Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Gooberdoodle's Belief In Pre-Existence
46 views
Skip to first unread message
Mr.Smartypants
May 7, 2013, 2:35:13 PM5/7/13
to
"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
dh
May 8, 2013, 1:10:52 PM5/8/13
to
On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
_________________________________________________________
dh wrote:
>I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
Goo replied:
Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
George Plimpton
May 8, 2013, 1:16:24 PM5/8/13
to
On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
That's correct. It's what *you* believe, *Goo*:
The animals that will be raised for us to eat
are more than just "nothing", because they
*will* be born unless something stops their
lives from happening. Since that is the case,
if something stops their lives from happening,
whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
them of the life they otherwise would have had.
Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
Too funny!
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
The animals that will be raised for us to eat
are more than just "nothing", because they
*will* be born unless something stops their
lives from happening. Since that is the case,
if something stops their lives from happening,
whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
them of the life they otherwise would have had.
Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
Too funny!
Mr.Smartypants
May 9, 2013, 2:44:27 AM5/9/13
to
On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>
> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>
> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
> _________________________________________________________
>
> dh wrote:
> >I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>
> Goo replied:
> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
> >"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>
> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
> _________________________________________________________
>
> dh wrote:
> >I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>
> Goo replied:
> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
it dozens of times.
Dutch
May 9, 2013, 3:10:45 AM5/9/13
to
an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
dh
May 9, 2013, 6:31:18 PM5/9/13
to
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>
>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>
>That's correct. Too funny!
>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>
LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
dh
May 9, 2013, 6:39:32 PM5/9/13
to
it from being to their advantage that they're still alive and so so you, though
neither of you or brother "Derek" are able to explain HOW. I challenge you to
try explaining it now. You will fail to.
George Plimpton
May 9, 2013, 10:32:32 PM5/9/13
to
On 5/9/2013 3:39 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), ankle-biter fuckstain lied:
You are the one who believes in "pre-existence", *Goo*.
cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
but wasting time ever since, lied:
>> ankle-biter fuckstain lied:
but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), ankle-biter fuckstain lied:
>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>> In spite of himselves
>>>
>>
>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
>
> Prof. Plimpton wants people to believe that something about pre-existence is preventing
>>
>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
>
You are the one who believes in "pre-existence", *Goo*.
George Plimpton
May 9, 2013, 10:32:34 PM5/9/13
to
On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.
Too funny.
cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
but wasting time ever since, lied:
but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 5/8/2013 10:16 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>
>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>
>> That's correct. It's what *you* believe, *Goo*:
>>
>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>>
>>
>>
>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>>
>>
>> Too funny!
>
> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to
It's hilarious, *Goo*, that you believe in "pre-existence", and that all
>
> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to
your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.
Too funny.
Dutch
May 9, 2013, 11:47:30 PM5/9/13
to
Terrier.
Mr.Smartypants
May 10, 2013, 3:18:19 AM5/10/13
to
LOL!
Dutch
May 10, 2013, 3:21:32 AM5/10/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 10, 2013, 5:23:35 PM5/10/13
to
Dutch
May 10, 2013, 11:05:06 PM5/10/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 11, 2013, 2:22:54 AM5/11/13
to
Dutch
May 11, 2013, 2:24:47 AM5/11/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 11, 2013, 10:29:51 PM5/11/13
to
posts.
Dutch
May 11, 2013, 10:46:50 PM5/11/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 12, 2013, 12:19:51 AM5/12/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 12, 2013, 1:05:07 AM5/12/13
to
On May 9, 4:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>
> >> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> >> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>
> >> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>
> >>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>
> >That's correct. Too funny!
>
> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
The thought of Goobs trying to explain that he now knows what he
> >>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>
> >That's correct. Too funny!
>
> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
Dutch
May 12, 2013, 2:34:48 AM5/12/13
to
Dutch
May 12, 2013, 2:37:54 AM5/12/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 12, 2013, 8:29:12 PM5/12/13
to
and sinker.
LOL!
Dutch
May 12, 2013, 9:03:46 PM5/12/13
to
I did one quick search and immediately found an example. That was all
the effort it warranted.
You remind me of my dog attacking his favourite stuffed toy, he actually
thinks he's killing something. You're making pointless anklebiting into
an art form.
Mr.Smartypants
May 13, 2013, 1:29:19 AM5/13/13
to
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 4:13:49 PM5/13/13
to
this newsgroup. Mostly I read replies to my posts. Very little new or
interesting has been posted here in the last 10 years.
George Plimpton
May 13, 2013, 4:45:48 PM5/13/13
to
respond to a lot of Fuckwit David Harrison's posts because I have it in
for him. I read most posts by apparent newcomer, and if they're
replying to Fuckwit, I usually make a point of setting them straight on
who and what Fuckwit is, so they won't waste more than a little time. I
don't read Douchebag Hamilton's posts firsthand at all. I usually don't
read them secondhand, either. If I click on one of Fuckwit's posts and
see that he's replying to Douchebag, I just move on - I know it's only
going to be another mutual ass-suck between the two of them. I
occasionally read your replies to Douchebag, so I might see a little of
his douchebaggery then. Otherwise, he's null, which is all he was when
I stopped reading his posts a couple of years ago.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:02:14 PM5/13/13
to
about, and can't even pretend that you do.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:02:20 PM5/13/13
to
you tried to act like the non-example you presented was after a very short and
easy search and you acted like you could find more with ease. In contrast to
that you probably searched a lot for the pitiful shit you managed to present and
never could find anything else even as "good" as the piss poor thing you posted.
