FLAME awards
John Kimball
in Message id: <u335u0m...@corp.supernews.com>:
>To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last years awards looked like:
>
>Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
>Usenet's most coveted achievements!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
[crap]
>
>MOY - Moron Of the Year
>
>There were plenty of other contenders, but the Mad Bed Wetter put up the
>strongest fight.
>
> Mad Hatter
*snicker*
[more crap]
>Honorable mention goes to John Kimball for driving Geno nuts, trying to
>figure out who he is.
He's still guessing, AFAICT.
>Since this New Year marks the beginning of a new century, we will also
>award...
>
>AOC - Asshole Of the Century
>
>The object of the ladies' affections, he had many FLAME regulars fooled into
>believing he'd actually bedded more than one of them at once.
>
> Steve "Critter" Henderson
Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
--
"For sale - Taliban rifles. Only dropped once."
Alan Gore in adfp
Steve Henderson
"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a0sf0b$e9u$0...@pita.alt.net...
> >To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last year's awards looked
like:
> >
> >Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
> >Usenet's most coveted achievements!
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
> >Honorable mention goes to John Kimball for driving Geno nuts, trying to
> >figure out who he is.
>
> He's still guessing, AFAICT.
I think you hit that right on the head.
> >AOC - Asshole Of the Century
> >
> >The object of the ladies' affections, he had many FLAME regulars fooled
into
> >believing he'd actually bedded more than one of them at once.
> >
> > Steve "Critter" Henderson
>
> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
ROFL!
John Kimball
<etao...@keytech.com> wrote in Message id:
<u37g3tb...@corp.supernews.com>:
>
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a0sf0b$e9u$0...@pita.alt.net...
>
>> >To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last year's awards looked
>like:
>> >
>> >Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
>> >Usenet's most coveted achievements!
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
(Rolls eyes)
For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that without
your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would have
understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim of
"Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
snot-encrusted nose plug.
Here it is, 2002, and you still haven't changed a bit, have you?
Fuckhead.
>
>> >Honorable mention goes to John Kimball for driving Geno nuts, trying to
>> >figure out who he is.
>>
>> He's still guessing, AFAICT.
>
>I think you hit that right on the head.
>
>> >AOC - Asshole Of the Century
>> >
>> >The object of the ladies' affections, he had many FLAME regulars fooled
>into
>> >believing he'd actually bedded more than one of them at once.
>> >
>> > Steve "Critter" Henderson
>>
>> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
>> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
>
>ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the floor
with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame for
once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then at
least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me, now
that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age old
question you've been dodging for years:
"Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste of
another man's semen is like?
Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
"Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
Ari Asikainen
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote...
>> "wamprat" <aoy...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last year's awards looked
>> >like:
>> >
>> >Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
>> >Usenet's most coveted achievements!
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
The part where "last year" in an article posted in 2002 refers to 2000
is a bit strange, but that particular piece of idiocy is more than
adequately explained by the assumption that the poster is a
Flamenetter. The funny part, on the other hand, is the idiocy
displayed by calling awards voted on by the laughingstock that was
alt.flamenet 2000 "Usenet's most coveted achievements."
ObShteveHendershonFlame: Moron.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Steve Henderson
> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
>
> (Rolls eyes)
Because the obvious finally "hit", eh?
> For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that without
> your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would have
> understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim of
> "Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
> snot-encrusted nose plug.
Sure you were.
> Fuckhead.
Nice sig.
> >> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
> >> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
> >
> >ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
What's the surprise when someone laughs at comedy, intended or not?
> C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the floor
> with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame for
> once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then at
> least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me, now
> that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age old
> question you've been dodging for years:
Flame you? Whatever for? According to you, you are "perfect" and can do no
wrong, even when you do.
Far be it from me to rain on your parade.
> "Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste of
> another man's semen is like?
> Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
> "Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
> message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
You still don't get it, do you?
I don't know why I'm surprised.
Steve Henderson
"Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:a11v0e$nqa3d$2...@ID-12638.news.dfncis.de...
Dense as always, aren't you?
John Kimball
>
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a11lrp$h1j$1...@pita.alt.net...
>
>> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
>>
>> (Rolls eyes)
>
>Because the obvious finally "hit", eh?
Indeed, I realized just how incredibly fucking stupid you were. In
retrospect, I suppose it was obvious from the beginning.
>> For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that without
>> your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would have
>> understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim of
>> "Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
>> snot-encrusted nose plug.
>
>Sure you were.
Good, we can agree on something: I am always right.
>> Fuckhead.
>
>Nice sig.
Don't be so obtuse, Pee-Wee.
>> >> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
>> >> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
>> >
>> >ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
>
>What's the surprise when someone laughs at comedy, intended or not?
Perhaps a LOL!!! and a :^0 would have been more apropos, rather than
rolling around on the floor? In any case it wasn't meant to be funny, it
was the truth. Don't you remember running from
<9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>?
>> C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the floor
>> with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame for
>> once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then at
>> least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me, now
>> that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age old
>> question you've been dodging for years:
>
>Flame you? Whatever for?
Because this is alt.flame, you dense cunt. What the ever-loving fuck is
wrong with you, Thteve?
>According to you, you are "perfect" and can do no
>wrong,
Absolutely, and you'll do well to remember that. Repeat it like a mantra,
if it helps you drill it into your undeniably thick skull.
> even when you do.
But I don't. Ever.
>Far be it from me to rain on your parade.
Well, this is turning out to be a bit of a disappointment.
>> "Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste of
>> another man's semen is like?
>> Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
>> "Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
>> message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
>
>You still don't get it, do you?
Oh, I get it alright. I just wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, as
they say.
>I don't know why I'm surprised.
You don't know much of anything, however, I'm *not* surprised.
--
John Kimball
Thteve, do yourself a favor:
Start, settings, control panel, add/remove programs, select Outlook
Express, and click on remove. It's for the best. Really.
Ari Asikainen
Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it looked?
>"Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> "Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
>>
>> The part where "last year" in an article posted in 2002 refers to 2000
>> is a bit strange, but that particular piece of idiocy is more than
>> adequately explained by the assumption that the poster is a
>> Flamenetter. The funny part, on the other hand, is the idiocy
>> displayed by calling awards voted on by the laughingstock that was
>> alt.flamenet 2000 "Usenet's most coveted achievements."
>
>Dense as always, aren't you?
This would work so much better if you could back it up with arguments.
Alas, you're only a poor Flamenetter; unable to spot any actual
mistakes, you must rely on vagaries.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
FJ
> "Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>
> Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
> Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it looked?
I thought it was almost endearing.
--
FJ
FJ
> "John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a11lrp$h1j$1...@pita.alt.net...
[...]
> > Fuckhead.
>
> Nice sig.
IKYABWAI.
--
FJ
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Ari Asikainen
Almost BoBish. Shame about the messages, though.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
KC8JBO
"Rhesus Butt Fucker: Usenet Assholelicker" <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>
wrote in message news:3C366E13...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com...
>
>
> FJ wrote:
>
> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>"Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
> >>
> >>Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
> >>Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it looked?
> >>
> >
> > I thought it was almost endearing.
>
> ....but then again you felt the same way about crotchless panties for
sheep.
>
>
> Which reminds me, know where you can buy crotchless panties for sheep?
>
> Fredricks of Glen Dale (or so I've heard).
Poor Weeno, he realy does fuck sheep and little boys. Too bad he never fared
very well in spelling.
But why do the Oklahoma courts have an updated record for you as recent as
June, 2000? Still on probation, Weeno? What will your parole officer say
about receiving a .wav file of your phone call to me?
Requested Party Record:
PARIS, PASKELL EUGENE
Alias or Alternate Names:
HACKER, ALVIN HOWARD
PARRIS, PASKELL
Personal Profile* Record Date Marital Status Birth Date Birth City
BirthPlace
No Records Found.
Physical Profile* Record Date Hair Eye Sex Race Skin Weight Height
Blood Type
June 20, 2000 at 2:22:43 PM Brown Brown - - - --------------180
510 ------------------
Guess they couldn't figure out if Weeno was male or female, or what fucking
race the mongolid Weeno belonged to.
Address Information1* Record Date Status Type Address
November 23, 1993 at 12:0:0 AM - Home Address 2232 SW 26TH
OKLA CITY , Oklahoma
Address Information2* Record Date Status Type Address
September 2, 1999 at 12:0:0 AM - Home Address 1201 N FRANCIS
OKC , Oklahoma 73106
Telephone Information* Record Date Type Number
September 2, 1999 at 12:0:0 AM Home Phone Number 405 319 9928
You moved around quite a bit, Weeno, dodging the cops, parole officers, bill
collectors or all three?
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
KC8JBO wrote:
<Guff> Keep taking pot shots. Maybe you'll hit one of these days.
-Jesus
P.S. Why do these supposed phone numbers you have for me never seem to
be working numbers?
MUhahahahhahahahahahahaha are you too fucking stupid to operate caller
Id, after all you said I called you or are you just a lying piece of shit.
--
Jesus Slut Fucker: Son of Gawd, Mary's Pimp
I was born, long ago. I am the chosen one.
Asshole of the Year 1987, 1989, 1999 (contested)
God Emperor: AssholeNet
Has Been of the Year 1995, 1997, 1999
Voted Flamer one would least like to share a prison cell with: 2000
Fuck up of the Year 2000
Fuck up of the Century for 20th Century
crm 1x3,
mhm 1x1,
The siLiCON voRtEX:
http://members.home.net/pparis7/Jesus/
http://members.home.net/pparis7/Mr.Taliban.swf
Do as thousands of Gay men have already done and view Woger's
home page, Woger's page contains contact numbers, you can sign
his guest book, send him e-mail or just look at his loser ass:
Or:
KC8JBO
"Rhesus Butt Fucker: Usenet Assholelicker" <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>
Translation: "I'll try to not act so nervous and laugh it off hoping nobody
else will notice these are my court records."
> P.S. Why do these supposed phone numbers you have for me never seem to
> be working numbers?
Sssuuuuuuuure they are, keep backpedaling. Even the "private" nuber you
called with the one-ringer got turned in.
> MUhahahahhahahahahahahaha are you too fucking stupid to operate caller
> Id, after all you said I called you or are you just a lying piece of shit.
Oh, you DID call, Weeno, and you asked about your favorite activity when you
did, dicksucking. Your slow drawl gave you away, Weeno. Plus it came back to
a 405 area coded number...i.e. yours.
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
KC8JBO wrote:
How many different ways are you going to misspell my name? Parris? Alvin
Hacker? Now who the fuck is that?
And where are the convictions for selling Schedule I&II narcotics? Where
are the court records "proving" I'm gay?
>
>
>
>
>>P.S. Why do these supposed phone numbers you have for me never seem to
>>be working numbers?
>>
>
> Sssuuuuuuuure they are, keep backpedaling. Even the "private" nuber you
> called with the one-ringer got turned in.
>
>
>
>>MUhahahahhahahahahahahaha are you too fucking stupid to operate caller
>>Id, after all you said I called you or are you just a lying piece of shit.
>>
>
> Oh, you DID call, Weeno, and you asked about your favorite activity when you
> did, dicksucking. Your slow drawl gave you away, Weeno. Plus it came back to
> a 405 area coded number...i.e. yours.
<snicker> Maybe just maybe it was made from a pay phone with a
electronic phone card :) Seems kinda hard to track back to any one
person. My sources inside the FBI say they use the same kind of cards
when they call your neighbors.
<snicker>
-Jesus
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
*plonk*
--
alt.flame Special Forces
"It's in this context that I watched BODY DOUBLE for the first time. This is a
film I have been missing half my life and it was with some trepidation I put it
into the video last night. From the cover, my wife thought it was one of my
'adult' tapes and thoughtfully provided me with a box of Kleenex before she
went out to her weekly coven meeting." -- FrMerrin on alt.horror, 3/14/99
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
John Kimball
<by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote in Message id:
<a18cnr$5o2$3...@og1.olagrande.net>:
>In alt.flame Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> wrote:
>
> [..]
>
> *plonk*
What took you so long?
Steve Henderson
> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:34:17 -0600, "Steve Henderson"
> <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in Message id:
> <u3a55j5...@corp.supernews.com>:
>
> >
> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:a11lrp$h1j$1...@pita.alt.net...
> >
> >> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
> >>
> >> (Rolls eyes)
> >
> >Because the obvious finally "hit", eh?
>
> Indeed, I realized just how incredibly fucking stupid you were. In
> retrospect, I suppose it was obvious from the beginning.
Yep. Pee Wee Herman all the way to the bone, you are.
> >> For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that without
> >> your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would have
> >> understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim of
> >> "Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
> >> snot-encrusted nose plug.
> >
> >Sure you were.
>
> Good, we can agree on something: I am always right.
>
> >> Fuckhead.
> >
> >Nice sig.
>
> Don't be so obtuse, Pee-Wee.
I don't have to be. You possess enough for a fucking platoon.
> >> >> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
> >> >> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
> >> >
> >> >ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
> >
> >What's the surprise when someone laughs at comedy, intended or not?
>
> Perhaps a LOL!!! and a :^0 would have been more apropos, rather than
> rolling around on the floor? In any case it wasn't meant to be funny, it
> was the truth. Don't you remember running from
> <9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>?
I haven't run from anything. I have a life, a job, -and- a good woman in my
life. I got busy.
> >> C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the
floor
> >> with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame for
> >> once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then at
> >> least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me,
now
> >> that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age old
> >> question you've been dodging for years:
> >
> >Flame you? Whatever for?
>
> Because this is alt.flame, you dense cunt. What the ever-loving fuck is
> wrong with you, Thteve?
Not a thing wrong with me that a little baiting and facetiousness won't
cure.
> >According to you, you are "perfect" and can do no
> >wrong,
>
> Absolutely, and you'll do well to remember that. Repeat it like a mantra,
> if it helps you drill it into your undeniably thick skull.
::snicker::
> > even when you do.
>
> But I don't. Ever.
It's nice to be able to believe in something fanciful, isn't it?
> >Far be it from me to rain on your parade.
>
> Well, this is turning out to be a bit of a disappointment.
With your life, I'm not particularly surprised.
> >> "Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste of
> >> another man's semen is like?
> >> Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
> >> "Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
> >> message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
> >
> >You still don't get it, do you?
>
> Oh, I get it alright. I just wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, as
> they say.
Just as I thought, you -can- describe it.
> >I don't know why I'm surprised.
>
> You don't know much of anything, however, I'm *not* surprised.
Once more with the Pee Wee Herman response?
Just about your speed, yeah.
Steve Henderson
> >Dense as always, aren't you?
>
> Thteve, do yourself a favor:
>
> Start, settings, control panel, add/remove programs, select Outlook
> Express, and click on remove. It's for the best. Really.
