!
mariage@wanadoo.fr hubert mariage
Rev. Don Kool
> hubert mariage <> wrote :
>
>
>>www.casinofrench.com
>>
>
> One fewer wanadoo account to bother with ...
The boy's got way, way too much time on his hands. :-(
--
*********************** You a bounty hunter?
* Rev. Don McDonald * Man's gotta earn a living.
* Baltimore, MD * Dying ain't much of a living, boy.
*********************** "Outlaw Josey Wales"
St.George
"Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3CBAC26D...@comcast.net...
> Desi Coughlan wrote:
>
> > hubert mariage <> wrote :
> >
> >
> >>www.casinofrench.com
> >>
> >
> > One fewer wanadoo account to bother with ...
>
>
> The boy's got way, way too much time on his hands. :-(
Talking of 'time', Don, is it true you were recently a resident of a
custodial facility as a result of online misbehaviour?
William Robert
wrote:
>Le Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:20:28 +0100, St.George
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>
>{ snip }
>
>> Talking of 'time', Don, is it true you were recently a resident of a
>> custodial facility as a result of online misbehaviour?
>
>You don't expect him to give you an honest answer, do you, Mark ?
Desi, this would be a matter of public record. Do some resarch and let us know.
You constantly tell us how smart you are, now Desi how about a demonstration?
William Robert
>Desi Coughlan | IDIOT BOY #1
Rev. Don Kool
> "Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote...
>>Desi Coughlan wrote:
>>>hubert mariage <> wrote :
>>>
>>>
>>>>www.casinofrench.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>One fewer wanadoo account to bother with ...
>>The boy's got way, way too much time on his hands. :-(
> Talking of 'time', Don, is it true you were recently a resident of a
> custodial facility as a result of online misbehaviour?
No. Here in the United States (the greatest country on the face of the
Earth, BTW) we enjoy the right of free speech, freedom to keep and bear
arms, freedom of religion, etc... Freedoms that our eurotrash friends
can only dream of having.
Hope this helps,
Don
dirtdog
Tell me all about that, if you would.
hAxXx0rzZz and paedos aside, what other online activity could cause
you to do a stretch?
w00f
St.George
"dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote in message
news:jadmbugui61ps0nts...@4ax.com...
I'm not sure exactly - I'm just winding old Don up over something that
Desmond said a little while ago, which, IIRC, was that old Koolio went down
for six months over some international computer naughtiness.
Given Don's past record for this sort of thing, especially re: Desmond, I
would not be at all surprised if the authorities eventually caught up with
him, and I certainly give no credence to his denials of same (as Don has
been known to tell porkies before)
However, the only one who knows the full story is our Francophile friend, so
perhaps he would be kind enough to elucidate to us the full scale, and
story, of Donnie's brush with the law, to our great amusement, no doubt....
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> "dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote in message
> news:jadmbugui61ps0nts...@4ax.com...
> > Tell me all about that, if you would.
> >
> > hAxXx0rzZz and paedos aside, what other online activity could cause
> > you to do a stretch?
> I'm not sure exactly - I'm just winding old Don up over something that
> Desmond said a little while ago, which, IIRC, was that old Koolio went
> down
> for six months over some international computer naughtiness.
True or merely Desmond's surmising that it occurred, it's a lovely
thought. Gigglesome indeed.
> Given Don's past record for this sort of thing, especially re: Desmond, I
> would not be at all surprised if the authorities eventually caught up
> with
> him,
There have undoubtedly been TOS violations. Des alleges that there
was/were one or more attempts to gain illegal access to computers on a
site that he administered and that these attempts were traced to Donnie.
That much I believe completely. That Donnie was sent down over said
events seems to be, for Des, surmising what the ramifications were and
leaning towards the side of optimism. Given that Donnie's complete
knowledge of IT is that Black #37 lasts for up to 300 pages longer than
Black #38 and that things have become more difficult now that his duty
statement includes changing toner cartridges as well as printer ribbons,
it seems very likely indeed that he was traced and caught.
> and I certainly give no credence to his denials of same (as Don has
> been known to tell porkies before)
Almost 100% of what little Donnie McDonald blathers is bollocks.
Porkies? Difficult to separate from his drooling and frothing.
> However, the only one who knows the full story is our Francophile friend,
> so
> perhaps he would be kind enough to elucidate to us the full scale, and
> story, of Donnie's brush with the law, to our great amusement, no
> doubt....