You're right to be ashamed of both your inability and your dishonesty regarding
it, as you have proven by your lame and pathetic reply to the challenge he
presented you with, while laughing in the knowledge that you have not found any.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:02:36 PM5/13/13
to
after all who was it hurting?" - "Dutch"
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:02:59 PM5/13/13
to
proven by Goo himself, and not in dispute. However, I believe the Goober reads
every one of them but is scared to reply to any of them for fear of
out-stupiding himself again. And rightly so.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:06:31 PM5/13/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:13:49 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>Facts can be inconvenient
You certainly appear to hate some of them.
>Facts can be inconvenient
You certainly appear to hate some of them.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:07:05 PM5/13/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:45:48 -0700, Goo lied:
>I don't read Douchebag Hamilton's posts firsthand at all. I usually don't
>read them secondhand, either.
That's a lie Goob and we know it. You outstupid yourself when you try to
confront him Goober, and he makes it so obvious that now you're scared to ever
respond to him at all. That is proved by you and not in dispute, Goo.
>I don't read Douchebag Hamilton's posts firsthand at all. I usually don't
>read them secondhand, either.
confront him Goober, and he makes it so obvious that now you're scared to ever
respond to him at all. That is proved by you and not in dispute, Goo.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:07:20 PM5/13/13
to
think he thinks he disagrees with himself, but the Goober has become scared to
try backing up any of his absurd seeming claims lately, afaik.
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:07:32 PM5/13/13
to
is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
(prediction: you can't make any attempt to try explaining it either)
dh
May 13, 2013, 9:07:46 PM5/13/13
to
On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:34 -0700, Goo wrote:
>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:18 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>
>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>
>Too funny.
Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov as well Goots. Can you make
any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that getting to experience
life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:18 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>
>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>
>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>
>>>That's correct. Too funny!
>>
>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>
>"pre-existence" . . . "getting to experience life" . . . is based on it.
>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>
>>>That's correct. Too funny!
>>
>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>
>
>Too funny.
Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov as well Goots. Can you make
any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that getting to experience
life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 11:32:01 PM5/13/13
to
<dh@.> wrote in message news:p533p8pp0ursge2hp...@4ax.com...
Because you're an idiot.
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 11:33:47 PM5/13/13
to
<dh@.> wrote in message news:n833p89tc0nktn4gp...@4ax.com...
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 11:35:00 PM5/13/13
to
<dh@.> wrote in message news:u833p858dkes814al...@4ax.com...
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 11:38:27 PM5/13/13
to
<dh@.> wrote in message news:e933p89o9e62tmtch...@4ax.com...
Anklebiters are boring, unlike idiot clowns like you who provide light
entertainment.
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 11:44:31 PM5/13/13
to
<dh@.> wrote in message news:gg33p8hcuo82ovasm...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:13:49 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>>Facts can be inconvenient
>
> You certainly appear to hate some of them.
Of course I do.
>
>>Facts can be inconvenient
>
> You certainly appear to hate some of them.
Dutch
May 13, 2013, 11:45:52 PM5/13/13
to
<dh@.> wrote in message news:ai33p8t1a6f0tmf88...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 23:37:54 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>> On May 9, 4:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own
>>>> stupidity:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>
>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>
>>>>> That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>
>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's
>>>> even more
>>>> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>
>>>
>>> The thought of Goobs trying to explain that he now knows what he
>>> claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
>>>
>>
>>You
>
> Try
You and shitstain both write like 8-year-old retards.
>
>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>> On May 9, 4:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own
>>>> stupidity:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>
>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>
>>>>> That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>
>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's
>>>> even more
>>>> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>
>>>
>>> The thought of Goobs trying to explain that he now knows what he
>>> claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
>>>
>>
>>You
>
> Try
George Plimpton
May 14, 2013, 1:19:16 AM5/14/13
to
On 5/13/2013 6:07 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/8/2013 10:16 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>>>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>>>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>>>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>>>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>>>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>>>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>>>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>> your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.
plodding cracker, and I run rings around you in my sleep.
You know it, too, cracker.
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/8/2013 10:16 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>
>>>> That's correct. It's what *you* believe, *Goo*:
>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>>>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>>>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>>>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>>>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>>>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>>>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>>>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Too funny!
>>>
>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to
>>
>> It's hilarious, *Goo*, that you believe in "pre-existence", and that all
>>>>
>>>> Too funny!
>>>
>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to
>>
>> your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.
>>
>> Too funny.
>
> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov
Ha ha ha ha ha! My claim, *Goo*, shows that you're a fuckwitted
>> Too funny.
>
> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov
plodding cracker, and I run rings around you in my sleep.
You know it, too, cracker.
