Roswell - The New Conspiracy
David Taylor
Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
I was watching a show on the Discovery Channel the other day about alien
crashes. It was filmed before “Roswell: Case Closed” and course Roswell came
up. They spent a lot of time talking about Project Mogul (The balloons sent
up to listen for Russian nuclear testing) and the types of balloons they
used. It became clear as the show went on, with the evidence and interviews
provided, that the Roswell incident was nothing more than a embarrasing
misidentification of a crashed balloon. The stories they played of
eyewitnesses to the alien bodies were contradictory and I wasn’t sure if I
could believe any of them.
If I was able to ignore the big “Roswell: Case Closed” press event I wouldn’
t have known what to believe.
About a week after “Roswell: Case Closed” there was another report by the
Airforce that admitted they lied… AGAIN! The Roswell incident was REALLY a
stealth airplane that crashed during a test flight. That was, by far, more
believeable than the earlier explanations combined.
Well… after some more thought, I’m even more confused! The television
program was obviously controlled very well. Retired officers giving
interviews about what they saw, eyewitnesses to the debris describing
objects similar to the balloons used for project Mugul.
HOW COULD ANYONE SEE THIS IF THAT’S NOT WHAT IT WAS.
What is our government doing? Who is responsible for the lies… The CIA? Men
in Black? WHO? How much time and money have we spent covering up a crashed
stealth airplane? It’s obvious to me that stealth technology was being
tested at some point… THE PLANE EXISTS TODAY! So why lie in 1997?
The only conclusion I can come too is that it really wasn’t a balloon, a
stealth, or imagination. The issue has been confused and covered-up so much
it’s hard for people interested in the subject to follow what’s going on!
I believe that time travellers crashed in Roswell and our government will
stop at nothing to protect that secret! Does anyone feel the same?
David Taylor
http://www.tnt-design.com/believe/
Check out my website for more information and some cool UFO and Alien
inspired products.
JungleAcid
> Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
I thought that was "Pepsi."
<el snippo>
> I believe that time travellers crashed in Roswell and our government will
> stop at nothing to protect that secret! Does anyone feel the same?
you worry about roswell, how many years ago.
take it for granted that the nineties are the top part of an
exponential curve. there's more important stuff to worry about.
> David Taylor
> http://www.tnt-design.com/believe/
> Check out my website for more information and some cool UFO and Alien
> inspired products.
yeeeeah. sure. try
"Check out my website for a catalogue of events and instances in which
capatalists took advantage of a weakness in the mass market."
Give a hick a credit card and he'll buy anything.
and it seems that your server is down or not responding.
--
JungleAcid mhm15x6, wsd2
"way number 47: Dave and Jungle Acid let me hit them in the head with
a 2x4 with a nail in it while they masturbate over anime whitey gals
turning into leopard nitro sex fiends." -Seester
Scott Demos
Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo by the military to the
military , that gets published and recorded on paper says: (probably a ballon)
in the start of it. That line is always in there as an "out" for the
government to say its a ballon. Check the records, you will see that all the
papers even today say it too!
>David Taylor <tay...@tnt-design.com> wrote in article
><68jsde$bh2$1...@guysmiley.blarg.net>...
>> Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
>> What is our government doing? Who is responsible for the lies… The CIA?
>Men
>> in Black? WHO? How much time and money have we spent covering up a
>crashed
>> stealth airplane? It’s obvious to me that stealth technology was being
>> tested at some point… THE PLANE EXISTS TODAY! So why lie in 1997?
>>
>> The only conclusion I can come too is that it really wasn’t a balloon, a
>> stealth, or imagination. The issue has been confused and covered-up so
>much
>> it’s hard for people interested in the subject to follow what’s going on!
>>
>> I believe that time travellers crashed in Roswell and our government will
>> stop at nothing to protect that secret! Does anyone feel the same?