Getting tired of getting spanked, are you?
Steve Henderson
> >> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
> >>
> >> The part where "last year" in an article posted in 2002 refers to 2000
> >> is a bit strange, but that particular piece of idiocy is more than
> >> adequately explained by the assumption that the poster is a
> >> Flamenetter. The funny part, on the other hand, is the idiocy
> >> displayed by calling awards voted on by the laughingstock that was
> >> alt.flamenet 2000 "Usenet's most coveted achievements."
> >
> >Dense as always, aren't you?
>
> This would work so much better if you could back it up with arguments.
> Alas, you're only a poor Flamenetter; unable to spot any actual
> mistakes, you must rely on vagaries.
What need for argument? The article was only posted about four hours after
2001, therefore making it the announcement for that year.
The 2002 awards, using your reasoning, should be posted, when......Jan 1,
2004?
Nighthawk
news:u3gsm06...@corp.supernews.com...
The one in Texas that you spend your days driving to see?
--
Nighthawk
1999 Fidonet FLAME Asshole of the Year
Nighthawk
He had to move each time members of the Moral Majority burned down the
crackhouse he was staying in.
Nighthawk
news:a18cnr$5o2$3...@og1.olagrande.net...
Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
Steve Henderson
"Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
news:xs0_7.8013$zw3.9...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> > I haven't run from anything. I have a life, a job, -and- a good woman
in
> my
> > life. I got busy.
>
> The one in Texas that you spend your days driving to see?
That's one of 'em, yeah.
Scott Campbell
"Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
> "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote in message
> news:a18cnr$5o2$3...@og1.olagrande.net...
> > In alt.flame Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > *plonk*
>
> Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
Real flamers don't get killfiled, boy.
--
Scott Campbell - mhm 24x12
Steve Henderson
"Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:a1a588$smj$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> > > [..]
> > >
> > > *plonk*
> >
> > Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
>
> Real flamers don't get killfiled, boy.
Real flamers get killfiled all the time by pansies that can't handle it.
Nighthawk
Then explain how you wound up in so many killfiles, Twatty.
Ari Asikainen
>> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>>
>> Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
>> Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it looked?
Well?
>> > Dense as always, aren't you?
>>
>> This would work so much better if you could back it up with arguments.
>> Alas, you're only a poor Flamenetter; unable to spot any actual
>> mistakes, you must rely on vagaries.
>
> What need for argument? The article was only posted about four hours after
> 2001, therefore making it the announcement for that year.
I was talking about your question "Dense as always, aren't you?" and
your complete inability to back it up in any meaningful way - as
further testified by the article I'm responding to now. But never mind
that.
The awards referred to in the article as "last year's" were the 2000
awards, which obviously weren't last year's awards at all. This is a
pretty easy concept to understand. Even you should be able to wrap
your soft head around it.
> The 2002 awards, using your reasoning, should be posted, when......Jan 1,
> 2004?
You're awfully confused, I can tell. By my reasoning, in 2002 the
phrase "last year's awards" should refer to the 2001 ones. Nothing
more, nothing less.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Scott Campbell
Ah, I see. You seem to be under the illusion that your *plonk*ing had
something to do with Stain's inability to "handle" your scathing witticisms
and nothing to do with your dreadfully dull output.
I think that's cute.
Scott Campbell
"Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
Belinda Burnore is the only person I know of. A while back she plonked me
after I mildly flamed Gary exactly -once-. Which I find amusing since she
appears to enjoy perpetuating the Burnore's contributions to their
neverending war with half of Usenet. I went fairly easy on Gary and she
flipped. Go figure.
Other than her, Usenet gets all atwitter over my every musing. My genius
is eagerly awaited with breath firmly baited on a daily basis by slobs like
yourself. My thoughts and utterances are so deeply and profoundly
important in your empty and shallow lives, actual wars have broken out over
the interpretations of my Google scriptures. Each word is more important
than the previous one..... no, check that, *as* important as the previous
one. Yeah, yeah, *as* important.
Remember that, flamenet-boy.
Nighthawk
LOL! You ought to consider taking up stand-up comedy.
> Remember that, flamenet-boy.
And you remember who your betters are, boy.
Avoid normal situations.
[..]
>> Then explain how you wound up in so many killfiles, Twatty.
> Belinda Burnore is the only person I know of. A while back she plonked me
> after I mildly flamed Gary exactly -once-. Which I find amusing since she
> appears to enjoy perpetuating the Burnore's contributions to their
> neverending war with half of Usenet. I went fairly easy on Gary and she
> flipped. Go figure.
There is only one thing worse than being talked about, and that is not being
talked about ((tm) Oscar Wilde).
subRoutine
<thunderin...@msn.com> wrote:
:
:"Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
:news:xb1_7.8157$zw3.9...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
:> "Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
:> news:a1a588$smj$0...@dosa.alt.net...
:> >
:> > "Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
:> > news:Es0_7.8015$zw3.9...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
:> > > "Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote in
:message
:> > > news:a18cnr$5o2$3...@og1.olagrande.net...
:> > > > In alt.flame Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> wrote:
:> > > >
:> > > > [..]
:> > > >
:> > > > *plonk*
:> > >
:> > > Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
:> >
:> > Real flamers don't get killfiled, boy.
:>
:> Then explain how you wound up in so many killfiles, Twatty.
:
:Belinda Burnore is the only person I know of.
Translation: "I don't have any friends. I'm such a loser."
: A while back she plonked me
Translation: "Even a loser like her rejected me."
:after I mildly flamed Gary exactly -once-.
Translation: "I cruised her boyfriend in the men's public toilet."
:Which I find amusing since
Translation: "It doesn't take much to amuse a moron like myself. Although I wish
the people at the group home wouldn't get so upset whenever I smear the walls
with my Christmas poo."
:she
:appears to enjoy perpetuating the Burnore's contributions to their
:neverending war with half of Usenet.
Translation: "I hate women. I prefer little boys."
:I went fairly easy on Gary and she
:flipped. Go figure.
Translation: "Gary enjoyed my handjobs. I even swallowed. Go figure."
:
:Other than her, Usenet gets all atwitter over my every musing. My genius
:is eagerly awaited with breath firmly baited on a daily basis by slobs like
:yourself. My thoughts and utterances are so deeply and profoundly
:important in your empty and shallow lives, actual wars have broken out over
:the interpretations of my Google scriptures. Each word is more important
:than the previous one..... no, check that, *as* important as the previous
:one. Yeah, yeah, *as* important.
:
Translation: "I'm not very original so here's something I plagiarised from
Palmjob."
:Remember that, flamenet-boy.
Translation: "Wanna come inside?"
--
---
subRoutine <www.softtargets.com> s^0.0^7ii...@softtargets.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
leg...@musashi.bushido.mil wrote:
<a1ahdb$t...@flatland.dimensional.com>
I told you all that sucking would pay off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Would you prefer a good ol' fashion mailbombing instead?
FJ wrote:
<a0o7ec$5k1$0...@pita.alt.net>
Seeing that both are an admission of not being able to hack it on alt.flame,
I'll take the one which will bother me the least.
FJ's hilarious attempt to hack a server using bug ridden security hole, WinXP:
Time of log entry - Dec. 31, 2001, 4:40am
Time of log entry - Dec. 31, 2001, 4:46am
Time of log entry - Dec. 31, 2001, 11:32pm
Time of log entry - Jan. 01, 2002, 12:08am
Time of log entry - Jan. 01, 2002, 1:46am
HTTP_CONNECTION = Keep-Alive
HTTP_HOST = www.softtargets.com
HTTP_COOKIE = amembernamecookie=FJ; apasswordcookie=auo2KuX;
HTTP_USER_AGENT = Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Q312461)
HTTP_WEFERER = MQZUIVOTQNQEMSFDULHPQQWOYIYZUNNYCGPKYLEJGDGVCJVTLBXFGGMEPY
REMOTE_ADDR = 213.10.89.63
REMOTE_HOST = ipd50a593f.speed.planet.nl
REQUEST_METHOD = POST
downgrade_1_0 = 1
force_response_1_0 = 1
nokeepalive = 1
ssl_unclean_shutdown = 1
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Steve Henderson
> >> Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
> >> Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it looked?
>
> Well?
That was covered, months ago. It's not my job to do your homework for you.
> >> > Dense as always, aren't you?
> >>
> >> This would work so much better if you could back it up with arguments.
> >> Alas, you're only a poor Flamenetter; unable to spot any actual
> >> mistakes, you must rely on vagaries.
> >
> > What need for argument? The article was only posted about four hours
after
> > 2001, therefore making it the announcement for that year.
>
> I was talking about your question "Dense as always, aren't you?" and
> your complete inability to back it up in any meaningful way - as
> further testified by the article I'm responding to now. But never mind
> that.
What need I back up? The information was there and you missed it. That's
all there is to it. You missed it.
> The awards referred to in the article as "last year's" were the 2000
> awards, which obviously weren't last year's awards at all. This is a
> pretty easy concept to understand. Even you should be able to wrap
> your soft head around it.
Yeah. The 2000 awards came out on New Year's Eve of 2000, dipshit. The
awards are not handed out -ahead- of time.
> > The 2002 awards, using your reasoning, should be posted, when......Jan
1,
> > 2004?
>
> You're awfully confused, I can tell. By my reasoning, in 2002 the
> phrase "last year's awards" should refer to the 2001 ones. Nothing
> more, nothing less.
The ones you are calling "2002" were for the year 2001, moron. They were
posted only four hours into the "new year" of 2002, but those awards were
for the 2001 calendar year.
I stand by my statement. You really -are- dense, aren't you?
Steve Henderson
You don't see. Ever. That's part of your problem.
> I think that's cute.
Lose the lisp, boy. You can't suck my dick.
John Kimball
<thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in Message id:
<a1ak6k$eli$0...@dosa.alt.net>:
ObBillPalmer: Yeah, but how many GEMS do you have?
John Kimball
>
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a14904$pen$1...@dosa.alt.net...
>> On Thu, 3 Jan 2002 20:34:17 -0600, "Steve Henderson"
>> <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in Message id:
>> <u3a55j5...@corp.supernews.com>:
>>
>> >
>> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:a11lrp$h1j$1...@pita.alt.net...
>> >
>> >> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you understand?
>> >>
>> >> (Rolls eyes)
>> >
>> >Because the obvious finally "hit", eh?
>>
>> Indeed, I realized just how incredibly fucking stupid you were. In
>> retrospect, I suppose it was obvious from the beginning.
>
>Yep. Pee Wee Herman all the way to the bone, you are.
I don't see an IKY up there Stheve.
>> >> For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that without
>> >> your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would have
>> >> understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim of
>> >> "Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
>> >> snot-encrusted nose plug.
>> >
>> >Sure you were.
>>
>> Good, we can agree on something: I am always right.
>>
>> >> Fuckhead.
>> >
>> >Nice sig.
>>
>> Don't be so obtuse, Pee-Wee.
>
>I don't have to be. You possess enough for a fucking platoon.
An abortive IKYABWAI, and right after I called you Pee-Wee.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
>> >> >> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took one
>> >> >> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
>> >> >
>> >> >ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
>> >
>> >What's the surprise when someone laughs at comedy, intended or not?
>>
>> Perhaps a LOL!!! and a :^0 would have been more apropos, rather than
>> rolling around on the floor? In any case it wasn't meant to be funny, it
>> was the truth. Don't you remember running from
>> <9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>?
>
>I haven't run from anything.
<9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>
Stop lying, Stheve.
>I have a life, a job, -and- a good woman in my
>life. I got busy.
Perhaps you might have a little time to write a book:
"Reasons I Am a Spankard" (tm) 2002 Steve Henderson/Moron Press.
>> >> C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the
>floor
>> >> with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame for
>> >> once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then at
>> >> least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me,
>now
>> >> that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age old
>> >> question you've been dodging for years:
>> >
>> >Flame you? Whatever for?
>>
>> Because this is alt.flame, you dense cunt. What the ever-loving fuck is
>> wrong with you, Thteve?
>
>Not a thing wrong with me that a little baiting
Where? I must have missed that one.
> and facetiousness won't cure.
Facetious: adj. intending or intended to be amusing, esp. inappropriately.
Are you sure that's what you meant to write, Stheve?
>> >According to you, you are "perfect" and can do no
>> >wrong,
>>
>> Absolutely, and you'll do well to remember that. Repeat it like a mantra,
>> if it helps you drill it into your undeniably thick skull.
>
>::snicker::
Mheh. Did it help?
>> > even when you do.
>>
>> But I don't. Ever.
>
>It's nice to be able to believe in something fanciful, isn't it?
Most people prefer reality. I can see why a flamenet spankard like
yourself might believe that though.
>> >Far be it from me to rain on your parade.
>>
>> Well, this is turning out to be a bit of a disappointment.
>
>With your life, I'm not particularly surprised.
Ho-hum. Perhaps that "busy life" is calling you, It would make a really
nifty excuse.
>> >> "Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste of
>> >> another man's semen is like?
>> >> Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
>> >> "Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
>> >> message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
>> >
>> >You still don't get it, do you?
>>
>> Oh, I get it alright. I just wanted to hear it from the horses mouth, as
>> they say.
>
>Just as I thought, you -can- describe it.
They're your words, Stheve. No matter how much you twist, squirm, and
attempt to foist off your own words on others, there's no denying it. You
claimed that some people have no desire to learn what the taste of semen
is like, then asked for someone to describe it. Therefore, you *do* have
the desire. The question remains however, whether your desire is
fulfilled?
Well... is it, or is your "research" still in progress, Dr. jizz?
>> >I don't know why I'm surprised.
>>
>> You don't know much of anything, however, I'm *not* surprised.
>
>Once more with the Pee Wee Herman response?
*sigh* Do you even know what an IKY is Stheve?
--
John Kimball
What part of "do yourself a favor" flew over your pointy head, you
diseased gum-flapping flamenet lint-ball?
KC8JBO
"Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
LOL!!!!!! Weeno didn't get with his Lambda butt-buddies to file
"discrimination" charges, then.
KC8JBO
"Twatt Campbell" <blunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:a1aip2$av0$0...@dosa.alt.net...
>
Twatty, you know all about being a pansy, huh, texASS twat.
KC8JBO
You've got an excuse for everything, Twatty.
KC8JBO
"Rhesus Butt Fucker: Usenet Assholelicker" <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>
>
>
> Scott Campbell wrote:
>
> > "Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
> > news:Es0_7.8015$zw3.9...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> >
> >>"Avoid normal situations." <by...@NOSPAM.olagrande.net> wrote in message
> >>news:a18cnr$5o2$3...@og1.olagrande.net...
> >>
> >>>In alt.flame Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>
> >>> *plonk*
> >>>
> >>Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
> >>
> >
> > Real flamers don't get killfiled, boy.