George Plimpton
May 14, 2013, 1:19:16 AM5/14/13
to
On 5/13/2013 6:07 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>> don't read Douchebag Hamilton's posts firsthand at all. I usually don't
>> read them secondhand, either. If I click on one of Fuckwit's posts and
>> see that he's replying to Douchebag, I just move on - I know it's only
>> going to be another mutual ass-suck between the two of them. I
>> occasionally read your replies to Douchebag, so I might see a little of
>> his douchebaggery then. Otherwise, he's null, which is all he was when
>> I stopped reading his posts a couple of years ago.
>
>> see that he's replying to Douchebag, I just move on - I know it's only
>> going to be another mutual ass-suck between the two of them. I
>> occasionally read your replies to Douchebag, so I might see a little of
>> his douchebaggery then. Otherwise, he's null, which is all he was when
>> I stopped reading his posts a couple of years ago.
>
> That's a lie Goob and
No. I don't read Douchebag's posts, and I haven't for years. I read
yours, because I like to kick your ass, which I do a dozen times or more
every time you post.
Mr.Smartypants
May 14, 2013, 2:33:04 AM5/14/13
to
On May 13, 9:38 pm, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:e933p89o9e62tmtch...@4ax.com...
Can you tell us which assinine post of Goo's you read that set you on
your frenzied search for pet food cows?
> <dh@.> wrote in messagenews:e933p89o9e62tmtch...@4ax.com...
your frenzied search for pet food cows?
Mr.Smartypants
May 14, 2013, 2:35:17 AM5/14/13
to
stopped reading my posts ever since your pet food cow self-
outstupidification.
Dutch
May 14, 2013, 3:50:27 AM5/14/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 14, 2013, 2:55:26 PM5/14/13
to
Dutch
May 14, 2013, 3:22:56 PM5/14/13
to
George Plimpton
May 14, 2013, 7:52:18 PM5/14/13
to
On 5/13/2013 6:06 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
You do not "challenge", Fuckwit. You do not "point out." You do not
present any "facts" that are pertinent to anything. You are unable to
do any of those, Fuckwit.
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:13:49 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>> Facts can be inconvenient
>
> You certainly appear to hate some of them.
He doesn't hate any facts, Fuckwit. You present none.
>
>> Facts can be inconvenient
>
> You certainly appear to hate some of them.
You do not "challenge", Fuckwit. You do not "point out." You do not
present any "facts" that are pertinent to anything. You are unable to
do any of those, Fuckwit.
Mr.Smartypants
May 15, 2013, 2:55:42 AM5/15/13
to
off in all directions looking for his imaginary herds of 12 year old
pet food cows.
Dutch
May 15, 2013, 5:55:49 PM5/15/13
to
anklebiter.
Mr.Smartypants
May 16, 2013, 2:37:09 AM5/16/13
to
apparently you weren't.
George Plimpton
May 16, 2013, 2:39:31 AM5/16/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 16, 2013, 3:09:04 AM5/16/13
to
all bullshit.
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 3:50:40 AM5/16/13
to
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 3:58:51 AM5/16/13
to
Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> know your pet food cow story was
> all bullshit.
What irrelevant nonsense.
> know your pet food cow story was
> all bullshit.
The only relevant issue about pet food is whether or not you consider it
an integral part of the economic model of the livestock industry. It is.
Vegans like to pretend that the food they buy for their pets is just
waste that doesn't support the livestock industry. They're kidding
themselves.
Derek
May 16, 2013, 6:20:30 AM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 00:09:04 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
[]
> cows
Yes, cows. Marvelous, aren't they?
Do you believe cows are subjects-of-a-life, just like humans are, and that
regardless of their inability to be rational agents, like some humans, they
are nevertheless rights-bearers who must be treated as ends in themselves
rather than a means to an end?
(Tom Regan)
or
Do you believe cows deserve just the one right; the right not to be regarded
as property?
(Gary Francione)
or
Do you believe cows hold rights against us on the basis that speciesism is
as morally repugnant as racism?
(Richard Ryder)
or
Do you believe cows deserve equal consideration rather than inalienable
rights, based on their ability to suffer and our inability to find any
logical reason to ignore such equal consideration of their suffering?
(Peter singer)
or
Do you believe cows can never hold rights against us because only humans
have moral duties, thereby excluding animals as rights-bearers?
(Roger Scruton)
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
[]
> cows
Yes, cows. Marvelous, aren't they?
Do you believe cows are subjects-of-a-life, just like humans are, and that
regardless of their inability to be rational agents, like some humans, they
are nevertheless rights-bearers who must be treated as ends in themselves
rather than a means to an end?
(Tom Regan)
or
Do you believe cows deserve just the one right; the right not to be regarded
as property?
(Gary Francione)
or
Do you believe cows hold rights against us on the basis that speciesism is
as morally repugnant as racism?
(Richard Ryder)
or
Do you believe cows deserve equal consideration rather than inalienable
rights, based on their ability to suffer and our inability to find any
logical reason to ignore such equal consideration of their suffering?
(Peter singer)
or
Do you believe cows can never hold rights against us because only humans
have moral duties, thereby excluding animals as rights-bearers?