>Why time travelers? Whynot just extraterrestrials? Possibly
>extradimensional beings. Time doesn't physically exist, it's a reference.
>So there's no physical past or physical future to travel to.
>>
>> David Taylor
>> http://www.tnt-design.com/believe/
>> Check out my website for more information and some cool UFO and Alien
>> inspired products.
>--
>Brian
>cyb...@nospam.worldnet.att.net
>To reply by email, remove nospam. from address
JungleAcid
On Sat, 03 Jan 1998 01:43:44 GMT, kha...@nospamhotmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jan 1998 00:21:37 GMT, smu...@nextdim.com (Scott A. Munro)
> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>
> >So researchers, confronted with a real event which was not
> >extraordinary, and an extraordinary event that is not real, stitched
> >them together and called it "The Roswell Incident." The whole thing is
> >a bad joke.
>
> Do you ever wonder if "They" just sit back and laugh at us? *grin*
don't wonder; we do.
Scott A. Munro
>Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
You need to distinguish between the real Roswell Incident (the one in
1947 which involved Jesse Marcel, Mac Brazel and Brazel's family and
neighbors) and the fake Roswell Incident (which started in 1978 and
involves such dubious characters as James Ragsdale, Glenn Dennis, and
Gerald Anderson).
The witnesses to the real Roswell Incident describe debris which (even
if we accept their decades-old memories as 100% accurate) is utterly
inconsistent with a spaceship (or, indeed, a powered or piloted craft
of any kind), but which (given reasonable allowance for the decades
which passed before they told their stories) is quite consistent with
a balloon.
The "witnesses" to the fake Roswell Incident offer contradictory
testimony as to time, place, and the number and appearance of the dead
aliens they claim to have seen. Much of the supposed "witness"
testimony is, in fact, nothing nore than hearsay or rumor. Some of the
"witnesses" have changed their stories. Others have been caught in
material misstatements. None of them can provide a shred of evidence
thast their stories are true.
So researchers, confronted with a real event which was not
extraordinary, and an extraordinary event that is not real, stitched
them together and called it "The Roswell Incident." The whole thing is
a bad joke.
And where you get "time travellers," I can't begin to imagine.
-----
Scott A. Munro http://www.nextdim.com/users/smunro/
UFOs, Jack the Ripper, politics, fiction,
computer art, and other strange subjects.
kha...@nospamhotmail.com
<snip>
>So researchers, confronted with a real event which was not
>extraordinary, and an extraordinary event that is not real, stitched
>them together and called it "The Roswell Incident." The whole thing is
>a bad joke.
Do you ever wonder if "They" just sit back and laugh at us? *grin*
Remove nospam from address to reply.
"What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say." - RWE
Brian
David Taylor <tay...@tnt-design.com> wrote in article
<68jsde$bh2$1...@guysmiley.blarg.net>...
> Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
> What is our government doing? Who is responsible for the lies… The CIA?
WeeSaul
On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 15:09:44 GMT, pizz...@gte.net (JungleAcid) wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Jan 1998 15:04:41 -0800, "David Taylor"
><tay...@tnt-design.com> wrote:
>> Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
>I thought that was "Pepsi."
Nope that is Star Trek...
Pepsi is the choose of a new generation...
The old generation be damned...
><el snippo>
>> I believe that time travellers crashed in Roswell and our government will
>> stop at nothing to protect that secret! Does anyone feel the same?
>you worry about roswell, how many years ago.
>take it for granted that the nineties are the top part of an
>exponential curve. there's more important stuff to worry about.
>> David Taylor
>> http://www.tnt-design.com/believe/
>> Check out my website for more information and some cool UFO and Alien
>> inspired products.
>yeeeeah. sure. try
>"Check out my website for a catalogue of events and instances in which
>capatalists took advantage of a weakness in the mass market."
>Give a hick a credit card and he'll buy anything.
>and it seems that your server is down or not responding.
WeeSaul mhm15x5
A vast sewer knowledge...
