Re: Plutonium Problem
Patrick Meuser-Bianca
way that memetics have been exported to extra-terrestrial intelligence that
does not even proclaim its existence in popular media, all waiting for
psychogenics that have been prevented by this embezzlement to reserve
restricted ownership in Area 51 at this point. Also my how my Vortal
Matroid Analysis was stolen. I guess some people are devised by other's
purpose to the extent that greed factors in the scale between grain and
insects as the seed of this root.
Note the way that the about button has been highlighted for some cause that
we can't seem yet to figure out. The memetics of automobile horns, psychic
lines, dating services and nuclear fission over finding the heavy water
deposits in the Dead and Red sea. What a shame.
Patrick Aslhey Meuser"-Bianca"
Cybreneticist
http://www.usag-ac.info
"Patrick Meuser-Bianca" <pmeuser...@usag-ac.info> wrote in message
news:dBGZj.4274$n9....@read2.cgocable.net...
> count your leap seconds very carefully
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
>
> Amongst those that show this abuse, I could'nt even feel as sorry for the
> how badly natural history will change to raise prices to keep dollars into
> the future instead of gross over net, exchange by current:
>
> m: mass
> q: charge
> 2(H_8C_3 O)$/m=Pl239_t/q
>
> Note that Wikpedia does waffle on these numbers too:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium
>
> Somewhere in the millions of years that the first figures I read from
> their site, dwon to 24,000. even without an Internet condenser to support
> this kind of jibe. Hows that for real-time? All because someone who
> didn't want the world to know what we've costed the sun in this criminal
> little war to support GWB's bid to play Amen Ra for the Ancient Egyptians.
> It's funny to think of how much earlier he could've done it if the
> original idea wasn't embezzled by the city of Hamilton, Ontario and their
> little Economic Development Department who claims they cannot help me
> develop it. Utilitarian and egalitarian plus totalitarian=-author
> {authoritarian} + Na<->Li.
>
> Patrick Ashley Meuser"-Bianca"
> Cyberenticst
> http://www.usag-ac.info
> "Richard Henry" <pome...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4ce6576e-d650-4420...@x1g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 23, 8:42 am, "Patrick Meuser-Bianca" <pmeuser-bia...@usag-
> ac.info> wrote:
>> Yes. Essentially one day is added to the amount of time that passes every
>> year every four years. So it is sufficient to say that there is an extra
>> day every leap year, discounting the implicit number by definition. And
>> that's what makes it a leap year, but in the context of this question I
>> was
>> hoping that the actual number would be counted for its number in a
>> quarter
>> second added to the same number of seconds (as in one year), to equal, a
>> number of leap years this one quarter second divides into to get this
>> number
>> at the same time. I know the final answer was close to 57000, but for the
>> (a-)life of me I cannot derive the formulae.
>>
>> d=3600*24
>> a=365*d
>> Pl239_t=a+(&d)/a+(&.25)
>>
>> Then:
>>
>> H_t=Solar mean time:
>> k:solar systematic charge_parity
>>
>> k(Pl_239*10)+Pl_239=H_t
>>
>> I would disprove alot of existing definitions for a better charge-parity
>> rating.
>>
>
>
> I hate to burst your bubble, but some "leap years" don't get an extra
> day, such as 1900 and 2100.
>
> However, you choice of calendars has no influence on the half-life of
> plutonium, anyway.
>
>
>
>