(Roger Scruton)
Rupert
May 16, 2013, 1:31:54 PM5/16/13
to
Which one do you believe, if any?
George Plimpton
May 16, 2013, 1:39:59 PM5/16/13
to
Mr.Smartypants
May 16, 2013, 2:02:11 PM5/16/13
to
On May 16, 1:58 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> > know your pet food cow story was
> > all bullshit.
>
> What irrelevant nonsense.
Why didn't you tell Goo that when he was spouting his nonsense about
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> > know your pet food cow story was
> > all bullshit.
>
> What irrelevant nonsense.
12 year old pet food cows?
Derek
May 16, 2013, 3:40:37 PM5/16/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 10:31:54 -0700 (PDT), Rupert <rupertm...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Regan, Francione and Ryder give solid reasons to accept the proposition, and
even Singer's argument for equal consideration holds true, in my opinion,
even though it falls short of conferring rights.
For me, though, after giving the problem a lot of serious thought, I've come
to understand that our rights are based on shifting cultural norms rather
than grounded on a solid universal foundation, and they rely solely on just
two controversial fronts; a presumed inherent human dignity or an appeal to
a divine creator, as in the American declaration of independence.
If pushed I would argue that the case for animal rights can best be made on
the assumption that all sentient animals have interests similar to our own
and thus inherent dignity.
wrote:
even Singer's argument for equal consideration holds true, in my opinion,
even though it falls short of conferring rights.
For me, though, after giving the problem a lot of serious thought, I've come
to understand that our rights are based on shifting cultural norms rather
than grounded on a solid universal foundation, and they rely solely on just
two controversial fronts; a presumed inherent human dignity or an appeal to
a divine creator, as in the American declaration of independence.
If pushed I would argue that the case for animal rights can best be made on
the assumption that all sentient animals have interests similar to our own
and thus inherent dignity.
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 3:43:35 PM5/16/13
to
Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On May 16, 1:58 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>> know your pet food cow story was
>>> all bullshit.
>>
>> What irrelevant nonsense.
>
>
> Why
Because you're an idiot.
> On May 16, 1:58 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>> know your pet food cow story was
>>> all bullshit.
>>
>> What irrelevant nonsense.
>
>
> Why
dh
May 16, 2013, 5:28:19 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 23:35:17 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:16 -0700, Goo lied:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:05 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:45:48 -0700, Goo lied:
>>>confront him Goober, and he makes it so obvious that now you're scared to ever
>>>respond to him at all. That is proved by you and not in dispute, Goo.
aware of the fact that being unable to attempt to explain things and proving it
consistently time after time isn't kicking any ass except his own. All Goo has
done for quite a while is make claims he can't even try to support when
challenged to do so, and then wussing away from the challenges without being
able to attempt to meet them.
>You pretend to have
>stopped reading my posts ever since your pet food cow self-
>outstupidification.
That Goober reads every one of your posts and is afraid to respond to a
single one for fear of outstupiding himself yet again.
<bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:16 -0700, Goo lied:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:05 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:45:48 -0700, Goo lied:
>>>
>>>>I don't read Douchebag Hamilton's posts firsthand at all. I usually don't
>>>>read them secondhand, either.
>>>
>>> That's a lie Goob and we know it. You outstupid yourself when you try to
>>>>I don't read Douchebag Hamilton's posts firsthand at all. I usually don't
>>>>read them secondhand, either.
>>>
>>>confront him Goober, and he makes it so obvious that now you're scared to ever
>>>respond to him at all. That is proved by you and not in dispute, Goo.
>>
>>No. I don't read Douchebag's posts, and I haven't for years. I read
>>yours, because I like to kick your ass, which I do a dozen times or more
>>every time you post.
>
>You don't kick anyone's ass Goobs and you know it.
It seems even as stupid as Goo has shown himself to be even he should be
>>No. I don't read Douchebag's posts, and I haven't for years. I read
>>yours, because I like to kick your ass, which I do a dozen times or more
>>every time you post.
>
>You don't kick anyone's ass Goobs and you know it.
aware of the fact that being unable to attempt to explain things and proving it
consistently time after time isn't kicking any ass except his own. All Goo has
done for quite a while is make claims he can't even try to support when
challenged to do so, and then wussing away from the challenges without being
able to attempt to meet them.
>You pretend to have
>stopped reading my posts ever since your pet food cow self-
>outstupidification.
single one for fear of outstupiding himself yet again.
dh
May 16, 2013, 5:28:27 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:45:52 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:32 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 11 May 2013 23:37:54 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>> On May 9, 4:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The thought of Goobs trying to explain that he now knows what he
>>>> claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You
>>
>> Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he disagrees with himself since Goo
>>is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
>>
>>(prediction: you can't make any attempt to try explaining it either)
>
>You
You failed, proving my prediction correct. Here's another chance for you to
pretend you have some clue though: Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he
disagrees with himself since Goo is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:32 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 11 May 2013 23:37:54 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>> On May 9, 4:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The thought of Goobs trying to explain that he now knows what he
>>>> claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
>>>>
>>>
>>>You
>>
>>is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
>>
>>(prediction: you can't make any attempt to try explaining it either)
>
>You
You failed, proving my prediction correct. Here's another chance for you to
pretend you have some clue though: Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he
disagrees with himself since Goo is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
dh
May 16, 2013, 5:28:39 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:16 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:46 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:34 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>
>>>Too funny.
