Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Kids accusing teachers of "Improper Behaviour"

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Cuil

unread,
Aug 6, 2008, 5:37:46 PM8/6/08
to
On Aug 5, 2:39 pm, illy...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 01:57:44 +0100, "<p>sychotic <c>hicken" <"\"Bill
>
>
>
>
>
> Jillians\""@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Lurching erratically into the sunlight holding
> ><nk7f941qp58ecl788neb0tvlqqfk588...@4ax.com>, it appeared
> >illy...@gmail.com had made a clean getaway:
> >>On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:57:46 +0100, "<p>sychotic <c>hicken" <"\"Bill
> >>Jillians\""@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Lurching erratically into the sunlight holding
> >>><46ue9419teb7j7e7dl12avvd16fg67o...@4ax.com>, it appeared
>
> >>>>yeah, right.  that kind of abuse has existed for thousands of years
> >>>>and it was considered no big deal when creepy old men in Greece took
> >>>>prepubescent boys as their proteges.  they allegedly were teaching
> >>>>them about life.  right.
>
> >>>It was actually acceptable in those days... so no abuse then.
>
> >>just because something is acceptable, it doesn't mean that it's abuse.
> >>beating one's wife was acceptable at some point and is still in some
> >>countries.  it doesn't mean that it's not violence and abuse.
>
> >You are imposing your values on people for whom they would be (a)
> >unwelcome and (b) meaningless.
>
> >In that respect you are a lot like Alex.
>
> /bitchslap
>
> fucking bullshit.  i am describing what it is and how it's experienced
> by the abused.  this is making me quite angry.  do you think an abused
> person tells himself or herself, "everyone thinks it's ok, everyone
> else is d doing it, therefore i am not suffering."  oh, they might say
> that, but they develop all sorts of emotional problems and start
> taking them out on themselves or others.  
>
> >But enough of that.
>
> perhaps you shouldn't have said that to begin with.
>
> >>>Modern thinking has deemed it an abuse so now it is just that.
>
> >>i'm not going to explain something to you that should be obvious.
>
> >>>I'm not arguing for it ... just pointing out that values change.
>
> >>values change.  facts don't.
>
> >I'll accept that.  Facts only have meaning according to how they are
> >interpreted.  I'm sure you know what a Paradigm shift is ?
>
> facts of abuse can only be interpreted in one way: it's bad however
> you spin it.  raping children and abusing anyone is wrong and causes
> them often irreparable harm.  i guess you've never had any experience
> with that, so it makes no sense to you, therefore you interpret it as
> a difference in values.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

People like him will try to make light of pedophiles and what they do
is not always their fault and those accused of those hanus crimes not
always guilty.

In other words pay no attention when someone tries to light shed on a
pedophile, just move along.

This is how they work.

kill_kollective

unread,
Aug 6, 2008, 7:20:42 PM8/6/08
to
I had a cousin who had a sexual relationship with one of his teachers
in high school. She helped him get his diploma and get his citizenship
cuz he was illegal. when word got out some big drama happened and his
teacher was labeled a pedophile pfftt >_> chimo alert

HAVOC

unread,
Aug 6, 2008, 10:29:08 PM8/6/08
to
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:37:46 -0700 (PDT), Cuil <cuild...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Cuil is the biggest pedophile around

Unknown

unread,
Aug 7, 2008, 1:17:35 PM8/7/08
to
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 14:37:46 -0700 (PDT), Cuil <cuild...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Aug 5, 2:39 pm, illy...@gmail.com wrote:

Take you 'ands off my hanus. And don't light that shed on me.

No, I agree in general. But that's the ultimate censorship trap.
Effective censorship stifles even discussion of the forbidden and of
the mecahnisms of censorship.

Speaking of which alt.support.g-l seems to have suddenly died (the
group is still supported but just getting apm in the past few days).
Anyone know why?

Who am I today?...Oh yes

TMUTL

0 new messages