John McCain Could Lose Senate Primary To Tea Party Supporter
Earl Evleth
And the sinking of the Republican Party
****
John McCain Could Lose Senate Primary To Tea Party Supporter
PHOENIX, AZ -- Rasmussen announced a new poll on Friday showing Senator John
McCain may be in trouble at home where a polarized electorate has him facing
constant criticism from both the left and the right.
The poll shows McCain tied with former Congressman and current talk radio
host J.D. Hayworth in a hypothetical Republican primary. Hayworth, who has
become an outspoken local hero among immigration-control activists, lost his
House seat to Rep. Harry Mitchell (D) in 2006. Since then, Hayworth has
promoted the Tea Parties on his radio show and has spoken at Tea Party
events, including the April 15 rally in Phoenix. Hayworth has expressed
interest in running but has been tight-lipped on whether or not he intends
to actually file as a candidate against McCain.
Rasmussen has McCain at 45% and Hayworth at 43% (4% margin of error).
Although McCain's loudest opponents from the right usually cite immigration
as the key issue, Minutmen founder Chris Simcox only reached 4% in the poll.
According to the poll, Hayworth is more popular overall among the GOP,
especially among the younger GOP sect. McCain fares better with females and
moderate Republicans.
Rodney Glassman, the only Democrat who has filed to run against McCain, was
not included in the poll. Glassman is a young Tucson city councilman who has
the support of the local and state Democratic Party structure and is
considered an up-and-comer in Arizona politics.
McCain has not faced a serious challenge to his senate seat since 1986.
Jigsaw1695
> The revolt of the Palin populists.
>
> And the sinking of the Republican Party
>
> ****
>
> John McCain Could Lose Senate Primary To Tea Party Supporter
>
> PHOENIX, AZ -- Rasmussen announced a new poll on Friday showing Senator John
> McCain may be in trouble at home where a polarized electorate has him facing
> constant criticism from both the left and the right.
>
A "Poarized electorate"?
Wow Earl, this must be somthing new. Imagine that?
This certainly something new in American politics, isn't it?
Let me enlighten you ....
It is the nature of American politics that the electorate is always
polorized with differnt factors vieing againt each other.
This type of competition is what makes the system work.
But you know that, dont you?
Jigsaw
Mike
McCain is hardly a Republican for that matter.
Remember, he was the darling of the New York Times before Barry came
along...
Earl Evleth
b2f1f096-3104-4348...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com,
"Jigsaw1695" <Jigsa...@aol.com> wrote:
> A "Poarized electorate"?
??, not in the dictionary
Earl Evleth
b5c14fbf-0ef5-4b46...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com, "Mike"
<foeha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> McCain is hardly a Republican for that matter.
He is indeed a Republican but a maverick at the same time.
Happy99
"Jigsaw1695" <Jigsa...@aol.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:b2f1f096-3104-4348...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
Planet Visitor II
wrote:
Wonder of wonders... Earl has a dictionary!!!
<Sorry, Earl... it was just too tempting to resist>
Planet Visitor II
Earl Evleth
"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Wonder of wonders... Earl has a dictionary!!!
A larger number of them, English, French and German.
But the easiest to use, of course, is merely posting
the word + definition on google.
In making inquiries about your status I find that
the word "idiot" means "a person of subnormal intelligence".
Idiot is also synonymous with Planet Visitor in another
dictionary I maintain privately.
Planet Visitor II
wrote:
>On 22/11/09 4:59, in article 3pdhg55u6kvl4qc07...@4ax.com,
>"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Wonder of wonders... Earl has a dictionary!!!
>
>A larger number of them, English, French and German.
>
Collecting them isn't the same as using them, Earl.
<clipped>
Planet Visitor II
Earl Evleth
"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Collecting them isn't the same as using them, Earl.
I rarely use a French dictionary. I found years
ago that I learned French better if I figured out
what a word meant and did not break up reading
with looking it up.
If I really need the meaning of a word I have encountered
I ask my wife. She is faster than flipping through
the pages. She does object to being exploited but usually
comes up with it.
Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )
Earl Evleth wrote:
>
> On 23/11/09 7:10, in article rq9kg511udj29n4fc...@4ax.com,
> "Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Collecting them isn't the same as using them, Earl.
