Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The debate can be summed as thus...

2 views
Skip to first unread message

DW

unread,
Aug 4, 2004, 5:20:18 PM8/4/04
to
I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
and women...why??? for protection.

Those opposed to abortion, as I am, believe in speaking up for the
unborn is more important than speaking up for those that use abortion
as their birth control

Bob's Boyfriend

unread,
Aug 4, 2004, 11:22:28 PM8/4/04
to
In article <4bb16722.04080...@posting.google.com>,
djwri...@hotmail.com (DW) wrote:

> I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
> their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
> and women...why??? for protection.

Pulease! What we have are nations with huge numbers of busybodies who
won't mind their own business.

Ray Fischer

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 1:50:04 AM8/5/04
to
DW <djwri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
>their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
>and women...why??? for protection.

Crap. Forced servitude is explicitely forbidden by the US
Constitution. You may not force women to serve just because they are
pregnant.

>Those opposed to abortion, as I am, believe in speaking up for the
>unborn is more important than speaking up for those that use abortion
>as their birth control

Everybody should notice that you're not speaking up for anything.
You, like most anti-abortion hypocrites, only speak out against women.

--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net

EvilZak

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 2:15:38 AM8/5/04
to
djwri...@hotmail.com (DW) wrote in message news:<4bb16722.04080...@posting.google.com>...

> I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
> their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
> and women...why??? for protection.
>
There are no laws that force any human being to give up control over
what is happening to his/her body. There are not even laws to force
people to undergo medical treatment either in their own or anyone
else's best interests.


> Those opposed to abortion, as I am, believe in speaking up for the
> unborn is more important than speaking up for those that use abortion
> as their birth control

In other words, you think your sentimental self-rightous drivel is
more important than women's human rights.
Well, you're just another sexual inadequate with a deep sense of
failure about your own life, desperately trying to believe that
there's someone you can control when you can't.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 2:17:46 AM8/5/04
to
Bob's Boyfriend wrote:

> In article <4bb16722.04080...@posting.google.com>,
> djwri...@hotmail.com (DW) wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
> > their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
> > and women...why??? for protection.
>
> Pulease! What we have are nations with huge numbers of busybodies who
> won't mind their own business.

Do you agree with laws against consentual incest? Do you agree with laws against prostitution? Do
you agree with laws against selling of heroine and crack?

<snipped rest />
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the
rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche

"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a compassion for them, on
account of personal experience and heredity."
-- Mark Twain

"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic."
-- Joseph Stalin

The other Donald

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 12:17:34 PM8/5/04
to

"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0dlnuf...@news.bri.connect.com.au...

> Bob's Boyfriend wrote:
>
> > In article <4bb16722.04080...@posting.google.com>,
> > djwri...@hotmail.com (DW) wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
> > > their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
> > > and women...why??? for protection.
> >
> > Pulease! What we have are nations with huge numbers of busybodies who
> > won't mind their own business.
>

I know that you asked loaded, rhetorical questions, so I'll preface this
with a statement: "opposing laws that ban something should not be construed
as any indicator that I would partake in such activities."

With that....:

> Do you agree with laws against consentual incest?

Nope. It's no one's business, as long as it's consensual.

Here's a few clues for you: #1) I don't know if it's illegal for siblings to
have sex. AFAIK, it's illegal for them to marry, but not for them to fuck.

#2) It's happening anyway.....

...and #3) Why do you give a shit? How died and made you Den Mother?


> Do you agree with laws against prostitution?

Nope. If a woman wants to have sex for money, then it should be her business
only, pun intended.

Again, I have to state the obvious from above: It's happening anyway in
various forms, and why do you feel it's any of your damn business?


> Do
> you agree with laws against selling of heroine and crack?

Nope. This country was founded on business principles*, with the rights of
the individuals being almost an afterthought.

Legalize it, and tax it. Put the "black market" out of business and balance
the damn budget.

....because, and here's those pesky facts again: it's happening anyway, and
what I do in the privacy of my home is none of your damn business, assuming
no unwilling participants.

