--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 10. Estimated numbers of persons living with AIDS, by year and
selected characteristics, 1998–2002—United States
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Age as of end of year (yrs)
<13
3,128
3,006
2,816
2,571
2,292
13--14
372
438
513
642
732
15--24
4,657
4,675
4,951
5,204
5,653
25--34
63,610
60,056
56,552
53,837
51,851
35--44
130,403
141,434
151,476
158,962
165,348
45--54
66,105
77,334
89,716
102,991
116,927
55--64
16,033
19,330
23,030
27,462
33,201
≥65
4,256
5,152
6,263
7,471
8,902
Race/ethnicity
White, not Hispanic
113,267
120,094
126,851
133,461
140,835
Black, not Hispanic
115,644
126,499
138,129
149,808
162,412
Hispanic
55,980
60,767
65,823
70,865
76,052
Asian/Pacific Islander
2,314
2,578
2,858
3,189
3,574
American Indian/Alaska Native
989
1,074
1,198
1,316
1,450
Exposure category
Male adult or adolescent
Male-to-male sexual contact
130,000
139,763
149,742
160,067
171,592
Injection drug use
55,735
59,199
62,743
65,729
68,636
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use
20,256
21,212
21,931
22,679
23,495
Heterosexual contact
17,656
20,433
23,328
26,420
29,973
Othera
3,846
4,008
4,164
4,348
4,553
Subtotal
227,494
244,615
261,907
279,242
298,248
Female adult or adolescent
Injection drug use
24,441
25,874
27,471
28,912
30,158
Heterosexual contact
31,175
35,295
40,072
44,895
50,174
Othera
1,722
1,854
2,036
2,227
2,432
Subtotal
57,338
63,023
69,579
76,035
82,764
Child(<13 yrs)
Perinatal
3,577
3,635
3,680
3,716
3,748
Otherb
154
149
147
147
145
Subtotal
3,731
3,784
3,827
3,864
3,893
Region of residence
Northeast
86,237
92,280
99,590
105,787
111,277
Midwest
28,577
30,941
33,517
36,125
39,516
South
106,857
116,778
126,203
136,698
148,573
West
58,296
62,232
66,255
70,193
74,652
U.S. dependencies, possessions, and associated nations
8,597
9,193
9,751
10,338
10,887
288,565
311,424
335,316
359,141
384,906
Totalc
288,565
311,424
335,316
359,141
384,906
Note. These numbers do not represent actual cases in persons living
with AIDS. Rather, these numbers are point estimates of persons living
with AIDS that have been adjusted for reporting delays and for
redistribution of cases in persons initially reported without an
identified risk. The estimates have not been adjusted for incomplete
reporting.
a Includes hemophilia, blood transfusion, perinatal, and risk not
reported or not identified.
b Includes hemophilia, blood transfusion, and risk not reported or not
identified.
c Includes persons of unknown or multiple race and of unknown sex.
Because column totals were calculated independently of the values for
the subpopulations, the values in each column may not sum to the column
total.
LOL! Good work, blob!
No he doesn't.
:-) "All About Blob".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surv.Report Vol.14 | Home | Search | Site Map |
Subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 10. Estimated numbers of persons living with AIDS, by year and
selected characteristics, 1998-2002-United States
Now we all know how the bigots love to do the numbers game, so here are some
numbers to play with.
Now using Boob's numbers we see...................
Male-to-male sexual contact
1988 130,000
1999 139,763
2000 149,742
2002 160,067
2003 171,592
I could not help noticing that the increase over the period was for male to
male sexual contact was :-
171,592 minus 130,000 which gave us an increase of some 41,592 which is
around a 24% increase
Heterosexual contact
1988 17,656
1999 20,433
2000 23,328
2001 26,420
2002 29,973
The heterosexual increase was :-
29,973 minus 17656 giving us an increase of 12,317 around a 41% increase.
So it seems that MSM increased by 24% while Hets increased by 41%.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I do not think Boob N Carole wanted us to notice these numbers...........