It's entirely possible that Donnie's a kiddie fiddler. After all, he
often calls others "my child molesting friend." Perhaps he's trying to
throw the heat off...
Mr Q. Z. D.
--
Drinker, systems administrator, wannabe writer, musician and all-round bastard.
"My parents always told me I could be what I wanted to be. ((o))
So I became a complete bastard." ((O))
A Planet Visitor
"Mr Q. Z. Diablo" <dia...@prometheus.humsoc.utas.edu.au> wrote in message
news:diablo-00630B....@newsroom.utas.edu.au...
> In article <a9fl69$5qb$1...@news5.svr.pol.co.uk>, "St.George"
> <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote in message
> > news:jadmbugui61ps0nts...@4ax.com...
>
<rest clipped>
> It's entirely possible that Donnie's a kiddie fiddler. After all, he
> often calls others "my child molesting friend." Perhaps he's trying to
> throw the heat off...
>
I took no interest at all in this thread, until coming across this
last comment. Again, far be it from me to defend Don... he is
quite capable of doing so himself. But it seems that YOU,
Mr. D., are engaging in two standards here. Certainly, dirt
has been obsessively consumed with 'Mother love.' Now,
correct me if I'm wrong, but have you ever accused HIM of
possibly ACTUALLY having that particular sexual aberration?
As far as I can determine, you've always tried to laugh it off,
as *just dirt's way.* Yet, the implication is clear. And if you
feel some SUBSTANCE exists to what you now claim is
'possible' with Don, than I wish you would clearly state that
some SUBSTANCE exists to it being equally 'possible' that
dirt ACTUALLY being engaged in incest with his own
Mother.
Fair's fair, I believe.
PV
Rev. Don Kool
> "dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote...
>>"St.George" <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>"Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote...
>>>>Desi Coughlan wrote:
>>>>>hubert mariage <> wrote :
>>>>>>www.casinofrench.com
>>>>>One fewer wanadoo account to bother with ...
>>>>The boy's got way, way too much time on his hands. :-(
>>>Talking of 'time', Don, is it true you were recently a resident of a
>>>custodial facility as a result of online misbehaviour?
>>Tell me all about that, if you would.
>>
>>hAxXx0rzZz and paedos aside, what other online activity could cause
>>you to do a stretch?
> I'm not sure exactly - I'm just winding old Don up over something that
You wish, shorty.
> Desmond said a little while ago, which, IIRC, was that old Koolio went down
> for six months over some international computer naughtiness.
Young, fatherless Desi often spams his off-topic fantasies and Kool
worship to many newsgroups. That is nothing new, my young eurotrash
friend. Ask YFD why his e-mail address changes regularly while mine has
remained the same for years.
> Given Don's past record for this sort of thing, especially re: Desmond, I
> would not be at all surprised if the authorities eventually caught up with
> him,
For what... free speech... posting the truth... making fun of murderer
lover boy...????
> and I certainly give no credence to his denials of same (as Don has
> been known to tell porkies before)
ROTFLOL!! As I have pointed out on numerous occasions; only the naive
and gullible support proven murderers.
> However, the only one who knows the full story is
Rev. Kool. You have my permission to gossip amongst yourselves. Perhaps
you'll get published in the "Weekly World News" alongside cases of alien
abductions or three headed babies.
Happy to have cleared things up for you,
Don
Rev. Don Kool
> "St.George" <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>"dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote...
>>
>
>>>Tell me all about that, if you would.
>>>
>>>hAxXx0rzZz and paedos aside, what other online activity could cause
>>>you to do a stretch?
>>>
>
>>I'm not sure exactly - I'm just winding old Don up over something that
>>Desmond said a little while ago, which, IIRC, was that old Koolio went
>>down
>>for six months over some international computer naughtiness.
>>
>
> True or merely Desmond's surmising that it occurred, it's a lovely
> thought. Gigglesome indeed.
Davy Herbert's wet dream, as it were. ICK!
Yours in Christ,
Don
Rev. Don Kool
> St.George <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> { snip }
>
>
>>However, the only one who knows the full story is our Francophile friend, so
>>perhaps he would be kind enough to elucidate to us the full scale, and
>>story, of Donnie's brush with the law, to our great amusement, no doubt....
>>
>
> Drewl also knows the full story, but as is usual, will lie, deny, squirm,
> and use deceit to avoid facing up to the truth, and to his
> responsibilities.