If I want to get whacked on coke and fuck goats in my house, what business
is it of ANYONE'S? If I involved someone against their will, then society
has something to say about it. If I drive while stoned and inflict myself on
others, then you have a say in my actions.

Other than that, the government, and society in general, should fuck off and
leave me alone.

(*My statement is very vague and all-encompassing. A brief study of the
founding of the US will answer your doubts.)


>
> <snipped rest />
> --
> Murdoc
> ; =================================
> "Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties,
nations and epochs, it is the
> rule."
> -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Odd that you quote Nietzsche, but feel compelled to interfere at the most
basic and personal levels in society. He seemed to be more of "big-picture"
kind of guy, concerned with the titans rather than the collateral.

--
-Donald in Austin
AA #2104
Apatriot #22
Atheist FF/EMT
....and ordained minister
Stork pin recipient: May 1, 2003 -Madelyn


Murdoc

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 9:06:59 PM8/5/04
to
The other Donald wrote:

>
> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0dlnuf...@news.bri.connect.com.au...
> > Bob's Boyfriend wrote:
> >
> > > In article <4bb16722.04080...@posting.google.com>,
> > > djwri...@hotmail.com (DW) wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not sure why femenists are so concerned about a law that controls
> > > > their bodies...there are so many laws that control bodies of both men
> > > > and women...why??? for protection.
> > >
> > > Pulease! What we have are nations with huge numbers of busybodies who
> > > won't mind their own business.
> >
>
> I know that you asked loaded, rhetorical questions, so I'll preface this
> with a statement: "opposing laws that ban something should not be construed
> as any indicator that I would partake in such activities."
>
> With that....:
>
> > Do you agree with laws against consentual incest?
>
> Nope. It's no one's business, as long as it's consensual.
>
> Here's a few clues for you: #1) I don't know if it's illegal for siblings to
> have sex. AFAIK, it's illegal for them to marry, but not for them to fuck.

The laws of incest prohibit sexual intercourse, and other forms of sexual penetration (oral, anal,
etc).

<snipped rest />
--
Murdoc
; =================================
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the
rule."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche

"All Congresses and Parliaments have a kindly feeling for idiots, and a compassion for them, on

Message has been deleted

The other Donald

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 9:46:01 PM8/5/04
to

"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au...

That notwithstanding, and I'm not saying you are correct, you still haven't
answered why you feel you have any say in the matter, nor did you address
any of the other answers given to your questions.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 5, 2004, 9:58:37 PM8/5/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> The laws

you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
issue.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 12:36:41 AM8/6/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
> > The laws
>

> you need to stop forging before you [...]

You need to start proving your claims, before you make demands of other people.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 12:36:44 AM8/6/04
to
The other Donald wrote:

If you feel you are against these three separate laws, are you doing anything to petition for the
changing of these laws?

Chris

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 2:56:45 AM8/6/04
to

"The other Donald" <the_do...@yehaw2.com> wrote in message
news:y4tQc.27$KZ2...@fe2.texas.rr.com...

Just as long as they don't leave your MONEY alone.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 7:48:27 AM8/6/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > The laws
>>
>> you need to stop forging before you

try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>

> You need

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 7:49:12 AM8/6/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> If you feel you are against these three separate laws


you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 8:20:03 AM8/6/04
to
On 6 Aug 2004 11:49:12 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

MurDICK needs to grow one (a sense of morality, that is), before he
can contemplate such an enormous task...

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 8:20:23 AM8/6/04
to
On 6 Aug 2004 11:48:27 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>
>>> > The laws
>>>
>>> you need to stop forging before you
>try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>>
>> You need
>
>you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
>issue.

Murdick needs to run away....

The other Donald

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 11:52:26 AM8/6/04
to

"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au...

Actually, I'm going one-better....

In January '04, at the ripe old age of 36, I have gone back to school with
the goal of becoming an attorney. Monday is my last day of the two summer
sessions I also enrolled in, and I'm taking on a 21-hour course load
beginning August 23.

I'm not going to just petition, I'm going to petition with an attitude.

EvilZak

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 3:10:15 PM8/6/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<xn0dlnuf...@news.bri.connect.com.au>...

