Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Need Advice RE: Session with Colette Guimond

210 views
Skip to first unread message

zackie aman

unread,
Dec 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/27/98
to
If she's coming to your city at $300 an hour? And, you're asking,
should I? Yes, please do it!

Or, send her to my city. I'll pay your fee, and mine.


FemCombat

unread,
Dec 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/28/98
to
It really depends on what you are into. If you prefer muscle worshipping or
light/fantasy wrestling, then I would highly recommend Collete...She has a
phenomenal physique with very good musculature and symmetry.

If you are looking for more of a competitive wrestling match, then Collete may
not be a good first choice.

>The beautiful Colette is coming to my city and I'm considering a session
>with her. She charges $300 for an hour or $200 for a half-hour. Has anybody
>done a session with her? If so would you recommend it? Any details you could
>provide about the session itself would be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Amazons in Combat - http://www.combatwomen.com
* Female fight stories
* Direct contact info for the best women wrestlers
* Pre-recorded female fight stories, Date Line and Live Adult Talk

You've Tried The Rest, Now Listen To The Best!!

Ssscold

unread,
Dec 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/28/98
to
I realize that the poor guy asked his question in a pretty insipid way, but is
it really such a bad question? I've never had a so-called session, nor do I
have any interest in having one, but I have heard that some of the women do
exactly what this poor fellow is asking about. I doubt that anyone who
participates in this newsgroup would admit to having had the experience
themselves, but, well, is it true? It is at least plausible? And if so, is it
fair to heap such abuse upon the poor guy who dared speak the unspoken?


HOOLIGAN9

unread,
Dec 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/28/98
to
>From: sss...@aol.com (Ssscold)

Yes, these things and sometimes more happen during sessions but I think any
client who would post specifics like that about one of these women on a public
newsgroup is certainly a cad to say the least. I also think that asking
someone about this on a public newsgroup is akin to asking someone details
about their sex life and abuse would not be uncalled for in response to such a
crude question. Just my 2 cents.


ken

unread,
Dec 28, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/28/98
to
Ssscold <sss...@aol.com> wrote:

>I realize that the poor guy asked his question in a pretty insipid way, but
is
>it really such a bad question? I've never had a so-called session, nor do
I
>have any interest in having one, but I have heard that some of the women do
>exactly what this poor fellow is asking about. I doubt that anyone who
>participates in this newsgroup would admit to having had the experience
>themselves, but, well, is it true? It is at least plausible? And if so,
is it
>fair to heap such abuse upon the poor guy who dared speak the unspoken?

I think the responses he provoked were befitting the way the question
was put. You can ask a question stupidly even if the question itself
is not stupid and don't be surprised if no one takes you seriously.

I've never had a session and don't expect to. But hearing from those
who have, I know that it's de rigueur for guys to become sexually
aroused during these sessions. That's the whole idea, really, is it
not? Why else would anyone cough up $300 for an hour-long encounter?
I also know that some of the women will provide, let's say, assistance
in this area, ranging from the subtle to the not-so-subtle. Now it's
just a matter of how much stimulation is required to reach the point
of climax whether the stimulation is applied intentionally or otherwise.
Don't try to tell me this never happens. (Note that I'm not referring
to Ms. Guimond here but rather commenting generally.)

For obvious reasons the women who might provide "extra" services are
not going to advertise the fact and most guys are pretty discreet about
it. I think a lot depends on the individual session; what two adults
decide to do in private is their own affair. I just happen to think
that paying for it is unnecessary and the experience would seem so
superficial. I prefer to take the non-commercial route, but that's
just me.


-ken

Rubdown

unread,
Dec 29, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/29/98
to
On 28 Dec 1998 18:30:17 GMT, sss...@aol.com (Ssscold) wrote:

>I realize that the poor guy asked his question in a pretty insipid way, but is
>it really such a bad question? I've never had a so-called session, nor do I
>have any interest in having one, but I have heard that some of the women do
>exactly what this poor fellow is asking about. I doubt that anyone who
>participates in this newsgroup would admit to having had the experience
>themselves, but, well, is it true? It is at least plausible? And if so, is it
>fair to heap such abuse upon the poor guy who dared speak the unspoken?
>

Oh God! Sssscold! You're right! "The poor guy," and "this poor
fellow"! :) (humor intended)

The GUILT that plagues my soul for replying to his, hmmmm, "artful",
nooooo, ummm, brave! (e.g. "who dared speak the unspoken"), welllll,
very doubtful if you check his verbiage. Bravery/courage most likely
had little to do with his post. Narrow-minded impulse more likely the
culprit. I believe Mr. Hooligan has some clear points, as well as
Ken.