>
>
>
>
> Don't talk about real flamers, twat. It's embarrassing for you....
PKB, pissflap.
Scott Campbell
>
> "Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:a1aip2$av0$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> >
> > "Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in message
> > news:u3h6olj...@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > > "Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
> > > news:a1a588$smj$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> > >
> > > > > > [..]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *plonk*
> > > > >
> > > > > Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
> > > >
> > > > Real flamers don't get killfiled, boy.
> > >
> > > Real flamers get killfiled all the time by pansies that can't handle
it.
> >
> > Ah, I see. You seem to be under the illusion that your *plonk*ing had
> > something to do with Stain's inability to "handle" your scathing
> witticisms
> > and nothing to do with your dreadfully dull output.
>
> You don't see. Ever.
Well that certainly told me what for, Henderson. You flame like old people
fuck.
> That's part of your problem.
Hey look, you've managed to go a whole post without [bringing up] male
genitalia!
Congats.
> > I think that's cute.
>
> Lose the lisp, boy. You can't suck my dick.
Never mind.
KC8JBO
>
> "Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in message
> news:u3i8k2l...@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:a1aip2$av0$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> > >
> > > "Steve Henderson" <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in message
> > > news:u3h6olj...@corp.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > > "Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:a1a588$smj$0...@dosa.alt.net...
> > > >
> > > > > > > [..]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > *plonk*
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Real men don't use killfiles, pussy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Real flamers don't get killfiled, boy.
> > > >
> > > > Real flamers get killfiled all the time by pansies that can't handle
> it.
> > >
> > > Ah, I see. You seem to be under the illusion that your *plonk*ing
had
> > > something to do with Stain's inability to "handle" your scathing
> > witticisms
> > > and nothing to do with your dreadfully dull output.
> >
> > You don't see. Ever.
>
> Well that certainly told me what for, Henderson.
> You flame like old people fuck.
Twatty, you've overused this line over and over. And just how do YOU know
how old people fuck? Been getting instructions from old Mrs. Campbell, "the
best little whore in TexASS?"
> > That's part of your problem.
>
> Hey look, you've managed to go a whole post without [bringing up] male
> genitalia!
And Twatty just loves the taste of male genitalia..except the cream just
goes to his thighs.
> Congats.
"Congats?" What the fuck is "congats, you illiterate, pock-marked little
geek?
> > > I think that's cute.
> >
> > Lose the lisp, boy. You can't suck my dick.
>
> Never mind.
Doing Rosanna Danna Danna now, Twatty?
Nighthawk
Nah. I think he just moved to the NAMBLA Youth Hostel.
KC8JBO
"Nighthawk" <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> wrote in message
LOL!!!!! His former cellmate/lover Timothy McVeigh would roll over in his
grave if he had one. He specifically requested Weeno not be able to dig up
his body and continue their relationship.
03:15:38 GMT
> "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>> >
>> >> Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
>> >> Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it looked?
If you don't want to talk about it, you don't want to talk about it.
I can't blame you if you find the topic embarrassing. In future, ask
yourself this question before picking a net.name: Would a 17 year old
heavy metal fan from the 'burbs find the name cool? Think about the
reaction such a person would have to the many embarrasingly bad
handles found right there in alt.flamenet: "Sinister Minister? Rad!"
"Jesus Slut Fucker? Kewl!" "Nighthawk? Bitching!"
> What need I back up? The information was there and you missed it. That's
> all there is to it. You missed it.
I see this is going to be another one of those 'spade/spayed' debates.
I can't imagine why you doltish dribblers don't just admit to your
mistakes. It'd hurt a lot less that way.
>> The awards referred to in the article as "last year's" were the 2000
>> awards, which obviously weren't last year's awards at all. This is a
>> pretty easy concept to understand. Even you should be able to wrap
>> your soft head around it.
>
> Yeah. The 2000 awards came out on New Year's Eve of 2000, dipshit. The
> awards are not handed out -ahead- of time.
They were the awards for 2000. Thus, in 2001 they were last year's
awards, but ceased to be so in 2002.
>> You're awfully confused, I can tell. By my reasoning, in 2002 the
>> phrase "last year's awards" should refer to the 2001 ones. Nothing
>> more, nothing less.
>
> The ones you are calling "2002" were for the year 2001, moron.
I haven't called any awards "2002". At least pretend you've been
reading the thread.
> They were posted only four hours into the "new year" of 2002, but
> those awards were for the 2001 calendar year.
In article <u335u0m...@corp.supernews.com>, wamprat
<aoy...@hotmail.com> wrote:
| To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last years awards looked
| like: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
| Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
^^^^
^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^
^^^^
^^^^
Shteve, it's understandable that you made a mistake. After all, you
are a Flamenetter. But how do you manage to repeat the same simple
mistake in one article after another, while you're repeatedly whacked
with the clue bat?
> I stand by my statement. You really -are- dense, aren't you?
That you compound your mistake by calling me dense just takes the
biscuit. If you weren't a Flamenetter, I'd think someone was putting
me on. The level of retardation you've displayed should render you
incapable of operating a computer.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
news:slrna3o9m...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
> >> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
> >> > "Ari Asikainen" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
> >> >
> >> >> Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
> >> >> Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it
looked?
>
> > That was covered, months ago. It's not my job to do your homework for
you.
>
> If you don't want to talk about it, you don't want to talk about it.
> I can't blame you if you find the topic embarrassing. In future, ask
> yourself this question before picking a net.name: Would a 17 year old
> heavy metal fan from the 'burbs find the name cool? Think about the
> reaction such a person would have to the many embarrasingly bad
> handles found right there in alt.flamenet: "Sinister Minister? Rad!"
> "Jesus Slut Fucker? Kewl!" "Nighthawk? Bitching!"
You mean something as catchy as "03:15:38 GMT"? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Listen retard, I'm going to tell you this one more time in a (probably
wasted) effort to drill the truth into your Mongoloid shaped head. We
are not Flamenetters. We are fidonetters. Crack Munster and his crew are
flamenetters. We ran them out of their own newsgroup and made a jokes
out of them.
I understand your frustration in any matters that require thinking or
deductive reasoning. I mean holy shit, you can't even get a spelling
flame right, you silly little man. However, wasn't one of your new year
resolutions admitting when you are wrong and a total fucking jerk? This
is one of those times, Ari.
-Jesus
--
Jesus Slut Fucker: Son of Gawd, Mary's Pimp
I was born, long ago. I am the chosen one.
Asshole of the Year 1987, 1989, 1999 (contested)
God Emperor: AssholeNet
Has Been of the Year 1995, 1997, 1999
Voted Flamer one would least like to share a prison cell with: 2000
Fuck up of the Year 2000
Fuck up of the Century for 20th Century
crm 1x3,
mhm 1x1,
The siLiCON voRtEX:
http://members.home.net/pparis7/Jesus/
http://members.home.net/pparis7/Mr.Taliban.swf
Do as thousands of Gay men have already done and view Woger's
home page, Woger's page contains contact numbers, you can sign
his guest book, send him e-mail or just look at his loser ass:
Or:
Flaagg
Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com> <Jesus Slut Fucker:
Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>> says...
>
> Listen retard, I'm going to tell you this one more time in a (probably
> wasted) effort to drill the truth into your Mongoloid shaped head. We
> are not Flamenetters.
I wouldn't admit it if I were a flamenetter either, Flamenetter.
--
Aaron M. Henne -flaagg mhm9x2-
PLANET F WEBSITE: http://home.attbi.com/~flaagg/
I get stupefied.
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
Flaagg
Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>> says...
> Flaagg wrote:
>
> > In article <3C3C4DD3...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>, Jesus Slut Fucker:
> > Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com> <Jesus Slut Fucker:
> > Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>> says...
> >
> >
> >>Listen retard, I'm going to tell you this one more time in a (probably
> >>wasted) effort to drill the truth into your Mongoloid shaped head. We
> >>are not Flamenetters.
> >>
> >
> > I wouldn't admit it if I were a flamenetter either, Flamenetter.
>
>
> The irony, the irony............... ah the irony.
You don't know what the word "irony" actually *means*, do you,
Flamenetter?
> STFU Pooper boy, before I'm forced to have Woger spank you.
If I tried posting the massive list of reasons why -that- just isn't
going to happen, Eugene, every box on the 'net would choke to death. YOU
couldn't "spank" me (or anyone else, ftm), try as you might...what makes
you think your clone could do it *for* you?
--
NIGHT OF THE UNDEAD JESUS SLUT FUCKERS:
http://home.attbi.com/~flaagg/images/gallery/udjsf.jpg
"I like looking a men's cocks even more than I like living with
Mommie and picking up doggie poo!"
- Planet F Webboard Message
Sender IP: 24.179.113.44 ("Jesus Slut Fucker", alt.flamenet)
"A few months ago I entered chat as a "Cyberslut", supposedly a 15 year
old girl."
- "Jesus Slut Fucker" trolls for a little teen boy-love
article <3BEE73DA...@home.com>
"Hi girl's! I like dressing in my mommies underwear!"
- Planet F Webboard Message
Sender IP: 24.179.113.44 ("Jesus Slut Fucker", alt.flamenet)
"You sure are cute, boyo."
- ICQ WWPager Message To: flaagg
Subject: Your ass my dick
Sender IP: 24.179.113.44 ("Jesus Slut Fucker", alt.flamenet)
"Please note: Your message is stamped with your IP address and the time
of sending."
- The ICQ WWPager small print "Jesus Slut Fucker" forgot to read
"? Close but no cigar."
- "Jesus Slut Fucker" claims 24.179.113.44 is NOT his IP in email
sent from IP 24.179.113.44
KC8JBO
"Rhesus Butt Fucker: Usenet Assholelicker"
news:3C3C520D...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com...
>
>
> Flaagg wrote:
>
> > In article <3C3C4DD3...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>, Jesus Slut Fucker:
> > Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com> <Jesus Slut Fucker:
> > Usenet Adminstrator <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>> says...
> >
> >
> >>Listen retard, I'm going to tell you this one more time in a (probably
> >>wasted) effort to drill the truth into your Mongoloid shaped head. We
> >>are not Flamenetters.
> >>
> >
> > I wouldn't admit it if I were a flamenetter either, Flamenetter.
>
>
> The irony, the irony............... ah the irony.
>
>
> STFU Pooper boy, before I'm forced to have Woger spank you.
Geno's always been the submissive one..just ask his ex-wife, she'll tell you
all kinds of stories about cocksucking Geno Paris. How finding Geno in the
throes of bliss fucking some little boy in the ass but Geno's mother
subsequently had a heart condition from being there. Geno's sodomy is what
caused her death.
So can his Parole Officer. Pussy Paris has tried to distance himself from
his past by attempting to misspell his name, but according to the l.e.
sources, it's the same person as in the court records.
"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
carpet..."
Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID:
<3A016FD9...@home.com>
Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
AKA "Pascal" Eugene Paris's real life fuckups at:
http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
Parole Officer:
Chris Hudson
d6@office@doc.state.ok.us
(405)681-4663
--
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
State of Oklahoma
v.
PARIS PASKELL EUGENE No. CF-1993-7215
(Criminal Felony)
Filed: 11/30/1993
Closed: 05/23/1994
Judge: Elliott, Ray C.
Parties
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
PARIS, PASKELL EUGENE, Defendant
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Plaintiff
Attorneys
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Attorney Represented Parties
Due Dates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Docket Code Original Due Date Current Due Date Description
Events
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Event Party Docket Reporter
Wednesday, December 15, 1993 at 9:00 AM
PRELIMINARY HEARING (PLH ) Clinton D. Dennis
Friday, January 28, 1994 at 9:00 AM
PRE-TRIAL HEARING Ray C. Elliott
Counts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Parties appear only under the counts with which they were charged. For
complete sentence information, see the court minute on the docket.
Count # 1.
Count as filed: CT. 1 FORGERY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, in violation of 21 O.S.
1577 Date of Offense: 11/18/1993
Defendant
Disposition Information
PARIS, PASKELL EUGENE Disposed: CONVICTION , 05/23/1994. Guilty Plea.
Disposed Count Code:CTFG
Disposed Statute:21 O.S. 1577
Count as disposed:CT. 1 FORGERY IN THE SECOND DEGREE
Count # 2.
Count as filed: CT. 2 POSSESSION OF A TAKEN CREDIT CARD, in violation of 21
O.S. 1550.22 (C) Date of Offense: 11/18/1993
Defendant
Disposition Information
PARIS, PASKELL EUGENE Disposed: CONVICTION , 05/23/1994. Guilty Plea.
Disposed Count Code:CCV
Disposed Statute:21 O.S. 1550.22 (C)
Count as disposed:CT. 2 POSSESSION OF A TAKEN CREDIT CARD
Count # 3.
Count as filed: CT. 3 POSSESSION OF A STATE LICENSE BEARING PHOTO OF
ANOTHER, in violation of 47 O.S. 6-301 (2) D Date of Offense: 11/18/1993
Defendant
Disposition Information
PARIS, PASKELL EUGENE Disposed: CONVICTION , 05/23/1994. Guilty Plea.
Disposed Count Code:MR1
Disposed Statute:47 O.S. 6-301 (2) D
Count as disposed:CT. 3 POSSESSION OF A STATE LICENSE BEARING PHOTO OF
ANOTHER
Steve Henderson
> >> >> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you
understand?
> >> >>
> >> >> (Rolls eyes)
> >> >
> >> >Because the obvious finally "hit", eh?
> >>
> >> Indeed, I realized just how incredibly fucking stupid you were. In
> >> retrospect, I suppose it was obvious from the beginning.
> >
> >Yep. Pee Wee Herman all the way to the bone, you are.
>
> I don't see an IKY up there Stheve.
Different words, same intent. That makes it a PWH(tm) response.
> >> >> For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that
without
> >> >> your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would
have
> >> >> understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim
of
> >> >> "Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
> >> >> snot-encrusted nose plug.
> >> >
> >> >Sure you were.
> >>
> >> Good, we can agree on something: I am always right.
> >>
> >> >> Fuckhead.
> >> >
> >> >Nice sig.
> >>
> >> Don't be so obtuse, Pee-Wee.
> >
> >I don't have to be. You possess enough for a fucking platoon.
>
> An abortive IKYABWAI, and right after I called you Pee-Wee.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Sure, moron. That's, yet another, PWH(tm) response on your part.
> >> >> >> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took
one
> >> >> >> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
> >> >
> >> >What's the surprise when someone laughs at comedy, intended or not?
> >>
> >> Perhaps a LOL!!! and a :^0 would have been more apropos, rather than
> >> rolling around on the floor? In any case it wasn't meant to be funny,
it
> >> was the truth. Don't you remember running from
> >> <9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>?