>
> Do you agree with laws against consentual incest?

No. What happens between consenting adults is not the law's business.

Do you agree with laws against prostitution?

No. People who choose freely to enter into a contract where sexual
services are exchanged for money should be free to do so. After all,
that's just the same as marriage, only with prostitution the hours are
limited and the money generally better.

Do
> you agree with laws against selling of heroine and crack?

Criminalisation of drug consumption only leads to more crime. All
drugs should be liegalised. You Americans clearly learned nothing from
Prohibition - sadly, neither did our government.

EvilZak

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 3:12:37 PM8/6/04
to
"The other Donald" <the_do...@yehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<y4tQc.27$KZ2...@fe2.texas.rr.com>...
>
> ....because, and here's those pesky facts again: it's happening anyway, and
> what I do in the privacy of my home is none of your damn business, assuming
> no unwilling participants.
>
> If I want to get whacked on coke and fuck goats in my house, what business
> is it of ANYONE'S? If I involved someone against their will, then society
> has something to say about it.

Well, the goats aren't exactlyu in a position to give their informed
consent. Oh, and you were doing so well up till that point.

The other Donald

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 3:40:42 PM8/6/04
to

"EvilZak" <z...@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1e57ec88.04080...@posting.google.com...

How the hell do you know? Did you ask them? Have you started a battered-goat
shelter? Is there some sort of "ass-raped-goats" hotline? (1-800-baa-baaa.)

Why is it okay to club baby seals but not have sex with a goat?

:-)

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 9:45:24 PM8/6/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:nrt6h0tv58b97acei...@4ax.com:


he already has, in all of the tangible ways.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 9:55:25 PM8/6/04
to
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 01:45:24 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>news:nrt6h0tv58b97acei...@4ax.com:
>
>> On 6 Aug 2004 11:48:27 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>
>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>>>
>>>>> > The laws
>>>>>
>>>>> you need to stop forging before you
>>>try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>>>>
>>>> You need
>>>
>>>you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
>>>issue.
>>
>> Murdick needs to run away....
>
>
>he already has, in all of the tangible ways.

Forging is his great escape...

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 10:07:44 PM8/6/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:ajd8h0lq11d3d9taa...@4ax.com:

exactly. he must have bene terrified.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 6, 2004, 10:15:39 PM8/6/04
to
On 7 Aug 2004 02:07:44 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>news:ajd8h0lq11d3d9taa...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 01:45:24 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>>>news:nrt6h0tv58b97acei...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On 6 Aug 2004 11:48:27 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>>>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>>>
>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > The laws
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> you need to stop forging before you
>>>>>try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You need
>>>>>
>>>>>you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any
>>>>>other issue.
>>>>
>>>> Murdick needs to run away....
>>>
>>>
>>>he already has, in all of the tangible ways.
>>
>> Forging is his great escape...
>
>exactly. he must have bene terrified.

That was before he lost his conscience.

EvilZak

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:49:36 AM8/8/04
to
"The other Donald" <the_do...@yehaw2.com> wrote in message news:<_8RQc.4613$rb2....@fe2.texas.rr.com>...

> "EvilZak" <z...@missdemeanour.idps.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1e57ec88.04080...@posting.google.com...
>
> >
> > Well, the goats aren't exactlyu in a position to give their informed
> > consent. Oh, and you were doing so well up till that point.
>
> How the hell do you know? Did you ask them? Have you started a battered-goat
> shelter? Is there some sort of "ass-raped-goats" hotline? (1-800-baa-baaa.)
>
> Why is it okay to club baby seals but not have sex with a goat?
>
Fair point. Bestiality is generally regarded as wrong because, as with
young children, animals are not able to give informed consent.
If you want to fuck corpses, I don't have an ethical problem with
that, but would advise against it on public health grounds.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 9:32:09 PM8/8/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

You need to prove your claims before you posts any more accusations.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 9:32:10 PM8/8/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >
> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >>
> >> > The laws
> >>
> >> you need to stop forging before you
> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
> >
> > You need
>
> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
> issue.