Blob&Carlo just posts what he thinks might be anti-gay without really
reading the material. Favorite source: the defrocked and humiliated
"psychologist" Paul Cameron.
Then Blob posts it as his own shit, taking credit for others' work by
thievery.
You advise me of nothing, faggot
The last thing anybody wants is advice from a faggot sperm eater.
that his
plagiarism is illegal.
And I'm supposed to care?
>
>Blob&Carlo just posts what he thinks might be anti-gay without really
Please dont feed the trolls
Of course not. No one expects you to care about anything, you absolute
horror of a human being.
I knew monkeys could type, but wasn't aware they could type with much degree
of literacy.
Does this mean you are a monkey?
How does it feel to be less intelligent than a monkey?
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. – Thomas Jefferson
How would I know?
LOL!
Maybe you can fill us in.
> "Andrealphus" <NOREALE...@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
> news:m6I9h.2844$sf5....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> In News %TH9h.16162$K9.1...@bignews4.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>> at johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>
>>> "ScottyFLL" <Scot...@mail2scott.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1164396723.6...@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>> bobandcarole wrote:
>>>>> ScottyFLL wrote:
>>>>>> bobandcarole wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> a chart boring beyond description, but at least there was a cite
>>>>>> after I advised him
>>>>>
>>>>> You advise me of nothing, faggot
>>>>> The last thing anybody wants is advice from a faggot sperm eater.
>>>>>
>>>> We LOVE watching you jump! You're just like a trained monkey!
>>>> LOL!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> I knew monkeys could type, but wasn't aware they could type with
>>> much degree of literacy.
>>
>> How does it feel to be less intelligent than a monkey?
>
> How would I know?
Because you're less intelligent than a monkey. See? I even had to explain
that to you!
Did you ever find out what happened in 1066?
Nobody has ever accused you of being literate.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Surv.Report Vol.14 | Home | Search | Site Map |
> Subscribe
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Table 10. Estimated numbers of persons living with AIDS, by year and
> selected characteristics, 1998-2002-United States
If you want people to weep,
you should give them the numbers for Africa I think . . . . .
We've been pulling the faggots strings for months and it tapdances
better then bojangles.
You're getting in over your head jim, my advice would be to shut up
before faggot scotty gets you involved.
I've seen parrots that could carry on a more intelligent conversation than
you're capable of. Maybe you should try for something more your speed, like
attempting to outwit a snail.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (November 21)
NEXT GAME: Friday, November 24 vs. San Antonio, 7:35
Nonetheless, he got a point, by getting you to spout some of the porn
text that obviously pervades your mind.
-- Jim07D6
Coming from you, the above means absolutely nothing. Because you are a
dolt.
Have a nice day! :-) LOL
And here you are yet again, blob! Just as we expected, and right on
schedule! LOL! You are such a predictable little snake.
> Andrealphus wrote:
>>>
>> Did you ever find out what happened in 1066?
>>
> LOL! He can't even figure out what happened in 1776! Or 2000!
LOL!
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
You poor pathetic little troll. Can form an argument, can't engage in
an adult discussion, can't sit at the table with the adults.
Come on, Blob. That post wasn't worthy, it didn't quite show us just
how lame and despicable you really are.
Try again! We'll be waiting and we are certain that you will not
disappoint (except for our expectation that you will be, as always,
disappointing)!
It's a well known fact that the gay community, acting before anybody else,
moved to promote safer sexual behavior and the number of cases among
gays have--overall--declined.
--
Mark K. Bilbo
------------------------------------------------------------
"Christians, it is needless to say, utterly detest each other.
They slander each other constantly with the vilest forms of
abuse and cannot come to any sort of agreement in their
teachings. Each sect brands its own, fills the head of its
own with deceitful nonsense, and makes perfect little pigs
of those it wins over to its side." -Celsus (2nd century C.E.)
>
What's with all the crossposting hissy fits?