> >
> >I haven't run from anything.
>
> <9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>
>
> Stop lying, Stheve.
>
> >I have a life, a job, -and- a good woman in my
> >life. I got busy.
>
> Perhaps you might have a little time to write a book:
>
> "Reasons I Am a Spankard" (tm) 2002 Steve Henderson/Moron Press.
I have no time to write a book and no reasons for that one.
> >> >> C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the
> >floor
> >> >> with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame
for
> >> >> once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then
at
> >> >> least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me,
> >now
> >> >> that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age
old
> >> >> question you've been dodging for years:
> >> >
> >> >Flame you? Whatever for?
> >>
> >> Because this is alt.flame, you dense cunt. What the ever-loving fuck is
> >> wrong with you, Thteve?
> >
> >Not a thing wrong with me that a little baiting
>
> Where? I must have missed that one.
You miss a lot, it's nice to see that you admit it.
> > and facetiousness won't cure.
>
> Facetious: adj. intending or intended to be amusing, esp. inappropriately.
> Are you sure that's what you meant to write, Stheve?
>
> >> >According to you, you are "perfect" and can do no
> >> >wrong,
> >>
> >> Absolutely, and you'll do well to remember that. Repeat it like a
mantra,
> >> if it helps you drill it into your undeniably thick skull.
> >
> >::snicker::
>
> Mheh. Did it help?
I don't do mantras and I don't contemplate my navel. You may do so whenever
you get the urge, however.
> >> > even when you do.
> >>
> >> But I don't. Ever.
> >
> >It's nice to be able to believe in something fanciful, isn't it?
>
> Most people prefer reality. I can see why a flamenet spankard like
> yourself might believe that though.
Still clueless as usual, aren't you? FYI, that's PWH(tm) 3, now, dumbass.
> >> >Far be it from me to rain on your parade.
> >>
> >> Well, this is turning out to be a bit of a disappointment.
> >
> >With your life, I'm not particularly surprised.
>
> Ho-hum. Perhaps that "busy life" is calling you, It would make a really
> nifty excuse.
I don't make excuses. I proffer reasons. You, apparently, have neither.
> >> >> "Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste
of
> >> >> another man's semen is like?
> >> >> Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
> >> >> "Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
> >> >> message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
> >> >
> >> >You still don't get it, do you?
> >>
> >> Oh, I get it alright. I just wanted to hear it from the horses mouth,
as
> >> they say.
> >
> >Just as I thought, you -can- describe it.
>
> They're your words, Stheve. No matter how much you twist, squirm, and
> attempt to foist off your own words on others, there's no denying it. You
> claimed that some people have no desire to learn what the taste of semen
> is like, then asked for someone to describe it. Therefore, you *do* have
> the desire. The question remains however, whether your desire is
> fulfilled?
>
> Well... is it, or is your "research" still in progress, Dr. jizz?
You still don't get it. I'm still not surprised.
> >> >I don't know why I'm surprised.
> >>
> >> You don't know much of anything, however, I'm *not* surprised.
> >
> >Once more with the Pee Wee Herman response?
>
> *sigh* Do you even know what an IKY is Stheve?
Yep.
Steve Henderson
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 09:53:20 -0600, "Steve Henderson"
> <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in Message id:
> <u3gso3m...@corp.supernews.com>:
>
> >
> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:a14905$pen$2...@dosa.alt.net...
> >
> >> >Dense as always, aren't you?
> >>
> >> Thteve, do yourself a favor:
> >>
> >> Start, settings, control panel, add/remove programs, select Outlook
> >> Express, and click on remove. It's for the best. Really.
> >
> >Getting tired of getting spanked, are you?
>
> What part of "do yourself a favor" flew over your pointy head, you
> diseased gum-flapping flamenet lint-ball?
What part of "I (this is your part) can't handle you (this is mine), so when
you got busy and didn't have time, I claimed spank" can't YOU understand?
This is -your- tack, nitwit.
The only way you can work that around to where -you- are the "good guy" is
to post-edit my statement, but then, "sub-standard" and "under par" are just
about your speed.
Steve Henderson
> > You don't see. Ever.
>
> Well that certainly told me what for, Henderson. You flame like old
people
> fuck.
That puts the old people one piece ahead of you, doesn't it?
> > That's part of your problem.
>
> Hey look, you've managed to go a whole post without [bringing up] male
> genitalia!
>
> Congats.
>
> > > I think that's cute.
> >
> > Lose the lisp, boy. You can't suck my dick.
>
> Never mind.
Good. It was useless effort on your part, anyway.
Steve Henderson
"03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:slrna3o9m...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
> >> >> Hey Shteve, how come you don't call yourself "The Shinishter
> >> >> Minishter" anymore? Did you finally realize just how silly it
looked?
>
> > That was covered, months ago. It's not my job to do your homework for
you.
>
> If you don't want to talk about it, you don't want to talk about it.
> I can't blame you if you find the topic embarrassing. In future, ask
> yourself this question before picking a net.name: Would a 17 year old
> heavy metal fan from the 'burbs find the name cool? Think about the
> reaction such a person would have to the many embarrasingly bad
> handles found right there in alt.flamenet: "Sinister Minister? Rad!"
> "Jesus Slut Fucker? Kewl!" "Nighthawk? Bitching!"
>
> > What need I back up? The information was there and you missed it.
That's
> > all there is to it. You missed it.
>
> I see this is going to be another one of those 'spade/spayed' debates.
> I can't imagine why you doltish dribblers don't just admit to your
> mistakes. It'd hurt a lot less that way.
I made no mistake. I used a nickname I liked. What's with yours? Doing
"time"? Do you wear your pants half off your ass to denote your stay in the
Big House? Go away, loser.
> >> The awards referred to in the article as "last year's" were the 2000
> >> awards, which obviously weren't last year's awards at all. This is a
> >> pretty easy concept to understand. Even you should be able to wrap
> >> your soft head around it.
> >
> > Yeah. The 2000 awards came out on New Year's Eve of 2000, dipshit. The
> > awards are not handed out -ahead- of time.
>
> They were the awards for 2000. Thus, in 2001 they were last year's
> awards, but ceased to be so in 2002.
Ah, but that's where you lost it. The awards winners in 2001 carry those
awards for the next calendar year. In this case, dimwit, 2002 IS the
following calendar year. Those were a reposting from the previous year done
as a reminder. Such is stated in the very first line of the message. Too
bad you have yet to figure out how to read for comprehension.
> >> You're awfully confused, I can tell. By my reasoning, in 2002 the
> >> phrase "last year's awards" should refer to the 2001 ones. Nothing
> >> more, nothing less.
> >
> > The ones you are calling "2002" were for the year 2001, moron.
>
> I haven't called any awards "2002". At least pretend you've been
> reading the thread.
I have been. You haven't been reading for comprehension.
> > They were posted only four hours into the "new year" of 2002, but
> > those awards were for the 2001 calendar year.
>
> In article <u335u0m...@corp.supernews.com>, wamprat
> <aoy...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> | To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last years awards looked
> | like: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> |
> | Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
> ^^^^
> ^^^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ^^^^
> ^^^^
> ^^^^
>
> Shteve, it's understandable that you made a mistake. After all, you
> are a Flamenetter. But how do you manage to repeat the same simple
> mistake in one article after another, while you're repeatedly whacked
> with the clue bat?
Exactly, dumbass. The 2000 awards were -last year's- awards. They were
posted initially on the final day of 2000. That post was -reposted- as a
reminder for previous year for the 2001 awards. Goddamn, moron. What's the
fucking difficulty, here?
> > I stand by my statement. You really -are- dense, aren't you?
>
> That you compound your mistake by calling me dense just takes the
> biscuit. If you weren't a Flamenetter, I'd think someone was putting
> me on. The level of retardation you've displayed should render you
> incapable of operating a computer.
You can't count on your scab-picking, nose-digging,
encrusted-shit-under-the-nails fingers.
Come back in a century or three when you've figured out what the fuck you
are talking about. It'll take that long, at least.
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> In future, ask yourself this question before picking a net.name:
>> Would a 17 year old heavy metal fan from the 'burbs find the name
>> cool? Think about the reaction such a person would have to the
>> many embarrasingly bad handles found right there in alt.flamenet:
>> "Sinister Minister? Rad!" "Jesus Slut Fucker? Kewl!" "Nighthawk?
>> Bitching!"
>
> You mean something as catchy as "03:15:38 GMT"? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
The deftness and guile with which you turned my "Your net.name is
stupid" comment to "No, _your_ net.name is stupid" and managed to
escape any accusations of an IKYABWAI reminds me of two very, very
inebriated sumo wrestlers duking it out in a China shop.
Besides, "catchy"? Gregster, we're not talking about advertizing
jingles here.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
03:15:38 GMT
> 03:15:38 GMT wrote:
>> Shteve, it's understandable that you made a mistake. After all, you
>> are a Flamenetter.
>
> Listen retard, I'm going to tell you this one more time in a (probably
> wasted) effort to drill the truth into your Mongoloid shaped head. We
> are not Flamenetters. We are fidonetters. Crack Munster and his crew are
> flamenetters.
"Flamenetter" is a term for an alt.flamenet regular, Flamenetter.
You're not members of Flamenet, Mack's 'cartel', but that's hardly
relevant.
> We ran them out of their own newsgroup and made a jokes
> out of them.
"They" - "them" being Monsta Mack - were spanked when you arrived
tarred and feathered, on a rail from Fidonet. Not only that, but
"they" already were a joke. Much like you guys.
> I understand your frustration in any matters that require thinking or
> deductive reasoning. I mean holy shit, you can't even get a spelling
> flame right, you silly little man.
When did I ever get a spelling flame wrong? I remember you messing it
up at least once - what was the phrase I used, again? - but me doing
the same? Not very likely.
> However, wasn't one of your new year resolutions admitting when you
> are wrong and a total fucking jerk? This is one of those times, Ari.
No, it wasn't, and no, it isn't.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
John Kimball
>
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a1c6f1$3d5$1...@dosa.alt.net...
>> On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 09:53:20 -0600, "Steve Henderson"
>> <etao...@keytech.com> wrote in Message id:
>> <u3gso3m...@corp.supernews.com>:
>>
>> >
>> >"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:a14905$pen$2...@dosa.alt.net...
OK, lets go over this step by step in an attempt to allow this to embed
itself in your walnut sized brain. I'll restore what Ari posted to put
this into context, perhaps then you might understand (I'll not be holding
my breath, however.)
Ari Wrote:
"The part where "last year" in an article posted in 2002 refers to 2000
is a bit strange, but that particular piece of idiocy is more than
adequately explained by the assumption that the poster is a
Flamenetter. The funny part, on the other hand, is the idiocy
displayed by calling awards voted on by the laughingstock that was
alt.flamenet 2000 "Usenet's most coveted achievements."
The part where "last year" in an article posted in 2002 refers to 2000
is a bit strange, but that particular piece of idiocy is more than
adequately explained by the assumption that the poster is a
Flamenetter. The funny part, on the other hand, is the idiocy
displayed by calling awards voted on by the laughingstock that was
alt.flamenet 2000 "Usenet's most coveted achievements."
Your original reply to Ari:
>> >> >Dense as always, aren't you?
Now, the suckage factor of this (f)lame would, in all likelihood, put the
quarterly vacuum cleaner output of Electrolux(tm) to shame.
I then, (oh so graciously) gave you some excellent computer advice FOR
FREE, (sorry to yell, but I feel it's truly necessary in this instance)
because of said suckage:
>> >> Thteve, do yourself a favor:
>> >>
>> >> Start, settings, control panel, add/remove programs, select Outlook
>> >> Express, and click on remove. It's for the best. Really.
Here we have the predictable flamenetters response, which of course, falls
as flat as road-kill on I95, after a week in the summer sun in the center
lane:
>> >Getting tired of getting spanked, are you?
Here you are implying that you've spanked *me* in the past. This statement
is beyond ridiculous; you haven't managed to spank anyone at all around
these parts, let alone *me*, you circle-jerk pivot boy.
>> What part of "do yourself a favor" flew over your pointy head, you
>> diseased gum-flapping flamenet lint-ball?
Lastly, we have the "dodge the issue" part of the typical flamenetters
response:
>What part of "I (this is your part) can't handle you (this is mine), so when
>you got busy and didn't have time, I claimed spank" can't YOU understand?
Now, what does this have to do with how much you suck, Sthevie?
The spank issue is being dealt with in another sub-thread, you wit-less
mental midget.
[drool removed.]
John Kimball
>
>"John Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a1c6ev$3d5$0...@dosa.alt.net...
>
>> >> >> >Goddamn, dumbass. What part of "last year's" didn't you
>understand?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> (Rolls eyes)
>> >> >
>> >> >Because the obvious finally "hit", eh?
>> >>
>> >> Indeed, I realized just how incredibly fucking stupid you were. In
>> >> retrospect, I suppose it was obvious from the beginning.
>> >
>> >Yep. Pee Wee Herman all the way to the bone, you are.
>>
>> I don't see an IKY up there Stheve.
>
>Different words, same intent. That makes it a PWH(tm) response.
"Because the obvious finally hit" != How incredibly stupid you are.
Fuckhead.
>
>> >> >> For fuck's sake, Sthevie, I never would have figured out that
>without
>> >> >> your help. Of course if you weren't a virtual net-dildo you would
>have
>> >> >> understood that I was making fun of the laughably toothe-less claim
>of
>> >> >> "Usenet's most coveted achievements" and not the date, you hapless
>> >> >> snot-encrusted nose plug.
>> >> >
>> >> >Sure you were.
>> >>
>> >> Good, we can agree on something: I am always right.
>> >>
>> >> >> Fuckhead.
>> >> >
>> >> >Nice sig.
>> >>
>> >> Don't be so obtuse, Pee-Wee.
>> >
>> >I don't have to be. You possess enough for a fucking platoon.
>>
>> An abortive IKYABWAI, and right after I called you Pee-Wee.
>>
>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
>
>Sure, moron. That's, yet another, PWH(tm) response on your part.
You incompetent flamenet ball-sack. I called you a fuckhead, and you
droolingly respond with "Nice sig."
That's the original IKYABWAI, you bumbling quarter-wit.
I responded with "Don't be so obtuse, Pee-Wee." Pointing out said IKY.
You respond *yet again* with another IKY: "I don't have to be. You
possess enough for a fucking platoon."
For fucks sake, it's right up there for anyone to see, you sniveling
useless flamenetter.
>> >> >> >> Pfft. I sent him into spankdom a month or two ago. It only took
>one
>> >> >> >> post, what a worthless little shit-stain he is.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >ROFL! <----< typical lamenet response.