You need to prove your claims before you come and make false accusations about people.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 9:45:34 PM8/8/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlqaq...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:

>> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>
> You need

you don't get to make demands until you stop forging and apologize for your
previous forgeries.

[...]

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 9:55:21 PM8/8/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xn0dlqaq...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
> >
> > You need
>
> you don't get to make demands until

You don't get to make demands until you prove your previous claims.

<snipped rest />

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:00:06 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>>
>>
>> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>

>You...

"You, you, you..."

Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:02:16 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 01:45:34 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

That's like asking Pamela Smart to take responsibility for the murder
of her husband. Murdick, much like Mrs. Smart, doesn't have a
conscience.

>[...]

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:02:56 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > The laws
>> >>
>> >> you need to stop forging before you
>> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>> >
>> > You need
>>
>> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
>> issue.
>

>You need....

"You, you, you..."

Buck up, Fuck-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:10:09 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Why don't you prove these alleged forgeries? It is a simple request, and it should be simple to
produce this alleged evidence. That is, of course, if these forgeries actually happened.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:10:11 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> Buck up, [####]-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.

Put up or shut up, and prove these alleged multiple forgeries. Oh, and there is no need for that
language.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:16:21 PM8/8/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:xn0dlt9ttb4hyv001
@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlqaq...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>> >
>> > You need
>>
>> you don't get to make demands until
>
> You don't

you haven't made a good start.

1. stop forging.
2. apologize for past forgeries

then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some measure of
credibility.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:16:40 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:vjmdh0p6ab8450cmn...@4ax.com:

i think he's afraid.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:16:55 PM8/8/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
>> >> else.
>> >
>> > You...
>>
>> "You, you, you..."
>>
>> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>
> Why don't

you haven't made a good start.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:17:20 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:cpmdh0lsv4qvj5bb0...@4ax.com:


i think he is too afraid.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:17:43 PM8/8/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlta6...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > The laws
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you need to stop forging before you
>> >> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > You need
>> >>
>> >> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any
>> >> other issue.
>> >
>> > You need....
>>
>> "You, you, you..."
>>
>> Buck up, [####]-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.
>
> Put

you haven't made a good start.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:22:37 PM8/8/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >>
> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
> >> >> else.
> >> >
> >> > You...
> >>
> >> "You, you, you..."
> >>
> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
> >
> > Why don't
>
> you haven't

You haven't proven your claims. Start proving your claims, and maybe you will regain some of your
lost credibility.

<snipped rest />

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:22:38 PM8/8/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xn0dlta6...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >>
> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > The laws
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you
> >> >> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You need
> >> >>
> >> >> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any
> >> >> other issue.
> >> >
> >> > You need....
> >>
> >> "You, you, you..."
> >>
> >> Buck up, [####]-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.
> >
> > Put
>
> you haven't

You haven't proven your claims. Start proving your claims, and maybe you will regain some of your
lost credibility.

<snipped rest />

--

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:23:29 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
>> Somesappywriter wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>> >>
>>> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
>>> >> else.
>>> >
>>> > You...
>>>
>>> "You, you, you..."
>>>
>>> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>>
>> Why don't
>
>you haven't made a good start.
>
>1. stop forging.
>2. apologize for past forgeries
>
>then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some measure of
>credibility.

He'd sooner lie about his mother than to do something unprecedented,
by doing something decent.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:23:59 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:40 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

Of what?

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:25:08 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:11 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > The laws
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you need to stop forging before you
>> >> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > You need
>> >>
>> >> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
>> >> issue.
>> >
>> > You need....
>>
>> "You, you, you..."
>>

>> Buck up, fuck-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.
>
>Put up or shut up...

You first, by apologising for your forgeries, Murdick.

Buck up, fuck-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:26:02 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

Notice how he censured the word "fuck" yet he has no qualms with
forging what people writes and posting blatant lies about himself and
his family?

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:26:21 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>> >
>> > You...
>>
>> "You, you, you..."
>>
>> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>

>Why...

WHY???

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:28:00 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:22:37 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
>> >> >> else.
>> >> >
>> >> > You...
>> >>
>> >> "You, you, you..."
>> >>
>> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>> >
>> > Why don't
>>
>> you haven't
>

>You...