>>
>> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov as well Goots. Can you make
>>any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that getting to experience
>>life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
getting to experience life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:46 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:34 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:18 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>
>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:18 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>
>>>>>That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>
>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>
>>>"pre-existence" . . . "getting to experience life" . . . is based on it.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>
>>>
>>>Too funny.
>>
>> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov as well Goots. Can you make
>>any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that getting to experience
>>life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
>
>Ha ha ha ha ha! My claim
Why can't you make any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that
>Ha ha ha ha ha! My claim
getting to experience life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
dh
May 16, 2013, 6:00:50 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:32:01 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:14 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>> it from being to their advantage that they're still alive and so so you, though
>>>> neither of you or brother "Derek" are able to explain HOW. I challenge you to
>>>> try explaining it now. You will fail to.
>>>
>>>Of course I'll fail
>>
>> That's because you have no idea what you think you're trying to talk
>>about, and can't even pretend that you do.
>
>Because you're
Your ineptitude has nothing to do with me. Here's another chance for you.
Try to explain HOW you want people to believe that something about pre-existence
is preventing it from being to their advantage that they're still alive. Go:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:14 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 09 May 2013 00:10:45 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
>>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dh wrote:
>>>>>>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Goo replied:
>>>>>>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
>>>>>>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
>>>>>> it dozens of times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>>>>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
>>>>
>>>> Goo wants people to believe that something about pre-existence is preventing
>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
>>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dh wrote:
>>>>>>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Goo replied:
>>>>>>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
>>>>>>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
>>>>>> it dozens of times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>>>>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
>>>>
>>>> it from being to their advantage that they're still alive and so so you, though
>>>> neither of you or brother "Derek" are able to explain HOW. I challenge you to
>>>> try explaining it now. You will fail to.
>>>
>>>Of course I'll fail
>>
>> That's because you have no idea what you think you're trying to talk
>>about, and can't even pretend that you do.
>
>Because you're
Your ineptitude has nothing to do with me. Here's another chance for you.
Try to explain HOW you want people to believe that something about pre-existence
is preventing it from being to their advantage that they're still alive. Go:
dh
May 16, 2013, 6:02:40 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:35:00 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>
>
><dh@.> wrote in message news:u833p858dkes814al...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and that's all it takes to scare Goo!!?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Look up "delusional".
>>
>> "I did find deluding myself quite comfortable,
>> after all who was it hurting?" - "Dutch"
>
>That means vegans are deluded. Do you disagree?
Clinging to faith in the misnomer necessarily gives people an unrealistic
interpretation of human influence on animals. How could it be otherwise?
>
>
><dh@.> wrote in message news:u833p858dkes814al...@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 9, 1:10 am, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loss:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goo replied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily must be a loss!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's proven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it dozens of times.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or is this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ankle-biter?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loss:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Goo replied:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessarily must be a loss!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He's proven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it dozens of times.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or is this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ankle-biter?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> said the guy who fell for Goo's pet food cow silliness.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, ankle-biter..
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOL!! Have you found any more cows for Goo?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you found any good ankle recipes?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's lame even for you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! That's ironic coming from the grand master of pointless ankle
>>>>>>> biting.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever I'm doing it has Goo so terrified he won't even read my
>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>
>>>>> What you're doing is repetitious, pointless, boring ankle-biting.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, ankle-biter..
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOL!! Have you found any more cows for Goo?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you found any good ankle recipes?
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's lame even for you.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! That's ironic coming from the grand master of pointless ankle
>>>>>>> biting.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Whatever I'm doing it has Goo so terrified he won't even read my
>>>>>> posts.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and that's all it takes to scare Goo!!?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Look up "delusional".
>>
>> "I did find deluding myself quite comfortable,
>> after all who was it hurting?" - "Dutch"
>
>That means vegans are deluded. Do you disagree?
Clinging to faith in the misnomer necessarily gives people an unrealistic
interpretation of human influence on animals. How could it be otherwise?
dh
May 16, 2013, 6:03:13 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:38:27 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:59 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>> He has Goo terrified to reply to his posts. That is proven obvious fact,
>>proven by Goo himself, and not in dispute. However, I believe the Goober reads
>>every one of them but is scared to reply to any of them for fear of
>>out-stupiding himself again. And rightly so.
stupid moron for using it even once, so why are you so obsessed with it all of a
sudden. It makes you look like a stupid moron, not him.
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:59 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>proven by Goo himself, and not in dispute. However, I believe the Goober reads
>>every one of them but is scared to reply to any of them for fear of
>>out-stupiding himself again. And rightly so.
>
>He has become a stupid anklelbiter.