>> >> >
>> >> >What's the surprise when someone laughs at comedy, intended or not?
>> >>
>> >> Perhaps a LOL!!! and a :^0 would have been more apropos, rather than
>> >> rolling around on the floor? In any case it wasn't meant to be funny,
>it
>> >> was the truth. Don't you remember running from
>> >> <9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>?
>> >
>> >I haven't run from anything.
>>
>> <9ug3qf$8uv$6...@dosa.alt.net>
>>
>> Stop lying, Stheve.
>>
>> >I have a life, a job, -and- a good woman in my
>> >life. I got busy.
>>
>> Perhaps you might have a little time to write a book:
>>
>> "Reasons I Am a Spankard" (tm) 2002 Steve Henderson/Moron Press.
>
>I have no time to write a book
Ahh, the pressing life issues, eh?
*snicker*
> and no reasons for that one.
Can't see the forest for the trees.
>> >> >> C'mon Stheve, you can do better than that, stop rolling around the
>> >floor
>> >> >> with the crotch-fruit and the household pet(s), and give me a flame
>for
>> >> >> once in your miserable usenet life. If you can't manage that, then
>at
>> >> >> least say something worth laughing at (see below). Which reminds me,
>> >now
>> >> >> that you're back from spankdom, perhaps you could answer that age
>old
>> >> >> question you've been dodging for years:
>> >> >
>> >> >Flame you? Whatever for?
>> >>
>> >> Because this is alt.flame, you dense cunt. What the ever-loving fuck is
>> >> wrong with you, Thteve?
>> >
>> >Not a thing wrong with me that a little baiting
>>
>> Where? I must have missed that one.
>
>You miss a lot, it's nice to see that you admit it.
It only happened in your delusional mind, Stheve.
>> > and facetiousness won't cure.
>>
>> Facetious: adj. intending or intended to be amusing, esp. inappropriately.
>> Are you sure that's what you meant to write, Stheve?
>>
>> >> >According to you, you are "perfect" and can do no
>> >> >wrong,
>> >>
>> >> Absolutely, and you'll do well to remember that. Repeat it like a
>mantra,
>> >> if it helps you drill it into your undeniably thick skull.
>> >
>> >::snicker::
>>
>> Mheh. Did it help?
>
>I don't do mantras and I don't contemplate my navel. You may do so whenever
>you get the urge, however.
*farts*
>> >> > even when you do.
>> >>
>> >> But I don't. Ever.
>> >
>> >It's nice to be able to believe in something fanciful, isn't it?
>>
>> Most people prefer reality. I can see why a flamenet spankard like
>> yourself might believe that though.
>
>Still clueless as usual, aren't you? FYI, that's PWH(tm) 3, now, dumbass.
All I see is an opinion, and then I agreed with you, Sthevie.
>> >> >Far be it from me to rain on your parade.
>> >>
>> >> Well, this is turning out to be a bit of a disappointment.
>> >
>> >With your life, I'm not particularly surprised.
>>
>> Ho-hum. Perhaps that "busy life" is calling you, It would make a really
>> nifty excuse.
>
>I don't make excuses. I proffer reasons. You, apparently, have neither.
So when were you planning on making your escape?
>> >> >> "Could it be that some of us have no desire to learn what the taste
>of
>> >> >> another man's semen is like?
>> >> >> Please, describe the flavor in terms that we can understand."
>> >> >> "Steve "I'm not gay, honest!" Henderson" <etao...@geotec.net> in
>> >> >> message ID <88uh9...@enews3.newsguy.com>
>> >> >
>> >> >You still don't get it, do you?
>> >>
>> >> Oh, I get it alright. I just wanted to hear it from the horses mouth,
>as
>> >> they say.
>> >
>> >Just as I thought, you -can- describe it.
>>
>> They're your words, Stheve. No matter how much you twist, squirm, and
>> attempt to foist off your own words on others, there's no denying it. You
>> claimed that some people have no desire to learn what the taste of semen
>> is like, then asked for someone to describe it. Therefore, you *do* have
>> the desire. The question remains however, whether your desire is
>> fulfilled?
>>
>> Well... is it, or is your "research" still in progress, Dr. jizz?
>
>You still don't get it. I'm still not surprised.
All I can see is your continual dodge on the issue.
>> >> >I don't know why I'm surprised.
>> >>
>> >> You don't know much of anything, however, I'm *not* surprised.
>> >
>> >Once more with the Pee Wee Herman response?
>>
>> *sigh* Do you even know what an IKY is Stheve?
>
>Yep.
Then try not to claim them, when they don't exist.
Fuckhead.
--
John Kimball
[...]
>I made no mistake. I used a nickname I liked. What's with yours? Doing
>"time"? Do you wear your pants half off your ass to denote your stay in the
>Big House? Go away, loser.
Translation: "Weave me awone, you big meany!"
>Ah, but that's where you lost it. The awards winners in 2001 carry those
>awards for the next calendar year.
Translation: "We meant to do that!"
Nighthawk
news:slrna3qs9...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
Just admit that you fucked up and be done with it, Ari.
03:15:38 GMT
[...] (Shteve calls himself "The Sinister Minister", is laughed at,
changes back to his current name, and refuses to discuss the
subject.)
>> > What need I back up? The information was there and you missed it.
>> > That's all there is to it. You missed it.
>>
>> I see this is going to be another one of those 'spade/spayed' debates.
>> I can't imagine why you doltish dribblers don't just admit to your
>> mistakes. It'd hurt a lot less that way.
>
> I made no mistake.
Of course you did. You said that "wamprat" made no mistake - a clear
mistake if there ever was one. Now, for some headfuck of a reason,
you insist on repeating the same mistake in one article after another.
> I used a nickname I liked.
How did the topic suddenly change from the "last year's" debate to
nicknames? At least _try_ to give the impression you know what's
going in this thread. It was bad enough when Eveningsparrow claimed
he wasn't reading the articles he was responding to after making some
particularly horrid mistakes, and subsequently became too busy to post
for a better part of a month. Don't go the same route - or if you do,
stay away.
> What's with yours? Doing "time"?
I got sentenced for three hours, fifteen minutes and 38 seconds for
excessive cruelty towards helpless Flamenetters, but the Man can't
keep me down.
> Do you wear your pants half off your ass to denote your stay in the
> Big House? Go away, loser.
Are you freebasing or something, homeboy? Your powers of deductive
reasoning, never anything resembling adequate in the first place, seem
to have gotten suddenly much, much worse. Greenwich Median Time and
the American prison system are two concepts that really shouldn't
remind you of each other.
>> They were the awards for 2000. Thus, in 2001 they were last year's
>> awards, but ceased to be so in 2002.
>
> Ah, but that's where you lost it. The awards winners in 2001 carry those
> awards for the next calendar year.
Who gives a flying fuck about how long they'll carry their
not-so-precious awards? The fact remains, that in 2002 "last year's
awards" refers to the awards for 2001, and 'wamprat' - yet another in
a long line of inferior alt.flamenet names - was talking about 2000.
> In this case, dimwit, 2002 IS the following calendar year.
2002 comes after 2001? Who could have known?
> Those were a reposting from the previous year done
> as a reminder. Such is stated in the very first line of the message. Too
> bad you have yet to figure out how to read for comprehension.
Stop molesting the poor strawman, Shteve. What did it ever do to you?
>> > The ones you are calling "2002" were for the year 2001, moron.
>>
>> I haven't called any awards "2002". At least pretend you've been
>> reading the thread.
>
> I have been.
So what was the bullshit about me calling some awards "2002" above?
Sudden hallucinations that went away as quickly as they came? Evil
spirits taking over your keyboard to revenge the streams of garbage
that pour out of it to the net.sewer known as alt.flamenet when you're
in control?
> You haven't been reading for comprehension.
[Imagine that 'PKB' ASCII here. I can't be bothered to copy'n'paste.]
>> Shteve, it's understandable that you made a mistake. After all, you
>> are a Flamenetter. But how do you manage to repeat the same simple
>> mistake in one article after another, while you're repeatedly whacked
>> with the clue bat?
>
> Exactly, dumbass. The 2000 awards were -last year's- awards.
No, they manifestly weren't. In those awards, you dish out various
awards that end in the words "of the Year". Which year do you think
that refers to? The one that has just ended, or the one that's just
beginning?
Even the guy running the awards doesn't agree with you. In his .sig,
Eveningsparrow advertises the deeply abashing fact that he's the
"alt.flamenet Fuckhead of the Year - 1999". If your tenuous
explanations are to be believed, he must have been elected for his
'achievements' in 1998. That's not the case, is it?
> They were posted initially on the final day of 2000. That post was
> -reposted- as a reminder for previous year for the 2001 awards.
You have the curious habit of announcing obvious stuff like it was
news. I think it stems from the years you've spent with the other
alt.flamenet dimwits.
> Goddamn, moron. What's the fucking difficulty, here?
Trying to get you to understand the remarkably simple concept that
awards are named for the year in which the winners produced whatever
it is that gave them the awards instead of the year after the awards.
>> That you compound your mistake by calling me dense just takes the
>> biscuit. If you weren't a Flamenetter, I'd think someone was putting
>> me on. The level of retardation you've displayed should render you
>> incapable of operating a computer.
>
> You can't count on your scab-picking, nose-digging,
> encrusted-shit-under-the-nails fingers.
Untrue. My fingers are very dependable.
> Come back in a century or three when you've figured out what the fuck you
> are talking about. It'll take that long, at least.
If you want me to leave you alone, you'll have to ask politely. The
wording "Please, Ari, won't you leave me alone?" will do nicely.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> The deftness and guile with which you turned my "Your net.name is
>> stupid" comment to "No, _your_ net.name is stupid" and managed to
>> escape any accusations of an IKYABWAI reminds me of two very, very
>> inebriated sumo wrestlers duking it out in a China shop.
>>
>> Besides, "catchy"? Gregster, we're not talking about advertizing
>> jingles here.
>
> Just admit that you fucked up and be done with it, Ari.
If I ever did fuck up, I bet none of you dunces would spot it.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
John Kimball
<as...@mailandnews.com> wrote in Message id:
<slrna3o9m...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de>:
>Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
[...]
>> I stand by my statement. You really -are- dense, aren't you?
>
>That you compound your mistake by calling me dense just takes the
>biscuit. If you weren't a Flamenetter, I'd think someone was putting
>me on. The level of retardation you've displayed should render you
>incapable of operating a computer.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
*choke*
--
"For sale - Taliban rifles. Only dropped once."
Alan Gore in adfp
John Kimball
Message id: <a1hp9p$8it$2...@pita.alt.net>:
>"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
>sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
>carpet..."
>Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
>after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID:
><3A016FD9...@home.com>
>
>Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
>AKA "Pascal" Eugene Paris's real life fuckups at:
>http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
>http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
>
>Parole Officer:
>Chris Hudson
>d6@office@doc.state.ok.us
>(405)681-4663
Stop plagiarizing my Geno sig, you redneck, jizz-covered, mutant
hillbilly.
--
"did you bite your momma's cock a little too hard the last time... "
Roger Wiseman 46 year old virgin demonstrates his ignorance of the
female anatomy, and validates news:alt.cocksucker.roger-wiseman in
Message ID: <UQFNSY3A3720...@frog.gilgamesh.org>
KC8JBO
"John 'cocksucking expert' Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a1k7v7$gqk$1...@pita.alt.net...
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:17:00 -0500, "KC8JBO" <kc8...@alt.net> wrote in
> Message id: <a1hp9p$8it$2...@pita.alt.net>:
>
>
> >"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
> >sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
> >carpet..."
> >Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
> >after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID:
> ><3A016FD9...@home.com>
> >
> >Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
> >AKA "Pascal" Eugene Paris's real life fuckups at:
> >http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
> >http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
> >
> >Parole Officer:
> >Chris Hudson
> >d6@office@doc.state.ok.us
> >(405)681-4663
>
> Stop plagiarizing
Stop whining, Joanie, and keep trying to figure out what time of the day it
is.
Joanie shows off his "grammar" skills and hypocrisy with the following
slobber:
"It's usually a good idea to check your own post for fuck-ups when
grammer or spell laming, Woger, you fucking idiot." in
<9rrsbb$53e$4...@dosa.alt.net>
Joanie shows off that 2nd grade education with the following IKYABWAI:
"You're "Guide to Gay Lifestyle" handbook doesn't count." in
<9r3sr9$rki$b...@dosa.alt.net>
Joanie shows off his "William and Mary" [William and Mary School for the
Mentally Handicapped, that is] education when he drooled:
"And what's you excuse?" in <9u2v8g$vp7$6...@pita.alt.net>
Joanie the Pulitzer prize winner slobbered incoherently:
"I cant' believe I'm agreeing with you, Woger."
in <9unp1u$rm$0...@dosa.alt.net>.
Joanie the ill-educated, perverted pedophile slobbered:
"Lets ask 8L0J08, maybe he'll know." in
<a0fcfg$n3e$1...@pita.alt.net>
--
"Joanie, did you bite your momma's cock a little too hard the last time... "
Roger Wiseman points out Joanie's denial of the he/she
anatomy of Joanie's hermaphrodite mother, and validates
news:alt.pedophile.john-kimball in
Message ID: <UQFNSY3A3720...@frog.gilgamesh.org>
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
KC8JBO wrote:
> Pedophile fry cook with the mangled, deformed face
> "John 'cocksucking expert' Kimball" <john...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:a1k7v7$gqk$1...@pita.alt.net...
>
>>On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:17:00 -0500, "KC8JBO" <kc8...@alt.net> wrote in
>>Message id: <a1hp9p$8it$2...@pita.alt.net>:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"...even as we speak I am working on a vacuum cleaner with a dick
>>>sucking attachment. It should put the fun back into cleaning the
>>>carpet..."
>>>Jesus Slut Fucker <drap...@home.com> comes to terms with his loneliness
>>>after his stint in federal prison in Message-ID:
>>><3A016FD9...@home.com>
>>>
>>>Read all about convicted felon Jesus Slut Fucker
>>>AKA "Pascal" Eugene Paris's real life fuckups at:
>>>http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt35 and
>>>http://www.philosophy.niu.edu/~crypt/other/crypt39
>>>
>>>Parole Officer:
>>>Chris Hudson
>>>d6@office@doc.state.ok.us
>>>(405)681-4663
>>>
>>Stop plagiarizing
>>
>
> Stop whining, Joanie, and keep trying to figure out what time of the day it
> is.
Damn Woger, I don't guess you stop and look what a complete fool you
make of yourself, each and every time you post?
-Jesus
--
Jesus Slut Fucker: Son of Gawd, Mary's Pimp
I was born, long ago. I am the chosen one.