"You, you, you..."

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 10:31:53 PM8/8/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 02:17:43 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

I wish he'd censure his forgeries and lies. Of course, he'd have
nothing to say....but who's complaining!

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 11:52:44 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> > news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >
> >> Somesappywriter wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >>> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
> >>> >> else.
> >>> >
> >>> > You...
> >>>
> >>> "You, you, you..."
> >>>
> >>> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
> >>
> >> Why don't
> >
> > you haven't made a good start.
> >
> > 1. stop forging.
> > 2. apologize for past forgeries
> >
> > then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some measure of
> > credibility.
>

> He'd sooner lie about his mother [...]

Prove it.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 11:57:41 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >>
> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
> >> >
> >> > You...
> >>
> >> "You, you, you..."
> >>
> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
> >

> > Why don't you prove these alleged forgeries? It is a simple request, and it should be simple to
> > produce this alleged evidence. That is, of course, if these forgeries actually happened.
>

> WHY???

Because you and Jimmy have made the claims, and you should provide evidence to support your claim
if, in fact, they are correct claims.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 11:57:44 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2004 02:22:37 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >
> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >>
> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
> >> >> >> else.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You...
> >> >>
> >> >> "You, you, you..."
> >> >>
> >> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
> >> >
> >> > Why don't
> >>
> >> you haven't
> >
> > You...
>

> "You ...

... still haven't proved these alleged multiple forgeries exist.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 11:57:46 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:11 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >>
> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > The laws
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you
> >> >> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You need
> >> >>
> >> >> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
> >> >> issue.
> >> >
> >> > You need....
> >>
> >> "You, you, you..."
> >>
> >> Buck up, fuck-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.
> >
> > Put up or shut up...
>
> You first, by apologising for your forgeries, Murdick.

Who, SomeSappyWriter, is 'Murdick'? No-one here posts under that handle.

<snipped rest />

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 8, 2004, 11:57:48 PM8/8/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
> > news:cpmdh0lsv4qvj5bb0...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> > > > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> > > >
> >>>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >>>> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >>>>
> >>>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >>>> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> > The laws
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> you need to stop forging before you
> >>>> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > You need
> >>>>
> >>>> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any
> >>>> other issue.
> > > >
> > > > You need....
> >>
> >> "You, you, you..."
> >>

> >> Buck up, [####]-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.


> >
> >
> > i think he is too afraid.
>

> Notice how he censured the word "[####]" yet he has no qualms with


> forging what people writes and posting blatant lies about himself and
> his family?

And these lies are ... ? Either provide proof of these claims that you make, or stop making false
claims.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 6:02:30 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:44 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:22:37 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
>> >> >> >> else.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "You, you, you..."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>> >> >
>> >> > Why don't
>> >>
>> >> you haven't
>> >
>> > You...
>>
>> "You ...
>

>... still...

...annoy the demonic shit out of Murdick.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 6:03:33 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 03:52:44 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> > news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >
>> >> Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >>> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything
>> >>> >> else.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > You...
>> >>>
>> >>> "You, you, you..."
>> >>>
>> >>> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>> >>
>> >> Why don't
>> >
>> > you haven't made a good start.
>> >
>> > 1. stop forging.
>> > 2. apologize for past forgeries
>> >
>> > then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some measure of
>> > credibility.
>>

>> He'd sooner lie about his mother than to do something unprecedented,
>>by doing something decent.

>Prove...

View many of your posted forgeries and lies.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 6:04:22 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>> >> >
>> >> > You...
>> >>
>> >> "You, you, you..."
>> >>
>> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>> >

>> > Why...
>>
>> WHY???
>
>Because...

You're an irresponsible arsewipe, that's why.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 6:04:42 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:46 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:11 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > The laws
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you
>> >> >> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You need
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any other
>> >> >> issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > You need....
>> >>
>> >> "You, you, you..."
>> >>
>> >> Buck up, fuck-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.
>> >
>> > Put up or shut up...
>>
>> You first, by apologising for your forgeries, Murdick.
>

>Who...

