Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Promethean Task

0 views
Skip to first unread message

TCFactory

unread,
Nov 19, 2002, 6:32:45 AM11/19/02
to
Basically my approach is, that as long as a motive force in human
evolution, may it be how political, economic or other social
interactions develop and institutionalise both as matter and theory
... is unconsciouss, then this evolution is like a natural law... but
as soon as a consciousness is there, the situation change... there is
a space for choice, the consciousness of the motive force, becomes a
motive force in itself...
Political and economic theories tend to have a pendulum between
dreaming idealism - Utopia (the conditions is bad, so we
make a dream plan for the perfect conditions)
and cynical realism (this is how it works, and this is how
it is supposed to work)
to be a threefolder is to have both these approaches - the utopia as
ideal, and the realism as tool - a constant metamorphizing process
The ideals is the nut (our future), and the reality the shell (the
past) ..
the present is to vitalize the nut to break the shell from within,
grow as a sprout into a flower, which again produce new seeds, new nuts
in a shell.
So far most political and economic theory works on cynical realism,
either breaking the shell to get to the nut, that they can't see as
they only analysed the shell, the nut is only an image of the shell
(marxism)
Or making a nut out of the shell, this is how it works and this is how
it is supposed to work, the nut is still only an image of the shell
(capitalism)
The rest of us who see the nut, know it in our hearts is condemned as
idealistic dreamers and naive fools ...
Well but socialism is as old as humanity as well as individualism -
Both have their idealistic dreamers - anarcho-socialists and
anarcho-individualists,
both emananting from the nature of threefold man... but there's few
who have found the creative middle here... the world is ruled by cynical
realism.. (shell)
And reactions to this becomes the opposition of utopia: dystopia...
nihilism - destruction - disilluioned idealism (shell & nutcracking)

The reason Marx's (and here we have to divide between Marx as economic
scientist and Marx as political agitator) "predictions" about
capitalism didn't work, is that Marx's theories in itself (his
economic analysis of capitalism at this paticular time in history was
actually pretty accurate - if you disregard his political aims) made
it possible to act in other ways... When Bismarck introduced social
welfare as a way to diminish some of the worst misery among the
proletariat.. all Marx's predictions went down the toilet, more or
less ...
And since that marxist analysis of politcal and economic realities
struggle more and more to adjust to the "scientific" part of Marx, a
situation most of them can't see, as they believe in dialectic
materialism, which says it is the productive factors that determine
the superstructure... however Marx's theories in itself has become a
superstructure that changed the reality of the very same productive
factors... So what StarMan calls marxism, is in every sense incredibly
non-marxist ... while the ones who stick to the scientific part of
marxism, his objective analysis is the ones who abandon dialectic
materialism and the political aims of Marx, and today is employed by
the neoliberal think-thanks promoting a victorian english
manchesterschool capitalism (the one Marx analysed) - nearly everyone
working in the think-thank "timbro" ((a cosponsered project of the
Swedish Employeers Association and the neoconservative/liberal party
"Moderaterna"), a cultural counterattack on the dominance of
leftliberalism in academia and media during the seventies here in
Sweden)) was active in extreme marxist (conservative version -
Stalinist, Maoist, Hoxhaist) movements in the 60'ties .. they
basically still is economic scientific marxist, but instead of
anti-capitalist, they are pro-capitalist ... the conservative values
didn't have to change.

So there's a need for a revitalized non-marxist left .. to abandon Marx,
let the neoconservative think-thanks have their marxists promoting 19th
century capitalism (mercantile-materialism) for themselves. That's
pretty much the onliest thing Marx can be used for today. (well ever
since 1848)

Sören

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/threefolding/

0 new messages