Tara
He really likes the banana.
--
Doc Smartass
"Bullshit repeated to the limit of infinity asymptotically approaches
the odour of roses." -- Relf's Law
> In News M8I9h.16176$K9.1...@bignews4.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
> at johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>
>> "Andrealphus" <NOREALE...@THISADDRESS.FOAD> wrote in message
>> news:m6I9h.2844$sf5....@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>> In News %TH9h.16162$K9.1...@bignews4.bellsouth.net,, John D.Wentzky
>>> at johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
>>>
>>>> "ScottyFLL" <Scot...@mail2scott.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1164396723.6...@14g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> bobandcarole wrote:
>>>>>> ScottyFLL wrote:
>>>>>>> bobandcarole wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a chart boring beyond description, but at least there was a cite
>>>>>>> after I advised him
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You advise me of nothing, faggot
>>>>>> The last thing anybody wants is advice from a faggot sperm eater.
>>>>>>
>>>>> We LOVE watching you jump! You're just like a trained monkey!
>>>>> LOL!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> I knew monkeys could type, but wasn't aware they could type with
>>>> much degree of literacy.
>>>
>>> How does it feel to be less intelligent than a monkey?
>>
>> How would I know?
>
> Because you're less intelligent than a monkey. See? I even had to
> explain that to you!
>
> Did you ever find out what happened in 1066?
Of course not. His clock doesn't count that high.
He told us a few weeks ago that the Magna Carta was signed in 1066. So his
clock not only doesn't count that high, but it's in serious need of
replacement.
If any of that were true, what does that make you, an amoeba?
> Did you ever find out what happened in 1066?
Was Satan released then?
Satan's time is short though.
Any more ideas?
What was it you told me was signed then?
LOL! Nice try, but I'm infinitely more intelligent than you can ever hope to
be.
>
>> Did you ever find out what happened in 1066?
>
> Was Satan released then?
See how stupid you are? You believe in imaginary beings.
Nothing, village idiot. Don't you even remember the conversation?
Remember? Battle of Hastings? Any of this ringing a bell? How
pathetically stupid can you be?
> Table 10. Estimated numbers of persons living with AIDS,
> by year and selected characteristics, 1998–2002—United
> States
Wow! That doesn't come anywhere near to the number of
abortions that took place in the same period.
There is a *Huge* difference though.
See, not all AIDS cases involve homosexuality, while each
and every abortion is the direct result of heterosexuality.
Clearly, the heterosexual deathstyle must be stamped out!
> 1998
> 1999
> 2000
> 2001
> 2002
>
> Age as of end of year (yrs)
>
> <13
> 3,128
> 3,006
> 2,816
> 2,571
> 2,292
>
> 13--14
> 372
> 438
> 513
> 642
> 732
>
> 15--24
> 4,657
> 4,675
> 4,951
> 5,204
> 5,653
>
> 25--34
> 63,610
> 60,056
> 56,552
> 53,837
> 51,851
>
> 35--44
> 130,403
> 141,434
> 151,476
> 158,962
> 165,348
>
> 45--54
> 66,105
> 77,334
> 89,716
> 102,991
> 116,927
>
> 55--64
> 16,033
> 19,330
> 23,030
> 27,462
> 33,201
>
> ≥65
> 4,256
> 5,152
> 6,263
> 7,471
> 8,902
>
>
> Race/ethnicity
>
> White, not Hispanic
> 113,267
> 120,094
> 126,851
> 133,461
> 140,835
>
> Black, not Hispanic
> 115,644
> 126,499
> 138,129
> 149,808
> 162,412
>
> Hispanic
> 55,980
> 60,767
> 65,823
> 70,865
> 76,052
>