You.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 6:05:52 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:48 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:17:20 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>> > news:cpmdh0lsv4qvj5bb0...@4ax.com:
>> >
>> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:10 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> > > > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> > > >
>> >>>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >>>> news:xn0dlp66...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >>>> >> news:xn0dlowi...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> > The laws
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> you need to stop forging before you
>> >>>> try to talk about "laws" or any other issue.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > You need
>> >>>>
>> >>>> you need to stop forging before you try to talk about "laws" or any
>> >>>> other issue.
>> > > >
>> > > > You need....
>> >>
>> >> "You, you, you..."
>> >>

>> >> Buck upn,Fuck-up, and take responsibility for your forgeries.


>> >
>> >
>> > i think he is too afraid.
>>

>> Notice how he censured the word "Fuck" yet he has no qualms with


>> forging what people writes and posting blatant lies about himself and
>> his family?
>
>And these lies are ...

Exactly as I have described them, above.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 7:34:19 AM8/9/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:fundh0pvid0ejficl...@4ax.com:

> On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

>>> Why don't

>>
>>you haven't made a good start.
>>
>>1. stop forging.
>>2. apologize for past forgeries
>>
>>then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some
>>measure of credibility.
>
> He'd sooner lie about his mother than to do something unprecedented,
> by doing something decent.


i think he wants to, but he's too afraid

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 7:35:28 AM8/9/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:41odh0ljacmfojs6c...@4ax.com:

i think he's afraid of readers' reactions when he admits his forgeries and
apologioes.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 7:36:03 AM8/9/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:d2odh05kp77sjosah...@4ax.com:

he too afraid to do that

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 7:36:43 AM8/9/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:64odh0hp8tmob8q91...@4ax.com:

those actions, all of them, define his character

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 11:01:36 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 11:34:19 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>news:fundh0pvid0ejficl...@4ax.com:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
>>>> Why don't
>>>
>>>you haven't made a good start.
>>>
>>>1. stop forging.
>>>2. apologize for past forgeries
>>>
>>>then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some
>>>measure of credibility.
>>
>> He'd sooner lie about his mother than to do something unprecedented,
>> by doing something decent.
>
>
>i think he wants to, but he's too afraid

Is he afraid of what tavish's puppeteer might think?

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 11:05:32 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 11:35:28 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>news:41odh0ljacmfojs6c...@4ax.com:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:40 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>>>news:vjmdh0p6ab8450cmn...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>>>>>
>>>>>You...
>>>>
>>>> "You, you, you..."
>>>>
>>>> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>>>
>>>i think he's afraid.
>>
>> Of what?
>
>i think he's afraid of readers' reactions when he admits his forgeries and
>apologioes.

He can't be afraid of something he hasn't tried.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 11:06:12 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 11:36:03 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

He musn't be. Unless he enjoys the abuse.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 11:06:55 AM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 11:36:43 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

His actions are indicative of an anti-social personality.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 11:17:53 AM8/9/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:3d4fh0papml56giie...@4ax.com:


no, i don't think so. i don't think he could verbalize his fears, even if he
wanted to.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 5:15:32 PM8/9/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 15:17:53 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>news:3d4fh0papml56giie...@4ax.com:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 11:34:19 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>>>news:fundh0pvid0ejficl...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On 9 Aug 2004 02:16:55 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>>>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>news:xn0dlta5...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>>
>>>>>> Why don't
>>>>>
>>>>>you haven't made a good start.
>>>>>
>>>>>1. stop forging.
>>>>>2. apologize for past forgeries
>>>>>
>>>>>then go away, or stay and spend a year or so trying to regain some
>>>>>measure of credibility.
>>>>
>>>> He'd sooner lie about his mother than to do something unprecedented,
>>>> by doing something decent.
>>>
>>>
>>>i think he wants to, but he's too afraid
>>
>> Is he afraid of what tavish's puppeteer might think?
>
>
>no, i don't think so. i don't think he could verbalize his fears, even if he
>wanted to.

Why would he be afraid of our reactions? It's not like he pays very
much attention to them, anyway. It's not like you'll see Murdick doing
the honorable thing...

