A Willy-Nilly GUT
mimus
If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other physical
phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
terms of any other physical phenomenon?
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Whatever are we to do to show the
true harmony and peace that rule here,
somewhat disguised at the moment by
the apparent disorder now seemingly in
progress?
< Laumer
Shirley
> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can
> be modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us,
> doesn't that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any
> other physical phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon
> can be modeled in terms of any other physical phenomenon?
Wavy G is a functioning, physical phenomena that needs to take a quantum
leap?
mimus
I thought his Mohammed Cartoon Contest was pretty ballsy.
Shirley
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:26:30 -0500, Shirley wrote:
>
>> mimus wrote:
>>
>>> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can
>>> be modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells
>>> us, doesn't that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms
>>> of any other physical phenomenon, and further that any physical
>>> phenomenon can be modeled in terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>>
>> Wavy G is a functioning, physical phenomena that needs to take a
>> quantum leap?
>
> I thought his Mohammed Cartoon Contest was pretty ballsy.
Did I miss that one?
Noodles Jefferson
hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
>
> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
> modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
> that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other physical
> phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
> terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>
>
I'll need some silly putty and a microwave to find out.
--
Noodles Jefferson
mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30
sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM
NP: "Jellyroll" -- Blue Murder
"Now, technology's getting better all the time and that's fine,
but most of the time all you need is a stick of gum,
a pocketknife, and a smile."
-- Robert Redford "Spy Game"
Smee
"mimus" <tinmi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1e42xh95chkn1$.hve9r6nryht1.dlg@40tude.net...
>
> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
> modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
> that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other
physical
> phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
> terms of any other physical phenomenon?
Sounds like rather circular reasoning there, mimus.
Smee
mutated...@web.com
>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
ignition ? Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ? Models
are just that, models. We generate, play with and discard them as
suites us.
Muty
mimus
> In article <1e42xh95chkn1$.hve9r6nr...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
> hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
>
>> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
>> modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
>> that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other physical
>> phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>> terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>
> I'll need some silly putty and a microwave to find out.
<stands way back>
Go ahead.
mimus
> "mimus" <tinmi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1e42xh95chkn1$.hve9r6nryht1.dlg@40tude.net...
>>
>> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
>> modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
>> that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other
> physical
>> phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>> terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>
> Sounds like rather circular reasoning there, mimus.
>
> Smee
But it's not. (Ha!)
mimus
My point is that the rhetorical questions supplied are in fact implied by
the quantum mechanical claim that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
terms of wave functions.
With a dash of transitivity.
"Modeled" here meaning "accurately and significantly represented".
dave hillstrom
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>On 6 Feb 2006 04:43:07 -0800, mutated...@web.com wrote:
>
>> In reply to mimus who wrote:
>>
>>>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>>
>> Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
>> ignition ? Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ? Models
>> are just that, models. We generate, play with and discard them as
>> suites us.
>
>My point is that the rhetorical questions supplied are in fact implied by
>the quantum mechanical claim that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>terms of wave functions.
>
>With a dash of transitivity.
>
>"Modeled" here meaning "accurately and significantly represented".
but when the wind stops blowing, the waves stop. what then?
--
dave hillstrom
"Quotes can't be forced. They just come to you, like diarrhea."
- dave hillstrom mhm15x4
mimus
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:43:15 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>
>>On 6 Feb 2006 04:43:07 -0800, mutated...@web.com wrote:
>>
>>> In reply to mimus who wrote:
>>>
>>>>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>>>
>>> Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
>>> ignition ? Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ? Models
>>> are just that, models. We generate, play with and discard them as
>>> suites us.
>>
>>My point is that the rhetorical questions supplied are in fact implied by
>>the quantum mechanical claim that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>terms of wave functions.
>>
>>With a dash of transitivity.
>>
>>"Modeled" here meaning "accurately and significantly represented".
>
> but when the wind stops blowing, the waves stop. what then?
Ya go to a flat model. I guess.
dave hillstrom
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:46:23 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:43:15 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>
>>>On 6 Feb 2006 04:43:07 -0800, mutated...@web.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In reply to mimus who wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>>>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>>>>
>>>> Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
>>>> ignition ? Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ? Models
>>>> are just that, models. We generate, play with and discard them as
>>>> suites us.
>>>
>>>My point is that the rhetorical questions supplied are in fact implied by
>>>the quantum mechanical claim that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>terms of wave functions.
