BOYCOTT U.S. RADIO HATER
A Planet Visitor
<feph...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:lK417.5143$oa1.5...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>
Rest clipped.
> Sensitive, tolerant people of the world UNITE. Stop The
> Hal Turner Radio Show!
>
>
Okay.. you clumsy spamming troll. I'll help stop the
Hal Turner Radio Show.
<plonk>... now everyone in unison... <plonk> <plonk>
PV
JIGSAW1695
>From: feph...@earthlink.net
>Date: 7/5/01 5:11 PM Eastern Daylight Time
>Message-id: <lK417.5143$oa1.5...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
>
>
>Two months ago, I wrote in these newsgroups
>that I did not understand why the United States
>permits public radio hosts to have
>web sites like http://www.halturnershow.com .
>
>At the time, I asked people to BOYCOTT the site
>because it calls African-Americans
>"savage negro beasts" calls gay people
>"fags, queers,sodomites" and says
>they should be "shoved back in the closet."
>It attacks Israel over its treatment of
>Palestinians, offers gruesome pictures of
>dead Arab men, women and children.
>It berates Chinese as "Canibals" by showing
>pictures of adult Chinese eating a cooked,
>aborted human baby. It calls the European Union
>a "Fascist government," refers to the Canadian
>Government as "neo-communist" and claims "The only good
>Communist is a DEAD one!"
>
>Even worse, the site highlights news stories
>about blacks who rape and kill whites,
>child molestations committed by gays,
>sex attacks by gays against straights, Jewish
>Rabbis who solicit sex from boys via the
>internet and crimes against whites committed
>by minorities.
>
>Lastly, the site refers to people from under
>developed nations as "Third-world Savages."
>
>DESPITE MY PLEAS, NOT ENOUGH OF US DEMANDED THE
>SITE BE TAKEN DOWN. The site is still up and
>as of July 5, has a completely fresh batch of
>hate and bashing.
>
>NOW, the site is calling for the assassination of
>Israeli Government Officials, says that Bi-racial
>couples are the work of Satan and that children of
>bi-racial couples are "adulterated" beings which
>God won't bother saving!
>
>Please help me shut down this virulent hate site.
>This man's radio show broadcasts to the entire
>world. Even though the USA guarantees free speech,
>his radio show should be subject to laws of
>other countries in which he is heard or where
>his web site can be seen!
>
>Sensitive, tolerant people of the world UNITE. Stop The
===============================
Its called the right to have freedom of speech. the Constitution was written
with people like Hal Turner in mind. You may not like them, you may loath them,
you may not approve of what the say, but traditionally in the US, he has the
right to say it.
A Planet Visitor
"JIGSAW1695" <jigsa...@aol.com> wrote in message news:20010705200202...@ng-ct1.aol.com...
You don't get it, Jigsaw. This is SPAM. He describes the site in
the hope of ATTRACTING viewers, not causing them to UNITE.
He wishes them to unite in rage alright. Right after visiting the
site.
PV
A Planet Visitor
"A Planet Visitor" <abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote in message news:Fs717.94025$WB1.25...@typhoon.tampabay.rr.com...
>
> "JIGSAW1695" <jigsa...@aol.com> wrote in message news:20010705200202...@ng-ct1.aol.com...
SPAM clipped.
dirtdog
Ah. I see. You have reassumed your position of 'man of the people'.
What a shame you are still so clearly afflicted by your 'condition'.
What, may I ask, PV, is the point of responding to cross posting with
derision which is, erm, cross posted? A little silly, wouldn't you
agree?
And I thought you NEVER used you KILLFILE?
w00f
PS - If you ever tell me to plonk someone again I'll knock you the
fuck out.
A Planet Visitor
"dirtdog" <dogo...@ilovemyseed.net> wrote in message news:af4akto0fr5jcl5h6...@4ax.com...
Sure you will, spindle legs... sure you will. More of your imaginary
'irony.' Perhaps it goes along with your 'I'm gonna sue you," image.
Now read my post in reply to Mr. D., in the thread 'Hello everyone,'
vent your spleen totally against my comments, and then pretend I
no longer exist, as I am trying hard to do with you.