> Asian/Pacific Islander
> 2,314
> 2,578
> 2,858
> 3,189
> 3,574
>
> American Indian/Alaska Native
> 989
> 1,074
> 1,198
> 1,316
> 1,450
>
>
> Exposure category
>
> Male adult or adolescent
>
> Male-to-male sexual contact
> 130,000
> 139,763
> 149,742
> 160,067
> 171,592
>
> Injection drug use
> 55,735
> 59,199
> 62,743
> 65,729
> 68,636
>
> Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use
> 20,256
> 21,212
> 21,931
> 22,679
> 23,495
>
> Heterosexual contact
> 17,656
> 20,433
> 23,328
> 26,420
> 29,973
>
> Othera
> 3,846
> 4,008
> 4,164
> 4,348
> 4,553
>
> Subtotal
> 227,494
> 244,615
> 261,907
> 279,242
> 298,248
>
>
> Female adult or adolescent
>
> Injection drug use
> 24,441
> 25,874
> 27,471
> 28,912
> 30,158
>
> Heterosexual contact
> 31,175
> 35,295
> 40,072
> 44,895
> 50,174
>
> Othera
> 1,722
> 1,854
> 2,036
> 2,227
> 2,432
>
> Subtotal
> 57,338
> 63,023
> 69,579
> 76,035
> 82,764
>
>
> Child(<13 yrs)
>
> Perinatal
> 3,577
> 3,635
> 3,680
> 3,716
> 3,748
>
> Otherb
> 154
> 149
> 147
> 147
> 145
>
> Subtotal
> 3,731
> 3,784
> 3,827
> 3,864
> 3,893
>
>
> Region of residence
>
> Northeast
> 86,237
> 92,280
> 99,590
> 105,787
> 111,277
>
> Midwest
> 28,577
> 30,941
> 33,517
> 36,125
> 39,516
>
> South
> 106,857
> 116,778
> 126,203
> 136,698
> 148,573
>
> West
> 58,296
> 62,232
> 66,255
> 70,193
> 74,652
>
> U.S. dependencies, possessions, and associated nations
> 8,597
> 9,193
> 9,751
> 10,338
> 10,887
>
> 288,565
> 311,424
> 335,316
> 359,141
> 384,906
>
>
> Totalc
> 288,565
> 311,424
> 335,316
> 359,141
> 384,906
>
>
> Note. These numbers do not represent actual cases in persons living
> with AIDS. Rather, these numbers are point estimates of persons living
> with AIDS that have been adjusted for reporting delays and for
> redistribution of cases in persons initially reported without an
> identified risk. The estimates have not been adjusted for incomplete
> reporting.
>
> a Includes hemophilia, blood transfusion, perinatal, and risk not
> reported or not identified.
> b Includes hemophilia, blood transfusion, and risk not reported or not
> identified.
> c Includes persons of unknown or multiple race and of unknown sex.
> Because column totals were calculated independently of the values for
> the subpopulations, the values in each column may not sum to the column
> total.
>
> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasr1402/table10.htm
Conclusion: the Goddess loves lesbians?
--
satyr #1953
Chairman, EAC Church Taxation Subcommittee
Director, Gideon Bible Alternative Fuel Project
Supervisor, EAC Fossil Casting Lab
>> He told us a few weeks ago that the Magna Carta was signed in 1066. So
>> his clock not only doesn't count that high, but it's in serious need of
>> replacement.
>
> What was it you told me was signed then?
oh no lol he really IS that dumb
>
>
And you are a sucker for punishment, faggot.
Read about faggot scottys "lawsuit" against me :-)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/msg/2274a97957dcd2d3?&hl=en
The cum drunk sperm golbin was actually stupid enough to type that
bullshit. LOL
Now who's predictable???
DANCE scotty, DANCE...
<tosses a quarter in the faggot monkeys cup>
No, you're the laughingstock of this discussion group.
How's living in the closet boobandcover?
>
> http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/hasr1402/table10.htm
So, how come you haven't got AIDS yet, iBend? Oh, yes! you just sit
there fantasising about it.
You stupid little twit. They're laughing at YOU! Because you are
stupid, vulgar, and cannot construct an argument!