JungleAcid
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998 22:14:48, De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos)
wrote:
> Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo by the military to the
> military , that gets published and recorded on paper says: (probably a ballon)
> in the start of it. That line is always in there as an "out" for the
> government to say its a ballon. Check the records, you will see that all the
> papers even today say it too!
so you've heard. did an ex-cia agent appear on jerry springer
lastnight? but you actually haven't -checked- the papers.
--
JungleAcid 15x6
minimalistic wsd2
twi...@worldnet.att.net
De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos) wrote:
>Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo by the military to the
>military , that gets published and recorded on paper says: (probably a ballon)
>in the start of it. That line is always in there as an "out" for the
>government to say its a ballon. Check the records, you will see that all the
>papers even today say it too!
>
Wrong! You are only referring to the NSA comint files.
They detail the intelligence about Russian radar checking
balloons.
Most of the data from Gov't records don't say anything like
this.
Go to:
http://www.iufog.org/project1947/
to look at loads of gov't documents that don't say any such
thing.
<snip>
twi...@worldnet.att.net
smu...@nextdim.com (Scott A. Munro) wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Jan 1998 15:04:41 -0800, "David Taylor"
><tay...@tnt-design.com> wrote:
>
>>Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
>
>You need to distinguish between the real Roswell Incident (the one in
>1947 which involved Jesse Marcel, Mac Brazel and Brazel's family and
>neighbors) and the fake Roswell Incident (which started in 1978 and
>involves such dubious characters as James Ragsdale, Glenn Dennis, and
>Gerald Anderson).
>
>The witnesses to the real Roswell Incident describe debris which (even
>if we accept their decades-old memories as 100% accurate) is utterly
>inconsistent with a spaceship (or, indeed, a powered or piloted craft
>of any kind), but which (given reasonable allowance for the decades
>which passed before they told their stories) is quite consistent with
>a balloon.
In 1947, the descriptions of the material were:
" Brazel related that on June 14 he and 8-year-old son,
Vernon were about 7 or 8 miles from the ranch house of the
J.B. Foster ranch, which heoperates, when they came upon a
large area of bright wreckage made up on (sic) rubber
strips, tinfoil, a rather tough paper and sticks. "
"When the debris was gathered up the tinfoil, paper, tape,
and sticks made a bundle about three feet long and 7 or 8
inches thick, while the rubber made a bundle about 18 or 20
inches long and about 8 inches thick. In all, he estimated,
the entire lot would have weighed maybe five pounds.
There was no sign of any metal in the area which might have
been used for an engine and no sign of any propellors of any
kind, although at least one paper fin had been glued onto
some of the tinfoil.
There were no words to be found anywhere on the instrument,
although there were letters on some of the parts.
Considerable scotch tape and some tape with flowers printed
upon it had been used in the construction.
No strings or wire were to be found but there were some
eyelets in the paper to indicate that some sort of
attachment may have been used. "
Even most of the ancient memories support this statement of
Scott's!
Jesse A. Marcel, NM (son of the late Major Jesse Marcel; 11
years old at the time of the incident). Affidavit dated May
6, 1991. " ... There were three categories of debris: a
thick, foil like metallic gray substance; a brittle,
brownish-black plastic-like material, like Bakelite; and
there were fragments of what appeared to be I-beams. On the
inner surface of the I-beam, there appeared to be a type of
writing. This writing was a purple-violet hue, and it had an
embossed appearance. The figures were composed of
curved, geometric shapes. It had no resemblance to Russian,
Japanese or any other foreign language. It resembled
hieroglyphics, but it had no animal-like characters ......
Loretta Proctor (former neighbor of rancher W.W. Brazel).
Affidavit dated May 5, 199 1.
