No proof for CIA puppy torture
Earl Dombroski
Larry (the Anonymous Free-Energy Coward) and are putting puppies to
death by roasting them alive.
There is even less evidence that they are being photographed in this
act by Sir GH and Dad.
Why I have received this email mystifies me to no end.
The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
Earl
"Protecting the innocent since 1992."
Twittering One
Larry (the Anonymous Free-Energy Coward) and are putting puppies to
death by roasting them alive.
There is even less evidence that they are being photographed in this
act by Sir GH and Dad.
Why I have received this email mystifies me to no end.
The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide."
~ Earl
"Let puppy inside ~ !"
~ Folly
Ugly Bob
"Earl Dombroski" <earl.do...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1133060471....@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> There is no proof that RL, T1, HVAC and Ugly Bob are in league with
> Larry (the Anonymous Free-Energy Coward) and are putting puppies to
> death by roasting them alive.
Though, this doesn't necessarily preclude the possibility, either.
> There is even less evidence that they are being photographed in this
> act by Sir GH and Dad.
>
> Why I have received this email mystifies me to no end.
Perhaps because someone sent it...
Earl Dombroski
> "Earl Dombroski" <earl.do...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1133060471....@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > There is no proof that RL, T1, HVAC and Ugly Bob are in league with
> > Larry (the Anonymous Free-Energy Coward) and are putting puppies to
> > death by roasting them alive.
>
> Though, this doesn't necessarily preclude the possibility, either.
http://www.cafepress.com/maryostore.12586457
Oh, the humanity!
Holly
Oh ... "What do the simple folk do?"
Earl Dombroski
Ser Holly,
They're bound to say... and it's liable to be what they've always done.
Pearl
"Listening to my future since 1992."
Pale.Pink.
Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
>
>
> The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
>
>
Of course not, Ossifer Ding ~~~What do you want? Kibbie?
Earl Dombroski
>
>
Ser Knobette,
A quick review of your posts reveals your highly intelligent nature. I
would like to be the first of the Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) to
congratulate you on your highly effective strategy of posting only
high-authority one-liners as opposed to anything of substance or
originality. No one before you has ever employed your shrewd method of
condescending pontification and we at the DUC (TINC) cannot imagine how
you ever thought it up.
I especially like the finality of your spine-tingling "~ DING ~"
denouement. Others, like Art Deco, use the bellboy's "*ding*" showing
that the person or post in question takes no more to remove or call out
than the sound the manager might ring from the front desk. A
forty-thousand source lines of code simulator was employed to match or
surpass the bellboy's dinger and it failed miserably, coming up with
only permutations such as the Ritz's front "Ding." or the Marberry's "I
say, ding, old boy" or the muffled sound of the towel againts the dome,
"*dinq" and when given enough cluster-processor time, even once yielded
"_ding_" - but it was so understated that analysts to this day question
whether its intent is to call for the removal of unwanted luggage or to
notify the concierge that an iced-latte is desired in suite 17.
For four decades, from 1e-12 to 1e-8, Art's distinctive "*ding*" has
been the unmitigated and unchallenged Usenet's "Front!" and the DUC
(TINC) as well as the cypherpunks have steered clear of further
attempts at improving upon its greatness.
And here you come along, muster the power and majesty of the bells of
Notre Dame, grab the ropes, and with all of your might, you are able to
make those lusty bells peal out a whole ding.
You must be self-taught. Really.
It's clear it didn't take you a whole lot of time to teach yourself.
I, for one, am simply glad that I don't have to deal with your
greatness in real life. (BTW - do you operate a motor vehicle on
public streets or procreate and if yes to either, are you required to
warn others in your community when so doing?)
Please, Ser Knobette, do respond and use as many clever sentences as
you are able to muster. Usenet holds its breath just for you,
regardless of which highly inventive nickname you feel you simply MUST
use this time.
Pearl
"Nothing more than typing practice since 1992."
Pale.Pink.
Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
>
>
>
>
Kibbie
Two layers of ground meat, mixed with wheat germ, then stuffed with
meat, pine nuts, onions, and spices.
http://www.plushfriends.com/g60163.html
or would you prefer a Lamb Chop?
http://www.elearningtoys.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/lambchop350.jpg
Twinkle, twinkle, little kook
Earl Dombroski wrote:
> Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
> > The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
> >
> >
> > ~DING~
>
> Ser Knobette,
>
> A quick review of your posts reveals your highly intelligent nature.
<AHEM>
Everyone here seems to have a personal definition of ..'intelligence'
...
> I would like to be the first of the Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) to
> congratulate you on your highly effective strategy of posting only
> high-authority one-liners as opposed to anything of substance or
> originality.
Thanks :-))))))
> No one before you has ever employed your shrewd method of
> condescending pontification and we at the DUC (TINC) cannot imagine how
> you ever thought it up.
See, I've learned.... life is like a roll of toilet paper.
(The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes)
> I especially like the finality of your spine-tingling "~ DING ~"
> denouement. Others, like Art Deco, use the bellboy's "*ding*" showing
> that the person or post in question takes no more to remove or call out
> than the sound the manager might ring from the front desk. A
> forty-thousand source lines of code simulator was employed to match or
> surpass the bellboy's dinger and it failed miserably, coming up with
> only permutations such as the Ritz's front "Ding." or the Marberry's "I
> say, ding, old boy" or the muffled sound of the towel againts the dome,
> "*dinq" and when given enough cluster-processor time, even once yielded
> "_ding_" - but it was so understated that analysts to this day question
> whether its intent is to call for the removal of unwanted luggage or to
> notify the concierge that an iced-latte is desired in suite 17.
>
> For four decades, from 1e-12 to 1e-8, Art's distinctive "*ding*" has
> been the unmitigated and unchallenged Usenet's "Front!" and the DUC
> (TINC) as well as the cypherpunks have steered clear of further
> attempts at improving upon its greatness.
>
> And here you come along, muster the power and majesty of the bells of
> Notre Dame, grab the ropes, and with all of your might, you are able to
> make those lusty bells peal out a whole ding.
>
> You must be self-taught. Really.
Dear idiot, ability to learn is itself intelligence.
> It's clear it didn't take you a whole lot of time to teach yourself.
Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more
intelligent than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
> I, for one, am simply glad that I don't have to deal with your
> greatness in real life.
~~~ DING ~~~
> (BTW - do you operate a motor vehicle on
> public streets or procreate and if yes to either, are you required to
> warn others in your community when so doing?)
~ ~
~~~ DONG ~~~
~ ~
> Please, Ser Knobette, do respond and use as many clever sentences as
> you are able to muster. Usenet holds its breath just for you,
> regardless of which highly inventive nickname you feel you simply MUST
> use this time.
Get lost, idiot
> Pearl
>
> "Nothing more than typing practice since 1992."
Pearl
The desire to understand is sometimes far less intelligent than the
inability to understand.
Earl Dombroski
You just really are not very good at this, are you? Well, no need for
you to answer, that was a *rhetorical* question. I will attempt to
answer that which tasks your existence. Let's see if there's hope for
you.
Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
> Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
> > > The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
> > >
> > >
> > > ~DING~
> >
> > Ser Knobette,
> >
> > A quick review of your posts reveals your highly intelligent nature.
>
>
> <AHEM>
>
> Everyone here seems to have a personal definition of ..'intelligence'
Yes, but when you are a slow learner, such as yourself, this doesn't
really mean much, now does it, Knobette?
> > I would like to be the first of the Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) to
> > congratulate you on your highly effective strategy of posting only
> > high-authority one-liners as opposed to anything of substance or
> > originality.
>
> Thanks :-))))))
Lower intelligence is marked by the joy of attention, even when the
attention is negative.
> > No one before you has ever employed your shrewd method of
> > condescending pontification and we at the DUC (TINC) cannot imagine how
> > you ever thought it up.
>
> See, I've learned.... life is like a roll of toilet paper.
> (The closer it gets to the end, the faster it goes)
How very of you to discount the conservation of angular momentum.
> > And here you come along, muster the power and majesty of the bells of
> > Notre Dame, grab the ropes, and with all of your might, you are able to
> > make those lusty bells peal out a whole ding.
