Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Julie Strain flicks?

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 18, 2001, 1:33:56 PM4/18/01
to
A question for anyone who has actually seen Juile Strain flicks...are there
any out there where she is blatantly flexing her muscles or armwrestling?

thanks


Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 18, 2001, 2:54:02 PM4/18/01
to
For what its worth: Julie's first boyfriend was an NPC promoter/judge. When
she was only 16. Some guys have all the luck.

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 18, 2001, 11:03:19 PM4/18/01
to
You're kidding, right? Do you try to bag the little girls, Billy? You think
that's OK that some 20/30 year old fag is bagging some 16 year old chick?
That's sick, and illegal. If you don't believe that's what some 20/30 year
old guy wanted to do with her, you're an idiot, well, more of an idiot.


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message
news:3ADDE2CA...@gte.net...

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 1:29:35 AM4/19/01
to
Your moral outrage...and envy...are duly noted. They are still good friends,
by the way.

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 10:18:22 AM4/19/01
to
You're, once again, delirious. I have no envy, especially of perverts and
child molesters. You obviously think bagging underage girls is
'appropriate'. Are you a diddler, Billy?

Who cares if they are "still good friends". Any 16 year old would love to
brag about being bagged by some guy in his 20/30s, and any 20/30 year old
would love to brag about bagging some 16 year old little biscuit.


"Bill Diddler" <billd...@gte.net> wrote in message
news:3ADE77BD...@gte.net...


> Your moral outrage...and envy...are duly noted. They are still good
friends,
> by the way.
>
> Nick Gravel wrote:
>
> > You're kidding, right? Do you try to bag the little girls, Billy? You
think
> > that's OK that some 20/30 year old fag is bagging some 16 year old
chick?
> > That's sick, and illegal. If you don't believe that's what some 20/30
year
> > old guy wanted to do with her, you're an idiot, well, more of an idiot.
> >

> > "Bill Diddler" <billd...@gte.net> wrote in message

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 12:37:15 PM4/19/01
to
Yawn.

Anonymous

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 12:59:17 PM4/19/01
to
Looks like Dobbins has stepped into another one. It's not my job to run the
world, but Nick's got a point, when older men prey on high school girls,
it's a crime, not "cute" etc. No matter what the two people involved think,
yep, it's criminal.

A.


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF143A...@gte.net...

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 2:32:39 PM4/19/01
to
I know some 16yr olds can seem quite older, but being 30 something myself I
can't help but see mid-teenagers as kids, regardless of how hot or muscular
they may be...the thought of 'bagging' one to me is unfathomable.


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF143A...@gte.net...

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 2:36:12 PM4/19/01
to
Why is everyone assuming that this guy, who is now an NPC judge, was 30 years
old when he dated Julie? I never said that. I'll have to tell him...he'll get
a kick out of it.

There are too many people in this group with too much time on their hands.

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 3:42:41 PM4/19/01
to
Who said he was 30ish at the time?

Anonymous

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 3:55:52 PM4/19/01
to
I suppose eventually the details will come out, when you deem us ready to
handle them. In your original post, you implied that he was a judge at the
time...how old was he then? If it's anything older than 18, then yes, our
responses are valid.

I mean, come on -- you've implied that a man was dating a high-school girl.
A few in here pointed out there's nothing funny about it, and you've
ridiculed it as envy and moral silliness. Do we have the facts wrong, or
were you joking about something that's not that funny?

A.


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF301A...@gte.net...

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 4:45:48 PM4/19/01
to
Its irrelevant whether he was 30 or not. If he was old enough to be a
promoter/judge as you stated, then he was too old to be dating a 16 year
old. As far as I know the NPC doesn't employ judges in their mid teens.

The tone and structure of your original post, intended or not, implied that
he was significantly older than her and that he was dating her when she was
16. Maybe you should clarify this...or perhaps you're just trying to cover
his PR ass now.

Renier Wolfcastle

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 5:24:02 AM4/19/01
to
She has muscles?
"Hollywood Muscle" <HMSta...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8ekD6.78$Zq4.4...@news2.news.adelphia.net...

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 7:02:19 PM4/19/01
to
How old was he then? You said, and I quote: "Julie's first boyfriend was an
NPC promoter/judge."

He's got to have been in his 20's or 30's to be an NPC Promoter/Judge,
right? A 20 year porking a 16 year old is ILLEGAL Willber.


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF3FB1...@gte.net...

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 7:10:36 PM4/19/01
to
You said, and I quote: "Julie's first boyfriend was an NPC promoter/judge. "

Come on, there Wobblie Dobbie, how old was this "NPC Promoter/Judge", I am
sure he was older than 17 in order to be an "NPC Promoter/Judge" (and I
quote ;-), and older than 17 makes porking a 16 year old criminal.

Tell us the truth here, Wilber. Or, were you just trying to impress us by
claiming you know people and things about them, you really don't.

Do you think diddling little girls is OK? Sounds like it to me!


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF301A...@gte.net...

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 7:42:35 PM4/19/01
to
enough shut up

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 7:42:10 PM4/19/01
to
I said the luck guy was Julie's first boyfriend...but he's in his 30s now and
that was 12 to 15 years ago I think. Anyway, who cares.

BD

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 8:14:21 PM4/19/01
to
not really, but she likes to flex

which is better? a muscular babe who doesn't like to flex...or a fit
exhibitionist who likes to show off however her fans like it?


"Renier Wolfcastle" <patrick...@gci.net> wrote in message
news:tdup962...@corp.supernews.com...

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 8:39:31 PM4/19/01
to
...but wait, this is where he says....

'who said he was porking her?'

on a simliar note, I was channel surfing the other day and ran across one of
the talk shows... Riki Rivera, or Jerry Lake, or Geraldo Springer, or
something or other....

anyway there was a mid thirties smuck, employed as a career pizza delivery
man, boinking a 17 year old chicky. He was divorced once, still married to
a woman with several kids. Everyone obviously thought he was scum, but the
real problem was the man had no capacity for rational thought. He didn't
even consider that, although he was having unprotected sex, the chick might
get pregnant. He saw nothing wrong with being a career pizza guy. (he was
fired from one place for fondling this chick in the storeroom, went right
down the street to get another pizza job). He didn't see why supporting a
wife( they were going to marry once the girl hits 18), with a kid, with
alimony and child support payments would be any issue. I don't think this
guy was even in it strictly for hot sex...I think he was simply dumb as a
post, but fortunate enough to have a dick.


"Nick Gravel" <ni...@demsdabreaks.net> wrote in message
news:9bnr3g$hgb$1...@slb6.atl.mindspring.net...

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 11:07:10 PM4/19/01
to
Dobbins cruises the high schools for dates, he believes anybody over 15
is fair game for him.


da

--
Don't let Democrats do to the country what they did to California!
Another massive budget surplus pissed away.

Eight years of economic, environmental, and social neglect to undo!

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 11:08:00 PM4/19/01
to
Open mouth, insert foot. A favorite Dobbins exercise.

da

--

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 11:09:58 PM4/19/01
to
Nobody really, unless you consider that they removed the statute of
limitations for child molesting a few years ago.

That might change the spectrum of interested parties, eh?


da

--

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 11:10:38 PM4/19/01
to
You brought it up, Dopey.

da

--

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 11:27:01 PM4/19/01
to
As I figured, you're trying to weasel out of this one. You said, and I'll
quote it again:

"Julie's first boyfriend was an NPC promoter/judge. When she was only 16. "

That says the boyfriend WAS an NPC Promoter/Judge AT THE TIME he was
'boyfriending' her, and she was SIXTEEN.

Now, you claim that he's now "in his 30's", and that was "12 to 15 years ago
I think (note...I doubt it)"...so now you claim he was 15-18 (if he's 30
now) through 24-27 (if he's 39 now) at the time. Mighty big 'spread' there,
Willy Boy. Well, WHAT IS IT? Was he 15 or 27?

Answer up, there Wobbly Dobbly, answer up...

"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF77CE...@gte.net...

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 11:31:34 PM4/19/01
to
Why? So you can either 1) lie about knowledge you really don't have, and
made up just to try to impress us, or 2) weasel out of admitting you think
it's OK to diddle little girls. Which is it Wilber? Liar or Diddler?

"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF77EA...@gte.net...

Rutabaga22

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 1:54:41 AM4/20/01
to
Hi there,

You-all are probably going to flame me for this, but I think that there are
grey areas. A guy in his 20's or older, making it with a 16 year old girl,
isn't really right (and the laws against it are probably not ill advised).
However, it also isn't the worst thing I've ever heard of, if there is consent
all around and no one gets pregnant or catches a social disease.

A girl I dated way back in the good old days had a string of 20-something
boyfriends while she was 15, 16, and 17. (I am a year younger than her.) She
is now a solid citizen - a schoolteacher, actually - and a terrific human
being. My wife also has a friend with a similar set of experiences
(interestingly, my wife's friend is also now a teacher). Good people sometimes
make ridiculously bad decisions, but I'm not sure it's always a matter for the
criminal courts.

Just my 2 cents -Larry

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 8:11:30 AM4/20/01
to
I don't think many people would fault the young girl at all...its the 20
something diddlers whose action are suspect..

"Rutabaga22" <rutab...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010420015441...@ng-fi1.aol.com...

Hollywood Muscle

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 8:15:00 AM4/20/01
to
Hey Bill,

This is a discussion board, not a newspaper or some Dobbins' announcement
network. You brought it up and several of us decided to have a conversation
about it.

What's the problem?


"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message

news:3ADF77EA...@gte.net...

Anonymous

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 1:11:58 PM4/20/01
to
The interesting thing, in my opinion, is why in some instances this crime
looks "acceptable." The example given may look acceptable to some, yet if
the young girl were a sister or daughter, the scenario looks quite heinous.
I know many guys that thought the story about the female teacher in
Washington state was "cool," yet she's as scary and predatory as they come.
Another twist: if a mid-20's guy seduces a teenage boy, does your discomfort
level rise? If so, doesn't that kind of prove how wrong it is to prey on
young people?

On this matter, I'm against "grey areas." There's too many people working
with young people who need it written in black and white, that is to "leave
minors alone." One success story doesn't excuse breaking the law...nor does
speeding once with no harm done mean it should be done all the time.

A.


"Rutabaga22" <rutab...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010420015441...@ng-fi1.aol.com...

EnkeMM

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 7:09:18 PM4/20/01
to
I believe that in most states, 16 is the age of consent. That is, no statutory
rape charges can be brought where there is consent between the two people.

While none of us would want our 16 year old daughter being messed with by an
older guy, we should be careful throwing around the word criminal. Lack of
moral fiber and character...perhaps...but criminal to be going out with a 16
year old gal...probably not.

atec77

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 9:37:31 PM4/20/01
to

EnkeMM wrote:

Personally such an age difference should (would to me) feel uncomfortable , last
guy that had such a thing with my daughter now knows the facts if life and she is
some what older now , amazing what a little "chat" can do , not a matter of rape
but knowing its wrong m only one way to be aware of that
G>


--
Me , myself and I


Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 2:05:59 AM4/21/01
to
EnkeMM wrote:
>
> I believe that in most states, 16 is the age of consent.


In West Virginia maybe, But I think most states now set 18 as the age of
consent for both boys and girls.

There used to be commonly a difference like, boys 17 or 18 and girls 15
or 16, but I think that was mostly changed a few years ago.

da

That is, no statutory
> rape charges can be brought where there is consent between the two people.
>
> While none of us would want our 16 year old daughter being messed with by an
> older guy, we should be careful throwing around the word criminal. Lack of
> moral fiber and character...perhaps...but criminal to be going out with a 16
> year old gal...probably not.

--

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 2:06:45 AM4/21/01
to
Just Dobbins trying to run the newsgroup. Now you wee why he's so
universally hated here.

da

--

Nick Gravel

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 9:53:16 AM4/21/01
to
Well, go here to see for your self:

http://www.ageofconsent.com/california.htm

In California, it's 18. Wobblie Dobbie is from California....so it isn't a
far stretch to believe so are his supposed 'friends'...and if this little
biscuit was 16 at the time, and Mr. NPC Promoter/Judge was 18 or older, then
there certainly is a legal problem if he was in fact bagging her at that
time.

"EnkeMM" <enk...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20010420190918...@ng-ci1.aol.com...

Rob

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 4:00:38 PM4/21/01
to
Dr...@mailroom.com (Dr ArmŽ) wrote in <3AE123...@Armory.arm>:

>Just Dobbins trying to run the newsgroup. Now you wee why he's so
>universally hated here.
>
>da

He is not universally hated here. He's just universally hated by you and a
few others, most of whom have no better reason for it than "just because".
It's silly.

atec77

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 8:56:28 AM4/22/01
to

Rob wrote:

why make such a lie ?. he is universaly hated by the very large majority who
untill recently remained quite , but, no more monkey boy . no more !

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 3:43:01 PM4/22/01
to

Nice try Bill.

da

Rob

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 3:27:18 AM4/24/01
to
Dr...@mailroom.com (Dr ArmŽ) wrote in <3AE334...@Armory.arm>:
>Nice try Bill.
>
>da

I'm not Bill, friend. I don't even subscribe to his website.

Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 4:12:22 AM4/24/01
to
Rob wrote:
>
I don't even subscribe to his website.


I don't blame you.

Bill Dobbins

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 2:30:20 PM4/24/01
to
Don't you get it? Everybody who says anything even mildly supportive of
me IS me...or somebody I am in cahoots with. It is the way some people
maintain the fiction that their point of view is universally shared.

BD

jabber

unread,
Apr 25, 2001, 6:12:29 AM4/25/01
to

"Bill Dobbins" <bill...@gte.net> wrote in message
news:3AE5C63C...@gte.net...

> Don't you get it? Everybody who says anything even mildly supportive of
> me IS me...or somebody I am in cahoots with. It is the way some people
> maintain the fiction that their point of view is universally shared.
>
> BD
>
Luckily DrArm has not accused me of being you, Bill. LOL

-jabber


Dr Arm®

unread,
Apr 25, 2001, 10:55:04 PM4/25/01
to


Fortunately you have a high position on Dr Arm's Putz List for numerous
other shenanagans.

0 new messages