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 9, 2004, 8:34:50 PM8/9/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:j9qfh05huas6vu6ld...@4ax.com:


on the contrary, he pays intense attantion to our reactions. in fact, he is
like a puppet on a string. i think his forgeries are just a plea for
attention.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 3:10:15 AM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Who, SomeShittyWriter, is 'Murdick'? No-one here posts under that handle.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 3:10:16 AM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Quote some of these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note: plural) - if you can.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 3:10:18 AM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You...
> >> >>
> >> >> "You, you, you..."
> >> >>
> >> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
> >> >
> >> > Why...
> >>
> >> WHY???
> >
> > Because...
>

> You're ...

... incapapble of posting the truth.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 3:10:20 AM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Prove it.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 3:10:22 AM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Re-post these alleged lies (if you can).

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 10:15:15 AM8/10/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlunf...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> Somesappywriter wrote:
>> View many of your posted forgeries and lies.
>
> Quote some of these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note:
> plural) - if you can.

oh please. i know you;re too afraid to apologize for forging but stop doing
it and stop lying. eventually readers will forget and you'll have a chance to
reestablish your credibility.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:24:38 PM8/10/04
to

>Who...

The annoyed (murdick).

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:25:33 PM8/10/04
to

>Quote...

Your posts are still available -- unless you had them "deleted," as
did Osprey with his cross-dressing posts.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:26:18 PM8/10/04
to
On 10 Aug 2004 14:15:15 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

Murdick isn't interested in going the honest avenue in life.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:27:14 PM8/10/04
to
On 10 Aug 2004 07:10:18 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter wrote:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "You, you, you..."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
>> >> >
>> >> > Why...
>> >>
>> >> WHY???
>> >
>> > Because...
>>

>> You're an irresponsible arsewipe, that's why.
>

>... incapapble of posting the truth.

I know you are capable of posting the truth, though -- but you're just
not interested (only God knows why).

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:27:31 PM8/10/04
to

>Prove...

You did so by responding to my posts.

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:28:31 PM8/10/04
to

>Re-post...

Did you have them deleted?

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:41:59 PM8/10/04
to
On 9 Aug 2004 11:36:43 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

Especially the email I supposedly received from you -- that was
actually from Murdick.

Bambi

Somesappywriter

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 12:46:04 PM8/10/04
to

Perhaps the next time you e-mail me masquerading as James Keegan
Jr.,you should conceal your IP.

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 4:36:59 PM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:vnthh0pakrqfn7bug...@4ax.com:

what will he try next that he has been caught forging usenet posts? email?

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 10, 2004, 4:38:14 PM8/10/04
to
Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
news:6luhh0l4eh9h9o3n9...@4ax.com:

i am not surprised that he stooped to trying to forge email after he got
caught forging usenet posts.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:38 AM8/11/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Who, SomeShittyWriter, is 'Murdick'? No-one here (other than you) posts under that handle.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:39 AM8/11/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

Oh please. I know you're too afraid to provide evidence to support your claims, but either provide
said evidence, or stop lying. Eventually you may regain some credibility.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:40 AM8/11/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

Then provide the quotes that prove these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note: plural).

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:43 AM8/11/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

> On 10 Aug 2004 07:10:18 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 Aug 2004 03:57:41 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 9 Aug 2004 02:10:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 9 Aug 2004 01:32:09 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> >> >> >> news:xn0dlp67...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > If you feel you are against these three separate laws
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> you need to stop forging before you post about laws or anything else.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > You...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "You, you, you..."
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Why don't you simply take responsibility for your forgeries?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Why...
> >> >>
> >> >> WHY???
> >> >
> >> > Because...
> >>

> >> You're [...]


> >
> > ... incapapble of posting the truth.
>
> I know you are capable of posting the truth, though -- but you're just
> not interested (only God knows why).

And you are not interested, it seems, to provide evidence to support your claims. What's the
matter? Can't find non-existant evidence?

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:46 AM8/11/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

How?

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:47 AM8/11/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

No. Can you provide quotes to prove your claims? Answer: No.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:08:51 AM8/11/04
to
Somesappywriter wrote:

When did I email you?

james g. keegan jr.