PV
St.George
<snip>
> Its called the right to have freedom of speech. the Constitution was
written
> with people like Hal Turner in mind. You may not like them, you may loath
them,
> you may not approve of what the say, but traditionally in the US, he has
the
> right to say it.
^^^^^
@ @ <------------ This is Jiggy
#
-----
This is the drawer---------> I_____I
####----£ <-------- This is some of the cutlery in the drawer
####---->
####---O
#####~~~~>>>>>> <--------This is the sharpest knife.
The moral of this story is that:
^^^^^
@ @ is NOT the same as #####~~~~>>>>>>
#
-----
St.George
<snip>
> Its called the right to have freedom of speech. the Constitution was
written
> with people like Hal Turner in mind. You may not like them, you may loath
them,
> you may not approve of what the say, but traditionally in the US, he has
the
> right to say it.
St.George
<snip>
> Its called the right to have freedom of speech. the Constitution was
written
> with people like Hal Turner in mind. You may not like them, you may loath
them,
> you may not approve of what the say, but traditionally in the US, he has
the
> right to say it.
JIGSAW1695
From: "St.George" god_save_...@my-deja.com
Date: 7/5/01 11:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <9i3aoc$f2q$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>
<snip>
================================
Litle wiggly lines representing symbolic logic has always eluded me.
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
<god_save_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> ^^^^^
> @ @ <------------ This is Jiggy
> #
> -----
[snip]
Alright, already. You've only posted it _three_fucking_times_!
Cute ASCII, though. I'm still trying to work out why Jiggy looks like a
Picasso portrait of dirtdog's mum...
Mr Q. Z. D.
----
Drinker, systems administrator, wannabe writer, musician and all-round bastard.
"If chance supplied a loaf of white bread,
Two casks of wine and a leg of mutton,
In the corner of a garden with a tulip-cheeked girl
There'd be enjoyment no Sultan could outdo." - Omar Khayyam.
JIGSAW1695
Date: 7/6/01 12:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <diablo-44BA98....@newsroom.utas.edu.au>
In article <9i3aqo$f3d$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>, "St.George"
<god_save_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> ^^^^^
> @ @ <------------ This is Jiggy
> #
> -----
[snip]
Alright, already. You've only posted it _three_fucking_times_!
Cute ASCII, though. I'm still trying to work out why Jiggy looks like a
Picasso portrait of dirtdog's mum...
===============================
LOL....franl;y I prefer Daili to Picasso.
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
jigsa...@aol.com (JIGSAW1695) wrote:
I prefer it Daili but I take it when I can get it.
:)
St.George
"Mr Q. Z. Diablo" <dia...@prometheus.humsoc.utas.edu.au> wrote in message
news:diablo-44BA98....@newsroom.utas.edu.au...
> In article <9i3aqo$f3d$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>, "St.George"
> <god_save_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > ^^^^^
> > @ @ <------------ This is Jiggy
> > #
> > -----
>
> [snip]
>
> Alright, already. You've only posted it _three_fucking_times_!
It's not my fucking fault. Fact is my fucking computer claimed it hasn't
been sent, when it has been, and kept it in the fucking outbox and fucking
sent it again and again.
Then your fucking ISP refused to fucking listen to my immediate fucking
cancel requests, so if you've got a fucking complaint I suggest you fucking
take it up with fucking Microsoft, fucking fsnet, your fucking ISP, or the
fucking criminals whose fucking appalling behaviour directly fucking led to
your fucking unfortunate fucking situation marooned on a fucking island that
would only fucking be in the 'back of beyond' if it fucking magically got a
good fucking deal fucking closer to fucking civilisation.
And now you're fucking trying to fucking claw your fucking way back in!
Don't you fucking realise we fucking abandoned you fucking people on the
other fucking side of the fucking world for a fucking reason???
It fucking wasn't because we fucking wanted you fucking back over here you
fucking fucker
> Cute ASCII, though. I'm still trying to work out why Jiggy looks like a
> Picasso portrait of dirtdog's mum...
I'm going through my surrealistic phase.
It's a metaphor, don'tcha know?
It's actually an impassioned protest about the plight of women under the
Afghanistani Taliban regime, and their right not to be subject to the
repressive Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
JIGSAW1695
Date: 7/6/01 7:30 AM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: <9i47g6$ero$1...@newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk>
===============================
Actually I see in as a comment on the Space-Time Contigent as modified by the
Murphey Affect.
dirtdog
<dia...@prometheus.humsoc.utas.edu.au> wrote:
snipped
>Cute ASCII, though. I'm still trying to work out why Jiggy looks like a
>Picasso portrait of dirtdog's mum...
>
>Mr Q. Z. D.
snipped
Don't be so fucking stupid.
^^^^^
@ @ <------------ This is My mum
#
-----
¬¬¬ ¬ ¬¬¬
[] [ ] []
[] [{*}{*}] []
[] [ ] []
[] { } []
£ { ### } £
{ ¬#¬ }
[] []
[] []
[] []
[] []
~~ ~~
w00f
dirtdog
<abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote:
snipped
>Sure you will, spindle legs... sure you will. More of your imaginary
>'irony.' Perhaps it goes along with your 'I'm gonna sue you," image.
>Now read my post in reply to Mr. D., in the thread 'Hello everyone,'
>vent your spleen totally against my comments, and then pretend I
>no longer exist, as I am trying hard to do with you.
>
>PV
>
>
I have read your excessively long self justificaton.
I have simply chosen to disregard every word of it.
Love
w00f
A Planet Visitor
"dirtdog" <dogo...@ilovemyseed.net> wrote in message news:dbnbktku0036nfsep...@4ax.com...
dirtdog's words reentered:
> > > PS - If you ever tell me to plonk someone again I'll knock you the
> > > fuck out.
>
> >Sure you will, spindle legs... sure you will. More of your imaginary
> >'irony.' Perhaps it goes along with your 'I'm gonna sue you," image.
> >Now read my post in reply to Mr. D., in the thread 'Hello everyone,'
> >vent your spleen totally against my comments, and then pretend I
> >no longer exist, as I am trying hard to do with you.
> >
> >PV
> >
> >
> I have read your excessively long self justificaton.
>
> I have simply chosen to disregard every word of it.
>
Obviously identifying which of us is intent on destroying the purpose of
this newsgroup - It's you... silly boy.... it's you. Which makes 'you'
guilty of ALL of the points I've raised. Once again.... hoisted on your
own petard, dribbledick.
And it's no wonder you took offense at my suggestion to <plonk>
obvious SPAM, rather than comments from legitimate posters...
considering that your intent is now clearly to SPAM this newsgroup
and myself rather than provide any meaningful content.
PV
> Love
>
> w00f
>
>
dirtdog
<abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote:
snipped
>
>Obviously identifying which of us is intent on destroying the purpose of
>this newsgroup - It's you... silly boy.... it's you. Which makes 'you'
>guilty of ALL of the points I've raised. Once again.... hoisted on your
>own petard, dribbledick.
>
>And it's no wonder you took offense at my suggestion to <plonk>
>obvious SPAM, rather than comments from legitimate posters...
>considering that your intent is now clearly to SPAM this newsgroup
>and myself rather than provide any meaningful content.
>
>PV
>
Fond of your (il)logical leaps to an (il)logical conclusion, aren't
you PV?
First it was 'murder requires an intention to kill', then it was 'rape
requires an intent to have [unconsenting] sex' (paraphrased), then it
was 'anyone who uses a race specific term is a racist', followed
closely by 'anyone who refers to campness is racist'.
Now, it appears that a perfectly civilised response to you abusive
post is the clear display of an intent to spam (or indeed, SPAM) the
group.
Way to go, fuckwit, I'd have thought you would have learned by now.
This is even without going into the debate as to whether it could
properly be regarded as spam were I to follow you around posting
complete gibberish, there being conflicting definitions as to whether
a commercial and unsolicited element is required for this term to be
applied (my remarks to you hardly could be adjudged 'unsolicited').
Try and talk sense, PV, and try not to exaggerate so much.
w00f
John Rennie
========================
Dear, dear. - Poor old Jiggy. You're getting sucked in by just anybody
these days.
A Planet Visitor
"dirtdog" <dogo...@ilovemyseed.net> wrote in message news:m32ckt4m0g712gb3f...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 18:26:35 GMT, "A Planet Visitor"
> <abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote:
> snipped
>
> >
> >Obviously identifying which of us is intent on destroying the purpose of
> >this newsgroup - It's you... silly boy.... it's you. Which makes 'you'
> >guilty of ALL of the points I've raised. Once again.... hoisted on your
> >own petard, dribbledick.
> >
> >And it's no wonder you took offense at my suggestion to <plonk>
> >obvious SPAM, rather than comments from legitimate posters...
> >considering that your intent is now clearly to SPAM this newsgroup
> >and myself rather than provide any meaningful content.
> >
> >PV
<crap from dirtdog clipped>
> Now, it appears that a perfectly civilised response to you abusive
> post is the clear display of an intent to spam (or indeed, SPAM) the
> group.
>
Your perfectly civilized response???
In a post which in NO WAY was directed at you I suggested that
SPAM from a site using a reverse psychology attempt to gain
visitors to the site, rather than an actual protest of the site --
A site which advocates --
"blacks who rape and kill whites,
child molestations committed by gays,
sex attacks by gays against straights, Jewish
Rabbis who solicit sex from boys via the
internet and crimes against whites committed
by minorities."
should be <plonked>
Your interruption of my suggestion was typically as foul as ever.
First suggesting that it was 'silly' for me to do so. Then, commenting
that I never used killfiles (which is true in cases where posters
are NOT spamming. But exactly why would one want to NOT killfile
a spammer intent on spreading racism and homophobia? - oh,
yeah - now I remember - you're FOR both of them). Now go on
and call me 'dave.'
And finally you threatened to knock the fuck out of me -- ouuuuuuuuuu.
That made me so afraid. Like when you threatened to sue me,
fuckface.
<spam from dirtdog in defense of site in question clipped>
PV
> w00f
>
>
>
>
dirtdog
<abc...@abcxyz.com> wrote:
snipped
>Your perfectly civilized response???
>
Yes, my perfectly civilised reponse to your abusive post, the latter
being;
>Sure you will, spindle legs... sure you will. More of your imaginary
>'irony.' Perhaps it goes along with your 'I'm gonna sue you," image.
>Now read my post in reply to Mr. D., in the thread 'Hello everyone,'
>vent your spleen totally against my comments, and then pretend I
>no longer exist, as I am trying hard to do with you.
>
>PV
The former being:
"I have read your excessively long self justificaton.
I have simply chosen to disregard every word of it.
Love
w00f"
Now, in what way is this offensive or rude?
>In a post which in NO WAY was directed at you I suggested that
>SPAM from a site using a reverse psychology attempt to gain
>visitors to the site, rather than an actual protest of the site --
>A site which advocates --
>
>"blacks who rape and kill whites,
>child molestations committed by gays,
>sex attacks by gays against straights, Jewish
>Rabbis who solicit sex from boys via the
>internet and crimes against whites committed
>by minorities."
>
Emotive irrelevancies to my comments
>should be <plonked>
Why should it be plonked? Know your enemy, PV. The speed at which you
resort to eye covering outrage is counter productive
>
>Your interruption of my suggestion was typically as foul as ever.
>First suggesting that it was 'silly' for me to do so. Then, commenting
>that I never used killfiles (which is true in cases where posters
>are NOT spamming. But exactly why would one want to NOT killfile
>a spammer intent on spreading racism and homophobia? - oh,
>yeah - now I remember - you're FOR both of them). Now go on
>and call me 'dave.'
Blah balh blah.
>
>And finally you threatened to knock the fuck out of me -- ouuuuuuuuuu.
>That made me so afraid. Like when you threatened to sue me,
>fuckface.
I think that you are either confusing what I am referring to with a
jocular comment in a previous post in this thread, or once again you
are intentionally trying to misquote me in order to try and gain the
moral high ground.
snipped potentially inaccurate attempt at technical reason for
justification of snip
>>
w00f
A Planet Visitor
"dirtdog" <dogo...@ilovemyseed.net> wrote in message news:lh9cktcovkh7bev4l...@4ax.com...
<pathetic attempt from dirtdog clipped>
>
> >In a post which in NO WAY was directed at you I suggested that
> >SPAM from a site using a reverse psychology attempt to gain
> >visitors to the site, rather than an actual protest of the site --
> >A site which advocates --
> >
> >"blacks who rape and kill whites,
> >child molestations committed by gays,
> >sex attacks by gays against straights, Jewish
> >Rabbis who solicit sex from boys via the
> >internet and crimes against whites committed
> >by minorities."
> >
<pathetic attempt from dirtdog clipped>
> >
> >Your interruption of my suggestion was typically as foul as ever.
> >First suggesting that it was 'silly' for me to do so. Then, commenting
> >that I never used killfiles (which is true in cases where posters
> >are NOT spamming. But exactly why would one want to NOT killfile
> >a spammer intent on spreading racism and homophobia? - oh,
> >yeah - now I remember - you're FOR both of them). Now go on
> >and call me 'dave.'
<pathetic attempt from dirtdog clipped>
> >And finally you threatened to knock the fuck out of me -- ouuuuuuuuuu.
> >That made me so afraid. Like when you threatened to sue me,
> >fuckface.
> I think that you are either confusing what I am referring to with a
> jocular comment in a previous post in this thread, or once again you
> are intentionally trying to misquote me in order to try and gain the
> moral high ground.
>
When WILL you learn that I expect NO comment from you, neither
jocular, supposedly logical, or obscene. How clear do I have to make
that? You're a non-entity to me... and every word from you I intend
to ignore, except those where you hope to draw me out, in which
case I'll either comment on your pathetic attempt or clip it in its
entirety. Your current post was obviously of the pathetic variety.
<final pathetic attempt from dirtdog clipped>
PV
> >>
>
> w00f
>
>
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
<god_save_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> "Mr Q. Z. Diablo" <dia...@prometheus.humsoc.utas.edu.au> wrote in message
> news:diablo-44BA98....@newsroom.utas.edu.au...
> > In article <9i3aqo$f3d$1...@newsg1.svr.pol.co.uk>, "St.George"
> > <god_save_...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >
> > > ^^^^^
> > > @ @ <------------ This is Jiggy
> > > #
> > > -----
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Alright, already. You've only posted it _three_fucking_times_!
> It's not my fucking fault. Fact is my fucking computer claimed it hasn't
> been sent, when it has been, and kept it in the fucking outbox and
> fucking
> sent it again and again.
Only Microsoft could be stupid enough to apply the notion of an "outbox"
to an NNTP client...
> Then your fucking ISP refused to fucking listen to my immediate fucking
> cancel requests,
My ISP? ROTFL!
>so if you've got a fucking complaint I suggest you
> fucking
> take it up with fucking Microsoft,
I've got plenty of complaints to take up with Microsoft, Mark. Your
inability to correctly use a poorly designed excuse for a mail and news
client is the least of them.
> And now you're fucking trying to fucking claw your fucking way back in!
> Don't you fucking realise we fucking abandoned you fucking people on the
> other fucking side of the fucking world for a fucking reason???
So that you would have someone to lose the cricket to, Mark!
> It fucking wasn't because we fucking wanted you fucking back over here
> you
> fucking fucker
London's pubs would immediately shut if it weren't for Aussies. You
would do well to remember that, Mark.
> > Cute ASCII, though. I'm still trying to work out why Jiggy looks like
> > a
> > Picasso portrait of dirtdog's mum...
> I'm going through my surrealistic phase.
I wasn't going to describe what dirtdog's mum was doing to my...
> It's actually an impassioned protest about the plight of women under the
> Afghanistani Taliban regime, and their right not to be subject to the
> repressive Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
Knew it had to be _something_ like that.