LOL!! Keep dancing, honey! We're enjoying the entertainment!
Why didn't you tell people what you did to make me threaten suit? Huh?
And after I threatened suit, suddenly the behavior (impersonating me)
stopped! Which means, of course, that you were indeed the one doing
it!
LOL! I scared the fuck out of you by threatening suit, and made you
stop your illegal activity!
So who has the power NOW, faggot? LOL!! (Want another banana?)
Interesting, though, that you don't say WHY I threatened suit. And
interesting as well that you don't mention that when I threatened suit,
the illegal impersonation suddenly and perhaps miraculously stopped!
And we know what THAT means, don't we? Huh? Why don't you link to
posts where you proclaim that I will never be able to find you because
you used an anonymous mail service? Hmmmmm?
LOL!! You've made a fool of yourself once again, Blob! I scared the
fuck out of you, and you stopped your seriously illegal behavior.
Want another banana? I am LAUGHING MY ASS OFF!!!! You scared little
PUSSY! LOL!
Nothing faggot, your AIDS dellusions were kicking in.
Huh?
> And after I threatened suit, suddenly the behavior (impersonating me)
> stopped! Which means, of course, that you were indeed the one doing
> it!
Again you provide nothing but your babbling.
READ MY LIPS...POST PROOF, FAGGOT
>
> LOL! I scared the fuck out of you by threatening suit, and made you
> stop your illegal activity!
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I knew you were blowing smoke out of your AIDS ridden ass and I told
you so daily,
as did everyone else.
You think you're the first one that threatened a lawsuit over an
insignificant incident like this?
Your "lawsuit" never bothered me anyway because I didn't impersonate
you, although I congratulate the one that did.
You tapdanced to perfection, faggot..thanks for the laughs!!
You're still the laughingstock of alt.usenet.kooks
>
> So who has the power NOW,
I do of course.
I don't have AIDS. (And you might want to consult Mr. Dictionary
again...)
> > And after I threatened suit, suddenly the behavior (impersonating me)
> > stopped! Which means, of course, that you were indeed the one doing
> > it!
>
> Again you provide nothing but your babbling.
> READ MY LIPS
They're filthy and I don't want to look at them.
> ...POST PROOF, FAGGOT
If I post it, I won't be able to use it if I need it. Do you
understand that? I am not going to give you my evidence. YOU know you
did it, and *I* know you did it and EVERYONE ON USENET knows you did
it, but I'm not going to reveal my evidence. I might need it if you
try this again. Get it? LOL!
> > LOL! I scared the fuck out of you by threatening suit, and made you
> > stop your illegal activity!
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> I knew you were blowing smoke out of your AIDS ridden ass and I told
> you so daily,
I don't have AIDS.
> as did everyone else.
NOBODY else. LOL!! You've obviously been drinking again!
> You think you're the first one that threatened a lawsuit over an
> insignificant incident like this?
It wasn't insignificant. One of the posts was you posing as me, saying
I liked to eat shit. That is libel and defamation and illegal.
> Your "lawsuit" never bothered me anyway
Then why do you keep obsessing about it? LOL!!!! You bring it up
EVERY DAY!!!!!!!! You are a scared little trailer-park PUSSY!
> because I didn't impersonate
> you,
Yes you did.
> although I congratulate the one that did.
It was you.
> You're still the laughingstock of alt.usenet.kooks
No, that would be you. I'm not being discussed on that ng.
> > So who has the power NOW,
>
> I do of course.
Wrong again. The boxed carbonated wine is giving you a false sense of
power. Put it away and take a nap.
LOLOLOL...here we go again, what a fucking queer liar you are!
Do you
> understand that? I am not going to give you my evidence. YOU know you
> did it, and *I* know you did it and EVERYONE ON USENET knows you did
> it, but I'm not going to reveal my evidence. I might need it if you
> try this again. Get it? LOL!
>
> > > LOL! I scared the fuck out of you by threatening suit, and made you
> > > stop your illegal activity!