>
> I rarely use a French dictionary. I found years
> ago that I learned French better if I figured out
> what a word meant and did not break up reading
> with looking it up.
>
I noted the passage from "Crome Yellow" which illustrates a danger
in doing that.
> If I really need the meaning of a word I have encountered
> I ask my wife. She is faster than flipping through
> the pages. She does object to being exploited but usually
> comes up with it.
>
So Donna is a computer made of meat?
--
What I hate about flip flops is the flip and the flop.
Earl Evleth
'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )" <tribuyl...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>> If I really need the meaning of a word I have encountered
>> I ask my wife. She is faster than flipping through
>> the pages. She does object to being exploited but usually
>> comes up with it.
>>
> So Donna is a computer made of meat?
Your are a guy with no brains and can't understand
that having quality brains is important.
You have not told us yet, Bill, of your own
accomplishments. Let me guess. None,
yitzhak in eretz isreal (sic)
> wrote:
>>On 22/11/09 4:59, in article 3pdhg55u6kvl4qc07...@4ax.com,
>>> Wonder of wonders... Earl has a dictionary!!!
>>A larger number of them, English, French and German.
> Collecting them isn't the same as using them, Earl.
LOL!!! The irony from the airhead who bought a Hebrew dictionary, and
claimed to be fluent in Hebrew two days later ...
Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
AADP's 'left-wing Israeli intellectual'
'The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of
one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that
oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the
beginning if it is to be stopped at all'
(H.L. Mencken)
<http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/>
deconstructing desmond coughlan
the Nile to the Tigris" Coughlan <yit...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 2009-11-23, James 'Jew lover' Noles <na...@earthlink.net> wrote ...
>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:23:05 +0100, Earl Evleth <evl...@wanadoo.fr>
>> wrote:
>>>On 22/11/09 4:59, in article 3pdhg55u6kvl4qc07...@4ax.com,
>>>James 'Jew lover' Noles <na...@earthlink.net> wrote ...
>
>>>> Wonder of wonders... Earl has a dictionary!!!
>
>>>A larger number of them, English, French and German.
>
>> Collecting them isn't the same as using them, Earl.
>
>LOL!!! The irony from the airhead who bought a Hebrew dictionary, and
>claimed to be fluent in Hebrew two days later ...
ROTFLMAO. That from the guy who claims he is fluent in Hebrew, but
insists that "kippa" is a Hebrew word. Meaning a real Jew who reads
only Hebrew, would be considered illiterate by the Nazi fuckwit
Coughlan. Since that real Jew wouldn't have a clue what "kippa" is
supposed to mean. It would be no different than trying to read
hieroglyphics to that real Jew. In fact, hieroglyphics would probably
be easier for him to read, than words written in the Latin alphabet.
Hey, desi... guess what? That Hebrew dictionary I bought doesn't
have the word "kippa" in it. So how could it be "Hebrew"?
Whoosh... right over desi's pointy little head.
A Jew deconstructing desmond coughlan
>Y.
Planet Visitor II
wrote:
>On 23/11/09 7:10, in article rq9kg511udj29n4fc...@4ax.com,
>"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Collecting them isn't the same as using them, Earl.
>
>I rarely use a French dictionary.
That's no surprise. You never use an English dictionary. Making
yourself understood by others has never been a big part of your
attempts to communicate.
> I found years
>ago that I learned French better if I figured out
>what a word meant and did not break up reading
>with looking it up.
Yeah... why bother with the trivial attempt to communicate with
others, in a way in which they might even understand you... right???
>If I really need the meaning of a word I have encountered
>I ask my wife. She is faster than flipping through
>the pages. She does object to being exploited but usually
>comes up with it.
I imagine you "compunicate" [1] in asking her. Since the two
of you never seen to talk to each other except through your
computers.
[1] Urban slang meaning "to chat with someone in the same
room via an instant messaging service, instead of speaking to
them out loud, in person."
Planet Visitor II
Donna Evleth
> From: Planet Visitor II <na...@earthlink.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:33:10 -0500
> Subject: Re: John McCain Could Lose Senate Primary To Tea Party Supporter
Why do you think our computers are in the same room?
Donna Evleth
>
>
> Planet Visitor II
Planet Visitor II
wrote:
Because Earl has already said that your apartment, while larger than
the average apartment in Paris, is rather small.
Planet Visitor IO
>Donna Evleth
Earl Evleth
"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Because Earl has already said that your apartment, while larger than
> the average apartment in Paris, is rather small.
Our daughter, currently visiting us, has a house with 3000 sq feet.
which is enormous for a Parisian apartment. Our place is about 700
sq feet, and small compared to that. But it is above average for
a Parisian apartment which average about 500-550.
American houses tend to be oversized and have little used space.
With the creation of the family room, family live (TV etc) tends
to occur there and the living room goes largely unused. In
a Paris apartment nearly all the space is in use during the day.
The exception are those inhabited by widows and widowers. One
person in a two bedroom 3-pieces implies unused space. A
Dutch friend told us that in Holland unused space is taxed
with the social goal of maximum efficiency of space use.
This is not true in France. In fact Paris has a number
of unoccupied apartments, or little used. There is one
apartment in our building, the same size as ours
owned by a man in Lyon. It is not occupied more than
2 weeks a year.
Donna Evleth
> From: Planet Visitor II <na...@earthlink.net>
> Newsgroups: alt.activism.death-penalty
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:52:08 -0500
Earl's computer is in the bedroom. Mine is in my office, which is my
territory alone. A hall separates them.
Donna Evleth
>
Earl Evleth
Evleth" <dev...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> Because Earl has already said that your apartment, while larger than
>> the average apartment in Paris, is rather small.
>
> Earl's computer is in the bedroom. Mine is in my office, which is my
> territory alone. A hall separates them.
In addition it is out of distance for communicating verbally. Walking
from one room, through the hall to the other requires a Z shaped pathway
which prevents conservation.
The term 3-pieces means three major rooms, plus a kitchen, bath room
and separate toilet area. Parisian 3-pieces sizes range from about
50-80 sq meters. Some are smaller meaning very small rooms.
The following http://www.pap.fr/immobilier/vente-immobilier.htm
list apartments for sale. One can specify the size
For 3-pieces in the 75006 (sixth) there is only one shown
however for the 14th there are 10 listed and the prices
are lower than here
here is one
Denfert-Rochereau. Immeuble ancien. Au 3e. 3 pièces 64 m?, traversant, au
calme et sur jardin : séjour 28 m?, 2 chambres, dressing, cuisine aménagée,
salle de bains, wc séparés. 2 caves. Local vélos. Chauffage individuel gaz.
Doubles fenêtres aluminium. Proche nombreux transports (RER B, bus, métro)
et commodités. 485.000 €.
Often the add is accompanied by photos.
The offer price of 485.000 euros is inflated since there is room for
negotiation and one tries to put the cost of the agency on the back of the
buyer. However in Le Particulier there are no agents.
So in this case the final sum realize by the seller be around 400,000
euros or $600,000. The buyer payes the notarial fees, around 8%. So
the money to come up with would be closer to 430,000 euros. The seller
has no fees except special inspections which could cost 500 euros total.
Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' )
Earl Evleth wrote:
>
> On 26/11/09 12:03, in article C7341EF9.84036%dev...@wanadoo.fr, "Donna
> Evleth" <dev...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> >> Because Earl has already said that your apartment, while larger than
> >> the average apartment in Paris, is rather small.
> >
> > Earl's computer is in the bedroom. Mine is in my office, which is my
> > territory alone. A hall separates them.
>
> In addition it is out of distance for communicating verbally. Walking
> from one room, through the hall to the other requires a Z shaped pathway
> which prevents conservation.
>
Perhaps you and Donna could get some CB radios:
"Uh, Breaker One-Nine, this here's the Rubber Duck, you got a copy
on me Pig-Pen? C'mon."
"Uh, yeah 10-4 Pig Pen, fer sure, fer sure, by golly I hoovered the
rug clean clear to Eifel-Town, c'mon."
"Uh, yeah right, yeah right, Pig Pen, did you also put your Sanka
in the sinko, come back?"
yitzhak in eretz isreal (sic)
> wrote:
>>I rarely use a French dictionary.
> That's no surprise. You never use an English dictionary. Making
> yourself understood by others has never been a big part of your
> attempts to communicate.
'If there were any, we can be sure that you would put them up in every
post of yours. But you there aren't any...'
<http://is.gd/1EyKu>
>>I found years ago that I learned French better if I figured out what a
>>word meant and did not break up reading with looking it up.
> Yeah... why bother with the trivial attempt to communicate with
> others, in a way in which they might even understand you... right???
'.. your French is as bad as your Germany..'
<http://is.gd/15bUF>
{ snip }
Foe
>
> <foehamme...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > McCain is hardly a Republican for that matter.
>
> He is indeed a Republican but a maverick at the same time.
He's a reach-across-the-aisle stooge.
Planet Visitor II
wrote:
>On 26/11/09 6:52, in article 3s5sg5lfmdfe9ln0i...@4ax.com,
>"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Because Earl has already said that your apartment, while larger than
>> the average apartment in Paris, is rather small.
>
>Our daughter, currently visiting us, has a house with 3000 sq feet.
>which is enormous for a Parisian apartment. Our place is about 700
>sq feet, and small compared to that. But it is above average for
>a Parisian apartment which average about 500-550.
"Average for a Parisian apartment" being the operative term here.
I presume you _don't like_ to have visitors overnight.
>American houses tend to be oversized and have little used space.
I beg to differ. And I find that every visitor we have from Paris
expresses nothing but envy at the spacious home and garden we have
to enjoy.
>With the creation of the family room, family live (TV etc) tends
>to occur there and the living room goes largely unused. In
>a Paris apartment nearly all the space is in use during the day.
Not unless one or the other suffers from colic, Earl.
>The exception are those inhabited by widows and widowers. One
>person in a two bedroom 3-pieces implies unused space. A
>Dutch friend told us that in Holland unused space is taxed
>with the social goal of maximum efficiency of space use.
The typical socialist way... when in doubt... impose a tax on it.
After all... that empty space can be utilized by the terminally
unemployed-unemployable who _deserve_ the same as the
employed-employable. And if they can't have it, then tax
it, and give the money to the unemployed-unemployable.
>This is not true in France. In fact Paris has a number
>of unoccupied apartments, or little used. There is one
>apartment in our building, the same size as ours
>owned by a man in Lyon. It is not occupied more than
>2 weeks a year.
How uncouth!!! How many 5000 sq ft villas on the Riviera do
you believe are only occupied a few weeks a year??
Planet Visitor II
Earl Evleth
Not important. There is a lack of housing in the Parisian area
and unused space is a waste of a social resource. In Holland
one is taxed for the extra space one does not really use
in one's resident. This adds incentive to maximum use
of space which is in short supply.
Planet Visitor II
wrote:
>On 2/12/09 7:02, in article 6n0ch5dhnk16br5p8...@4ax.com,
>"Planet Visitor II" <na...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>> It is not occupied more than
>>> 2 weeks a year.
>>
>> How uncouth!!! How many 5000 sq ft villas on the Riviera do
>> you believe are only occupied a few weeks a year??
>
>Not important. There is a lack of housing in the Parisian area
>and unused space is a waste of a social resource.
Whatever are you raving about? Have you no idea of how many
of the rich maintain large and luxurious apartments that stay
empty for probably eight months a year? Your precious
former president lives in one offered to him free as a gift
for as long as he needs it. Are you willing to set up a cot in
your living room and share it with one of those 300 or so
people given tents by your socialist government to sleep in
the streets of Paris?
> In Holland
>one is taxed for the extra space one does not really use
>in one's resident. This adds incentive to maximum use
>of space which is in short supply.
What it does is tax the doer to provide for the do-nothing.
Creating at the same moment a disincentive for the do-nothing
to do-anything to help themselves. While it may seem
right for you...since you already have yours and would not
share it for anything in the world and are only interested
in looking good to others... socialism is actually a disincentive for
our entire species to achieve progress.
Think of a dog race and what happens when the mechanical
rabbit stops moving.
Planet Visitor II