."..Brazel came to my ranch and showed my husband and me a
piece of material he said came from a large pile of debris
on the property he managed. The piece he brought was brown
in color, similar to plastic...'Mac' said the other material
on the property looked like aluminum foil. It was very
flexible and wouldn't crush or bum. There was also something
he described as tape which had printing on it. The color of
the printing was a kind of purple..."
(This testimony is somewhat different than was given when
her husband was alive!)
Bessie Brazel Schreiber (daughter of W.W. Brazel; 14 years
old at the time of the incident). Affidavit dated September
22, 1993. ."..The debris looked like pieces of a large
balloon which had burst. The pieces were small, the largest
I remember measuring about the same as the diameter of a
basketball. Most of it was a kind of double-sided material,
foil-like on one side and rubber-like on the other. Both
sides were grayish silver in color, the foil more silvery
than the rubber. Sticks, like kite sticks, were attached to
some of the pieces with a whitish tape. The tape was about
two or three inches wide and had flowerlike designs on it.
The 'flowers' were faint, a variety of pastel colors, and
reminded me of Japanese paintings in which the flowers are
not all connected. I do not recall any other types of
material or markings, nor do I remember seeing gouges in the
ground or any other signs that anything may have hit the
ground hard. The foil-rubber material could not be tom like
ordinary aluminum foil can be tom..."
Sally Strickland Tadolini (neighbor of WW Brazel; nine years
old in 1947). Affidavit dated September 27, 1993. ".. What
Bill showed us was a piece of what I still think as fabric.
It was something like aluminum foil, something like satin,
something like welltanned leather in its toughness, yet was
not precisely like any one of those materials. ...It was
about the thickness of very fine kidskin glove leather and a
dull metallic grayish silver, one side slightly darker than
the other. I do not remember it having any design or
embossing on it..."
Robert R. Porter (B-29 flight Engineer stationed at Roswell
in 1947). Affidavit dated June 7, 1991 " On this occasion, I
was a member of the crew which flew parts of what we were
told was a flying saucer to Fort Worth. The people on board
included ... and Maj Jesse Marcel. Capt. William E. Anderson
said it was from a flying saucer. After we arrived, the
material was transferred to a B-25. I was told they were
going to Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio. I was involved in
loading the B-29 with the material, which was wrapped in
packages with wrapping paper. One of the pieces was
triangle-shaped, about 2 1/2 feet across the bottom. The
rest were in small packages, about the size of a shoe box.
The brown paper was held with tape. The material was
extremely lightweight. When I picked it up, it was just like
picking up an empty package. We loaded the triangle shaped
package and three shoe box-sized packages into the plane.
All of the packages could have fit into the trunk of a car.
...When we came back from lunch, they told us they had
transferred the material to a B-25. They told us the
material was a weather balloon, but I'm certain it wasn't a
weather balloon..."
(Interestingly, the entire debris according to Proctor could
have fit into the trunk of a car!)
>
>The "witnesses" to the fake Roswell Incident offer contradictory
>testimony as to time, place, and the number and appearance of the dead
>aliens they claim to have seen.
For example, from just one book on the subject, we have the
following:
Jim Ragsdale - 3 bodies
Frank Kaufmann - 5 bodies
Glenn Dennis - 3 bodies, 2 of them badly mutilated
Anaya Montoya - 3 bodies plus 1 live ET
Mary Bush - 1 body
Barbara Dugger - 3 bodies plus 1 live ET
Frankie Rowe - 2 bodies plus 1 live ET
>Much of the supposed "witness"
>testimony is, in fact, nothing nore than hearsay or rumor. Some of the
>"witnesses" have changed their stories. Others have been caught in
>material misstatements. None of them can provide a shred of evidence
>thast their stories are true.
>
>So researchers, confronted with a real event which was not
>extraordinary, and an extraordinary event that is not real, stitched
>them together and called it "The Roswell Incident." The whole thing is
>a bad joke.
>
balloo
pizz...@gte.net (JungleAcid) wrote:
> De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos) wrote:
>> Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo
>> by the military to the military , that gets published and recorded
>> on paper says: (probably a balloo) in the start of it.
