Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

conergent subsequences of sin n?

273 views
Skip to first unread message

Fickdichhh

unread,
Jan 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/26/98
to

I am currently in my second semester of Real Analysis and I was posed a problem
just for fun that I've been working on but with limited success:

Prove that there exists a convergent subsequence {xnk} of
{sin n} (where n is a natural number) such that {xnk} converges for every real
number in [-1, 1].

My first thought was to show that the function sin n with the domain the
natural numbers is equivanlent to the function sin n with the domain the
natural numbers modulo 2*pi. This was easy to show.

I ran into trouble however, when I tried to show that the range of values of {N
modulo 2*pi} contains an infinite quantity of unique values. If this is true I
can show by some manipulation of the Bolzano-Weierstrauss theorem that there is
a Cauchy subsequence of {sin n} that converges for every number in [-1, 1].

But this entire proof hinges on my assumptions regarding the properties of the
set of Natural numbers modulo 2 pi.
Can anyone point me in the right direction or show me what errors I have made?

I would greatly appreciate it! :-)
fickdichhh

If you reply, please send me an email as well.

Fickdichhh

unread,
Jan 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/26/98
to

I realized there was in error when I wrote my last post:

>>I ran into trouble however, when I tried to show that the >>range of values
of {N
>>modulo 2*pi} contains an infinite quantity of unique >>values.

This should read "contains an infinite quantity of unique IRRATIONAL values.
Sorry :-)

fickdichhh

Haran Pilpel

unread,
Jan 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/26/98
to Fickdichhh

(e-mailed and posted)

Fickdichhh wrote:
>
> I am currently in my second semester of Real Analysis and I was posed a problem
> just for fun that I've been working on but with limited success:
>
> Prove that there exists a convergent subsequence {xnk} of
> {sin n} (where n is a natural number) such that {xnk} converges for every real
> number in [-1, 1].

I think what you mean is:
Show that for every x in [-1, 1], there exists a convergent subsequence
{sin(n(k))} (where k goes from 1 to inf) of {sin(n)} (where n goes from
1 to inf) which converges to x.

> I ran into trouble however, when I tried to show that the range of values of {N

> modulo 2*pi} contains an infinite quantity of unique values. If this is true I
> can show by some manipulation of the Bolzano-Weierstrauss theorem that there is
> a Cauchy subsequence of {sin n} that converges for every number in [-1, 1].

It does, indeed, contain an infinite number of unique values. To prove
this, note the following:
1. sin(x) = sin(y) means that (modulo 2pi) x=y or x=pi-y.
2. pi is irrational, and therefore (prove!) there do not exist natural
numbers n and m such that n = m*pi.
If you still have difficulties with this section, send me an e-mail.
[Note that actually _proving_ pi to be irrational is not that easy...but
I assume you don't need to do that.]
I don't really see, though, how the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem could be
used to conclude the proof from this point. It would show the
_existence_ of a (partial) limit, but unless I misunderstood the
problem, it wouldn't show the limit to be x.

Actually, I would solve this somewhat differently (I will use e instead
of epsilon in the following):
What you need to show is that, for some arbitrary x in [-1, 1], and an
arbitrary e>0, there is an n such that sin(n) is in the e-neigbhourhood
of x. [This is trivially equivalent to the definition of partial limit.]
Since sin(x) is continuous in x, it is sufficient to show that, for
arbitrary e, there is some n such that, modulo 2pi, |n-arcsin(x)| < e.
What remains to be shown is that, for every x in [-1, 1], there is an n
such that |n-x| < e (mod 2pi). I won't prove this, but here's a hint:
try dividing the line segment [0,2pi] into sections of size e, and use
the pigeonhole principle.
Feel free to e-mail me if you still have trouble with this.
Quite a fun little problem, BTW!

> If you reply, please send me an email as well.

I did, but AOL seems to have been bouncing my messages recently...

Hope this helps,
Haran
--
e^(Pi*i) + 1 = 0 (Euler)

William A. McWorter Jr.

unread,
Jan 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/26/98
to

Two integers, n and m, are congruent modulo 2pi if and only if m-n is an INTEGRAL
multiple of pi, which, of course, it cannot be; no integral multiple of pi is an
integer.

William

Fickdichhh wrote:

> I am currently in my second semester of Real Analysis and I was posed a problem
> just for fun that I've been working on but with limited success:
>
> Prove that there exists a convergent subsequence {xnk} of
> {sin n} (where n is a natural number) such that {xnk} converges for every real
> number in [-1, 1].
>

> My first thought was to show that the function sin n with the domain the
> natural numbers is equivanlent to the function sin n with the domain the
> natural numbers modulo 2*pi. This was easy to show.
>

> I ran into trouble however, when I tried to show that the range of values of {N
> modulo 2*pi} contains an infinite quantity of unique values. If this is true I
> can show by some manipulation of the Bolzano-Weierstrauss theorem that there is
> a Cauchy subsequence of {sin n} that converges for every number in [-1, 1].
>

> But this entire proof hinges on my assumptions regarding the properties of the
> set of Natural numbers modulo 2 pi.
> Can anyone point me in the right direction or show me what errors I have made?
>
> I would greatly appreciate it! :-)
> fickdichhh
>

slim potter

unread,
Jan 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/27/98
to mcwo...@midohio.net
sorry, I don't have much to offer in response to your question.
Apparently some people don't even understand the question. I've often
toyed with using a pi based number system, circle radius pi area
pi^3=1^3 modulo pi, circle diameter pi circumference pi^2= 1^2 mod pi.
I never took it much further than idle musings.

dbe...@frii.com

unread,
Feb 3, 1998, 3:00:00 AM2/3/98
to

The problem statement is a little confusing. Perhaps you want a
subsequence of {sin nx} that converges for every real number x in
[0.1]. I suggest that you clear up the statement and post it here
and in sci.math.
David Besser

0 new messages