But, WAIT! I'm forgetting my remorse for the horrifyingly insensitive
reply I made to his insightful question, his question laden with
perspective and consideration, bravery and vision!

Forgive me John Sayers! I was wrong with the advise about the
watermelon!

Try a Summer Squash instead.

zackie aman

unread,
Dec 29, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/29/98
to
MORON.

You've never had a session? What's your problem? You're all MAN like
NICK? Me suspects you and Nickie do not have any extra dollars to
spend. You know what? You're boys dealing with a MAN, enough SAID!


TomNine

unread,
Dec 29, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/29/98
to
First off, Mo asked a very reasonable question. I've never met Colette
but what I've heard agrees with FemCombat's comments about her being
fine for muscle worship and light/fantasy wrestling. I understand that
she has been working hard on her wrestling, but recent shoulder surgery
will keep her from anything remotely competitive for a little while.

Colette is very attractive, and I have a few great videos featuring her.
She's a little small to really take me on in the type of session I
prefer, but if her skills pick up I may reconsider.

Rapid Ron asked for reviews of sessions (more on this later) and he also
mentioned that BDSM houses could provide a cheaper alternative. Ron
says the higher cost for a girl like Colette is to cover her travel
expenses.

If all you want is sensual contact and light wrestling with a pretty
girl, then your local dominatrix may well be a great solution. If you
want to be with an elite athlete and experience real skill and strenth,
then the travelling FBBs and wrestlers really have no competition unless
you are very lucky. The big money is what lures them out on the road to
meet strangers in hotel rooms, but the only justification for the fee is
the very specialized service they provide.

Now, where does one find reviews of sessions? My friend Peeping Tom was
kind enough to plug the message board I host on Diana the Valkyrie's
great site, and this type of discussion is what that board is for. The
message boards are free for everyone, just use "non-member" for your
user name and "sesame" for your password if you aren't a member.

There are also several reviews in Diana's library as well as on the
terrific Big List: http://wb270.com . The list is the best resource on
the Web for mixed wrestling info, and without it I never would have
jumped into world of sessions. Besides info on each of the wrestling
ladies, wb270 and the reviews he links to provide a good idea about what
goes on in these wrestling sessions.

I've written several reviews, and all can be linked to from the entry
for the wrestler in wb270's site. I don't believe there is enough
interest in posting them here as well, so I have not done so. I hope
others will post comments about their sessions, here, on my board, with
a note to wb270, whatever. I know there are good reasons for keeping
ones thoughts private.

Now, I'd like to comment on the subject John Sayers brought up so
rudely. "Does she like, jerk you off and stuff." My pal HOOLIGAN9's
response was right on. Some of the wrestling ladies will perform
explicitely sexual services, starting from letting the customer beat
himself off. Or so I understand. Many ladies will not put up with any
such hanky panky. If a client is looking for specific services he would
be wise to ask the woman privately. This is just normal, human
courtesy.

My new chatroom buddy Ken continued the line of questioning, and he made
one comment I need to respond to. He concluded that the private
session's only reason was the sexual gratification of the guy. "Why


else would anyone cough up $300 for an hour-long encounter?"

Hey, I am aroused at some point during every session. Not to mention
the excitement of anticipating a session as the date approaches, or the
rich memories of it afterwards, bruises still tender and the smell of
ones wrestling opponent still in ones nostrils. But the sense of bliss
from the encounter transcends the erotic, at least for me, and I am glad
that I discovered this experience at age 39 and no later.

People pay $300 and more for an hour's entertainment all the time. How
much does a ski weekend cost, and how many hours on the slope does it
break down to? That family trip to Disneyworld? How much was shelled
out for each hour on the rides? Tickets to a Broadway show or the World
Series, the list goes on. The private session fees are high, sure, but
not really out of line with what you get for the money.

