Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: The 9/11 Stand Down in 2 Minutes

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Al Dykes

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 10:24:47 AM4/3/08
to
In article <ft1na3$17no$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>,
<ri...@math.missouri.edu> wrote:
>http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2008/03/norad-stand-down-in-2-minutes.html
>
>[5]George Washington's Blog
>
>Thursday, March 27, 2008
>
>The 9/11 Stand Down in 2 Minutes
>
> NORAD, responsible for intercepting errant aircraft over the U.S., has
> a standard operating procedure for scrambling planes for interception
> which takes [6]less than 15 minutes
>
> They did this successfully (on time) [7]129 times in 2000 and and [8]67
> times between September 2000 and June 2001.


Why don't you post this stuff where people with real expertise can
comment on it or maybe be shown the light and agree with you.

I suggest rec.aviation.military, which I read. I look forward to
seeing what those people say about it,


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

Fred Williams

unread,
Apr 3, 2008, 1:20:10 PM4/3/08
to
On Thursday 03 April 2008 10:24, Al Dykes wrote:

> In article <ft1na3$17no$1...@pencil.math.missouri.edu>,
> <ri...@math.missouri.edu> wrote:
>>http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2008/03/norad-stand-down-in-2-minutes.html
>>
>>[5]George Washington's Blog
>>
>>Thursday, March 27, 2008
>>
>>The 9/11 Stand Down in 2 Minutes
>>
>> NORAD, responsible for intercepting errant aircraft over the U.S.,
>> has a standard operating procedure for scrambling planes for
>> interception which takes [6]less than 15 minutes
>>
>> They did this successfully (on time) [7]129 times in 2000 and and
>> [8]67 times between September 2000 and June 2001.
>
>
> Why don't you post this stuff where people with real expertise can
> comment on it or maybe be shown the light and agree with you.
>
> I suggest rec.aviation.military, which I read. I look forward to
> seeing what those people say about it,
>

He's exactly right. Before the propagandists got hold of it, that's
what was going down. That's the sort of stuff we should be talking
about.

--
Regards,
Fred
<http://www.fredwilliams.ca/thesecretofmoney.html>

0 new messages