>
> Briefly, he got drunk with some friends one night, and ran a few telnet
> sessions into my UNIX server here in Paris. Telnet was still running on
> the machine at that time, but he didn't have a valid login (and couldn't
> hack his way in if his life depended on it), and so he couldn't connect.
>
> Next morning, I (as always) checked the logs, and saw four failed
> connections from his @home.com IP.
>
> I forwarded the logs to @home.com's abuse service, and things would
> _probably_ have ended there, had he not, a few days later, tried to crash
> my server (he and Necro both) by opening hundreds of simultaneous FTP
> connections. Of course, he failed.
>
> I again forwarded the logs to his ISP, and this time, copied the e-mail to
> the postmaster for the Department of Defense (sic). She apparently
> forwarded it to the FBI, and to a certain Officer Rau of the Baltimore
> County Police Department. The latter contacted me, and we had a long chat
> on the phone. He forwarded the complaint to the NSA, which he probably
> wouldn't have done, had Drewl not (at the time) been employed by he
> DoD. They apparently don't like their employees engaging in hacking (at
> least not unless they've been told to do so).
>
> He got back to me about a year later, just to inform me that Drewl had
> a) lost his job, and b) been sentenced to six months gaol.
Nice of @home to do all that but never cancel my account. LOL!!!!
> To say that I
> was flabbergasted, would be an understatement. All that because of his
> obsession with me, and his desire to 'get one up' on me. I also heard
> that his wife left him because of the visits from the FBI. Apparently,
> her previous husband had been in trouble with the law (although the police
> wouldn't go into detail on this matter), and it brought back memories.
>
> Anyway, that's all I know about the matter. As far as I'm concerned, it's
> closed. He broke the law, he got punished. I'm not going to keep beating
> him up about it. He'll deny everything, of course, just as he will deny
> that his first wife left him because of his 'liking' for whisky (let's be
> generous). Or he'll use one of his 'n Free Hours' AOL accounts to deny
> it.
>
> Will anyone seriously believe him ?
Young, fatherless Desi continues his creepy obsession with all things
kool. Then again, his latest fantasy has at least as much truth to it
as his imagining that President Bush ordered the September 11th attacks.
Poor Desi. I will pray for him lest he be tormented by these demons
forever.
Yours in Christ,
Don
St.George
<snip>
> Young, fatherless Desi continues his creepy obsession with all things
> kool. Then again, his latest fantasy has at least as much truth to it
> as his imagining that President Bush ordered the September 11th attacks.
> Poor Desi. I will pray for him lest he be tormented by these demons
> forever.
Interesting that you seem to fail to deny the substantive points, Don.
I wonder why? One thing I do know is that probation and parole services
take a dim view of ex-cons failing to come to terms with - and denying the
fact and implications of - their crimes, convictions and punishments.
Given, therefore, that you are likely to be under quite intense online
surveillance at this time, perhaps you wouldn't want explicit denials of
your criminality to appear in the very same forum that you have abused so
long, for anyone to see and report....
St.George
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@noos.fr> wrote in message
news:slrnabnn18.8vq.p...@lievre.voute.net...
> Le Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:45:50 +0100, St.George
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>
> { snip }
>
> > However, the only one who knows the full story is our Francophile
friend, so
> > perhaps he would be kind enough to elucidate to us the full scale, and
> > story, of Donnie's brush with the law, to our great amusement, no
doubt....
>
> and use deceit to avoid facing up to the truth, and to his
> responsibilities.
>
> Briefly, he got drunk with some friends one night, and ran a few telnet
> sessions into my UNIX server here in Paris. Telnet was still running on
> the machine at that time, but he didn't have a valid login (and couldn't
> hack his way in if his life depended on it), and so he couldn't connect.
>
> Next morning, I (as always) checked the logs, and saw four failed
> connections from his @home.com IP.
>
> I forwarded the logs to @home.com's abuse service, and things would
> _probably_ have ended there, had he not, a few days later, tried to crash
> my server (he and Necro both) by opening hundreds of simultaneous FTP
> connections. Of course, he failed.
>
> I again forwarded the logs to his ISP, and this time, copied the e-mail to
> the postmaster for the Department of Defense (sic). She apparently
> forwarded it to the FBI, and to a certain Officer Rau of the Baltimore
> County Police Department. The latter contacted me, and we had a long chat
> on the phone. He forwarded the complaint to the NSA, which he probably
> wouldn't have done, had Drewl not (at the time) been employed by he
> DoD. They apparently don't like their employees engaging in hacking (at
> least not unless they've been told to do so).
>
> He got back to me about a year later, just to inform me that Drewl had
> was flabbergasted, would be an understatement. All that because of his
> obsession with me, and his desire to 'get one up' on me. I also heard
> that his wife left him because of the visits from the FBI. Apparently,
> her previous husband had been in trouble with the law (although the police
> wouldn't go into detail on this matter), and it brought back memories.
Fascinating, Desmond, thank you.
FWIW, I'm very inclined to believe you, but I wonder if you have any further
proof...perhaps a correctional website that records poor old Don's stay at
the Governor's pleasure (or was it a federal offence?)
Alternatively any further info that would allow the group to, erm,
'sympathise' with Don's plight...
Furthermore, although I know it is digging up the past somewhat, I believe
that comparitive newbies should know what Don is capable of so that they can
make an informed decision as to dealing with him, both on and off the
newsgroup. Hence, would you be kind enough to remind me and the group of
the firebombing incident, and how you know that Don was connected with this?
John Rennie
"St.George" <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:a9h9tu$5rd$1...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
I too, believe Desmond. I just wish he hadn't taken so long to tell
it. Perhaps now doggie will understand why I warn newbies off trying
to mix it with Kool.
David_Mcdonald
>Le Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:45:50 +0100, St.George
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>
>{ snip }
>
>> However, the only one who knows the full story is our Francophile
friend, so
>> perhaps he would be kind enough to elucidate to us the full scale,
and
>> story, of Donnie's brush with the law, to our great amusement, no
doubt....
>
>Anyway, that's all I know about the matter. As far as I'm concerned,
it's
>closed. He broke the law, he got punished. I'm not going to keep
beating
>him up about it. He'll deny everything, of course, just as he will
deny
>that his first wife left him because of his 'liking' for whisky
(let's be
>generous). Or he'll use one of his 'n Free Hours' AOL accounts to
deny
>it.
>
>Will anyone seriously believe him ?
Deswaldo, will anyone seriously believe you?
It is Tuesday Deswaldo, you should have detoxed from your weekend
adventures by now.
David McDonald
Dave Proctor
<j.re...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>I too, believe Desmond. I just wish he hadn't taken so long to tell
>it. Perhaps now doggie will understand why I warn newbies off trying
>to mix it with Kool.
Kool is not worth mixing it with - he is a nobody that is best read,
laughed at, and then ignored.
btw John, I still remember your failure to reply to my invitation to
drinkins when I was in the UK. I contacted Desmond, but unfortunately
I did not get across to Paris, so it did not happen. But I was in the
UK for two weeks, and did about Ł3000 worth of travel on my BritRail
Pass, which cost me $A1020 (about Ł340) so I would have been able to
get wherever you were.....
=====
Dave
(remove Spambait to email me - spambots, please pay particular attention to addresses below)
gr...@aitsupplies.com.au
charli...@bigpond.com
virgin...@bigfoot.com
aitsu...@bigfoot.com
A Planet Visitor
"St.George" <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:a9h9tu$5rd$1...@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk...
>
That should be interesting.. Ranging somewhere between his claim
that "'the Lockerbie disaster wasn't caused by a bomb at all," and
"none of the terrorists knew what was about to happen until they
got onto the aircraft," in the WTC attack.
How can ANYONE lend ANY credence to ANY claim Desmond
makes? Seriously, folks... you people need to gain some objectivity.
Just because he provides his name, doesn't make him the Pope.
If he can rant about things that we KNOW are false, why should we
accept ANYTHING he says in respect to his other ravings.
PV
A Planet Visitor
"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@noos.fr> wrote in message
news:slrnabnn18.8vq.p...@lievre.voute.net...
> Le Mon, 15 Apr 2002 23:45:50 +0100, St.George
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>
> { snip }
>
> > perhaps he would be kind enough to elucidate to us the full scale, and
> > story, of Donnie's brush with the law, to our great amusement, no doubt....
>
> closed. He broke the law, he got punished. I'm not going to keep beating
> him up about it. He'll deny everything, of course, just as he will deny
> that his first wife left him because of his 'liking' for whisky (let's be
> generous). Or he'll use one of his 'n Free Hours' AOL accounts to deny
> it.
>
> Will anyone seriously believe him ?
>
*firebombing of your flat,* and your convenient *mugging but still
opposed to the DP.* Think about your *Israel was behind the
WTC attack,* and *I do not fear death, but I'd crap my drawers if
I saw it coming toward me.* Think about your "none of the terrorists
knew what was about to happen until they got onto the aircraft" in
the WTC attack,' and your claim that *Lockerbie was an unfortunate
wind shear accident.* Think about your claim that *The Balkans are
not in Europe,* and ... and.... and. Holy Jesus... come to think
about it... when HAVE you ever made a factual statement?
>
> --
> Desmond Coughlan |DP SUPPORTER #1
John Rennie
> Le Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:45:48 +0100, St.George
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>
snip
>>
>
URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?q=firebombing+group:alt.activism.death-p
enalty+author:desmond+author:coughlan&hl=fr&scoring=d&selm=3667acf3.2387389%
40news.pratique.fr&rnum=3
Well what happened when the case came to court?
William Robert
wrote:
>Le Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:45:48 +0100, St.George
<god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
>
>{ snip }
>
>> Fascinating, Desmond, thank you.
>>
>> FWIW, I'm very inclined to believe you, but I wonder if you have any further
>> proof...perhaps a correctional website that records poor old Don's stay at
>> the Governor's pleasure (or was it a federal offence?)
>>
>> Alternatively any further info that would allow the group to, erm,
>> 'sympathise' with Don's plight...
>
>I e-mailed the Maryland Department of Corrections a month or so back,
>asking for details of his conviction. They have yet to get back to
>me. Perhaps one of our American posters would care to file a Freedom of
>Information Act request ...
Desi,
As this 'crime' was international in nature, why would the state of Maryland
have jurisdiction? I'd think it would be at the Federal level.
Desi, or anyone else, can you help me here?
William Robert
>I just don't believe in coincidence.
or the facts.
>Desi Coughlan | VILLIAGE IDIOT #1
Rev. Don Kool
> "Rev. Don Kool" <old...@comcast.net> wrote...
>
>
> <snip>
>
>
>>Young, fatherless Desi continues his creepy obsession with all things
>>kool. Then again, his latest fantasy has at least as much truth to it
>>as his imagining that President Bush ordered the September 11th attacks.
>> Poor Desi. I will pray for him lest he be tormented by these demons
>>forever.
> Interesting that you seem to fail to deny the substantive points, Don.
There are no "substantive points" to deny, my son.
> I wonder why? One thing I do know is that probation and parole services
> take a dim view of ex-cons failing to come to terms with - and denying the
> fact and implications of - their crimes, convictions and punishments.
>
> Given, therefore, that you are likely to be under quite intense online
> surveillance at this time, perhaps you wouldn't want explicit denials of
> your criminality to appear in the very same forum that you have abused so
> long, for anyone to see and report....
LOL!! There are no crimes to to give details of, my young eurotrash friend.
Except of course the crime of young, fatherless Desi's poor fiction.
Rev. Don Kool
> "Desi Coughlan" <pasdespa...@noos.fr> wrote...
Then you believe that proven murderers are great guys that need to be
released from prison.
> but I wonder if you have any further
> proof...perhaps a correctional website that records poor old Don's stay at
> the Governor's pleasure (or was it a federal offence?)
Yeah Desi, perhaps you can forge something credible.
> Alternatively any further info that would allow the group to, erm,
> 'sympathise' with Don's plight...
>
>
> Furthermore, although I know it is digging up the past somewhat, I believe
> that comparitive newbies should know what Don is capable of so that they can
> make an informed decision as to dealing with him, both on and off the
> newsgroup. Hence, would you be kind enough to remind me and the group of
> the firebombing incident, and how you know that Don was connected with this?
ROTFLOLASTD!!! I have a bridge in Brooklyn that I could sell you, Mark.
Yours in Christ,
Don
Rev. Don Kool
> "St.George" <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote...
>>"Desi Coughlan" <pasdespa...@noos.fr> wrote...
>>>St.George <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote :
>>
No you don't. You're just trolling, Johnnie.
> I just wish he hadn't taken so long to tell it.
Well it took him a while to make it up.
> Perhaps now doggie will understand why I warn newbies off trying
> to mix it with Kool.
Why, because young, fatherless Desi will make up stories about them?
Yours in Christ,
Don
Rev. Don Kool
> "St.George" <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote...
>>"Desi Coughlan" <pasdespa...@noos.fr> wrote...
>>>St.George <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
[...snip...]
> That should be interesting.. Ranging somewhere between his claim
> that "'the Lockerbie disaster wasn't caused by a bomb at all," and
> "none of the terrorists knew what was about to happen until they
> got onto the aircraft," in the WTC attack.
>
> How can ANYONE lend ANY credence to ANY claim Desmond
> makes? Seriously, folks... you people need to gain some objectivity.
> Just because he provides his name, doesn't make him the Pope.
> If he can rant about things that we KNOW are false, why should we
> accept ANYTHING he says in respect to his other ravings.
You shouldn't. Young, fatherless Desi is a liar pure and simple. Of
course he is also intensely paranoid so that feeds into his bi-polar
disorder. Apparently he is off his lithium this week.
Hope this helps,
Don
Rev. Don Kool
> "Desi Coughlan" <pasdespa...@noos.fr> wrote...
>>St.George <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> a écrit :
> snip
>
> URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?q=firebombing+group:alt.activism.death-p
> enalty+author:desmond+author:coughlan&hl=fr&scoring=d&selm=3667acf3.2387389%
> 40news.pratique.fr&rnum=3
>
>
>
> Well what happened when the case came to court?
The fact that it was unrelated to young, fatherless Desi came out.
Happy to have cleared things up for you,
Don
Rev. Don Kool
> "Desi Coughlan" <des...@noos.fr> wrote...
>>St.George <god_save_t...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
[...Desi's wet dream snipped...]
> Does anyone take YOU seriously? Think about your reported
> *firebombing of your flat,* and your convenient *mugging but still
> opposed to the DP.* Think about your *Israel was behind the
> WTC attack,* and *I do not fear death, but I'd crap my drawers if
> I saw it coming toward me.* Think about your "none of the terrorists
> knew what was about to happen until they got onto the aircraft" in
> the WTC attack,' and your claim that *Lockerbie was an unfortunate
> wind shear accident.* Think about your claim that *The Balkans are
> not in Europe,* and ... and.... and. Holy Jesus... come to think
> about it... when HAVE you ever made a factual statement?
He hasn't. Ask young, fatherless Desi for the real reason behind his
months long absences from this forum. LOL!!!! He's still a little
pissed at me for those.
Hope this helps,
Don
dirtdog
No need, PV.
I freely admit that I fuck my own family.
Up the arse.
w00f
A Planet Visitor
> Le Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:36:45 +0100, John Rennie <j.re...@ntlworld.com> a
écrit :
>
> > URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?q=firebombing+group:alt.activism.death-p
> > enalty+author:desmond+author:coughlan&hl=fr&scoring=d&selm=3667acf3.2387389%
> > 40news.pratique.fr&rnum=3
>
> > Well what happened when the case came to court?
>
> police.
>
I might just do that. Provide me a case number, or a cite which
I might ask him about.
> --
> Desmond Coughlan |POOR PERSECUTED #1
A Planet Visitor
"dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote in message
>
> Up the arse.
>
dirt, you and I are already well aware of that fact. I simply want
to be sure OTHERS recognize it as well. Nor do I accept your
ADMISSION as anything other than what is obvious. But I need
to hear from OTHERS that they see it as well. Generally, because
I really don't give a shit about you. But thanks for confriming it.
Perhaps now you can tell us who James Boswell was?
PV
> w00f
Mr Q. Z. Diablo
I leave it for you to try to wind up doggie, PV. I shall continue to
wind up Donnie.
I really can't see the problem. These are things that we undertake for
our own amusement - nothing more, nothing less.
William Robert
>"dirtdog" <dog.o...@w00f.w00f.cxm> wrote in message
>news:7a4pbu0t7jehv52mp...@4ax.com...
>> No need, PV.
>>
>> I freely admit that I **** my own family.
>>
>> Up the arse.
>>
>dirt, you and I are already well aware of that fact. I simply want
>to be sure OTHERS recognize it as well. Nor do I accept your
>ADMISSION as anything other than what is obvious. But I need
>to hear from OTHERS that they see it as well.
PV,
I have no doubt about Dirt's statement. However, is it admissible?
Remember, he honestly believes he is a real lawyer. How sane can he be?
William Robert
>PV
>> w00f
A Planet Visitor
point is moot. Just be aware that when dirt speaks of sex with
Mother, he is admittedly speaking in the LITERAL sense of
having it with his own Mother.
PV