> >
> > ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > I knew you were blowing smoke out of your AIDS ridden ass and I told
> > you so daily,
>
> I don't have AIDS.
>
> > as did everyone else.
>
> NOBODY else.
I've seen many posts, especially in AUK.
LOL!! You've obviously been drinking again!
>
> > You think you're the first one that threatened a lawsuit over an
> > insignificant incident like this?
>
> It wasn't insignificant.
LOL...yes it was, clueless faggot.
One of the posts was you posing as me, saying
> I liked to eat shit.
You post shit, eating it isn't such a stretch..LOL
That is libel and defamation and illegal.
>
Then do something about it, faggot
Action speaks louder then words
But as usual you will do nothing but show your complete ignorance by
running your dicksucker.
> > Your "lawsuit" never bothered me anyway
>
> Then why do you keep obsessing about it? LOL!!!! You bring it up
> EVERY DAY!!!!!!!!
And I will bring it up every day.
I want everyone to know what an insignificant, impotent little faggot
you are.
We love to laugh at you scotty.
You are a scared little trailer-park PUSSY!
Are ya mad, faggot???
Scared of your dellusions? hardly...
>
> > because I didn't impersonate
> > you,
>
> Yes you did.
>
POST PROOF
> > although I congratulate the one that did.
>
> It was you.
POST PROOF, I dare you
>
> > You're still the laughingstock of alt.usenet.kooks
>
> No, that would be you. I'm not being discussed on that ng.
Oh but you are, faggot, shall I sic the Ayatollah on you again?? :-)
We humiliated you again with the old bait and switch..LOL
>
> > > So who has the power NOW,
> >
> > I do of course.
>
> Wrong again. The boxed carbonated wine is giving you a false sense of
> power. Put it away and take a nap.
Running away again, faggot?.
I told you when you floated in here you were a clueless piece of shit
and you were out of your league and you're proved me right time and
time again.
Read about your obsession with homosexuality.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
You homosexuals must cease with your following me around all day.
> Ray Fischer rfis...@sonic.net said:
>> bobandcarole <bobandc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> And you are a sucker for punishment, faggot.
>>>
>>> Read about faggot scottys "lawsuit" against me :-)
>>
>> Read about your obsession with homosexuality.
>>
>>
> Homosexuals want to forcefully have anal sex with my bum.
No sag-bottom, they really just don't.
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson
>
> ScottyFLL wrote:
>> bobandcarole wrote:
>> > >
>> > And you are a sucker for punishment, faggot.
>> >
>> > Read about faggot scottys "lawsuit" against me :-)
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/msg/2274a9
>> > 7957dcd2d3?&hl=en The cum drunk sperm golbin was actually stupid
>> > enough to type that bullshit. LOL
>> >
>> Oh, my.
>>
>> Why didn't you tell people what you did to make me threaten suit?
>
> Nothing faggot, your AIDS dellusions were kicking in.
And this is the best Brokeback Bob can manage.
That's utterly pathetic. I went to Google and typed in "magna carta
signed" and got the date in the results page. None so blind as he who
will not see, I suppose.
You dress like that, you're asking for it, baby.
We're not interested in your fantasies.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
> > > Again you provide nothing but your babbling.
> > > READ MY LIPS
> > They're filthy and I don't want to look at them.
> Again the filthy faggot avoids the question, as I knew it would.
> > > ...POST PROOF, FAGGOT
> > If I post it, I won't be able to use it if I need it.
> LOLOLOL...here we go again, what a fucking queer liar you are!
Again, please link us to the lies. You continually tell us they exist,
yet we have not seen one. I threatened suit, you changed your illegal
behavior because you're a scared little pussy, and I let it go.
< snip >
> I've seen many posts, especially in AUK.
And again I will ask you to link to one. And I'd really love to see
one that did not include the name "bob&carole" or its derivatives.
Because you would be the only one to post something there, just as you
were the only one who would illegally impersonate me and think you
could get away with it.