Asshole of the Year 1987, 1989, 1999 (contested)
God Emperor: AssholeNet
Has Been of the Year 1995, 1997, 1999
Voted Flamer one would least like to share a prison cell with: 2000
Fuck up of the Year 2000
Fuck up of the Century for 20th Century
crm 1x3,
mhm 1x1,
The siLiCON voRtEX:
http://members.home.net/pparis7/Jesus/
http://members.home.net/pparis7/Mr.Taliban.swf
Do as thousands of Gay men have already done and view Woger's
home page, Woger's page contains contact numbers, you can sign
his guest book, send him e-mail or just look at his loser ass:
Or:
KC8JBO
"Rhesus Butt Fucker: Usenet Assholelicker" <ppa...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>
Damn, Weeno, you fail to see the IRONY in your above statement.
Pussy Geno Paris self-describes his (f)laming style as
follows:
"Be sure and file it under "lame unimaginative bullshit".
in Message-ID: <3C1C9656...@home.com>.
Pedophile and convicted drug-using felon Rhesus Butt Fucker
slobbered the following Ebonics:
"Woger could never finger out how to work AOL"
in <3C217A42...@home.com>.
Geno slobbers out another drunken delusion and proof of his ignorance in
<3C3C44E4...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>:
"The best part of the Desert Storm was when we got to kill inept British
units through "friendly fire"! The funny thing was you though us Yanks
were doing it on accident."
Geno shows he's visibly upset at the prospect of some one calling his Parole
Officer
in <3C3C5725...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>:
"Since you contiue to backpedalled and were never are able to call Mr.
Hudson..."
"If I decided to take you ass, there would be little you could do about
it."
- After his homosexual advances are turned down, "Jesus Slut Fucker"
considers homosexual rape in article <3B356032...@home.com>
Dumbass drug addicted CONVICT Geno fails to recognize the irony in his
slobbering
in <3C3E0FDF...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>:
"You should ask yourself, who is the sillier, the man who is illiterate
or the moron who writes an illiterate a message. FYI it's a moot question,
dumbass."
--
Geno finally comes clean so to speak about his deepest, innermost desires in
<3C3CF304...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com> :
"I would like to give mucho oral sex to your doggie and Woger Wiseman."
Nighthawk
news:slrna3r7f...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
If we miss any of your fuck ups, Ari, it's only because we're so used to
seeing them from you. That would fall in the category of not being able to
see the forest for the trees.
--
Nighthawk
news:slrna3r7c...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
Do you post here only to prove your studity and or ignorance on a daily
basis, Ari? I don't run the FLAME awards. Try to understand what's going on
before you open your mouth and make an ass of yourself yet again.
> > They were posted initially on the final day of 2000. That post was
> > -reposted- as a reminder for previous year for the 2001 awards.
>
> You have the curious habit of announcing obvious stuff like it was
> news. I think it stems from the years you've spent with the other
> alt.flamenet dimwits.
>
> > Goddamn, moron. What's the fucking difficulty, here?
>
> Trying to get you to understand the remarkably simple concept that
> awards are named for the year in which the winners produced whatever
> it is that gave them the awards instead of the year after the awards.
>
> >> That you compound your mistake by calling me dense just takes the
> >> biscuit. If you weren't a Flamenetter, I'd think someone was putting
> >> me on. The level of retardation you've displayed should render you
> >> incapable of operating a computer.
> >
> > You can't count on your scab-picking, nose-digging,
> > encrusted-shit-under-the-nails fingers.
>
> Untrue. My fingers are very dependable.
>
> > Come back in a century or three when you've figured out what the fuck
you
> > are talking about. It'll take that long, at least.
>
> If you want me to leave you alone, you'll have to ask politely. The
> wording "Please, Ari, won't you leave me alone?" will do nicely.
--
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> If I ever did fuck up, I bet none of you dunces would spot it.
>
> If we miss any of your fuck ups, Ari,
"We"? Strength in numbers would work so much better if you had
numbers. Unfortunately for you, Shteve did a runner and Marting is
nowhere to be seen. As per usual.
> it's only because we're so used to seeing them from you.
Horribly boring _and_ detached from reality is no way to go through
life.
> That would fall in the category of not being able to see the forest
> for the trees.
Nice autoflame.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
03:15:38 GMT
[I said that even the guy running the awards doesn't agree with
Shteve.]
> Do you post here only to prove your studity and or ignorance on a daily
> basis, Ari?
I crosspost there to make fun of Flamenetters. Really, Greg, it's
obvious to all but the Flamenetters. Then again, it's just this kind
of staggering lack of perception that makes a proper Flamenetter in
the first place.
"Studity". Heh.
> I don't run the FLAME awards.
You did run the 2000 ones, did you not? Fucking 'ell, you're grasping
at straws.
It's all for vain, you know. I doubt Shteve will gather the fortitude
to stop running. That leaves you and _Rhesus_ manning the alt.flamenet
'guns'. If you were a bit more perceptive, the sense of shame would
overwhelm you.
> Try to understand what's going on before you open your mouth and
> make an ass of yourself yet again.
If you simply have to be pedantic, make sure you have a leg to stand
on and try to inject some panache into it.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
03:15:38 GMT
> 03:15:38 GMT wrote:
>> Nighthawk <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> did this:
>>>it's only because we're so used to seeing them from you.
>>
>> Horribly boring _and_ detached from reality is no way to go through
>> life.
>
> Autoflame detected.
+###########V ####### I######t###### ####### ########
iti ### itI .### = ####I, :V### X###+ t #####,
### ### #### i##R ### ##+###
### ##W #### ###, ### ### ##V
### ######R ###### ### ###
### ######## #### ### ##Y
### ###B B### ##X ##########
### ### ### ##X ############
### ### ;##X ##+ ## .##
VVV.### VXX ,=###,V ###=X BI,##W;Xt t###.+ ::###Y
i###########X #######, ##### ########## #######X ########
. .. . ..
:tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii++;, .:;++iiiiiiiiiii;
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, ;tV#############WRI; :;;;;;;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:, .X###########################t ,:;;;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;;;;:: X###############W####WWW#WW#######M :;;;;,
.=;;;;;;;;;:, :W#######WW######W#WW#BWW#W#WW#WW#######t :;;;,
.=;;;;;;;: +W########W#W####WW#WW##############W#MW#W### :;;,
.=;;;;:, +#########################WMW######WMW##W#W###### :;,
.=;;:. =############WM######WB###WW####WWW#WW##W#WWW####### ;,
.=;;:,R#######################################WW###WW#WW#W###Y ;,
.=;;: I###############################i#####WW#W#BW#WWW##W###B ,,
.=;;;. ######################XI;+:;i V#####W#WWW###W#W#WWW### ,
.=;;;, +YB#######V#RI+ ..,,,:;= X#########M#WW#WWWWWW#B .
.=;;:,=;, :#B: ,;;;;;=++++++++++; I###############W#WW###
.=;::=ti++;.. ;=+++++i=++++=+++iiiiiii:+############WW#W#WW###
.=;,=t++++++=+i++ii++i+ii++i++iiiiiiti+, ####WW####WWW#WWWW####
.=:,+i+++=++=++++iiiii+iiiiiiiiii+++=+;::#W#####W#WW###W###WW##
.=,;ii++++++iii++++iii+iii+=iiii++++==:=R##########W####WW##M##
.;,ii++++++=i++ii++iiiiiii+iiiiiitiii=I######W##W##W#WM#B##W###
.;=Yiii+++++ii+i+iiii+iiiiiititiitiiIX###MW##BW#W###WWW#X#W###M .
.;+ii+iiii+iii+ttiittiiiiiittiitittY##########################X .
.,:;=++i+tiiii+iiiiiiiiitiiiiItttIItW##################; V#= ,
..RB;,+iiiiiii=+=:::.,.,;=ittYItiiItiW##############M +M###, ,,
.,W##X;+tii+=;,;;;+VVBXi.:;tItitItti+:t############X Y#B. .i#.,;,
.. +Xti++++Y#############X;=iiIIItt++:=B##W####B I= .++iI::;:
.,,+ ;=;+i=RXi, .:B###R+tttttItYtti######: ;+;V###Yi+I+;:;,
.,i###i =i=i=;+i;iRYt;. tBWXIiIIItItt=#Y##W :+t+##: ;BV=i;,:;:
.,Bt ###:+iYB##R##WMBI;:=i;=itIItItiti+;+.: =+iii B#W+,+i++:,;;,
.,;#V=X##,;+VBYXM#V #####BIIIItIIIttttiitiIti+ti;; i==+ti+,:;;,
.: +i+tYW.+II=;;ItXXY++W=,tYI+iitIttittItIYYiIiiti+#V+=iI=Y=,;;;,
,;,tVXYIi;+tt+ii+M#RYIVXXWXiiiii+ttYtIItIIitittittI+=;t+;VB.:;;;,
.;,i=:;;=+iIIYIi=;=IXVXI=::+++++iIIIIYIYIItii+ittt=;=;=++; ,;;;;,
.=.it++i==iYtYItIi+=:;:;;=+i+iIYYIIYIItIttiiitItit ;+:.,:;;;;;,
.=,+Iit+++IYiitittIIti=++i+++tYIIIIYYYItttttiIt=iM####..:;;;;;;;,
.=:iVtI=+;XVIYVVVYIIi++++itttttIYVYYIIIittiitIit+I#W#I ,;;;;;;;;,
.=,,+#X:+=IYVIYtt+R##V;=iittIYYYYYVXYIiittYYItitIRXBWY .:;;;;;;;,
.=:..#++t=++, ..+#XB##B+=iIYYVVIItiIYXVVVVYItVXBXVYR#.: ,:;;;;;,
.=;: +ttXBRIVM####i=tiB###MYYIIVBMBtYVXVtYIItXBMVItIX# #, .:;;;;,
.=;;:.. ,tW#####V=tItItX######WBVVBBVIIVYRXBBWWRtttYXW ##I ,:;;,
.=;;:;, WMMBRVXVYVVBW######M#RV#RVtX####RBYIYYYV#: XWMMi .:;,
.=, ,;: #MV=I#W########BXB##MWMRWRRB###BXBVIVYIXBX ,#VXW#I.,;,
.:,;IRBM###W###WWiM#W#W##+=iVitYXBWWRR#WXVRRBXVYRMW= iVBVIVBRt,;,
.;Y##M#MXXBVRtWWXVRW###XiIVYti+IXRBXX#RItVXVRVXBBV WtXYVYWX;.;,
:tVtYIRYtIR#Xt#####BtIXXYIitIYXWMXYMBIYRMXRW#WI . WMVtVtXRX:.;,
:i#MBVYYMWMB#.;+tYYYVVi++itYYVB#XtBMRB#####M+ ,, WRXYRRYiBV:,;,
:+tit+iiRYVB#= ;;=:::;=+I=IYXW#VYMW######Y. :;, IWXYiIRt+B+:,;,
.:=ItVY#YRBWW## ,:=++=i+tIiBW#BYV######t ,=; ;WVXIYIVMYX+,:;,
.:;YBXVXiV#IRW##X:;;=tVRRB###XM####+ ,i :,.MBBYVY#VYMY;.:;,
.:+#I+MtXIIVtV#M#################B =######### : M#XiYBYVVXMY;,:;,
.;;V+ItYiIYYIVRB############WWBWB#####WW##### +#RBVBIRXIVBi,,;;,
.::IViYVVIXV#tXMW#W##WWW#WW#W###########WW### #BIBXVWRXBWV=,:;;,
.:;IBYY;#i#VRX:YI##WWMMM##################W## XVIVYRBXX#Xi=:,:;;,
.;:+MMVBVX+YYWRVi#B#MW####W :Y#W#####R.MYVXIIWMMtttY:,:;;,
.=,,+BRXYRIRVYRW+#;#####:; ,,:,, , t##R;tRiYVYRtVXVRRt,:;;;,
.=:,,iRV#WBXMRY#R#+ .. ,.;:::::::;,:,. RRt#MR#XVXRMWI=,:;;;,
,+=;::=iitIVtVXBX#= ,.:;;===========;===+:t#tVWB#BBRBXRI;;:;===+:
,=:,,. . .,,:;===;:,,,:;==;:,,,,.::;,...,.. ..,,,:;:
############ ######## Y#######= ######## ############
R############M Y####### ####### ######## ############
## ### ### ## ##M### ##
t## .## M## ### ,## W## X## ##t
t## t### :##, ####B B## ### ### ##t
t########## ##t ##### ### ### ##+ ##t
t###########, ##X ##.## ### ### ;. ### ##t
t## ###, ###M## ##W### ###########B ##t
i## ### #####, X####R ;##XiVVVY;### ##i
.## t##R i#### ####; ### ##R ##
############### #### #### ####### I####### ############
:#MBBBBBBBMX; #B# #M# M#BBB## #MBBM#; i#BBBBBBBB##
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
That's one useful piece of ASCII art.
meowmix
I was going to suggest that PKB^H^H^HJSF changed his nym to that, but
I don't think he'd have got it.
meowmix
mhm xvi x iii
oobie doobie doo
The Paris the frog sig quote gallery:
You want that I make a group for you all your own?
How does: alt.spanked.cocksucking-morons, grab you?
It works for me.
Paris the frog fuckwit shows his grasp of English and homosexual desire in Message-ID: <3C42FDE2...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com>
> Where did I grammar or spell lame you Spanky? <more crying deleted>
See your sig. I realize you are Asstralian therefore prone to lying out your ass, however you really shouldn't do it when proof is so closely at hand.
Paris the frog in Message-ID: <3C442E62...@NOFUCKINGSPAMhome.com> PKB's and whines that a sig quote is a spelling lame and ironicly gets it added to The Paris the Frog sig quote gallery.
More Coming Soon.
Steve Henderson
"03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:slrna4al7...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
> >> If I ever did fuck up, I bet none of you dunces would spot it.
> >
> > If we miss any of your fuck ups, Ari,
>
> "We"? Strength in numbers would work so much better if you had
> numbers. Unfortunately for you, Shteve did a runner and Marting is
> nowhere to be seen. As per usual.
"Strength in numbers" against you only takes one. Any one, any where, any
time.
Run? Nah. You are just too pathetic to describe.
> > it's only because we're so used to seeing them from you.
>
> Horribly boring _and_ detached from reality is no way to go through
> life.
>
> > That would fall in the category of not being able to see the forest
> > for the trees.
>
> Nice autoflame.
How about "the hay in the needlestack"?
Steve Henderson
> [I said that even the guy running the awards doesn't agree with
> Shteve.]
-What- guy running the awards, moron?
> > Do you post here only to prove your studity and or ignorance on a daily
> > basis, Ari?