> >
> > You must be self-taught. Really.
>
> Dear idiot, ability to learn is itself intelligence.
Ser Knobette - it's not good to talk out loud when writing in your
diary.
BTW, the ability to learn is not *in* itself intelligence - it is
merely the ability to learn. You've learned how to use those square
thingies below your monitor with the alphabet marked on them to write
and post, but you show no intelligence whatsoever. This is probably
going way over your head, but others are enjoying your posts more than
you can possibly imagine - because you don't comprehend the source of
their joy...
> > It's clear it didn't take you a whole lot of time to teach yourself.
>
>
> Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
> intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more
> intelligent than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
No. No. No. (Repetition being a small part of education.) You are
uniquely unqualified to make such a statement. Your personal
insecurity by not even giving proper capitalization to Art Deco's name
speaks volumes - but you're not listening...
If I were as jealous of Dr. Flonkenstein and Art Deco as you are, I'd
be forced to use a sock puppet, too. I've asked one of my bestest
friends why people use sock puppets, as I'm not wired for it, and now
you've answered for your case.
You still have time to take the toilet paper of life in hand, wipe away
the residue on your head, and think and speak intelligently. Then you
won't need to be jealous of Flonk and Art.
You can do it!
> > I, for one, am simply glad that I don't have to deal with your
> > greatness in real life.
Still stands.
> > (BTW - do you operate a motor vehicle on
> > public streets or procreate and if yes to either, are you required to
> > warn others in your community when so doing?)
Still stands.
> > Please, Ser Knobette, do respond and use as many clever sentences as
> > you are able to muster. Usenet holds its breath just for you,
> > regardless of which highly inventive nickname you feel you simply MUST
> > use this time.
>
> Get lost, idiot
That's four complete sentences so far, and three sentence fragments -
very, very good! Wow!
> > Pearl
> >
> > "Nothing more than typing practice since 1992."
>
> Pearl
That's my handle, Knobette. Imitation is the sincerest form of
imitation.
> The desire to understand is sometimes far less intelligent than the
> inability to understand.
Wow. Keep that up and you'll cross the 100 IQ mark in ***no*** time!
Pearl
"Still only typing practice since 1992."
Raving Loonie
> Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
> > The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
> >
> >
> > ~DING~
+++ dong +++
http://www.answers.com/topic/the-dirty-fork
Doctor P. Inque.
Raving Loonie
http://www.badmovies.org/movies/darkstar/darkstar4.jpg
For Pearl ...
To help with the Sci/Fi lessons
~~~~> http://www.benzedrine.cx/darkstar-screenplay.html
RL
Earl Dombroski
No help required - I've seen Dark Star about a zillion times - or four
- and LMAO each time. I believe it was Carpenter's directorial debut
or sci/fi debut or something.
Great stuff.
Pearl
Raving Loonie
Another film from my youth ...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0067866/
Predates Tarantino. Slightly dated. Amusing, too.
' ...
JODOROWSKY
Yes. I'll tell you what Godard said when someone asked
him, "Why do you show so much blood in Weekend ?"
And he answered, "I don't use blood; I use the color red.
I like red." There are so many people who don't like red.
There's a social barrier against red. If all the violence shown
in movies doesn't show blood, people will accept it. The first
barrier against red is the red of traffic lights. Then there's the
Communist terror. And the menstrual cycles. And hemorrhoids ...
which eighty percent of the people in the U.S. suffer from ... from bad
eating habits, from eating hamburgers. To solve this problem, I
propose
that the audience see different colors of blood. Think of green blood
... '
Raving Loonie
Twittering One
Two layers of mixed with wheat germ,
Then stuffed with pine nuts, onions, and spices.
... or would you prefer
Lamb Chop ~ ?"
~ Pale Pink
"Lamb Chop is our fluffy friend
Ba ba ba,
Bud de Peeps ~ !"
~ Kibbles
Pale.Pink.
Raving Loonie wrote:
> Doctor P. Inque. wrote:
> > Raving Loonie wrote:
> > > Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > > > Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
> > > > > The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ~DING~
> > >
> > > +++ dong +++
> > >
> > > http://www.answers.com/topic/the-dirty-fork
> > >
> > > > Pearl
> > > >
> > > > "Nothing more than typing practice since 1992."
> >
> > http://frogstar.com/wav/displaywav.asp?fil=meepmeep.wav
> ~ bad link ~ :(
Sorry. It works on this end so I don't know how to improve it for you.
Art Deco
>Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
>intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more
>intelligent than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
Nice lits, fanboi.
Anyone want to play "spot the irony"?
--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in alt.astronomy
"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
"Human beings CAN NOT live in a solar system without a sun
with a ferrite core and a planet without a solid iron core."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004
"I am a sean being from another planet."
-- Darla aka Dr. Why aka Dr. Yubiwan aka Silouen aka ...
Art Deco
>Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
>> Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
>> intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more
>> intelligent than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
>
> =+ =
>
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astronomy/msg/937c298175ff1932?dmode=source&
>hl=en
>Art Deco wrote:
>mop jockey started the "Fart Deco" froggery, which was then adopted by
>the oh_brutha20002 sockpuppet machine/fanboi.
>
> "FArt Deco" is/was oh_brutha.
>
>
> ~~~ DING ~~~
>
Was there a point to this reply to yourself, fanboi?
Dr. Flonkenstein
> Twinkle, twinkle, little kook <oh_brut...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
>>intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more intelligent
>>than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
>
> Nice lits, fanboi.
AHahahh
This time is't ME #uno on the lits!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <40376AD8...@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.
The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
in Message-ID:<1132269600.4...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Raving Loonie shows his homoerotical masturbatory fantasms:
"Wank on, twit."
in Message-ID:<adurg15tk0vd6ip6r...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Crackpot" Cameron explains electromagnetism, and how
the sun has an 'iron core':
"The sun and the earth are 'magnets', each with an iron
based core, and both have an electrical force between them."
in Message-ID: <rjise19nrclufrgjg...@4ax.com>
Mark "Woody" Ferguson shows his mastery of the English language:
"With patients and practice you could be nominated next time around..."
in Message-MID: <k1kte1hu59khhkt4m...@4ax.com>
Mark "The illiterate" Ferguson astonishes everybody saying:
"Oh, for fucks sake, Gary no matter how angery he thinks he makes there
are lines I will not cross unless I believe what I say is the true, I
know more then you."
in Message-ID: <lhic01pc5svudk22n...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Tequila Titsz" Cameron explains world religions:
"The jews roots are islamic."
in Message-ID: <j1b5c1l2629tc6afu...@4ax.com>
Alexa "dumbass" Cameron shows her knowledge of history:
"WRONGO. There was NO Bible before King James had it written."
in Message-ID: <5g89d15kbjd3cd7i6...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Word Salad" Cameron shows her knowledge of science:
"Einstein never found the double superimposed doubl 'equilateral' triangle."
in Message-ID: <1rfee1d5iuhq3piii...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Kook of the year 2004" Cameron uses words she doesn't understand again:
"Why is the Pentagon killing American citizens with non-lethal technology?"
in Message-ID: <2mrge1phgk68ourdt...@4ax.com>
Alexa "Imnotalexadammit" Cameron has problems with that extra finger
on her hand:
"Why do the Jews use the Star of David as symbolic of the Pentagon, or
Pentagram?"
reminder: Message-ID: <pan.2005.09.01...@localhost.localdomain>
The quote naziwhore Don Ocean stole.
Earl Dombroski
I'm not sure what all of your web references gains you when it's so
easy for you to sum up your position with a single link.
As you are not very good at this sort of thing, I've found and
compressed the link that expresses your viewpoint nicely.
Always glad to help!
Pearl
Georges Jaques Danton
http://www.fireflysun.com/book/sci.psychology.psychotherapy.php
> Always glad to help!
~ DING ~
>
> Pearl
http://grimey87.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/hahahaha.jpg
Pale.Pink.
Georges Jaques Danton wrote:
http://frogstar.com/wav/displaywav.asp?fil=litesab3.wav
Earl Dombroski
The psychotherapy link was completely enjoyable. I recommend it as
general reading material.
The underlying premise for your use of it is completely false.
You will recall that you entered this thread by lamely posting
off-topic that it was a good idea (wrong) to crush the "bad apple," a
(wrong) reference to Holly.
You are just so very lame that eventually someone just had to point
this out to you - and that fell to me. Everything I've said about you
is straight from your own fossil record - nothing was added or made up,
and no larting has occurred.
Now that you are exposed for the crybaby wannabee that you are, I
should think that it would be best for you to put your tail between
your legs and skulk away. Or slither away on your belly.
You continue to show no mastery of the language. You continue to not
be able to decide what moniker to use (like, what? I'll be *fooled*
into reading you? I've already demonstrated that I thoroughly enjoy
laughing *at* you).
You're the Usenet equivalent of a professional welfare recipient -
posting links is designed to give someone an occasional assist, not
become a way of life.
OBTW - If I say Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) again, does this mean I'm
stalking you? Mua hahaha!
But ... what if I just ignore you now? And I can, because I don't
care, but for you this is a win or lose game, and by your rules, I've
won each time. That it doesn't matter to me is what tasks you the
most.
By'bye, fart-breath!
Pearl
"Administering last rites to those dying of their own lame obscurity
since 1992."
Earl Dombroski
The frogstar asp?= links are broken if not accessed from their home
page. However, as I am always glad to help:
http://faultgame.com/images/litesab3.wav
Cheer and carry on,
Pearl
Dick MEOW Cheney aka Aaron M Henne
<spit>
General John Forbes wrote:
> Art Deco wrote:
> > Twinkle, twinkle, little kook <oh_brut...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
> > >intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more
> > >intelligent than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
> >
> > Nice lits, fanboi.
> >
> > Anyone want to play "spot the irony"?
> >
> > --
>
> { http://novelco.com/clegg/sp/deskBell/desk_bell.jpg }
>
> ~~ DING ~~ DING ~~ DING ~~
Pale.Pink.
Thank you Mr. Dombroski. The links work for me (accessed from this
NG). I am perplexed.
Here's a picture of Perplexa's work.
http://frogstar.com/spider/index.asp
Raving Loonie
Pale.Pink. wrote:
> Raving Loonie wrote:
> > Doctor P. Inque. wrote:
> > > Raving Loonie wrote:
> > > > Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > > > > Twinkle, twinkle, little kook wrote:
> > > > > > The Dark Usenet Cabal (TINC) does not condone puppycide.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ~DING~
> > > >
> > > > +++ dong +++
> > > >
> > > > http://www.answers.com/topic/the-dirty-fork
> > > >
> > > > > Pearl
> > > > >
> > > > > "Nothing more than typing practice since 1992."
> > >
> > > http://frogstar.com/wav/displaywav.asp?fil=meepmeep.wav
> > ~ bad link ~ :(
>
>
> Sorry. It works on this end so I don't know how to improve it for you.
http://www.whereisthemoney.org
wrote:
Looks very much like you've been self-appointed as the High Priest of on the
Alter of the Green Smelly Paper.
That's no claim to fame, DUMBASS!
Pale.Pink.
I like you bester on acid. Nice straight little lines. Highway to the
Fangs.
Earl Dombroski
> Thank you Mr. Dombroski. The links work for me (accessed from this
> NG). I am perplexed.
>
> Here's a picture of Perplexa's work.
> http://frogstar.com/spider/index.asp
Ser Pink,
I loved the reference to Perplexa's work - many thanks.
Maybe it worked for you because you already had a cookie there.... or
something????
Now I'm Perplexa on caffeine - how can we ever know if our links work
beforehand?
OK, we don't - we just have to have friends!
Best,
Pearl.l.
Twittering One
And the table ~ side suicide
Of The Matre D ... O alas,
Aside from ~
A fine glass of Margaux,
A perfectly stuffed artichoke,
A legion of asparagae,
A pride of lemon souflee,
A decanter of enhanced water
Sparkling ...
A few other minor details
Dragged out,
Olive oil redressed, by Pepper sprinkled,
The question ~
The Scenario of The Dirty Fork
Of casting and set dressing,
The illustrated scene featured
On the gold ~ tassled
Dinner Menu
Remained substantially the same sketch
And stretch of French Bread
As The Dirty Knife
By butter spread."
~ Justin
Twittering One
Scene of Vanitas,
Still life,
If by laurel leaf,
Perfection's woven wreath,
Gilded, garlanded ...
By life surrounded ~
A summoning ~ !"
~ Mum
Earl Dombroski
> Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > Ser Knobette,
> >
> > you to answer, that was a *rhetorical* question. I will attempt to
> > answer that which tasks your existence. Let's see if there's hope for
> > you.
<snip>
> Uh? YOU'RE the goddamed loozer , { oh_brutha20002 } definitely
> mocked the Mighty Earl Dombroski & Co.
Ah. OK. BTW - does O' know your using his sock puppet now or is it a
franchise deal where you pass it on to someone else when you're done
with it?
> Okay, gotta go, gotta go now ;-) it's 13:00 o clock pm
> here.....................................*
> http://www.aircanada.jp/images/fleet-hist-747-100.jpg
Hope you had a safe trip home.
Pearl
Mark Shippey
> Uh? YOU'RE the goddamed loozer , { oh_brutha20002 } definitely
> mocked the Mighty Earl Dombroski & Co.
Hi Manfred!
What pray tell is "Earl Dombroski & Co." and do you happen to know the
stock code for that company? I want to buy some shares and invest in it.
Is it like EDCO or something? Thanks in advance.
Francisco Pizarro
> Manfred von Richthofen wrote:
> > Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > > Ser Knobette,
> > >
> > > You just really are not very good at this, are you? Well, no need for
> > > you to answer, that was a *rhetorical* question. I will attempt to
> > > answer that which tasks your existence. Let's see if there's hope for
> > > you.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Uh? YOU'RE the goddamed loozer , { oh_brutha20002 } definitely
> > mocked the Mighty Earl Dombroski & Co.
>
> Ah. OK. BTW - does O' know your using his sock puppet now or is it a
> franchise deal where you pass it on to someone else when you're done
> with it?
LOL -you're a paranoid idiot as well!
> > Okay, gotta go, gotta go now ;-) it's 13:00 o clock pm
> > here.....................................*
> > http://www.aircanada.jp/images/fleet-hist-747-100.jpg
>
> Hope you had a safe trip home.
>
> Pearl
<The missing post>
Mon Nov 28, 2005 12:00 pm
General John Forbes
Post subject: Re: No proof for CIA puppy torture
Earl Dombroski wrote:
Ser Knobette,
You just really are not very good at this, are you? Well, no need for
you to answer, that was a *rhetorical* question. I will attempt to
answer that which tasks your existence. Let's see if there's hope for
you.
This is probably going way over your head, but others are enjoying your
posts more than
you can possibly imagine - because you don't comprehend the source of
their joy...
It's clear it didn't take you a whole lot of time to teach yourself.
> Actually sockpuppets like oh_brut...@yahoo.com doesn't need
> intelligence, nevertheless ...this socks is infinitely more
> intelligent than Dr. Flonkenstein or art deco.
No. No. No. (Repetition being a small part of education.) You are
uniquely unqualified to make such a statement. Your personal
insecurity by not even giving proper capitalization to Art Deco's name
speaks volumes - but you're not listening...
> http://mimo.softservei.com/chirris.gif
> ~ { DING } ~
If I were as jealous of Dr. Flonkenstein and Art Deco as you are, I'd
be forced to use a sock puppet, too. I've asked one of my bestest
friends why people use sock puppets, as I'm not wired for it, and now
you've answered for your case.
You still have time to take the toilet paper of life in hand, wipe away
the residue on your head, and think and speak intelligently. Then you
won't need to be jealous of Flonk and Art.
You can do it!
> Nope, I'm hopeless.
I, for one, am simply glad that I don't have to deal with your
greatness in real life.
Still stands.
(BTW - do you operate a motor vehicle on
public streets or procreate and if yes to either, are you required to
warn others in your community when so doing?)
Still stands.
> http://www.cvgreys.org/Cool%20Girl.jpg
Please, Ser Knobette, do respond and use as many clever sentences as
you are able to muster. Usenet holds its breath just for you,
regardless of which highly inventive nickname you feel you simply MUST
use this time.
> Get lost, idiot
That's four complete sentences so far, and three sentence fragments -
very, very good! Wow!
> http://www.cvgreys.org/Cool%20Girl.jpg
Pearl
"Nothing more than typing practice since 1992."
> Pearl
> The desire to understand is sometimes far less intelligent than the
> inability to understand.
That's my handle, Knobette. Imitation is the sincerest form of
imitation.
> Yes, I'm definitely mocking you.
Wow. Keep that up and you'll cross the 100 IQ mark in ***no*** time!
> http://www.cheesedip.com/einstein-tongue.jpg
Pearl
"Still only typing practice since 1992."
) ~ ~ GONG ~ ~ (
Usted es un pendejo muy grande.
Earl Dombroski
> Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > Manfred von Richthofen wrote:
> > > Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > > > Ser Knobette,
> > > >
> > > > You just really are not very good at this, are you?
> >
> > franchise deal where you pass it on to someone else when you're done
> > with it?
>
> LOL -you're a paranoid idiot as well!
Moi? Je ne pense pas.
BTW - you have no clue, the meaning of the words: paranoid and idiot.
I bothered to skim your old posts. You disprove the adage that
practice makes perfect. You are about as good at this as your friend,
Knobette.
In fact, one of my friends asked in email if I thought Knobette might
be a sock for Francisco Pizarro. I said no, Knobette is a celebate
Penatente to rationalize not being able to get any dick, whereas
Francisco loiters at bus station restrooms.
Here, I'll prove it.
In this hand, I have a bisquichito. In the other, a dildo wrapped with
razor wire. Now I'm going to hold the bisquichito and the dildo up and
see which one you sit up for. Most chihuahuas would simply go for the
bisquichito. The neurotic ones wil pee themselves and run in circles
through their own pee - and go for the bisquichito. And you? You are
the first chihuahua I've seen to stand on your nose.
I may give out bisquichitos, but I'm not going rape your ass with this
razored dildo - that's a job for your mom and she'll take care of her
Franchito just as soon as she's done swallowing. (You do recognize the
back of her head from watching her pay the cable TV bill this way, no?)
Anyway Francisco, the thing you're best at is something you inherited
from your mom's side. (What's that you say, Francisco? Fingering your
ass? Ah. OK. The *two* best things you're good at ... what
Francisco? You like to eat what!?!? Jeez, Francisco, I just wanted to
say that you suck like your mama ... learned it from your dad??
Francisco, no one wants to hear your personal problems. Pretty much
gives you no reason to ever post anything again.
> <The missing post>
It wasn't missing - you just couldn't see it with your tongue licking
down there.
> Usted es un pendejo muy grande.
¿Habla usted cretin?
¿Quien es mas macho? _*Pearl*_ es mas macho. Francisco es mui gay
chihuahua, and licks the panties for pesos.
(Hey, Knobette - wanna cum pleasure your little puppy, Francisco? He's
peeing himself again.)
Seriously, Francisco - wipe up after yourself and come back when you
know how.
Pearl
"Poof! Brujeria since 1992."
Earl Dombroski
> {Disgusting}
> Earl ohbrother wrote:
Ser Admiral Knobette,
Your attempt to flame here as the sock ohbrutha failed, so now you
accuse me of being that sock.
Penultimately stoopid of you. Now, ring in as your other dozen socks
and *scare* me that others *believe* it. Golly, that's as original as
what you're trying now - I'm *sure* it will work.
Do you wear a helmut?
If not, is your favorite color red or yellow? (Christmas is
coming....)
Pearl
"Keeping the special ones from bumping their heads too often since
1992."
Earl Dombroski
Earl Dombroski
> Earl Dombroski wrote:
> > It's no use sucking up to me at this point, Knobette.
>
Ser Knobette,
You seem to be a very hierarchical thinker. When your rules don't work
and people don't fit into your very little reality, do you run around
the room screaming, "When worlds collide! When worlds collide,
Jerry!?"
Are you doing that right now?
Pearl