My 2 cents.
Tom


ken

unread,
Dec 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/30/98
to
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998 17:42:02 -0500 (EST), Mist...@webtv.net (TomNine) wrote:

[good stuff snipped]


>Now, I'd like to comment on the subject John Sayers brought up so
>rudely. "Does she like, jerk you off and stuff." My pal HOOLIGAN9's
>response was right on. Some of the wrestling ladies will perform
>explicitely sexual services, starting from letting the customer beat
>himself off. Or so I understand. Many ladies will not put up with any
>such hanky panky. If a client is looking for specific services he would
>be wise to ask the woman privately. This is just normal, human
>courtesy.
>
>My new chatroom buddy Ken continued the line of questioning, and he made
>one comment I need to respond to. He concluded that the private
>session's only reason was the sexual gratification of the guy. "Why
>else would anyone cough up $300 for an hour-long encounter?"
>
>Hey, I am aroused at some point during every session. Not to mention
>the excitement of anticipating a session as the date approaches, or the
>rich memories of it afterwards, bruises still tender and the smell of
>ones wrestling opponent still in ones nostrils. But the sense of bliss
>from the encounter transcends the erotic, at least for me, and I am glad
>that I discovered this experience at age 39 and no later.
>
>People pay $300 and more for an hour's entertainment all the time. How
>much does a ski weekend cost, and how many hours on the slope does it
>break down to? That family trip to Disneyworld? How much was shelled
>out for each hour on the rides? Tickets to a Broadway show or the World
>Series, the list goes on. The private session fees are high, sure, but
>not really out of line with what you get for the money.

Good comments, Tom. You know, after I posted I got to thinking about how
much one might spend on a special date. Heck, between theatre tickets
and dinner and whatever else might go into it, $250 - $300 is really not
unreasonable. And I'm not saying the fees are unreasonable because in
addition to the other overhead expenses, if a woman is doing sessions
all day the risk of injury must be pretty high.

But I think that sexual gratification comes in many forms besides just
the orgasmic one. Underlying this newsgroup is a very strong sexual
theme and this NG really isn't so much different than any other in this
respect. Maybe Freud was right. Nonetheless, although private sessions
or even the admiration of photos can transcend the erotic, I still think
that most of the pleasure is linked directly or indirectly to sex, and
I don't mean sex in a crude or bad way.

I think I understand what you're saying, though. Because I feel the
same way about sex itself as sex also transcends the erotic and can
become even spiritual. But this is probably a bit too philosophical
for AAWA so I'll stop while I'm ahead.


-ken

zackie aman

unread,
Dec 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/30/98
to
Ssscold, you're like Nick. Well, I've never had a session and it is
certainly below me to pay the money to have one. Puritan values.
Whether you would like to, or not, who cares?

There is nothing sexual in having a session. It is the appreciation
that a male enjoys being in the company of a woman who has worked her
butt off to get where she is, and she deserves some compensation. None
coming from you.


zackie aman

unread,
Dec 30, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/30/98
to
Good post TenNine, no way I could improve on it. From my experience,
no woman want's to wrestle a male. Why would they? I think some males
give the excuse that they would like to wrestle to justify the session
they are paying for. I'm sure that there are a small number of males
who enjoy wrestling females. So be it. I'm not one.


The big deal is this, an attractive man comes in, wants to give me a
very sensuous massage and want's to pay me $300 an hour?

Thank goodness for the nineties!


Keith Huddleston

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to

ROTFLMAO! Yeah, RIGHT Zackie! ;)

Ivan Petarski

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to
Zackie writes:

>The big deal is this, an attractive man comes >in, >wants to give me a
very sensuous >massage >and want's to pay me $300 an >hour?

Let me get this "straight". You're now telling us that "attractive men"
are now offering you money for a "very sensuous massage"?

I think that's a little more information than I want, thank you.
Shouldn't you be posting this to another ng? Perhaps
alt.homo-fag.massages?


Keith Huddleston

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to

LMAO! Thats some seriously funny s**t!

Ivan Petarski

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to
From Zackie:

[To Ssscold]


You're all MAN like NICK?

[To Ssscold}


Ssscold, you're like Nick.

[To Ssscold]
You and Nick have resolved to be suck-ups?

[To Ssscold]
I move you down to number seven of the top ten morons participating.
Last count:
1. NICK
2. NICK
3. NICK
4. NICK
5. NICK
6. NICK
7. Ssscold
8. Ssscold
9. Ssscold

[To Ssscold]
Used-to-be-Nick-enemy-now-Nick-suck-up-with-a-lap-top!

I believe it's apparant what's going on here. Why don't you just get it
over with, Zackie. What you obviously are lusting after is a muscle
worship session with "NICK".

Hey, if he's as broke as you suggest, maybe he'll be willing to accept
your money and you can oil up his glutes. Hell, the women put up with
you for money.

So how 'bout it, "NICK"? And don't forget to send me my commission fee!


Keith Huddleston

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to

Hey Zackie-Smokes-Crackie, why don't you just gimme the $300, I got this
real nice ocean front property in Arizona for ya...

Pablo

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to
In article <368B68...@bellatlantic.net>, Keith says...

>
>Ivan Petarski wrote:
>>
>> Zackie writes:
>>
>> >The big deal is this, an attractive man comes >in, >wants to give me a
>> very sensuous >massage >and want's to pay me $300 an >hour?
>>
>> Let me get this "straight". You're now telling us that "attractive men"
>> are now offering you money for a "very sensuous massage"?
>>
>> I think that's a little more information than I want, thank you.
>> Shouldn't you be posting this to another ng? Perhaps
>> alt.homo-fag.massages?
>

No doubt a Freudian slip...

Pablo.

zackie aman

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to
You boys just do not give up, do you?

I made plans two months ago to attend Glamourcon in Los Angeles in
February with about 80 Playmates attending. Average women attending, I
admit, except for Cynthia Myers and Sharon Johannsen. But guess who
else is going to be there? The magnificent Collette Guimond!

Sorry you can't make it boys! Just pull your Johnson while you're
thinking about it, and think about Wacky Zackie making your inept
dreams come true!


zackie aman

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to
Not a very good thought. You've never had a session and don't intend to
do so. Why? You're broke, or your puritan values control your life.


zackie aman

unread,
Dec 31, 1998, 3:00:00 AM12/31/98
to
I'm very happy for Ken and Ssscold. They are not interested in
providing the things that worthy women deserve, is that why you have
them no longer? I used to. I used to. What are you doing now other
than debating an old fool like me?


Ssscold

unread,
Jan 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/1/99
to
No interest - and a recent but now former FBB girlfriend. I had it almost
daily for several months.


ken

unread,
Jan 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/1/99
to
On Thu, 31 Dec 1998 20:51:23 -0500 (EST), mio...@webtv.net (zackie aman) wrote:

>Not a very good thought. You've never had a session and don't intend to
>do so. Why? You're broke, or your puritan values control your life.

I thought that I explained all that and who are you or anyone
else to judge what is right for someone else? I don't harbor
any antipathy towards anyone who wishes to indulge in private
sessions. If it works for you, then by all means go for it.
But I hold this peculiar notion that there are some things
that money just cannot buy. And it has nothing to do with
Puritanism or lack of funds.

I simply have no desire to pay for something that's readily
available for the asking. If it's what you want and you can't
find it, then you're not trying very hard.

Happy New Year to you, Zackie, and I hope you find what you're
looking for without having to spend too much.


-ken

ken

unread,
Jan 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/1/99
to

You're making a lot of assumptions, Zackie. You assume that we
don't have what we want and you assume that we aren't interested
in providing the things that "worthy women deserve" from the sheer
fact that we're talking to you. I can only speak for myself but
I'll assure you such is not the case. I don't pay women for their
affections and I don't expect to be paid for mine -- simple as that.
You do what you have to do.


-ken

Observher

unread,
Jan 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM1/2/99
to
It's too bad that TomNine's outstanding comments were eventually followed by
the kind of nonsense this NG has been suffering from recently. There are many
different reasons why men and women participate in these sessions. I can say
with 100 % certainty that ladies like Raquel and Gemini - who do not perform
any activities that are sexual in nature - are totally into the wrestling, and
it shows through their high level of skill.

I honestly can't say much more about the subject because Mr. 9's response
covered all of the bases - and quite eloquently.

LTF

0 new messages