Those bastards!
>> That line is always in there as an "out" for the government to say
>> its a balloo.
Dammit I get blamed for everything. Toilet seat left up? Balloo.
Mud tracked into the house? Balloo. Massive statuary stolen from
public parks and laid out like June Taylor dance routines on major
thoroughfares about the greater Vancouver Metropolitan area? Police
go straight to me, start asking all these personal questions. I don't
know why I did it, dammit. And that's not an admission of guilt, just
a statement of fact.
>> Check the records, you will see that all the
>> papers even today say it too!
Well, heh heh, it was pretty funny. That sort of thing is going to
make the front page, unless somebody shoots the Prime Minister (and
why would Somebody do that?)
>so you've heard. did an ex-cia agent appear on jerry springer
>lastnight? but you actually haven't -checked- the papers.
I only said I was an ex-cia agent to get on the show. They were going
to throw me off when they found out I wasn't until I said I was a
lesbian who had been given a sex change by a ufo. I think it airs
next tuesday.
I believe in extraterrestrial life, but theories of Usenet are pretty
improbable.
--
coochie coo alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
ben capoeman mhm 15x1 wsd10 balloo at wilhelp dot com
jelliebun's dainty ursine of delight meow
"A new isp so soon? Get spanked off the other?"
Gareth Gee in <34ac03ec...@snews.zippo.com>
Jerry Bryson
David Taylor <tay...@tnt-design.com> wrote:
>
> I believe that time travellers crashed in Roswell and our government will
> stop at nothing to protect that secret! Does anyone feel the same?
probably.
--
Nescio ne sum, ergo penso sum.
Jerry Bryson
Scott A. Munro <smu...@nextdim.com> wrote:
>
> And where you get "time travellers," I can't begin to imagine.
That's easy. The time travelers have set up a loop. First there was
one "Roswell inc i den t. Now there are two. In a few years there will
be three....
Dr Entropy
balloo wrote:
> pizz...@gte.net (JungleAcid) wrote:
>
> > De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos) wrote:
>
> >> Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo
> >> by the military to the military , that gets published and recorded
> >> on paper says: (probably a balloo) in the start of it.
>
> Those bastards!
So you deny this act?!?!
> >> That line is always in there as an "out" for the government to say
> >> its a balloo.
>
> Dammit I get blamed for everything. Toilet seat left up? Balloo.
> Mud tracked into the house? Balloo. Massive statuary stolen from
> public parks and laid out like June Taylor dance routines on major
> thoroughfares about the greater Vancouver Metropolitan area? Police
> go straight to me, start asking all these personal questions. I don't
> know why I did it, dammit. And that's not an admission of guilt, just
> a statement of fact.
You have the right to remain silent...
>
>
> >> Check the records, you will see that all the
> >> papers even today say it too!
>
> Well, heh heh, it was pretty funny. That sort of thing is going to
> make the front page, unless somebody shoots the Prime Minister (and
> why would Somebody do that?)
He's a flonker. Flonkers are a highly unpredictable lot.
>
>
> >so you've heard. did an ex-cia agent appear on jerry springer
> >lastnight? but you actually haven't -checked- the papers.
>
> I only said I was an ex-cia agent to get on the show. They were going
> to throw me off when they found out I wasn't until I said I was a
> lesbian who had been given a sex change by a ufo. I think it airs
> next tuesday.
We're holding our collective breath. This is a benchmark achievement,
balloo!
>
>
> I believe in extraterrestrial life, but theories of Usenet are pretty
> improbable.
Most theories are met with derision at first. Just ask Gallileo.Or
Copernicus. Or Tim Leary. Oops! forgot where they were for a sec.
BTW where --exactly-- are they?
>
>
> --
> coochie coo alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
> ben capoeman mhm 15x1 wsd10 balloo at wilhelp dot com
> jelliebun's dainty ursine of delight meow
>
> "A new isp so soon? Get spanked off the other?"
> Gareth Gee in <34ac03ec...@snews.zippo.com>
couldn't possibly snip any of this. It's all germain.
Dr E--
mhm 17x1
Proud to be "rug free!" meow indeed...
Dr Entropy
David Taylor wrote:
> Roswell Conspiracy: The Next Generation
>
> I was watching a show on the Discovery Channel the other day about alien
> crashes. It was filmed before “Roswell: Case Closed” and course Roswell came
> up. They spent a lot of time talking about Project Mogul (The balloons sent
> up to listen for Russian nuclear testing) and the types of balloons they
> used. It became clear as the show went on, with the evidence and interviews
> provided, that the Roswell incident was nothing more than a embarrasing
> misidentification of a crashed balloon. The stories they played of
> eyewitnesses to the alien bodies were contradictory and I wasn’t sure if I
> could believe any of them.
>
> If I was able to ignore the big “Roswell: Case Closed” press event I wouldn’
> t have known what to believe.
>
> About a week after “Roswell: Case Closed” there was another report by the
> Airforce that admitted they lied… AGAIN! The Roswell incident was REALLY a
> stealth airplane that crashed during a test flight. That was, by far, more
> believeable than the earlier explanations combined.
>
> Well… after some more thought, I’m even more confused! The television
> program was obviously controlled very well. Retired officers giving
> interviews about what they saw, eyewitnesses to the debris describing
> objects similar to the balloons used for project Mugul.
>
> HOW COULD ANYONE SEE THIS IF THAT’S NOT WHAT IT WAS.
>
> What is our government doing? Who is responsible for the lies… The CIA? Men
> in Black? WHO? How much time and money have we spent covering up a crashed
> stealth airplane? It’s obvious to me that stealth technology was being
> tested at some point… THE PLANE EXISTS TODAY! So why lie in 1997?
>
> The only conclusion I can come too is that it really wasn’t a balloon, a
> stealth, or imagination. The issue has been confused and covered-up so much
> it’s hard for people interested in the subject to follow what’s going on!
>
> I believe that time travellers crashed in Roswell and our government will
> stop at nothing to protect that secret! Does anyone feel the same?
It's a "heavy" issue... Gravity will out. Weak or strong nuke aside. Time is
linearonly in our twisted perception of reality. You (metaphorically, of course)
could be the grandfather of an entire population of toast-eating-alien-vampires.
On the other hand
you could be a pimple on a quark's ass... Fascinatin' ain't it?
>
>
> David Taylor
> http://www.tnt-design.com/believe/
> Check out my website for more information and some cool UFO and Alien
> inspired products.
Dr E--
mhm 17x1
Don't bother me-- I'm watchin' X-Files.
Jerry Bryson
balloo <bal...@balloo.at.wilhelp.dot.com> wrote:
>
> I only said I was an ex-cia agent to get on the show. They were going
> to throw me off when they found out I wasn't until I said I was a
> lesbian who had been given a sex change by a ufo. I think it airs
> next tuesday.
>
> I believe in extraterrestrial life, but theories of Usenet are pretty
> improbable.
Yours was at least entertaining. Thanks!
Scott Demos
I think all of you know that word was BALLOON!
>+>On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, balloo wrote:
>+>
>+>}pizz...@gte.net (JungleAcid) wrote:
>+>}
>+>}> De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos) wrote:
>+>}
>+>}>> Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo
>+>}>> by the military to the military , that gets published and recorded
>+>}>> on paper says: (probably a balloo) in the start of it.
>+>}
>+>}Those bastards!
>+>}
>+>}>> That line is always in there as an "out" for the government to say
>+>}>> its a balloo.
>+>}
>+>}Dammit I get blamed for everything. Toilet seat left up? Balloo.
>+>}Mud tracked into the house? Balloo. Massive statuary stolen from
>+>}public parks and laid out like June Taylor dance routines on major
>+>}thoroughfares about the greater Vancouver Metropolitan area? Police
>+>}go straight to me, start asking all these personal questions. I don't
>+>}know why I did it, dammit. And that's not an admission of guilt, just
>+>}a statement of fact.
>+>}
>+>}>> Check the records, you will see that all the
>+>}>> papers even today say it too!
>+>}
>+>}Well, heh heh, it was pretty funny. That sort of thing is going to
>+>}make the front page, unless somebody shoots the Prime Minister (and
>+>}why would Somebody do that?)
>+>
>+>The Secret Service apparently thought I would. They asked me questions
>+>and stuff. And they wouldn't let me record it. This is what I gots on
>+>tape:
Jelliebun
De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos) wrote:
>I think all of you know that word was BALLOO!
Yes, yes I think we did know that, but thank you for reminding
everyone.
>>+>On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, balloo wrote:
>>+>}> De...@interaccess.com (Scott Demos) wrote:
>>+>}>> Since 1947, every coorespondence that is made on a ufo
>>+>}>> by the military to the military , that gets published and recorded
>>+>}>> on paper says: (probably a balloo) in the start of it.
>>+>}Those bastards!
>>+>}>> That line is always in there as an "out" for the government to say
>>+>}>> its a balloo.
>>+>}Dammit I get blamed for everything. Toilet seat left up? Balloo.
>>+>}Mud tracked into the house? Balloo. Massive statuary stolen from
>>+>}public parks and laid out like June Taylor dance routines on major
>>+>}thoroughfares about the greater Vancouver Metropolitan area? Police
>>+>}go straight to me, start asking all these personal questions. I don't
>>+>}know why I did it, dammit. And that's not an admission of guilt, just
>>+>}a statement of fact.
And, well, down here was some stuff that didn't have anything to do
with me, so I deleted it. Conspiracy, UFOs, that sort of nut job
stuff.
-----
Genetics explain why you look like your father
and if you don't why you should.
JungleAcid
On Tue, 06 Jan 1998 06:56:18 GMT, jel...@weirdness.com (Jelliebun)
wrote:
hold on, back up, refrain.
did I see "nut job"?
> -----
>
> Genetics explain why you look like your father
> and if you don't why you should.
And why you really sorta kinda (shouldn't but do) look like the
mailman.
flowerO...@yahoo.com
I found a lot of Information about alien and Roswell in the Bible
Codes program. Try a see for yourself...
flowerO...@yahoo.com
Jerry Bryson
No, thanks.
<flowerO...@yahoo.com> wrote:
--
Failure doesn't mean you can't;
It just means you haven't
Mark Elliott
flowerO...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> I found a lot of Information about alien and Roswell in the Bible
> Codes program. Try a see for yourself...
>
> Http://grapho.net/codes
Roswell and the bible. I never thought I would live to see the day when
those 2 would somehow be paired up.
--
http://members.aol.com/orangecomp/
"For Online Computer Help"
khaas68
Mark Elliott <elli...@mail.mia.bellsouth.net> wrote in article
<355D79...@mail.mia.bellsouth.net>...
> flowerO...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > I found a lot of Information about alien and Roswell in the Bible
> > Codes program. Try a see for yourself...
> >
> > Http://grapho.net/codes
>
> Roswell and the bible. I never thought I would live to see the day when
> those 2 would somehow be paired up.
Limited imagination there, Mark. This is Usenet, after all!!
--
"God is Poohbear"
Remove NOSPAM. from address to reply.
nos...@linkononline.net
On Sat, 16 May 1998 14:27:18 GMT, "khaas68" <kha...@mci2000.com> wrote:
>Limited imagination there, Mark. This is Usenet, after all!!
Long time no see, young'un. Get back in here and scrap:-)
Wf