>
> I crosspost there to make fun of Flamenetters. Really, Greg, it's
> obvious to all but the Flamenetters. Then again, it's just this kind
> of staggering lack of perception that makes a proper Flamenetter in
> the first place.
>
> "Studity". Heh.
You still don't have a clue.
> > I don't run the FLAME awards.
>
> You did run the 2000 ones, did you not? Fucking 'ell, you're grasping
> at straws.
>
> It's all for vain, you know. I doubt Shteve will gather the fortitude
> to stop running. That leaves you and _Rhesus_ manning the alt.flamenet
> 'guns'. If you were a bit more perceptive, the sense of shame would
> overwhelm you.
You forgot, moron, I have a life -and- a job.
> > Try to understand what's going on before you open your mouth and
> > make an ass of yourself yet again.
>
> If you simply have to be pedantic, make sure you have a leg to stand
> on and try to inject some panache into it.
If "a leg to stand on" were a requirement, you'd be stuck with your
"quadruple amputee" status in the smarts department.
Nighthawk
> Nighthawk <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> did this:
>
> [I said that even the guy running the awards doesn't agree with
> Shteve.]
>
> > Do you post here only to prove your studity and or ignorance on a daily
> > basis, Ari?
>
> I crosspost there to make fun of Flamenetters. Really, Greg, it's
> obvious to all but the Flamenetters. Then again, it's just this kind
> of staggering lack of perception that makes a proper Flamenetter in
> the first place.
>
> "Studity". Heh.
You're one to talk about grasping at straws, Ari, when all you manage to
serve up is a typo lame.
> > I don't run the FLAME awards.
>
> You did run the 2000 ones, did you not?
Yes, but the 2000 awards weren't the set in question.
> Fucking 'ell, you're grasping at straws.
Right... Shall I make sure to leave you another typo or other misteak to
whine about?
> It's all for vain, you know. I doubt Shteve will gather the fortitude
> to stop running. That leaves you and _Rhesus_ manning the alt.flamenet
> 'guns'. If you were a bit more perceptive, the sense of shame would
> overwhelm you.
>
> > Try to understand what's going on before you open your mouth and
> > make an ass of yourself yet again.
>
> If you simply have to be pedantic, make sure you have a leg to stand
> on and try to inject some panache into it.
What's the matter, Ari? Did I use too many big words and confuse you?
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> did this:
>> Then again, it's just this kind of staggering lack of perception that
>> makes a proper Flamenetter in the first place.
Intent on proving me right, Greg staggers on...
>> "Studity". Heh.
>
> You're one to talk about grasping at straws, Ari,
Wow. Absolutely correct. Would you like a banana?
> when all you manage to serve up is a typo lame.
Give my banana back, and learn to distinguish between flaming a typo
(e.g. insisting that the typo proves a great deal about the typists
intellectual faculties) and guffawing at a particularly appropriate
one.
When every other facet of your output tells of your incompetence and
idiocy, I don't need to use a typo to establish your worthlessness.
>> > I don't run the FLAME awards.
>>
>> You did run the 2000 ones, did you not?
>
> Yes, but the 2000 awards weren't the set in question.
Are you absolutely sure about that?
>> Fucking 'ell, you're grasping at straws.
>
> Right... Shall I make sure to leave you another typo or other misteak to
> whine about?
"Heh" is not whining, you maladroit mook.
> What's the matter, Ari?
You're currently more boring than Marty Goldberg, that's the matter. I
never thought it could be done.
> Did I use too many big words and confuse you?
PKB, I'm afraid. Do you remember the article at the URL below?
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=slrna018c0.utv.asik%40nntp.newsnet
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
03:15:38 GMT
> -What- guy running the awards, moron?
Try reading the original article, Shteve. Once you've done that, try
responding to it.
>> I crosspost there to make fun of Flamenetters. Really, Greg, it's
>> obvious to all but the Flamenetters. Then again, it's just this kind
>> of staggering lack of perception that makes a proper Flamenetter in
>> the first place.
>>
>> "Studity". Heh.
>
> You still don't have a clue.
Your childlike belief in the awesome flame power of the non sequitur
one-liner is heart-warming, but it won't help you to win any
arguments.
>> It's all for vain, you know. I doubt Shteve will gather the fortitude
>> to stop running. That leaves you and _Rhesus_ manning the alt.flamenet
>> 'guns'. If you were a bit more perceptive, the sense of shame would
>> overwhelm you.
>
> You forgot, moron,
You _really need to find a synonym for the word moron. Try
substituting it with "idiot", "imbecile", "cretin", "half-wit" or
"retard" once in a while. I'd make you look less of changeling.
> I have a life -and- a job.
Now, if only you had a spine...
>> make sure you have a leg to stand on
>
> If "a leg to stand on" were a requirement, you'd be stuck with your
> "quadruple amputee" status in the smarts department.
This quality 'IKYABWIH' was brought to you by alt.flamenet.
alt.flamenet - excellence in eejits.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Steve Henderson
> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>
> > -What- guy running the awards, moron?
>
> Try reading the original article, Shteve. Once you've done that, try
> responding to it.
You are, mayhap, referring to "wamprat"?
> >> I crosspost there to make fun of Flamenetters. Really, Greg, it's
> >> obvious to all but the Flamenetters. Then again, it's just this kind
> >> of staggering lack of perception that makes a proper Flamenetter in
> >> the first place.
> >>
> >> "Studity". Heh.
> >
> > You still don't have a clue.
>
> Your childlike belief in the awesome flame power of the non sequitur
> one-liner is heart-warming, but it won't help you to win any
> arguments.
How can a statement of fact, in any way, possibly be a non sequitur? You do
not and have never had a clue. There's no argument to win. It's a comment
grounded in the tidiest of evidence.
> >> It's all for vain, you know. I doubt Shteve will gather the fortitude
> >> to stop running. That leaves you and _Rhesus_ manning the alt.flamenet
> >> 'guns'. If you were a bit more perceptive, the sense of shame would
> >> overwhelm you.
> >
> > You forgot, moron,
>
> You _really need to find a synonym for the word moron. Try
> substituting it with "idiot", "imbecile", "cretin", "half-wit" or
> "retard" once in a while. I'd make you look less of changeling.
Why change it? The word is entirely too apt when directed at you.
> > I have a life -and- a job.
>
> Now, if only you had a spine...
I have one, thank you.
> >> make sure you have a leg to stand on
> >
> > If "a leg to stand on" were a requirement, you'd be stuck with your
> > "quadruple amputee" status in the smarts department.
>
> This quality 'IKYABWIH' was brought to you by alt.flamenet.
> alt.flamenet - excellence in eejits.
Hardly. You used a euphemism, I described, albeit using a continuation of
your euphemism, the extent of your inability to realize just how stupid you
really are.
03:15:38 GMT
>> Eveningsparrow did this:
> "Strength in numbers" against you only takes one.
You don't understand what words mean, do you?
> Any one,
You.
> any where,
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=slrna3r7cl.obs.asik%40ID-12638.user.dfncis.de
> any time.
Take your time.
> Run?
As fast as your stubby legs can carry you.
> Nah.
No? So where's my follow-up?
> You are just too pathetic to describe.
Your subpar writing skills can't help much, either.
>> > That would fall in the category of not being able to see the forest
>> > for the trees.
>>
>> Nice autoflame.
>
> How about "the hay in the needlestack"?
Still a horrible analogy if you're trying to assert that I make
mistakes often, but you're slowly moving in the right direction.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Nighthawk
news:slrna4dad...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
> Nighthawk <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> did this:
> > "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
> >> Nighthawk <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> did this:
>
> >> Then again, it's just this kind of staggering lack of perception that
> >> makes a proper Flamenetter in the first place.
>
> Intent on proving me right, Greg staggers on...
>
> >> "Studity". Heh.
> >
> > You're one to talk about grasping at straws, Ari,
>
> Wow. Absolutely correct. Would you like a banana?
>
> > when all you manage to serve up is a typo lame.
>
> Give my banana back, and learn to distinguish between flaming a typo
> (e.g. insisting that the typo proves a great deal about the typists
> intellectual faculties) and guffawing at a particularly appropriate
> one.
It's *still* a typo lame, Ari, no matter how fast you try and back-pedal.
> When every other facet of your output tells of your incompetence and
> idiocy, I don't need to use a typo to establish your worthlessness.
>
> >> > I don't run the FLAME awards.
> >>
> >> You did run the 2000 ones, did you not?
> >
> > Yes, but the 2000 awards weren't the set in question.
>
> Are you absolutely sure about that?
Of course.
> >> Fucking 'ell, you're grasping at straws.
> >
> > Right... Shall I make sure to leave you another typo or other misteak to
> > whine about?
>
> "Heh" is not whining, you maladroit mook.
>
> > What's the matter, Ari?
> I never thought.
That's what I've been trying to tell you all along, Ari.I'm glad to see
you're finally beginning to see the light.
> > Did I use too many big words and confuse you?
>
> PKB, I'm afraid. Do you remember the article at the URL below?
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=slrna018c0.utv.asik%40nntp.newsnet
Certainly. Thanks for the laugh. You're still pathetic.
Jesus Slut Fucker: Usenet Adminstrator
03:15:38 GMT
>> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>>
>> > -What- guy running the awards, moron?
>>
>> Try reading the original article, Shteve. Once you've done that, try
>> responding to it.
>
> You are, mayhap, referring to "wamprat"?
No, I'm not. I was talking about the 2000 awards.
>> > You still don't have a clue.
>>
>> Your childlike belief in the awesome flame power of the non sequitur
>> one-liner is heart-warming, but it won't help you to win any
>> arguments.
>
> How can a statement of fact, in any way, possibly be a non sequitur?
Rather easily. Observe:
PERSON A: That Steve Henderson is one subliterate, frightfully
boring twit. Don't you agree?
PERSON B: The capitol of Ecuador is Quito.
PERSON A: Uh. Yes. But not only is Henderson a subliterate,
frightfully boring twit, he doesn't understand what words mean. He's
even too lazy to look them up himself, the spineless sack of shit he
is. What do you think?
PERSON B: "God Only Knows" is the eighth song of _Pet Sounds_,
The Beach Boys' crowning achievement. Therefore, Andre Franquin is
Belgian.
Even you should've gotten the idea by now, Shteve.
> You do not and have never had a clue. There's no argument to win.
> It's a comment grounded in the tidiest of evidence.
Present the "tidiest" evidence, then. (This should be "neat".)
>> > You forgot, moron,
>>
>> You _really need to find a synonym for the word moron. Try
>> substituting it with "idiot", "imbecile", "cretin", "half-wit" or
>> "retard" once in a while. I'd make you look less of changeling.
>
> Why change it? The word is entirely too apt when directed at you.
You direct the same word at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
arguments, your limited vocabulary, your utter failure at projecting
even a tiny bit of personality in your writing, the lack of character
that prevents you from admitting your mistakes, your total lack of
flaming ability, your choice of newsgroup, your hair style, your lisp,
your semi-famous effort to conduct a comparative study of the taste
of semen, and many others I must elide from this article due to space
constraints.
Because of this, the word has lost any effect it might otherwise
possess. Because you limply toss it in the ring every time someone
gets the better of you - i.e. every time you try your hairy hand
against someone who isn't a fellow Flamenetter - you've successfully
emasculated the word through overuse.
Also, your use of it is very, very boring.
>> > I have a life -and- a job.
>>
>> Now, if only you had a spine...
>
> I have one, thank you.
You keep it in a glass jar under the bed, right next to the brain.
Occasionally you wonder what would happen if you put one of them to
use, but then the shiny surface of the jar distracts you for a
millisecond, and the rudimentary thought is gone.
>> This quality 'IKYABWIH' was brought to you by alt.flamenet.
>> alt.flamenet - excellence in eejits.
>
> Hardly. You used a euphemism,
"You don't have a leg to stand on."
> I described, albeit using a continuation of your euphemism,
"No, _you_ don't have a leg to stand on."
Textbook stuff.
> the extent of your inability to realize just how stupid you
> really are.
The "smarts department" is populated by stupid people and "last year"
means the one before last year; all part of the
magical-if-it-wasn't-so-goddamn-dreary inner world of your average
Flamenetter.
(That would be you, Shteve.)
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
03:15:38 GMT
> he did do a story lame on me long ago that was mildly amusing
Which one of the several did _you_ find amusing? I thought I hadn't
gone overboard with vulgarity, but perhaps I was wrong.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Nighthawk <Nigh...@BlowMe.com> did this:
>> > "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> > You're one to talk about grasping at straws, Ari,
>>
>> Wow. Absolutely correct. Would you like a banana?
>>
>> > when all you manage to serve up is a typo lame.
>>
>> Give my banana back, and learn to distinguish between flaming a typo
>> (e.g. insisting that the typo proves a great deal about the typists
>> intellectual faculties) and guffawing at a particularly appropriate
>> one.
>
> It's *still* a typo lame, Ari,
No, it wasn't, nor was it all I wrote in that particular article. Two
facts, and you got both wrong.
> no matter how fast you try and back-pedal.
Please learn what backpedalling means in this context.
>> >> You did run the 2000 ones, did you not?
>> >
>> > Yes, but the 2000 awards weren't the set in question.
>>
>> Are you absolutely sure about that?
>
> Of course.
What was the set in question, then?
> I've been trying to see the light.
Isn't post-editing fun, kids?
>> > Did I use too many big words and confuse you?
>>
>> PKB, I'm afraid. Do you remember the article at the URL below?
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=slrna018c0.utv.asik%40nntp.newsnet
>
> Certainly. Thanks for the laugh.
In future you should take into account the absurdly low level of
reading comprehension you displayed in that thread before you go
mouthing off.
> You're still pathetic.
_How to Tell the Flamenetters Apart (Without Looking at the Headers)_
1. Pick a Flamenetter. Any Flamenetter.
2. Insult the Flamenetter.
3. Carefully not which one of the following words you receive in
response:
*fag* - You're probably talking to Rhesus. Check the post for
horridly formatted posts to make sure.
*moron* - You're probably talking to Shteve. Check the post
for sleep inducing verbiage to make sure.
*pathetic* - You're probably talking to Eveningsparrow. Check
the post for the most embarrassing .sig known to man to make
sure.
4. If none of the above words are present, or the other identifying
traits are missing, the article may be from some other Flamenetter.
Don't worry about it. There are no real differences between any of
them.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Steve Henderson
"03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:slrna4ikm...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
> >> > -What- guy running the awards, moron?
> >>
> >> Try reading the original article, Shteve. Once you've done that, try
> >> responding to it.
> >
> > You are, mayhap, referring to "wamprat"?
>
> No, I'm not. I was talking about the 2000 awards.
Which has nothing to do with the fact that we -were- discussing the 2001
awards and the fact that you can't grasp the fact that the 2000 awards
message was a fucking repost!