>>>
>>>With a dash of transitivity.
>>>
>>>"Modeled" here meaning "accurately and significantly represented".
>>
>> but when the wind stops blowing, the waves stop. what then?
>
>Ya go to a flat model. I guess.
the asphalt model of the universe. too bad alt.pave.the.earth is dead.
Noodles Jefferson
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 01:01:39 -0600, Noodles Jefferson wrote:
>
> > In article <1e42xh95chkn1$.hve9r6nr...@40tude.net>, mimus took the
> > hamburger, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh wow"...
> >
> >> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
> >> modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
> >> that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other physical
> >> phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
> >> terms of any other physical phenomenon?
> >
> > I'll need some silly putty and a microwave to find out.
>
> <stands way back>
>
> Go ahead.
>
Now, hold real still.
mimus
> In reply to mimus who wrote:
>
>>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>
> Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
> ignition ?
Sure!
> Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ?
Well, who knows? the PBS model of yer ignition system, or the TEIS model of
yer sandwich, might well prove very illuminating.
--
Life exists. Get over it.
dave hillstrom
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>Life exists. Get over it.
lies!
knoxy
tinmi...@hotmail.com says...
>
> If any physical quantity, and therefore any physical phenomenon, can be
> modeled in terms of wave functions, as quantum mechanics tells us, doesn't
> that mean that wave functions can be modeled in terms of any other physical
> phenomenon, and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
> terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>
Good thing I just took two of the three painkillers I'm supposed to
take.
--
knoxy
mhm34x10
smeeter #6
#6 on mimus wanted poster list
Best Newbie in alt.flame 2005
"The Internet is a gateway to get on the net."
Bob Dole
Lorrill Buyens
of the alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk Illuminati, gifted us with these
words of wisdom:
>On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:46:23 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:43:15 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>
>>>On 6 Feb 2006 04:43:07 -0800, mutated...@web.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> In reply to mimus who wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>>>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>>>>
>>>> Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
>>>> ignition ? Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ? Models
>>>> are just that, models. We generate, play with and discard them as
>>>> suites us.
>>>
>>>My point is that the rhetorical questions supplied are in fact implied by
>>>the quantum mechanical claim that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>terms of wave functions.
>>>
>>>With a dash of transitivity.
>>>
>>>"Modeled" here meaning "accurately and significantly represented".
>>
>> but when the wind stops blowing, the waves stop. what then?
>
>Ya go to a flat model. I guess.
One without silicon implants?
--
Lorrill Buyens
MHM: 9x1; Smeeter: #21; WSD: #3
Alcatroll Labs; Sex, Drugs and Rock 'n' Roll Division
"I ZM NOT FIRGIT."
- The title of a thread started by an apparently
drunk Incantatrix, in aav3f
dave hillstrom
<buy...@interlacken.com> spewed in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:54:25 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com>, Loyal Agent
>of the alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk Illuminati, gifted us with these
>words of wisdom:
>
>>On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:46:23 -0500, dave hillstrom wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:43:15 -0500, mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> spewed in
>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
>>>
>>>>On 6 Feb 2006 04:43:07 -0800, mutated...@web.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In reply to mimus who wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>and further that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>>>>terms of any other physical phenomenon?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can I model my peanut butter sandwich on my Toyota's electronic
>>>>> ignition ? Maybe I could, but how useful is that going to be ? Models
>>>>> are just that, models. We generate, play with and discard them as
>>>>> suites us.
>>>>
>>>>My point is that the rhetorical questions supplied are in fact implied by
>>>>the quantum mechanical claim that any physical phenomenon can be modeled in
>>>>terms of wave functions.
>>>>
>>>>With a dash of transitivity.
>>>>
>>>>"Modeled" here meaning "accurately and significantly represented".
>>>
>>> but when the wind stops blowing, the waves stop. what then?
>>
>>Ya go to a flat model. I guess.
>
>One without silicon implants?
yes. one without silicon implants, or penile implants.
and everyone has to take thorazine.
mimus
Did they ever get any other flavor besides cherry?
dave hillstrom
in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
orange-custard
doesnt even list cherry.
http://www.drugs.com/PDR/Thorazine_Syrup.html
mimus
Wot? no more cheerily bright- red cherry elixir?
dave hillstrom
in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk:
sorry. maybe you could start a write in campaign?
Lorrill Buyens
Chocolate-covered broccoli. Needless to say, it hasn't been a big success so
far.