That is about as stupid a term as you could use making you look like a
>He has become a stupid anklelbiter.
stupid moron for using it even once, so why are you so obsessed with it all of a
sudden. It makes you look like a stupid moron, not him.
dh
May 16, 2013, 6:03:20 PM5/16/13
to
probably used to do it pretty frequently because the boys used to try to support
the Goober a lot more frequently than they do now. Maybe to some extent somehow
they're catching on to how stupid their hero Goo really is, and he now emails
for their help in vain.
dh
May 16, 2013, 6:04:50 PM5/16/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:33:47 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:20 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>> The last time you said anything to me about your lame failures in that area
>>you tried to act like the non-example you presented was after a very short and
>>easy search and you acted like you could find more with ease. In contrast to
>>that you probably searched a lot for the pitiful shit you managed to present and
>>never could find anything else even as "good" as the piss poor thing you posted.
>>You're right to be ashamed of both your inability and your dishonesty regarding
>>it, as you have proven by your lame and pathetic reply to the challenge he
>>presented you with, while laughing in the knowledge that you have not found any.
>
>The bottom line is you
Again your ineptitude has nothing to do with me. You are inept. Proved by
you and not in dispute.
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:02:20 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>you tried to act like the non-example you presented was after a very short and
>>easy search and you acted like you could find more with ease. In contrast to
>>that you probably searched a lot for the pitiful shit you managed to present and
>>never could find anything else even as "good" as the piss poor thing you posted.
>>You're right to be ashamed of both your inability and your dishonesty regarding
>>it, as you have proven by your lame and pathetic reply to the challenge he
>>presented you with, while laughing in the knowledge that you have not found any.
>
>The bottom line is you
Again your ineptitude has nothing to do with me. You are inept. Proved by
you and not in dispute.
dh
May 16, 2013, 6:04:56 PM5/16/13
to
· The meat industry includes habitats in which a small
variety of animals are raised. The animals in those
habitats, as those in any other, are completely dependant
on them to not only sustain their lives, but they also
depend on them to provide the pairing of sperm and egg
that begins their particular existence. Those animals will
only live if people continue to raise them for food.
Animals that are born to other groups--such as wild
animals, pets, performing animals, etc.--are completely
different groups of animals. Regardless of how many or few
animals are born to these other groups, the billions of animals
which are raised for food will always be dependant on consumers
for their existence. ·
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 6:47:45 PM5/16/13
to
dh@. proved he can type gibberish
We already know that fuckwit.
We already know that fuckwit.
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 7:00:43 PM5/16/13
to
dh@. wrote:
> Try to explain HOW you want people to believe that something about pre-existence
> is preventing it from being to their advantage that they're still alive.
I'll try again, but I'm not holding my breath.
> Try to explain HOW you want people to believe that something about pre-existence
> is preventing it from being to their advantage that they're still alive.
Every instance of a benefit involves two states of existence of the
thing receiving the benefit, before and after. With coming into
existence, there is no 'before' unless you presume a "pre-existent state"
However, harm is different, you *harm* a thing by killing it despite
there being no "after" state. That's because it already exists.
That's why considering their deaths does not imply considering their lives.
I realize none of that made sense to you, but it's there as a public
service.
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 7:04:07 PM5/16/13
to
not helpful.
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 7:06:10 PM5/16/13
to
dh@. wrote:
>> >He has become a stupid anklelbiter.
> That is about as stupid a term as you could use
When small does are annoyed they make a repetitious yapping sound.
>> >He has become a stupid anklelbiter.
> That is about as stupid a term as you could use
It suits him perfectly.
Dutch
May 16, 2013, 7:07:34 PM5/16/13
to
George Plimpton
May 16, 2013, 7:31:43 PM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/2013 2:28 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 5/13/2013 10:19 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/13/2013 6:07 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>>>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>>>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:16 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>>>>>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>>>>>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>>>>>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>>>>>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>>>>>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>>>>>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>>>>>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>>>> your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.
>> plodding cracker, and I run rings around you in my sleep.
>>
>> You know it, too, cracker.
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
> On 5/13/2013 10:19 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/13/2013 6:07 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On 5/9/2013 7:32 PM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>> On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
>>>> cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
>>>> but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:16 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>>>>>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>>>>>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's correct. It's what *you* believe, *Goo*:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>>>>>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>>>>>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>>>>>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>>>>>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>>>>>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>>>>>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>>>>>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too funny!
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to
>>>>
>>>> It's hilarious, *Goo*, that you believe in "pre-existence", and that all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Too funny!
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to
>>>>
>>>> your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.
>>>>
>>>> Too funny.
>>>
>>> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov
>>
>> Ha ha ha ha ha! My claim, *Goo*, shows that you're a fuckwitted
>>>> Too funny.
>>>
>>> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov
>>
>> plodding cracker, and I run rings around you in my sleep.
>>
>> You know it, too, cracker.
>
> Why can't you make any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that
Write in English, Goo.
> Why can't you make any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that
Derek
May 17, 2013, 2:35:38 AM5/17/13
to
encouragement to remain a strict vegetarian.
> Animals that are born to other groups--such as wild
>animals, pets, performing animals, etc.--are completely
>different groups of animals. Regardless of how many or few
>animals are born to these other groups, the billions of animals
>which are raised for food will always be dependant on consumers
Even more encouragement to remain a strict vegetarian. Thanks again.
Mr.Smartypants
May 17, 2013, 3:32:45 AM5/17/13
to
being raised for 12 years only to be pet food........but YOU did.
LOL!
Dutch
May 17, 2013, 3:33:37 PM5/17/13
to
And you KNOW Harrison is an idiot, why not just admit it?
Mr.Smartypants
May 17, 2013, 3:49:29 PM5/17/13
to
couldn't even show it was being raised for 12 years.
Do you deny that?
Dutch
May 17, 2013, 5:32:06 PM5/17/13
to
only to be pet food so I did a quick Google search, of course, didn't
you? If you did you'd discover that they are.
Twelve years had nothing to do with it, that's your obsession.
> Do you deny that?
>
>
>>
>> And you KNOW Harrison is an idiot, why not just admit it?
larder. How can you not call him out?
>
Mr.Smartypants
May 18, 2013, 1:22:48 AM5/18/13
to
they were being raised for TWELVE YEARS, under contract no less.
Dutch
May 18, 2013, 1:24:06 AM5/18/13
to
interest to me. I already explained the only relevant aspect of pet food
to this subject. That is all I care about. Don't bother me with your
silly obsessions.
Mr.Smartypants
May 18, 2013, 2:33:25 AM5/18/13
to
Dutch
May 18, 2013, 4:07:01 AM5/18/13
to
Go bite someone else's ankles you miserable little turd.
Mr.Smartypants
May 18, 2013, 6:15:31 PM5/18/13
to
story, don't you?
Dutch
May 18, 2013, 7:50:11 PM5/18/13
to
mentioned the issue of cows being raised for pet food, so out of
curiosity I did a quick Google and found an example immediately. I
immediately lost interest after that.
You like talking about this, my Yorkie likes attacking his favourite
squeaky toy, there are lots of similarities, both are mindless obsessions.
Mr.Smartypants
May 18, 2013, 8:04:32 PM5/18/13
to
your's.
Secondly, you "lost interest" when you could only find ONE cow and
realized that Gooberdoodle was trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass
and the only one who even remotely took him seriously was YOU.
>
> You like talking about this, my Yorkie likes attacking his favourite
> squeaky toy, there are lots of similarities, both are mindless obsessions.
Dutch
May 18, 2013, 8:51:37 PM5/18/13
to
>
> Secondly, you "lost interest" when you could only find ONE cow and
> realized that Gooberdoodle was trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass
> and the only one who even remotely took him seriously was YOU.
deserved. How much much time did you spend determining if cows are
raised to be pet food?
>>
>> You like talking about this, my Yorkie likes attacking his favourite
>> squeaky toy, there are lots of similarities, both are mindless obsessions.
>
>
> Hmmm......Seems you're still talking about it too.
Mr.Smartypants
May 18, 2013, 9:54:23 PM5/18/13
to
>
>
> > Secondly, you "lost interest" when you could only find ONE cow and
> > realized that Gooberdoodle was trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass
> > and the only one who even remotely took him seriously was YOU.
>
> I looked for 10 seconds and found one. That was all the time it
> deserved. How much much time did you spend determining if cows are
> raised to be pet food?
>
> You basicly blew Goo's ship out of the water. Did he thank you for that?
>
> >> You like talking about this, my Yorkie likes attacking his favourite
> >> squeaky toy, there are lots of similarities, both are mindless obsessions.
> > Hmmm......Seems you're still talking about it too.
>
> Yes, and I throw the squeaky toy for my Yorkie too.
Keep telling us how little you believed Goo's story.
> >> You like talking about this, my Yorkie likes attacking his favourite
> >> squeaky toy, there are lots of similarities, both are mindless obsessions.
> > Hmmm......Seems you're still talking about it too.
>
> Yes, and I throw the squeaky toy for my Yorkie too.
Dutch
May 19, 2013, 5:26:39 AM5/19/13
to
>>> Secondly, you "lost interest" when you could only find ONE cow and
>>> realized that Gooberdoodle was trying to blow smoke up everyone's ass
>>> and the only one who even remotely took him seriously was YOU.
>>
>> I looked for 10 seconds and found one. That was all the time it
>> deserved. How much much time did you spend determining if cows are
>> raised to be pet food?
>>
>
>
> and you didn't have the guts to tell Gooberdoodle he was full of SHIT!
What's behind this silly obsession ?
>
>> You basicly blew Goo's ship out of the water. Did he thank you for that?
>>
>>>> You like talking about this, my Yorkie likes attacking his favourite
>>>> squeaky toy, there are lots of similarities, both are mindless obsessions.
>
>>> Hmmm......Seems you're still talking about it too.
>>
>> Yes, and I throw the squeaky toy for my Yorkie too.
>
>
> Keep telling us how little you believed Goo's story.
Mr.Smartypants
May 19, 2013, 2:22:08 PM5/19/13
to
enfeebled mind was in heaven while he blabbered endlessly about 12
year old pet food cows in spite of the jeers and catcalls he was
receiving. You piddled on Goo's little parade and woke him from his
orgasm of delusion.
How many times did he bitch-slap you for that?
Dutch
May 19, 2013, 3:16:19 PM5/19/13
to
all I was looking for and it was more time than the issue is worth.
I'm done wasting time with your pointless anklebiting. The last word on
this is all yours, enjoy.
Mr.Smartypants
May 19, 2013, 6:03:50 PM5/19/13
to
raised for pet food. You found ONE lonely cow being raised apparently
to feed a few mutts and a couple of pussycats.
>
> I'm done wasting time with your pointless anklebiting. The last word on
> this is all yours, enjoy.
dh
May 20, 2013, 7:03:08 PM5/20/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:31:43 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:28:39 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:16 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:46 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:34 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:18 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>>>funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>"pre-existence" . . . "getting to experience life" . . . is based on it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too funny.
>>>>
>>>> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov as well Goots. Can you make
>>>>any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that getting to experience
>>>>life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
>
>Wr
Your wussile pulings clearly reveal that once AGAIN you haven't got a clue
what you think you want people to think you thought you were trying to talk
about Goob. As usual your position is inept and pathetic and all you're capable
of "doing" is wussing horribly, Goo.
>On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:28:39 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 22:19:16 -0700, Goo wussed horribly:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:46 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 19:32:34 -0700, Goo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 09 May 2013 18:31:18 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>> <bunghol...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>>>funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>>>
>>>>>"pre-existence" . . . "getting to experience life" . . . is based on it.
>>>>>
>>>>>Too funny.
>>>>
>>>> Your claim seems amusingly retarded from my pov as well Goots. Can you make
>>>>any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that getting to experience
>>>>life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
>>>
>>>Ha ha ha ha ha! My claim
>>
>>>Ha ha ha ha ha! My claim
>>
>> Why can't you make any attempt to explain HOW you want people to think that
>>getting to experience life is based on pre-existence, Goo?
>
>Wr
Your wussile pulings clearly reveal that once AGAIN you haven't got a clue
what you think you want people to think you thought you were trying to talk
about Goob. As usual your position is inept and pathetic and all you're capable
of "doing" is wussing horribly, Goo.
dh
May 20, 2013, 7:03:29 PM5/20/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:47:45 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:28:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:45:52 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:32 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>> claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You
>>>>
>>>> Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he disagrees with himself since Goo
>>>>is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
>>>>
>>>>(prediction: you can't make any attempt to try explaining it either)
>>>
>>>You
>>
>> You failed, proving my prediction correct.
another chance for you to pretend you have some clue: Try to explain how you
think Goo thinks he disagrees with himself since Goo is afraid to try doing it
himself. Go:
>>Here's another chance for you to
>>pretend you have some clue though: Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he
>>disagrees with himself since Goo is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
>On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:28:27 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:45:52 -0700, "Dutch" <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:07:32 -0400, dh@. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 11 May 2013 23:37:54 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 11 May 2013 23:37:54 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>>>> On May 9, 4:31 pm, dh@. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>>>> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The thought of Goobs trying to explain that he now knows what he
>>>>>>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's correct. Too funny!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
>>>>>>> funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> claims can't be known is hilarious.......but I sure hope he tries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You
>>>>
>>>> Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he disagrees with himself since Goo
>>>>is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
>>>>
>>>>(prediction: you can't make any attempt to try explaining it either)
>>>
>>>You
>>
>> You failed, proving my prediction correct.
>
>We already know that fuckwit.
It's fun pointing it out anyway even though everyone knows it. Here's yet
>We already know that fuckwit.
another chance for you to pretend you have some clue: Try to explain how you
think Goo thinks he disagrees with himself since Goo is afraid to try doing it
himself. Go:
>>Here's another chance for you to
>>pretend you have some clue though: Try to explain how you think Goo thinks he
>>disagrees with himself since Goo is afraid to try doing it himself. Go:
dh
May 20, 2013, 7:11:22 PM5/20/13
to
On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:00:43 -0700, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
>dh@. wrote:
>> Try to explain HOW you want people to believe that something about pre-existence
>> is preventing it from being to their advantage that they're still alive.
>
>I'll try again, but I'm not holding my breath.
>
>Every instance of a benefit involves two states of existence of the
>thing receiving the benefit, before and after. With coming into
>existence, there is no 'before' unless you presume a "pre-existent state"
You need to explain what about that you want us to think prevents it from
>dh@. wrote:
>> Try to explain HOW you want people to believe that something about pre-existence
>> is preventing it from being to their advantage that they're still alive.
>
>I'll try again, but I'm not holding my breath.
>
>Every instance of a benefit involves two states of existence of the
>thing receiving the benefit, before and after. With coming into
>existence, there is no 'before' unless you presume a "pre-existent state"
being to your advantage that you're still alive NOW. Go:
>However, harm is different, you *harm* a thing by killing it despite
>there being no "after" state. That's because it already exists.
>
>That's why considering their deaths does not imply considering their lives.
othere it certainly does imply considering their lives.
>I realize none of that made sense to you
them. You need to explain HOW you unlearned because I would need to unlearn in
order to join you. But since you can't say how, I couldn't attempt to join you
even if I thought is was superior and wanted to try.
dh
May 20, 2013, 7:11:32 PM5/20/13
to
couldn't.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages