$1.2 billion examples of ABC News' bias

[Leroy N. Soetoro]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/10/05/12-billion-examples-abc-news-
bias/?intcmp=obinsite

The slimiest news coverage of 2012 has nothing to do with the presidential
election. It concerns a massive ABC News campaign against an American beef
company. Led by national correspondent Jim Avila, the network bombarded a
South Dakota firm with a seemingly endless barrage of stories claiming
that its lean beef was � it doesn�t get uglier than this � �pink slime.�

According to that company, ABC�s reports cost it hundreds of millions of
dollars, and cost more than 700 people their jobs.

Now that company is suing ABC � for $1.2 billion.

The heart of ABC�s campaign lasted nearly a month as story after story,
wave upon wave attacked every aspect of Beef Products Inc. � its record,
its reputation and the food it makes. ABC called the USDA-approved lean
beef made by the firm �filler,� �not really beef,� and even �economic
fraud.� The network has used the term �pink slime� at least 178 times
between newscasts and Avila�s Twitter feed.

That is the kind of assault that the national outlets reserve for true
villains. Except in this case, Beef Products, Inc. says it has done
nothing wrong. And they back up their position with facts.

In fact, BPI has been doing just about everything right, and to great
applause. It has received awards from the Consumer Federation of America,
International Association for Food Protection and National Meat
Association. According to the USDA, lean finely textured beef (LFTB) is
safe and healthy; and industry sources acknowledge it is less expensive
and an essential component of lean ground beef. And, newsflash, Americans
have safely consumed 5 billion pounds of it over the last 20 years.

None of that has mattered. One activist reporter, one out-of-control
network and a couple, surly former USDA employees wanted to destroy BPI
and almost succeeded. In less than an hour of actual broadcast time, ABC�s
culinary crusade nearly sabotaged a family company that took more than 30
years to build.

BPI decided it was left with only one option: to file suit. In its Sept.
13 complaint, the company charged the network made �nearly 200 false and
disparaging statements regarding BPI and its product, lean finely textured
beef.� Statements like these would make Pinocchio proud:

�Defendants repeatedly told consumers that LFTB was �widely known as� or
was �commonly referred to as� �pink slime.�� Only it wasn�t. The term
wasn�t commonly used until ABC shouted it to millions of viewers night
after night.

The whole premise of the ABC report was that lean beef had been called
�pink slime� back in 2002 at the USDA. But even the USDA couldn�t find any
copy of such an e-mail, according to BPI�s complaint.

ABC relied on claims from Kit Foshee, who they said, was the �number two�
person at BPI. Not ever true, says BPI. Instead, BPI says he was a
�quality assurance employee who was fired� because he didn�t support �more
rigorous safety procedures.�

All of this happened after ABC had problems with its previous coverage.
Back in 2011, ABC�S chef Jamie Oliver said the beef was �not fit for human
consumption� and was bleeped when he described the lean beef as �s---.�
According to Oliver�s �Food Revolution,� BPI was washing the beef in a
�water and ammonia solution.�

BPI responded to those allegations with a letter from the head of the
American Meat Institute who told them Oliver�s comments were �false and
malicious.� He then gave the network more accurate information. ABC�s
response came less than a year later. The network ignored the information
they had been given and added even more errors.

The �news� team generated a national uproar as viewer comments flooded
into the on-air coverage and the website, outraged by the thought of �pink
slime.� In its complaint the company quoted some of the typical comments
still available on ABCNews.com that include: �Cancer stew, anyone?� or �I
wouldn�t feed it to my dog!�

According to the complaint, the stories caused incredible harm to the
company and the industry. For example in March, before the �pink slime�
stories oozed across the TV, BPI sold 4.9 million pounds of lean finely
textured beef and made an average profit of $2.3 million each week.

By the end of the month, that had dropped to 1.8 million pounds and a loss
of $368,000 � per week. And don�t forget the more than 700 lost jobs. BPI
has tried to adapt, but three of its plants are still closed.

The company is asking for $400 million in damages, but under South Dakota
agricultural disparagement laws, ABC News may be on the hook for three
times those damages, or $1.2 billion.

ABC News almost singlehandedly damaged a business with what the company
has rightly called a �disinformation campaign.� The network first attacked
the beef, was told it what it was reporting was inaccurate and then it
came back with a vengeance.

Author and journalism entrepreneur Steven Brill came down hard on ABC,
calling the suit �the most detailed, persuasive complaint of its kind that
I have ever read.� Brill, who founded Court TV, The American Lawyer
Magazine and 10 legal newspapers, knows a bit about media law. He said
that ABC appears to have disregarded any opposing view may establish a
��reckless disregard� for the truth that would put ABC in real legal
jeopardy.�

BPI�s fight began with ABC�s deliberately harmful use of the term �pink
slime,� and who can blame them? �There is not a more offensive way of
describing a food product than to call it �slime,� which is a noxious,
repulsive, and filthy fluid not safe for human consumption,� they wrote.

That�s a good way to describe the truly disgusting ABC coverage �
�noxious, repulsive� and �not safe for human consumption.�

Brent Bozell is founder and president of the Media Research Center.



--
Obama's black racist USAG appointee.

Eric Holder, racist black United States Attorney General drops voter
intimidation charges against the Black Panthers, "You are about to be
ruled by the black man, cracker!"

Eric Holder, prejudiced black United States Attorney General settles the
hate crime debate, "Whites Not Protected by Hate Crime Laws."

Nancy Pelosi, Democrat criminal, accessory before and after the fact, to
former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles B. Rangel of New
York's million dollar tax evasion.

Barack Obama and Eric Holder, committed treason by knowingly and
deliberately arming enemies of the United States of America through
Operation Fast and Furious. Complicit in the murder of Federal employees
during the execution of their duties.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---