. Whats not to understand?

Marika E. Buchberger

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to

It's not a matter of misunderstanding. It's a matter of trying to dredge up
old news in a lame attempt to rewrite history.

I think you could stand to show some intelligence if you start a NEW thread on
an INTELLIGENT topic (regarding furtrapping) instead of scrounging around
constantly digging up old news and trying to twist what was previously written,
understood, accepted and acknowledged.

If this is a fur trapping newsgroup (and I've asked this question before many
times as well), then where are the posts regarding fur trapping?

Gordy wrote:

--
********************************************************************
Healthcare references for everyone.
"Recipient of the year 2000 Featured Site Award at healthAtoZ.com"
http://pages.prodigy.net/m_erika/m_erika.html

Internet Safety Lessons. Must reading for everyone.
http://pages.prodigy.net/m_erika/safetylessons.html

My Safety Lessons are also hosted in the UK. Thank you, Wolves!!
(Convenient access for my European friends)
http://www.raydavies.totalserve.co.uk/marika.htm
********************************************************************

Gordy

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to
Your asking me where the posts on fur trapping are? Your laughable. At
least I have an interest in it and support it. Which is much more than I can
say for a troll such as yourself. If anyone's doing the "twisting" it would
be yourself.


Marika E. Buchberger <M_E...@prodigy.net> wrote in message

news:38B7E72F...@prodigy.net...

Marika E. Buchberger

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to

In your humble opinion....ROFLMAO!!! at you....

smiley492

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to
Ah but you said you personally witnessed this. Did you or did you work for
him also and in what capacity this time.

Smiley

smiley492

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to
You need to go back and clarify your lies before you will ever be taken
seriously again here. Have someone scan and post the arcticle.

Smiley

Gordy

unread,
Feb 26, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/26/00
to
Oh good, I like making people laugh. Especially when its that off balance "I
have nothing left to say", nervous laughter ;)


Marika E. Buchberger <M_E...@prodigy.net> wrote in message

news:38B808FF...@prodigy.net...

0 new messages