> > > You think you're the first one that threatened a lawsuit over an
> > > insignificant incident like this?
> > It wasn't insignificant.
> LOL...yes it was, clueless faggot.
If it were insignificant, you wouldn't have shit in your pants because
of it, and then changed your behavior to something more acceptable to
me? See that? I made you change your behavior (as I frequently do
when I feel like watching you tapdance and peel bananas).
> One of the posts was you posing as me, saying
> > I liked to eat shit.
> You post shit, eating it isn't such a stretch..LOL
Ah. And so we have your admission that you DID do what I accused you
of! I KNEW it'd come out sooner or later! PROOF POSITIVE!! LOL!!
WHAT A RETARD YOU ARE!
> > That is libel and defamation and illegal.
> Then do something about it, faggot
> Action speaks louder then words
> But as usual you will do nothing but show your complete ignorance by
> running your dicksucker.
I thought I told you to turn off the spigot on that box of carbonated
wine...
> > > Your "lawsuit" never bothered me anyway
> > Then why do you keep obsessing about it? LOL!!!! You bring it up
> > EVERY DAY!!!!!!!!
> And I will bring it up every day.
Because you are mentally ill? Is THAT why?
> I want everyone to know what an insignificant, impotent little faggot
> you are.
Well, for an impotent faggot, I sure scared the fuck out of YOU! LOL!!
> We love to laugh at you scotty.
Most people are laughing WITH me, and AT you. I know you aren't so
good with the English, but there is a difference.
> Running away again, faggot?
Why would I run? You present no challenge. You're just an enormous,
toothless troll without a life who I like to put in his place once in
awhile.
You are incapable of presenting a rational adult argument, and you
continue to make yourself look more and more the fool with each passing
day! LOL!!!
> I told you when you floated in here you were a clueless piece of shit
> and you were out of your league and you're proved me right time and
> time again.
Oh, honey. You poor (and I do mean POOR) little twit. I am so
superior to you that you can't even see it. It would be sad if it
weren't so fucking hilarious!
How do you get that? I'm seeing no homosexual transmission among
women (at least not enough to break out of the "other" category) Seems
like women could protect themselves by becoming lesbians. That must
be what the Supreme Being wants. This makes me assume that god is a
lesbian but I guess God could be a male who is sexually aroused by
lesbians.
Or maybe there is no God and lesbian sex practices and lifestyles are
just not conducive to HIV transmission.
>How do you get that? I'm seeing no homosexual transmission among
>women (at least not enough to break out of the "other" category) Seems
>like women could protect themselves by becoming lesbians.
An easier route would be not to fuck bisexuals or IV druggers. Any
heterosexual man can tell you that some pussies stink (no, I'm not
alluding to your mother or sisters) and if the only sexual outlet you
have is sticking your nose in it (i.e., lesbianism) then that is not a
good choice. "If you can get tast the smell you've got it licked" is
bad Mojo!
It's just like my mother taught me with pistachios; don't eat the bad
ones. Most of them taste pretty good.
FINGER lickin' good, I'd say!
>On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 02:08:28 GMT, bibon@râlant.org wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:53:09 GMT, satyr <RsEaM...@infidels.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>How do you get that? I'm seeing no homosexual transmission among
>>>women (at least not enough to break out of the "other" category) Seems
>>>like women could protect themselves by becoming lesbians.
>>
>>An easier route would be not to fuck bisexuals or IV druggers. Any
>>heterosexual man can tell you that some pussies stink (no, I'm not
>>alluding to your mother or sisters) and if the only sexual outlet you
>>have is sticking your nose in it (i.e., lesbianism) then that is not a
>>good choice. "If you can get tast the smell you've got it licked" is
>>bad Mojo!
>
>It's just like my mother taught me with pistachios; don't eat the bad
>ones. Most of them taste pretty good.
NOD
You're one dumb troll
Oh, yes! you just sit
> there fantasising about it.
YAWN