> >> > You still don't have a clue.
> >>
> >> Your childlike belief in the awesome flame power of the non sequitur
> >> one-liner is heart-warming, but it won't help you to win any
> >> arguments.
> >
> > How can a statement of fact, in any way, possibly be a non sequitur?
A -relevant- statement of fact, nitwit.
> > Why change it? The word is entirely too apt when directed at you.
>
> You direct the same word at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
> your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
> arguments, your limited vocabulary, your utter failure at projecting
> even a tiny bit of personality in your writing, the lack of character
> that prevents you from admitting your mistakes, your total lack of
> flaming ability, your choice of newsgroup, your hair style, your lisp,
> your semi-famous effort to conduct a comparative study of the taste
> of semen, and many others I must elide from this article due to space
> constraints.
Uh-huh. So your "methodology" of living inside your Thesaurus makes your
posts more desirable? An idiot with a Thesaurus is still an idiot.
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>> > "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> >> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>> >>
>> I was talking about the 2000 awards.
>
> Which has nothing to do with the fact that we -were- discussing the 2001
> awards
No, we were not.
| > Exactly, dumbass. The 2000 awards were -last year's- awards.
|
| No, they manifestly weren't. In those awards, [etc.]
[a few lines later...]
| Even the guy running the awards doesn't agree with you.
I told you to read the original article. Did you listen? No way. Mr.
"Sinister Minister" - tee hee - was above all that. You just had to
make yourself look like a fool, didn't you?
Like you hadn't already firmly cemented your position as one.
> and the fact that you can't grasp the fact that the 2000 awards
> message was a fucking repost!
I can't? What evidence do you have for this most puzzling claim?
>> >> > You still don't have a clue.
>> >>
>> >> Your childlike belief in the awesome flame power of the non sequitur
>> >> one-liner is heart-warming, but it won't help you to win any
>> >> arguments.
>> >
>> > How can a statement of fact, in any way, possibly be a non sequitur?
Oh, this is fun. First Shteve snips out all the offending text...
[offending text was here]
...then he backpedals for all he's worth...
> A -relevant- statement of fact,
...then the cumbersome crybaby acts like this was all my fault...
> nitwit.
...and, to top it all off, his original statement of an imaginary fact
_wasn't_ relevant.
|| > You do not and have never had a clue. There's no argument to win.
|| > It's a comment grounded in the tidiest of evidence.
||
|| Present the "tidiest" evidence, then. (This should be "neat".)
Well?
[Shteve's horrid overuse of the word "moron".]
>> You direct the same word at almost everyone who takes the time to mock
>> your many shortcomings; such as your inability to construct logical
>> arguments, your limited vocabulary, your utter failure at projecting
>> even a tiny bit of personality in your writing, the lack of character
>> that prevents you from admitting your mistakes, your total lack of
>> flaming ability, your choice of newsgroup, your hair style, your lisp,
>> your semi-famous effort to conduct a comparative study of the taste
>> of semen, and many others I must elide from this article due to space
>> constraints.
>
> Uh-huh. So your "methodology" of living inside your Thesaurus makes your
> posts more desirable? An idiot with a Thesaurus is still an idiot.
My method of using varied insults - you really shouldn't accept
Rhesus' pet theories like they were gospel - is more desirable for the
obvious reasons: It doesn't automatically make for good flaming
but it makes such a thing a possibility.
[About fifty lines of text used to be here, but Steve didn't want to
quote them so they went missing from his follow-up.]
Poor, befuddled, pindicked, boorish boob - beset by brighter, poised,
properly brought-up people; befuddled by poignancy; plus posting
pointless blubbering.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Steve Henderson
"03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:slrna4l4i...@ID-12638.user.dfncis.de...
> >> >> > -What- guy running the awards, moron?
>
> >> I was talking about the 2000 awards.
> >
> > Which has nothing to do with the fact that we -were- discussing the 2001
> > awards
>
> No, we were not.
Yes, we were. From the second post (since the very first one was
the -reposted- 2000 awards). If you've been talking about the 2000 awards,
that's where you've been wrong from the outset. The 2001 awards have been
the topic from the very beginning.
From the start, you've been confused about which year is the one being
referenced. I thought I'd finally gotten through your skull just exactly to
what year the latest awards applied. If you are still working on
the -reposted- section, you've handed me -proof- of what I've been saying
about your lack of intelligence from your very first post. Not that you
hadn't already done so, anyway. Just one more nail in your coffin.
> | > Exactly, dumbass. The 2000 awards were -last year's- awards.
> |
> | No, they manifestly weren't. In those awards, [etc.]
> [a few lines later...]
> | Even the guy running the awards doesn't agree with you.
>
> I told you to read the original article. Did you listen? No way. Mr.
> "Sinister Minister" - tee hee - was above all that. You just had to
> make yourself look like a fool, didn't you?
I know which article was the original. It started with something along the
lines of "To refresh your memory, here's last year's awards..........". The
whole fucking bunch of you missed that very important line.
> Like you hadn't already firmly cemented your position as one.
>
> > and the fact that you can't grasp the fact that the 2000 awards
> > message was a fucking repost!
>
> I can't? What evidence do you have for this most puzzling claim?
Google for the fucking message, dumbass. I know it's there. That is the
one that started this entire thread.
> >> >> > You still don't have a clue.
> >> >>
> >> >> Your childlike belief in the awesome flame power of the non sequitur
> >> >> one-liner is heart-warming, but it won't help you to win any
> >> >> arguments.
> >> >
> >> > How can a statement of fact, in any way, possibly be a non sequitur?
>
> Oh, this is fun. First Shteve snips out all the offending text...
>
> [offending text was here]
>
> ...then he backpedals for all he's worth...
>
> > A -relevant- statement of fact,
>
> ...then the cumbersome crybaby acts like this was all my fault...
I get it. A crybaby is someone that tells you something true (and has been
trying to get straight in your head) since you got it all fucked up in the
original telling. I can deal with that.
> > nitwit.
>
> ...and, to top it all off, his original statement of an imaginary fact
> _wasn't_ relevant.
Yeah, right. Your point was that the 2001 awards were "named" incorrectly.
> || > You do not and have never had a clue. There's no argument to win.
> || > It's a comment grounded in the tidiest of evidence.
> ||
> || Present the "tidiest" evidence, then. (This should be "neat".)
>
> Well?
Do your own homework.
> > Uh-huh. So your "methodology" of living inside your Thesaurus makes
your
> > posts more desirable? An idiot with a Thesaurus is still an idiot.
>
> My method of using varied insults - you really shouldn't accept
> Rhesus' pet theories like they were gospel - is more desirable for the
> obvious reasons: It doesn't automatically make for good flaming
> but it makes such a thing a possibility.
Varied insults? This claim coming from someone that can't tell the
difference between a repost and a post? Your posts aren't -varied-, they
are "thesaurused" to death!
What "pet theory"? I give even less credence to Rhesus than I do to you.
Jesus Slut Fucker
03:15:38 GMT
> "03:15:38 GMT" <as...@mailandnews.com> wrote...
>> Steve Henderson <etao...@keytech.com> did this:
>> >> I was talking about the 2000 awards.
>> >
>> > Which has nothing to do with the fact that we -were- discussing the 2001
>> > awards
>>
>> No, we were not.
>
> Yes, we were.
No, we weren't. Really. Take notes.
Ari presents...
STEVE HENDERSON, an idiot to STAND THE TEST OF TIME! Watch as Steve
DEFIES CLUES and battles ENLIGHTENMENT! Sit at the edge of your seat
as DARTS dipped in POISONOUS REALITY bounce off Steve's RUBBERY SKULL!
Gasp in awe as our hero gets REAMED WITH THE TRUTH but WALKS AWAY
unscathed!
(Not for children under the age of 18 or persons operating heavy
machinery.)
--- begin quotes from thread "FLAME awards" ---
To refresh everyone's memories, here's what last year's awards looked
like:
Congratulations to the following 2000 alt.flamenet award winners!
-- wamprat sets the stage by quoting Nighthawk's announcement and
adding the first sentence as a little intro.
What part of 'last year's' didn't you understand?
-- Steve Henderson babbles incoherently to John Kimball who in
turn was talking about something else completely.
The part where "last year" in an article posted in 2002 refers to 2000
is a bit strange [...] The funny part, on the other hand, is the
idiocy displayed by calling awards voted on by the laughingstock that
was alt.flamenet 2000 "Usenet's most coveted achievements."
-- My first article in the thread.
Dense as always, aren't you?
-- Steve Henderson, ineloquent as always.
This would work so much better if you could back it up with arguments.
Alas, you're only a poor Flamenetter; unable to spot any actual
mistakes, you must rely on vagaries.
-- Me.
The article was only posted about four hours after 2001, therefore
making it the announcement for that year.
-- Steve tries his first line.
The awards referred to in the article as "last year's" were the 2000
awards, which obviously weren't last year's awards at all.
-- I shoot him down.
The 2000 awards came out on New Year's Eve of 2000, dipshit. The
awards are not handed out -ahead- of time.
-- Steve tries his second line.
They were the awards for 2000. Thus, in 2001 they were last year's
awards, but ceased to be so in 2002.
-- I shoot him down.
The awards winners in 2001 carry those awards for the next calendar
year. In this case, dimwit, 2002 IS the following calendar year.
-- Steve tries his third line, and is now mysteriously talking
about 2001.
Who gives a flying fuck about how long they'll carry their
not-so-precious awards? The fact remains, that in 2002 "last year's
awards" refers to the awards for 2001, and 'wamprat' - yet another in
a long line of inferior alt.flamenet names - was talking about 2000.
-- I shoot him down.
The 2000 awards were -last year's- awards. They were posted initially
on the final day of 2000. That post was -reposted- as a reminder for
previous year for the 2001 awards.
-- Later in the same article, Steve switches back to 2000.
No, they manifestly weren't. In those awards, you dish out various
awards that end in the words "of the Year". Which year do you think
that refers to?
-- I shoot him down. [This is also the point in which Steve drops
that subthread.]
I was talking about the 2000 awards.
-- We rejoin the action a few articles later in the thread with
this seemingly innocuous comment from me.
Which has nothing to do with the fact that we -were- discussing the
2001 awards and the fact that you can't grasp the fact that the 2000
awards message was a fucking repost!
-- Steve switches to 2001 again, and forgets all about 2000. [He
may or may not also think that the entirety of wamprat's
message was a repost. In reality, that first sentence
containing the words "last year's" was no such thing.]
No, we were not.
-- I, once again, try to offer a clue.
Yes, we were. From the second post (since the very first one was the
-reposted- 2000 awards). If you've been talking about the 2000
awards, that's where you've been wrong from the outset. The 2001
awards have been the topic from the very beginning.
-- Steve again turns it down. [That second post was from John
Kimball, and mainly concentrated in mocking Nighthawk's
reposted announcement for the _2000_ awards.]
--- end quotes from thread "FLAME awards" ---
Can Steve resist the seemingly UNSTOPPABLE forces of ILLUMINATION?
Tune in next week to find out!
> From the second post (since the very first one was
> the -reposted- 2000 awards). If you've been talking about the 2000 awards,
> that's where you've been wrong from the outset. The 2001 awards have been
> the topic from the very beginning.
You'd do well to note that when I said that I was talking about the
2000 awards, I was referring to my previous comment about the "guy
running the awards".
> From the start, you've been confused about which year is the one being
> referenced. I thought I'd finally gotten through your skull just exactly to
> what year the latest awards applied. If you are still working on
> the -reposted- section, you've handed me -proof- of what I've been saying
> about your lack of intelligence from your very first post. Not that you
> hadn't already done so, anyway. Just one more nail in your coffin.
The irony levels in that paragraph alone are a serious health hazard.
>> I told you to read the original article. Did you listen? No way. Mr.
>> "Sinister Minister" - tee hee - was above all that. You just had to
>> make yourself look like a fool, didn't you?
>
> I know which article was the original. It started with something along the
> lines of "To refresh your memory, here's last year's awards..........". The
> whole fucking bunch of you missed that very important line.
Apparently you don't. I was talking about the article of mine in which
I originally used the words "the guy running the awards". You know,
the one you couldn't bring yourself to answer at the time. The one I
just quoted there.
Sheesh.
>> > and the fact that you can't grasp the fact that the 2000 awards
>> > message was a fucking repost!
>>
>> I can't? What evidence do you have for this most puzzling claim?
>
> Google for the fucking message, dumbass. I know it's there. That is the
> one that started this entire thread.
No, it isn't. Prove me wrong if you can.
>> ...then the cumbersome crybaby acts like this was all my fault...
>
> I get it. A crybaby is someone that tells you something true (and has been
> trying to get straight in your head) since you got it all fucked up in the
> original telling. I can deal with that.
Nice going ignoring the real argument.
> Yeah, right. Your point was that the 2001 awards were "named" incorrectly.
My point was nothing of the sort.
>> || > You do not and have never had a clue. There's no argument to win.
>> || > It's a comment grounded in the tidiest of evidence.
>> ||
>> || Present the "tidiest" evidence, then. (This should be "neat".)
>>
>> Well?
>
> Do your own homework.
Presenting evidence you claim to exist but I think exists only inside
your pointy head is not my own homework.
> Varied insults? This claim coming from someone that can't tell the
> difference between a repost and a post? Your posts aren't -varied-, they
> are "thesaurused" to death!
Being able to tell the difference between a repost and a post, and
using varied language have very little to do with each other, logic
boy. Even if you do fail at both.
> What "pet theory"? I give even less credence to Rhesus than I do to you.
The one where Rhesus says that I look up adjectives in a dictionary
and you repeat it like a trained parrot.
--
Ari <fun...@all.at>
Steve Henderson
"Jesus Slut Fucker" <pparis7@NO_FUCKING_SPAMcox.net> wrote in message
news:3C4B1067.3070700@NO_FUCKING_SPAMcox.net...
> > Varied insults? This claim coming from someone that can't tell the
> > difference between a repost and a post? Your posts aren't -varied-,
they
> > are "thesaurused" to death!
> >
> > What "pet theory"? I give even less credence to Rhesus than I do to
you.
>
>
> Hey, I resemble that remark...
I was posting while doing something else. I got it backwards.
KC8JBO
"Rhesus Butt Fucker" <pparis7@NO_FUCKING_SPAMcox.net> wrote in message
news:3C4B1067.3070700@NO_FUCKING_SPAMcox.net...
>
>
The only thing you resemble is a floating turd, frog-boy.
--
"I wish that ever other guy on the whole fucking planet was a homo."
- Jesus Slut Fucker sings "It's Raining Men" in article
3B5B9059...@home.com>