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:20:37 AM8/11/04
to
"Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:xn0dlw5x...@news.bri.connect.com.au:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlunf...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >> View many of your posted forgeries and lies.
>> >
>> > Quote some of these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note:
>> > plural) - if you can.
>>
>> oh please. i know you;re too afraid to apologize for forging but stop
>> doing it and stop lying. eventually readers will forget and you'll have
>> a chance to reestablish your credibility.
>
> Oh please.

perhaps you can't regain credibility after all.

i'm flattered you tried to forge email from me. *smirk*

sit up. beg. now fetch! good boy.

Murdoc

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 12:24:47 AM8/11/04
to
james g. keegan jr. wrote:

> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:xn0dlw5x...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>
> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >
> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >> news:xn0dlunf...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
> >>
> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
> >> >> View many of your posted forgeries and lies.
> >> >
> >> > Quote some of these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note:
> >> > plural) - if you can.
> >>
> >> oh please. i know you;re too afraid to apologize for forging but stop
> >> doing it and stop lying. eventually readers will forget and you'll have
> >> a chance to reestablish your credibility.
> >
> > Oh please.
>
> perhaps you can't regain credibility after all.
>

> i'm flattered you tried to forge email from me. smirk

What email? When? To Whom?

-SomeSappyWriter-

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 7:02:41 AM8/11/04
to

>Who...

Yup, Murdick's annoyed.

-SomeSappyWriter-

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 7:03:36 AM8/11/04
to
On 11 Aug 2004 04:24:47 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlw5x...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> news:xn0dlunf...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>> >>
>> >> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >> >> View many of your posted forgeries and lies.
>> >> >
>> >> > Quote some of these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note:
>> >> > plural) - if you can.
>> >>
>> >> oh please. i know you;re too afraid to apologize for forging but stop
>> >> doing it and stop lying. eventually readers will forget and you'll have
>> >> a chance to reestablish your credibility.
>> >
>> > Oh please.
>>
>> perhaps you can't regain credibility after all.
>>
>> i'm flattered you tried to forge email from me. smirk
>
>What email? When? To Whom?

The one you mailed to me, posing as "james...@yahoo.com," the same
e-mail you were unable to conceal the IP origin.

-SomeSappyWriter-

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 7:04:09 AM8/11/04
to
On 11 Aug 2004 04:08:39 GMT, "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>
>> "Murdoc" <murd...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> news:xn0dlunf...@news.bri.connect.com.au:
>>
>> > Somesappywriter wrote:
>> >> View many of your posted forgeries and lies.
>> >
>> > Quote some of these alleged forgeries (note: plural) and lies (note:
>> > plural) - if you can.
>>
>> oh please. i know you;re too afraid to apologize for forging but stop doing
>> it and stop lying. eventually readers will forget and you'll have a chance to
>> reestablish your credibility.
>
>Oh please.

Why should you care about your non-existent credibility...

-SomeSappyWriter-

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 7:05:37 AM8/11/04
to

>Then...

Actually, anybody who wants to see your lies do not have to look back
to see your lies and forgeries...there in any one of your posts of
recent and past.

-SomeSappyWriter-

unread,
Aug 11, 2004, 7:06:29 AM8/11/04
to
On 10 Aug 2004 00:34:50 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
<kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

>Somesappywriter <sappy...@poetic.com> wrote in
>news:j9qfh05huas6vu6ld...@4ax.com:
>
>> On 9 Aug 2004 15:17:53 GMT, "james g. keegan jr."
>> <kee...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>i think he wants to, but he's too afraid
>>>>
>>>> Is he afraid of what tavish's puppeteer might think?
>>>
>>>
>>>no, i don't think so. i don't think he could verbalize his fears, even
>>>if he wanted to.
>>
>> Why would he be afraid of our reactions? It's not like he pays very
>> much attention to them, anyway. It's not like you'll see Murdick doing
>> the honorable thing...
>
>
>on the contrary, he pays intense attantion to our reactions. in fact, he is
>like a puppet on a string. i think his forgeries are just a plea for
>attention.

His impersonation of you is a good example...

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages