Wentzky's Arrest Info
Mark Sebree
record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
Mark Sebree
ScottyFLL
> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>
> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> Mark Sebree
Interesting.
You missed his guilty plea and conviction in 1996/7 for "SEX/INDECENT
EXPOSURE"
Indictment Number: 1997GS0402248 Warrant Number : 79265AH
Here ya go: http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/gsdetail1.cgi?warrind=79265AH!!!1997GS0402248
John D.Wentzky
You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
Why did you become accesory to that crime?
In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
All those charges are false charges.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Hey, idiot.
> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> > Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
You're toast.
What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
John D.Wentzky
Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
All of those warrants are sworn documents that contain false charges against
me.
None of them can be proven.
The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me on a
swron document.
None of those warrants were obtained prior to any of the charges being
levied.
The actions of the police officers and the judge who affirmed the warrants
are criminal in nature.
> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the crime of
RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
I am completely innocent of all the false charges that were levide agaisnt
me by the officer who assaulted me in public.
Giovanni violated the police code many times.
He was negligent, derelict and signed his name to a false oaths.
I was withing my rigths every step of the way.
Giovanni committed crimes against me as did the officers who beat me.
Also, there are those who have committed theft against me in this case.
The link you provided did not show the information you posted.
John D.Wentzky
How did you pull up all that information?
You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up without
anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
You gotta be a fool to be colluding with anyone in the county of Anderson,
SC against me.
You can and will be required to reveal the name of your sources by court
order if it is deemed necessary to do so; and, I deem it necessary to do so
now.
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
Nah, proud criminal.
You're destined for a fall.
> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
What about it?
There is no relevance to the present case.
What about your illicit actions?
You are stepping on thin ice.
John D.Wentzky
You once again show the work of darkness in secret by going against me.
The identitied of every person who was involved in this incident are
required to be posted online.
WHere are the names of the arresting officer and judge who levied these
charges against me?
WHere are the names of the offiocers who attacked me and beat me?
LOL!
YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
Your total agenda is criminal gang violence and lies and secrecy in this
case that go against one innocent member of the public. me.
I am now requiring Anderson County to produce all the identities of all the
parties involved in each and every step of this case for the public;s
perusal.
They have violated my right to privacy while shielding the identities of the
accusers and the identities of those who committed crimes against me.
No One
Well, "Charge 1" would explain many of his posts and some of his
language, as he sounds very much like an angry drunk. :-)
He'll no doubt plead diminished capacity due to the root cause of
Charge 1 to get Charges 2 and 3 reduced. One can only hope he has to
drive to get to whereever he gets his Internet access. :-)
John D.Wentzky
They are guilty of violating the 14th Amendment.
No One
Care to post what the urine or blood-alchohol test showed, or should we
wait until the trial after which that will be in a public record?
Ray Fischer
>Hey, idiot.
>You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
Wrong again, idiot. Arrest records are public information.
>Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
>> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
>They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
Drunken driving is "no reason"?
>All those charges are false charges.
Tell it to the judge. But if you're nice and lucky he won't send you
to jail and will only fine you a few thousand dollars and give you
probation.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Pinch
wrote:
> Innews:1175013279.7...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 12:32 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> > wrote:
> >> Hey, idiot.
> >> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> >> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
> >> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> >> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> >>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> >>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> >>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> >>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> >>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> >>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>
> >>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> >>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> >>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> >>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> >>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> >> All those charges are false charges.-
>
> > You're toast.
>
> Nah, proud criminal.
> You're destined for a fall.
>
> > What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>
> What about it?
And you called US perverts? Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
have done anything like this. Are there any crimes for which you
haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?
Ray Fischer
>In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
>> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
>All of those warrants are sworn documents that contain false charges against
>me.
That will be determined by trial.
>None of them can be proven.
Oh, I'm pretty sure that every one of them can be proven.
>The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me on a
>swron document.
The sworn testimony of a police office is vastly more credible than
the drunken ravings of an asshole.
>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
>There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
That will be determined by trial.
>I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the crime of
>RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
Unless you were drunk and don't even remember.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175013279.7...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 12:32 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> > wrote:
> >> Hey, idiot.
> >> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> >> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
> >> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> >> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> >>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> >>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> >>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> >>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> >>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> >>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>
> >>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> >>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> >>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> >>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> >>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> >> All those charges are false charges.-
>
> > You're toast.
>
> Nah, proud criminal.
I see.
> You're destined for a fall.
Oh, I think you've got your people confused. It is YOU who is gonna
fall. You're the one with the DUI charge, resisting arrest charge,
and assault charge.
You are going to lose. Big time.
> > What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>
> What about it?
Tell us about your lewd, unwanted sexual perversion.
> There is no relevance to the present case.
Ah. That's what YOU think.
Tells us something about your character, dontcha think?
Want me to send you a raincoat when you're in prison?
> What about your illicit actions?
Where?
> You are stepping on thin ice.-
It's not me who is on thin ice.
You should get yourself into recovery.
Ray Fischer
>In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
>> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>
>> Mark Sebree
>
>How did you pull up all that information?
Your county clerk puts arrest record up on the web. Search by name
and your conviction and indictments come up.
>You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up without
>anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
Or the idiot is you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
ScottyFLL
Yep. That's my point. Hypocrisy is lovely, until you're found out.
> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
> have done anything like this. Are there any crimes for which you
> haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?-
If you go to that site and look for the OTHER Wentzkys who've been
charged with felonies, you'll get a good picture of what the family is
like. We're talking forgery, animal abuse, all sorts of shit.
John D.Wentzky
Pinch <pi...@cheerful.com> typed:
Yes.
> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
> have done anything like this.
I wasn't guilty of that crime.
The assistant DA advised me to plead guilty.
I trusted him.
That was something I should not have done.
> Are there any crimes for which you
> haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?
No.
John D.Wentzky
I'm not a pervert, and I am not a hypcorite.
>> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
>> have done anything like this. Are there any crimes for which you
>> haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?-
>
> If you go to that site and look for the OTHER Wentzkys who've been
> charged with felonies, you'll get a good picture of what the family is
> like.
You would get a picture of people who have been denied their right to due
process of law.
> We're talking forgery, animal abuse, all sorts of shit.
Animal abuse?
All the crimes can be blamed on you roevwade drug pushers.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> All of those warrants are sworn documents that contain false charges against
> me.
Lying pervert drunk.
> None of them can be proven.
Lying pervert drunk.
> The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me on a
> swron document.
Lying pervert drunk.
> None of those warrants were obtained prior to any of the charges being
> levied.
Lying pervert drunk.
> The actions of the police officers and the judge who affirmed the warrants
> are criminal in nature.
Lying pervert drunk.
Check out AA in your "jurisdiction". The judge will probably send ya
that way anyway. Get a head start before he throws your ass in jail.
Again.
> There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
Right now there is probable cause or those charges wouldn't be up.
This has been determined legally.
> I was not DUI
Sure ya were.
> I did not resist arrest
Yes you did.
> and I did not commit the crime of
> RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
The Police Department of your "jurisdiction" says otherwise, and
likely there are witnesses. YOUR witness might be a bartender or
liquor store owner.
> I am completely innocent of all the false charges that were levide agaisnt
> me by the officer who assaulted me in public.
You are a liar.
> Giovanni violated the police code many times.
Nope.
> He was negligent, derelict and signed his name to a false oaths.
Gee, wonder what could have gotten him so mad at you....
Oh, that's right... you were driving drunk.
> I was withing my rigths every step of the way.
Drunk driving is illegal. So is resisting arrest and attacking a
police officer. Those are not rights you have.
> Giovanni committed crimes against me as did the officers who beat me.
They should have beat you harder.
> Also, there are those who have committed theft against me in this case.
Liar.
> The link you provided did not show the information you posted.
Click that link, then click on Courts, then Clerk of Court. Enter the
name "Wentzky" and you'll see other members of your family with
felonies. See? You're not the black sheep!! You're ALL fucking
loons!
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> > Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> > Mark Sebree
>
> How did you pull up all that information?
> You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up without
> anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
Want me to post screenshots, John?
Let me know. I'll do that for ya.
John D.Wentzky
I'm not falling.
> You're the one with the DUI charge, resisting arrest charge,
> and assault charge.
All of those charges are false.
Fraud has been committed against me.
> You are going to lose. Big time.
No, i won't.
The Constitution and the law are in my favor.
Publishing the charges without publishing the names of the person who levied
the charges and the person who signed the warrants violates my right to
equal protection.
It is another crime committed against me.
>>> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>>
>> What about it?
>
> Tell us about your lewd, unwanted sexual perversion.
What lewd, unwanted sexual perversion?
>> There is no relevance to the present case.
>
> Ah. That's what YOU think.
There is no relevance whatsoever.
There is no relation to the carges from the past and the current charges.
> Tells us something about your character, dontcha think?
Not at all.
I was innocent of the crime of indecent exposure.
The law verifies my statement.
> Want me to send you a raincoat when you're in prison?
I'm not going to prison.
>> What about your illicit actions?
>
> Where?
Your actions of posting a charge that was dismissed.
>> You are stepping on thin ice.-
>
> It's not me who is on thin ice.
Nah, idiot.
You are treading on very thin ice.
You are acting as if charges that were dismissed are relevant to me.
That is treading on thin ice.
> You should get yourself into recovery.
You should learn that you are in error.
John D.Wentzky
No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> typed:
Zero. Nada. Nil. Zilch. No presence of alcohol was detected in my system.
> or should we wait until the trial after which that will be in a public
> record?
There is no record of any blood alcohol content.
The DUI charge is erroneous.
John D.Wentzky
Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>> Hey, idiot.
>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>
> Wrong again, idiot. Arrest records are public information.
>
>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>
>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>
>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>
>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>
>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>
>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>
>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>
> Drunken driving is "no reason"?
I was not involved in drunken driving.
I was on my way home after eating dinner to watch the Ohio State - Florida
NCAA football game.
>> All those charges are false charges.
>
> Tell it to the judge.
Why?
It is best that these charges be dropped, and that I be compensated for the
many cirmes that have been committed against me already.
> But if you're nice and lucky he won't send you
> to jail
There is no evidence to send me to jail.
> and will only fine you a few thousand dollars and give you
> probation.
There is no evidence to fine me or to place me on probation.
All the charges are false charges.
Where are the names of the accusers in these matters?
Unequal protections are being performed.
That is a felony.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> So, idiot,.
> You once again show the work of darkness in secret by going against me.
> The identitied of every person who was involved in this incident are
> required to be posted online.
> WHere are the names of the arresting officer and judge who levied these
> charges against me?
> WHere are the names of the offiocers who attacked me and beat me?
Did you press charges? Give us their names, and they will show up
with the charges against them.
> LOL!
> YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
> Your total agenda is criminal gang violence and lies and secrecy in this
> case that go against one innocent member of the public. me.
>
Perhaps the jail has a psych ward where you can get some help for this
paranoia. Or are you just detoxing?
> They have violated my right to privacy
Your "jurisdiction" has decided that public records, in this case
arrest records, can be put up on the internet for the enjoyment of
people of ALL "jurisdictions".
> while shielding the identities of the
> accusers and the identities of those who committed crimes against me.
If it were a civil offense, the plaintiffs would be named. Your
offenses are criminal, meaning that your behavior offends society as a
whole. It is Society who is trying you. You are going to lose.
If you filed charges against these cops who you say beat you, they
will have entries on that site as well if there is probable cause for
the charges. Please provide us with information on the complaint
you've filed with the DA.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> A violation of equal protections.
> They are guilty of violating the 14th Amendment.
File a petition with the Supreme Court. Do it immediately!
John D.Wentzky
Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>
>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>
>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> All of those warrants are sworn documents that contain false charges
>> against me.
>
> That will be determined by trial.
There is no need for trial.
>> None of them can be proven.
>
> Oh, I'm pretty sure that every one of them can be proven.
None of them can be proven.
All of them are flase charges sworn to by one officer who assaulted me. and
affirmed by a negro judge who lied to me at the bond hearing.
All of the cirmes committed against me are recorded.
It isn't my fault that none of the people involved, that I know of, did not
graduate from Furman University.
They are practicing lies and crimes against me.
>> The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me
>> on a swron document.
>
> The sworn testimony of a police office is vastly more credible than
> the drunken ravings of an asshole.
I wasn't drunk.
The evidence shows that quite clearly.
It is my opinion that some of the officers involved were under the
influence of alcohol.
>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>
>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>
>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>
>> There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
>
> That will be determined by trial.
I am not required to stand trial.
The officers and the judge who committed crimes against me are required to
stand trial.
The County itself is required to stand trial since they violated my
fourteenth amendment rights.
I am sure they will be happy to find the person or persons who engaged in
violating my constitutional rights.
>> I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the
>> crime of RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>
> Unless you were drunk and don't even remember.
I wasn't drunk, and I remember every crime that was committed against me.
Destruction of evidence is a crime as well.
There is no escape for the criminals who committed their cirms against me.
John D.Wentzky
Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>
>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>
>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>
>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>
>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>
>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>>
>>> Mark Sebree
>>
>> How did you pull up all that information?
>
> Your county clerk puts arrest record up on the web. Search by name
> and your conviction and indictments come up.
I saw them.
>> You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up
>> without anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
>
> Or the idiot is you.
So, why is it sebree didn't confess yet how he obtained the information all
on his own independtly without the aid of any person from Anderson, SC?
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175015108.7...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
But you are.
> > You're the one with the DUI charge, resisting arrest charge,
> > and assault charge.
>
> All of those charges are false.
You are a liar.
> Fraud has been committed against me.
You are a liar.
> > You are going to lose. Big time.
>
> No, i won't.
Yes you will.
> The Constitution and the law are in my favor.
No they aren't. Drunk driving is not a constitutionally protected
behavior.
> Publishing the charges without publishing the names of the person who levied
> the charges and the person who signed the warrants violates my right to
> equal protection.
No it doesn't. It's a criminal, not a civil, case. The charges
against you are coming from your own legal system (read: Society).
> It is another crime committed against me.
You poor thing. Tell it to your prison guard.
> >>> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>
> >> What about it?
>
> > Tell us about your lewd, unwanted sexual perversion.
>
> What lewd, unwanted sexual perversion?
The one for which you were arrested and pled guilty in 1996/7. Your
disgusting "SEX/INDECENT EXPOSURE" thingy.
> >> There is no relevance to the present case.
>
> > Ah. That's what YOU think.
>
> There is no relevance whatsoever.
Sure there is. It tells us who you are. A low-life drunk-driving
police-attacking lewd and lascivious pervert.
> There is no relation to the carges from the past and the current charges.
So? It's still fun information to know. :-) Perv! LOL!
> > Tells us something about your character, dontcha think?
>
> Not at all.
Sure it does! It says you exposed yourself and a complaint was made
against you!
> I was innocent of the crime of indecent exposure.
No you weren't. You pled guilty and were convicted.
> The law verifies my statement.
The court record tells us that you are lying.
> > Want me to send you a raincoat when you're in prison?
>
> I'm not going to prison.
Well, you will be if you get more than a year. If you just go to
county jail, I can get that address easily. I'll send you a nice
raincoat so you can flash your cellmates.
>
> >> What about your illicit actions?
>
> > Where?
>
> Your actions of posting a charge that was dismissed.
LOL! You don't know what "dismissed" means when it comes to charges
filed!
The charge was not dismissed. You pled guilty and were convicted.
> >> You are stepping on thin ice.-
>
> > It's not me who is on thin ice.
>
> Nah, idiot.
> You are treading on very thin ice.
> You are acting as if charges that were dismissed are relevant to me.
They weren't dismissed.
> That is treading on thin ice.
Nope!
> > You should get yourself into recovery.
>
> You should learn that you are in error.-
They usually send drunk drivers to AA or treatment. If you do it on
your own and admit that you have a problem, maybe the judge will go
easy on you. In the meantime, I wouldn't be surprised if some of your
posts here might make it to your judge as a means of character
assessment. Better start deleting!!!!
John D.Wentzky
No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> typed:
> "Mark Sebree" <seb...@infionline.net> writes:
>
>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>
>> Mark Sebree
>
>
> Well, "Charge 1" would explain many of his posts and some of his
> language, as he sounds very much like an angry drunk. :-)
Charge one is a false cahrge.
It must be dismissed.
> He'll no doubt plead diminished capacity due to the root cause of
> Charge 1 to get Charges 2 and 3 reduced.
I do not walk in the cousel of the wicked.
All the charges are false.
> One can only hope he has to drive to get to whereever he gets his Internet
> access. :-)
Why?
So some criminal with a badge on can try to harass me again?
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:87ircmv...@nospam.pacbell.net,
> No One <n...@nospam.pacbell.net> typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
> >> Hey, idiot.
> >> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> >> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
> >> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
> >>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> >>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> >>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> >>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> >>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> >>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>
> >>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> >>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> >>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> >>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> >>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> >> All those charges are false charges.
>
> > Care to post what the urine or blood-alchohol test showed,
>
> Zero. Nada. Nil. Zilch. No presence of alcohol was detected in my system.
What did they find then? They can't really arrest some for driving
under the influence when the influence does not exist.
> > or should we wait until the trial after which that will be in a public
> > record?
>
> There is no record of any blood alcohol content.
Was it some other drug? Heroin or benzos, maybe? A little bit of
crack?
> The DUI charge is erroneous.-
Naw. Even the judge saw probable cause that the charge is true.
Otherwise, it would have been dismissed.
Pinch
Crime appears to be the Wentzky family business.
Pinch
wrote:
> Innews:1175014741.5...@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com,
> Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> typed:
Why? I've never committed sexual crime. Nor any crime, for that
matter.
> > Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
> > have done anything like this.
>
> I wasn't guilty of that crime.
> The assistant DA advised me to plead guilty.
> I trusted him.
> That was something I should not have done.
You should not have committed the crime.
> > Are there any crimes for which you
> > haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?
>
> No.
I thought so.
ScottyFLL
> "Mark Sebree" <seb...@infionline.net> writes:
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> > Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> > Mark Sebree
>
> Well, "Charge 1" would explain many of his posts and some of his
> language, as he sounds very much like an angry drunk. :-)
It all makes sense now, doesn't it?
> He'll no doubt plead diminished capacity
He will NEVER admit to diminished capacity!! NEVER!! He's a genius
who has been wronged!
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> A violation of equal protections.
> They are guilty of violating the 14th Amendment.
They're protecting society from drunk-driving, police-assaulting,
arrest-resisting, indecent exposers, such as yourself.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175014741.5...@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com,
> Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> typed:
Two choices:
1. You are even dumber than I thought
2. You are lying
Now, Number 1 is impossible, so the correct answer is Number 2: You
are lying.
The Chief Instigator
>Hey, idiot.
>You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
Take it up with Anderson County, since your warrants are public information.
>Why did you become accesory to that crime?
You're the one that did the crime. July 3, 1996, eh?
>In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
>> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>All those charges are false charges.
Looks like you'll be taking an unscheduled vacation in the next couple of
months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as the sex/indecent
exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Omaha 10, Houston 2 (March 24)
NEXT GAME: Friday, March 30 vs. Peoria, 7:35
The Chief Instigator
>In news:1175013279.7...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
>ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>> On Mar 27, 12:32 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
>> wrote:
>>> Hey, idiot.
>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>>> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
>>> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>>> All those charges are false charges.-
>>
>> You're toast.
>Nah, proud criminal.
>You're destined for a fall.
>> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>What about it?
>There is no relevance to the present case.
Why did you plead guilty to it, if you (supposedly) didn't do it?
>What about your illicit actions?
>You are stepping on thin ice.
You're busted, Wentzky. You don't have a rap sheet as long as you're tall,
but DUI isn't what I'd call something to be proud of. Your neighbors deserve
better than that. You might as well get used to the fact that you're likely
going to be doing time.
John D.Wentzky
Pinch <pi...@cheerful.com> typed:
Because you stand for perversions.
>>> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
>>> have done anything like this.
>>
>> I wasn't guilty of that crime.
>> The assistant DA advised me to plead guilty.
>> I trusted him.
>> That was something I should not have done.
>
> You should not have committed the crime.
I didn't commit the crime.
You idiots believe lies way too often.
>>> Are there any crimes for which you
>>> haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?
>>
>> No.
>
> I thought so.
There are none.
John D.Wentzky
You mean in 1996.
> 2. You are lying
Not a character trait of mine.
> Now, Number 1 is impossible, so the correct answer is Number 2: You
> are lying.
Nah.
I'm not lying.
The law supports me in my lack of guilt.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175015200.1...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
But you have a record as a sexual pervert. It says you pled guilty to
and were convicted of indecent exposure. I presume this isn't because
you were running around in the cold without a shirt on.
> and I am not a hypcorite.
Ah, but you are. See, on this ng, you've been trying to present
yourself as a man of the highest moral character.
But now we see a conviction for sexual perversion, and new charges of
drunk driving and assault!
So, you are actual a man of substantial IMMORAL character, trying to
present yourself as a man of moral character, and that provides us
with a diagnosis of "HYPOCRITE".
> > If you go to that site and look for the OTHER Wentzkys who've been
> > charged with felonies, you'll get a good picture of what the family is
> > like.
>
> You would get a picture of people who have been denied their right to due
> process of law.
THE WHOLE FUCKING FAMILY!?!?!??!?!
Larry Wentzky has multiple convictions for DUI.
Christopher Wentzky has a DUI conviction too.
This DOES run in the family!
Paul Eric, who apparently also goes by Eric Paul, has numerous forgery
convictions.
Even Jennifer Wentzky has a conviction of assault and battery!
PLEASE GIVE ME SOME ADVICE ON MORALS, JOHN D. WENTZKY!! LOL!
> All the crimes can be blamed on you roevwade drug pushers.
Ah. But I'm not in your "jurisdiction", so how can I be held
responsible for the criminality evident in your family? Perhaps you
should all be sterilized in order to stop the cycle of felonious
behavior.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175017905.4...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
The law accepted your admission of guilt, and convicted you. Pervert!
John D.Wentzky
I can't fall versus crime.
>>> You're the one with the DUI charge, resisting arrest charge,
>>> and assault charge.
>>
>> All of those charges are false.
>
> You are a liar.
Not even a little.
I have been victimized by dishonest persons who committed crimes against me.
>> Fraud has been committed against me.
>
> You are a liar.
Not even a little.
I have been victimized by dishonest persons who committed crimes against me.
>>> You are going to lose. Big time.
>>
>> No, i won't.
>
> Yes you will.
Not even a little.
I have been victimized by dishonest persons who committed crimes against me.
>> The Constitution and the law are in my favor.
>
> No they aren't.
Not even a little.
I have been victimized by dishonest persons who committed crimes against me.
> Drunk driving is not a constitutionally protected
> behavior.
There is no evidence of drunk driving in this case.
All evidence shows careful, defensive driving techniques learned from
government funded instruction and the hospitable nature of someone who
creates a safe work environment.
>> Publishing the charges without publishing the names of the person
>> who levied the charges and the person who signed the warrants
>> violates my right to equal protection.
>
> No it doesn't.
Bullshit, you idiot.
You can not go against the Constitution without being regarded as having
committed treason.
> It's a criminal, not a civil, case.
The rights of the people do not make a distinction, treasonous loon.
> The charges against you are coming from your own legal system (read:
> Society).
Read the 14th Amendment, you criminal secrecy pervert.
Traitor.
Treasonous coward.
FOOL!
>> It is another crime committed against me.
>
> You poor thing. Tell it to your prison guard.
Why don't you get ready to pack your bags for that destination.
There are plenty of beds to let all you traitors use after the people who
were wrongly incarcerated are released.
And, just think how less crowded it will be when you are there?
>>>>> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>>
>>>> What about it?
>>
>>> Tell us about your lewd, unwanted sexual perversion.
>>
>> What lewd, unwanted sexual perversion?
>
> The one for which you were arrested and pled guilty in 1996/7. Your
> disgusting "SEX/INDECENT EXPOSURE" thingy.
Why are you displaying such a prurient interest?
>>>> There is no relevance to the present case.
>>
>>> Ah. That's what YOU think.
>>
>> There is no relevance whatsoever.
>
> Sure there is.
Nah. Liar.
> It tells us who you are.
Nah, idiot.
> A low-life drunk-driving police-attacking lewd and lascivious pervert.
Is that supposed to be something I can sue about?
Your description is a lie.
>> There is no relation to the carges from the past and the current
>> charges.
>
> So? It's still fun information to know. :-) Perv! LOL!
Fun for you to side with false charges all day?
>>> Tells us something about your character, dontcha think?
>>
>> Not at all.
>
> Sure it does! It says you exposed yourself and a complaint was made
> against you!
Where does it say that?
>> I was innocent of the crime of indecent exposure.
>
> No you weren't.
I was innocent of indecent exposure.
> You pled guilty and were convicted.
I was ill-advised by the corrupt system.
>> The law verifies my statement.
>
> The court record tells us that you are lying.
No, it doesn't.
>>> Want me to send you a raincoat when you're in prison?
>>
>> I'm not going to prison.
>
> Well, you will be if you get more than a year.
The law does not dictate that I serve any prison time at all in this fraud
againt me.
> If you just go to county jail,
Already been falsely arrested, falsely incarcerated, falsely charged and
falsey imprisoned.
> I can get that address easily.
Why do you want it? Why don't you visit people who are already there?
> I'll send you a nice raincoat so you can flash your cellmates.
God damn you.
You are a god damned perverted asshole.
>>
>>>> What about your illicit actions?
>>
>>> Where?
>>
>> Your actions of posting a charge that was dismissed.
>
> LOL! You don't know what "dismissed" means when it comes to charges
> filed!
All charges are supposed to be dismissed and erased from the record once the
sentence has been fulfilled in guilty plea cases.
> The charge was not dismissed. You pled guilty and were convicted.
Which means I have another claim against the perverted government.
>>>> You are stepping on thin ice.-
>>
>>> It's not me who is on thin ice.
>>
>> Nah, idiot.
>> You are treading on very thin ice.
>> You are acting as if charges that were dismissed are relevant to me.
>
> They weren't dismissed.
So, the government is bearing false witness of me then.
>> That is treading on thin ice.
>
> Nope!
You are on very thin ice.
>>> You should get yourself into recovery.
>>
>> You should learn that you are in error.-
>
> They usually send drunk drivers to AA or treatment.
I'm not a drunk driver.
> If you do it on your own and admit that you have a problem, maybe the
> judge will go
> easy on you.
I am not required to perform as your opinion misleads.
> In the meantime, I wouldn't be surprised if some of your
> posts here might make it to your judge as a means of character
> assessment.
My judge?
> Better start deleting!!!!
Better start studying that law book, idiot.
Your master, me, has been wrongfully accused.
Your job is to exhonerate him and to file charges against the persons who
committed crimes against him.
John D.Wentzky
The Chief Instigator <pat...@eris.io.com> typed:
The asst DA advised me to.
I trusted him.
That was something I learned was not reliable.
>> What about your illicit actions?
>> You are stepping on thin ice.
>
> You're busted, Wentzky.
Busted, for what?
> You don't have a rap sheet as long as you're
> tall, but DUI isn't what I'd call something to be proud of.
I wasn't DUI.
> Your neighbors deserve better than that.
I don't drive DUI.
> You might as well get used to
> the fact that you're likely going to be doing time.
I won't.
I am never used to that idea.
You, your family, your children, your parents, your entire ancestry and
decendants will be cursed if I do time.
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
They did no tests.
They pulled me over, beat me and hauled me to the station and wrote false
charges against me.
I am innocent.
>>> or should we wait until the trial after which that will be in a
>>> public record?
>>
>> There is no record of any blood alcohol content.
>
> Was it some other drug? Heroin or benzos, maybe? A little bit of
> crack?
Are you an idiot?
I wasn't under the influence of any illegal drug(s).
And, I wasn't drunk or DUI.
>> The DUI charge is erroneous.-
>
> Naw.
God damn.
They did not detect any BAC on me at all.
> Even the judge saw probable cause that the charge is true.
Bullshit.
He lied to me during the bond hearing.
> Otherwise, it would have been dismissed.
Idiot.
There is no charge against me that is not false.
John D.Wentzky
This case could be disposed of by dropping all charges againt me and by
paying me for the damages I incurred as a result of the illicit actions of
Anderson County.
The longer it goes the more weight there is to my case.
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
> On Mar 27, 12:40 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> wrote:
>> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>
>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> against me.
>
>
>> None of them can be proven.
>
>
>> The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me
>> on a swron document.
>
>
>> None of those warrants were obtained prior to any of the charges
>> being levied.
>
> Lying pervert drunk.
>
>> The actions of the police officers and the judge who affirmed the
>> warrants are criminal in nature.
>
> Lying pervert drunk.
>
> Check out AA in your "jurisdiction". The judge will probably send ya
> that way anyway. Get a head start before he throws your ass in jail.
> Again.
>
>> There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
>
> This has been determined legally.
Bullshit.
The evidence shows that every charge is a false charge and that i was
attcked by oficers who were sworn to protect me.
>> I was not DUI
>
> Sure ya were.
Nah. Where is any proof of that?
There is none.
>> I did not resist arrest
>
> Yes you did.
I didn't.
I defended myself against someone who attacked me.
>> and I did not commit the crime of
>> RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>
> The Police Department of your "jurisdiction" says otherwise, and
> likely there are witnesses.
The polioce department doesn;t sauy that.
Only one person who was bested at his own game, which he failed to play
legally, charged me.
He overstepped his bounds when he tryied to throw me on the ground, and
ended up on his back.
That is not a crime on my part.
> YOUR witness might be a bartender or
> liquor store owner.
The camera shows I put down a cop who attacked me without sufficient cause.
>> I am completely innocent of all the false charges that were levide
>> agaisnt me by the officer who assaulted me in public.
>
> You are a liar.
Nah, you coward faced offended dogshit peon.
I am better than you, and in so many ways, you have zero chance at
convicting me, you cirminal tax leech bitchboy.
>> Giovanni violated the police code many times.
>
> Nope.
God damn.
That little disrepsectful twerp atacked me you idiot.
That god damned coward faced offended idiot criminal tax leech bitchboy
liar is damned.
>> He was negligent, derelict and signed his name to a false oaths.
>
> Gee, wonder what could have gotten him so mad at you....
LOL!
I asked him a question.
He lost his cool.
What an idiot, huh?
> Oh, that's right... you were driving drunk.
A lie.
His god damned bitchboy pride caused him to fall.
LOL!
He is a criminal.
Giovanni is a damned liar.
>> I was within my rigths every step of the way.
>
> Drunk driving is illegal.
You just now learned that?
> So is resisting arrest and attacking a
> police officer.
I did not resist arrest or attack a police officer.
I defened myself against a disrespectful junior idiot tax leech with a badge
on who attacked me.
He is damned until nhe confesses his crimes and opays the required price.
> Those are not rights you have.
You god damned fool.
I have full rights at law to defend myself against any attacker.
>> Giovanni committed crimes against me as did the officers who beat me.
>
> They should have beat you harder.
They shoulda all been fired.
>> Also, there are those who have committed theft against me in this
>> case.
>
> Liar.
God damn you and god damn your lies.
>> The link you provided did not show the information you posted.
>
> Click that link, then click on Courts, then Clerk of Court. Enter the
> name "Wentzky" and you'll see other members of your family with
> felonies.
What felonies?
The US government is guilty of committing felonies against at least 48
states.
> See? You're not the black sheep!! You're ALL fucking
> loons!
You are a lazy idiot coward faced fool who can not beat people like me.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:1175016755....@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
Sure ya were.
> >> The DUI charge is erroneous.-
>
> > Naw.
>
> God damn.
> They did not detect any BAC on me at all.
Then why did they charge you with DUI?
> > Even the judge saw probable cause that the charge is true.
>
> Bullshit.
> He lied to me during the bond hearing.
The judge knows you're a liar, because the judge found probable cause
for the charges that you deny.
> > Otherwise, it would have been dismissed.
>
> Idiot.
> There is no charge against me that is not false.
What you meant is that there are no false charges against you.
The true charges are DUI, resisting arrest, and assault or assault and
battery. You will be found guilty by a jury of your peers on all
counts.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
> Innews:szkwt12...@eris.io.com,
> The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> typed:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
> >> Hey, idiot.
> >> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>
> > Take it up with Anderson County, since your warrants are public
> > information.
>
> >> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
>
> > You're the one that did the crime. July 3, 1996, eh?
>
> >> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
> >>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> >>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> >>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> >>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> >>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> >>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>
> >>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> >>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> >>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> >>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> >>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> >>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> >> All those charges are false charges.
>
> > Looks like you'll be taking an unscheduled vacation in the next
> > couple of months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as
> > the sex/indecent exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
>
> This case could be disposed of by dropping all charges againt me
That's not gonna happen. The cops don't like it when civilians
assault them, and the rest of society hates drunk drivers. You're
gonna hang.
ScottyFLL
wrote:
>
> >> I was not DUI
>
> > Sure ya were.
>
> Nah. Where is any proof of that?
The arrest for DUI.
> There is none.
The arrest for DUI will suffice for now. The guilty verdict will
serve only to confirm what we already know.
> >> I did not resist arrest
>
> > Yes you did.
>
> I didn't.
> I defended myself against someone who attacked me.
Being arrested by police officers is not legally considered assault.
You were being arrested for driving while under the influence.
> >> and I did not commit the crime of
> >> RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>
> > The Police Department of your "jurisdiction" says otherwise, and
> > likely there are witnesses.
>
> The polioce department doesn;t sauy that.
> Only one person who was bested at his own game, which he failed to play
> legally, charged me.
Because you deserved to be charged.
> He overstepped his bounds when he tryied to throw me on the ground
He was just trying to handcuff your drunken, out-of-control ass.
>, and
> ended up on his back.
> That is not a crime on my part.
Assault of a police officer, and resisting arrest. Both crimes.
> > YOUR witness might be a bartender or
> > liquor store owner.
>
> The camera shows I put down a cop who attacked me without sufficient cause.
I wonder what the bar or liquor store videos will show. How much did
you drink that night? Must've been quite a lot, huh?
> >> I am completely innocent of all the false charges that were levide
> >> agaisnt me by the officer who assaulted me in public.
>
> > You are a liar.
>
> Nah, you coward faced offended dogshit peon.
> I am better than you
Well, I wouldn't say THAT! I mean, after all, I have no felonies or
even misdemeanors on MY record!
> and in so many ways, you have zero chance at
> convicting me
Your peers are gonna do that for me. I can hear 12 "GUILTY"s even as
I type this.
> >> Giovanni violated the police code many times.
>
> > Nope.
>
> God damn.
The judge isn't gonna want you to talk like that in his courtroom.
I'm seeing a possible additional charge of contempt during your
trial. Let us know when the trial starts. I might want to come up
north for a few days to see the proceedings.
> That little disrepsectful twerp atacked me you idiot.
He was trying to arrest you and you resisted.
> That god damned coward faced offended idiot criminal tax leech bitchboy
> liar is damned.
Looks more like YOU are the one who is damned, Madam.
> >> He was negligent, derelict and signed his name to a false oaths.
>
> > Gee, wonder what could have gotten him so mad at you....
>
> LOL!
> I asked him a question.
I'm sure you did say something. What was it, exactly, that you asked
him?
> He lost his cool.
Must've been SOME BIG QUESTION you asked, huh?
> What an idiot, huh?
No. He arrested you. I would have him sainted.
> > Oh, that's right... you were driving drunk.
>
> A lie.
> His god damned bitchboy pride caused him to fall.
> LOL!
> He is a criminal.
Yet he isn't charged with anything, while YOU are. How does THAT
work?
> Giovanni is a damned liar.
Have you filed charges against him?
> >> I was within my rigths every step of the way.
>
> > Drunk driving is illegal.
>
> You just now learned that?
I just wanted to make sure you knew. Because that's what you were
arrested for.
> > So is resisting arrest and attacking a
> > police officer.
>
> I did not resist arrest or attack a police officer.
Yes you did. Says so right on the Clerk of Court's site.
> I defened myself against a disrespectful junior idiot tax leech with a badge
> on who attacked me.
I think we can send that one to your judge, just in case you try to
appear "remorseful" for your immoral and violent public behavior.
> He is damned until nhe confesses his crimes and opays the required price.
He's not gonna be paying anything unless charges are filed, which, if
the charges weren't bogus, would have been done by NOW, dontcha
think? I mean, it's been 3 months since you were caught driving
drunk.
> > Those are not rights you have.
>
> You god damned fool.
> I have full rights at law to defend myself against any attacker.
Not against arrest.
> >> Giovanni committed crimes against me as did the officers who beat me.
>
> > They should have beat you harder.
>
> They shoulda all been fired.
No, they're obviously very good and wise police officers. You should
be glad to have them. They protect the public, and put people like
you behind bars, where ya belong.
> >> Also, there are those who have committed theft against me in this
> >> case.
>
> > Liar.
>
> God damn you and god damn your lies.
Oh!
> >> The link you provided did not show the information you posted.
>
> > Click that link, then click on Courts, then Clerk of Court. Enter the
> > name "Wentzky" and you'll see other members of your family with
> > felonies.
>
> What felonies?
> The US government is guilty of committing felonies against at least 48
> states.
Doesn't matter what the U.S. is guilty of. We aren't discussing what
the U.S. is guilty of. We're discussing your drunk driving and
assault.
> > See? You're not the black sheep!! You're ALL fucking
> > loons!
>
> You are a lazy idiot coward faced fool who can not beat people like me
I've kicked your ass so many times I've lost count. And it appears
that Anderson County's got your number, too.
bob&carole
> On Mar 27, 12:59 pm, "Pinch" <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Innews:1175013279.7...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
> > > ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>
> > > > On Mar 27, 12:32 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >> Hey, idiot.
> > > >> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> > > >> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> > > >>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > > >>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> > > >>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > > >>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > > >>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> > > >>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
> > > >>> interested.http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > > >>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > > >>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> > > >>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> > > >>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > > >>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > > >>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > > >>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> > > >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>
> > > > You're toast.
>
> > > Nah, proud criminal.
> > > You're destined for a fall.
>
> > > > What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>
> > > What about it?
>
>
>
> > haven't been charged charge and convicted you'd care to confess now?-
>
> If you go to that site and look for the OTHER Wentzkys who've been
> charged with felonies, you'll get a good picture of what the family is
And scotty knows shit when he sees it!!
Proof of faggot scottys shit fetish:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame.faggots/msg/7a684d3c7919c791?
ScottyFLL
>
> And scotty knows
This must bring back memories, huh, Blob? Remember how I humiliated
you when I found those posts of yours? Hmmm? Remember how you're
always high and mighty and moral, but then I revealed you for the
vulgar, morbidly obese fuckwit that we all suspected you were all
along?
Do the words "juicy shaved pussy that squirts" ring a bell? Hmmmmmm?
LOL!
Witness yet another humiliation, Blob. I'm sure you can feel
Wentzky's pain.
Mark Sebree
wrote:
> Hey, idiot.
> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
Nope. These are all public records, freely available to anyone that
wants them.
> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
I didn't. There was no indication that your right to privacy was
violated.
> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> > Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
They thought that you were intoxicated, according to the first
charge. That is a valid reason for the police to stop someone.
> All those charges are false charges.
Somehow, I seriously doubt it. You have already admitted to the
second and the third, and the first is supported by your subsequent
actions.
Mark Sebree
Mark Sebree
wrote:
> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> me.
It will be up to you to prove that the charges are false, especially
if the cops' car cam was on.
> None of them can be proven.
Video tape is a wonderful tool
> The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me on a
> swron document.
Unlikely. You will have to prove the charge of fraud.
> None of those warrants were obtained prior to any of the charges being
> levied.
Yes, they were. The Drunk Driving was on a public road, concerns
immediate action with respect to public safety, and thus does not need
a prior warrant. The other two charges were due to actions you have
already admitted to taking subsequent to being stopped, and thus also
do not need a warrant.
> The actions of the police officers and the judge who affirmed the warrants
> are criminal in nature.
Nope. There is nothing criminal in any of their apparent actions.
YOUR apparent actions, however, appear to be criminal. If you had not
taken a swing at the officer, you might have even been able to beat
the DUI charge, assuming that you did not have any alcohol or drugs in
your system.
>
> > Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
I would not stake my freedom on that. Video cameras in cop cars are
pretty common these days. If it was on an recording, it will be the
prime piece of evidence against you for the second and third charge.
> I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the crime of
> RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
Yes, you did. You have already admitted to it here.
> I am completely innocent of all the false charges that were levide agaisnt
> me by the officer who assaulted me in public.
However, you are not necessarily innocent of the factual charges that
I listed.
> Giovanni violated the police code many times.
Where? I see no such violations as yet.
> He was negligent, derelict and signed his name to a false oaths.
Nope. No evidence of him doing that either.
> I was withing my rigths every step of the way.
No, you were not. It is not within your rights to take a poke at a
police officer for whatever reason.
> Giovanni committed crimes against me as did the officers who beat me.
It does not look that way from what you have said so far. You have
already admitted to resisting arrest.
> Also, there are those who have committed theft against me in this case.
Again, unlikely. Impounding your vehicle pending trial is not
considered theft. Taking evidence that can be used for the trial is
also not theft.
Besides, exactly what was supposedly taken from you?
>
> The link you provided did not show the information you posted.
That is because you did not read what I wrote before it. The link was
the PORTAL to the info. Because of a couple things after it, a direct
link is not necessarily feasible. However, the site itself is free
and simple to use, so anyone interested can look up the needed
information.
Mark Sebree
Mark Sebree
wrote:
> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
>
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
>
> How did you pull up all that information?
I did a Google search of "Anderson South Carolina", went to the city
government website, went to the courts link, went to the county clerks
link, and entered the portal. From there, I did a search of the
current docket for your name and select the ones that with your name
beside them.
Took less than 10 minutes start to finish.
> You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up without
> anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
Why would I need help from anyone in Anderson. The County Clerk's
records are public.
> You gotta be a fool to be colluding with anyone in the county of Anderson,
> SC against me.
Nope. Public records are there for anyone to look at.
> You can and will be required to reveal the name of your sources by court
> order if it is deemed necessary to do so; and, I deem it necessary to do so
> now.
I already did. I provided the link to the information so that anyone
could check me on what I said. Your request would get laughed out of
court.
Mark Sebree
No One
> In news:87mz1yv...@nospam.pacbell.net,
> No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> typed:
> > "Mark Sebree" <seb...@infionline.net> writes:
> >
> >> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
> >> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
> >> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
> >> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
> >> Mark Sebree
> >
> > Well, "Charge 1" would explain many of his posts and some of his
> > language, as he sounds very much like an angry drunk. :-)
>
> Charge one is a false cahrge. It must be dismissed.
Run that by the judge.
> > He'll no doubt plead diminished capacity due to the root cause of
> > Charge 1 to get Charges 2 and 3 reduced.
>
> I do not walk in the cousel of the wicked. All the charges are
> false.
Try that one in court and see how far it gets you.
> > One can only hope he has to drive to get to whereever he gets his Internet
> > access. :-)
>
> Why?
> So some criminal with a badge on can try to harass me again?
"Why" is obvious to everyone but you.
No One
> On Mar 27, 1:16 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> wrote:
> > Innews:87ircmv...@nospam.pacbell.net,
> > >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> > >> All those charges are false charges.
> >
> > > Care to post what the urine or blood-alchohol test showed,
> >
> > Zero. Nada. Nil. Zilch. No presence of alcohol was detected in my system.
>
> What did they find then? They can't really arrest some for driving
> under the influence when the influence does not exist.
Don't know about where he lives, but in California you can refuse to
take a urine or blood test when the police set up checkpoints. If
you refuse to take the test, the DMV can suspend your license and
probably will.
The Chief Instigator
>Hey, idiot.
>You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>Why did you become accesory to that crime?
Free clue: It's available at the referenced website...in other words, it's a
public record.
You're busted. Again.
The Chief Instigator
>>>> You're toast.
Stupidity becomes you.
>>> What about your illicit actions?
>>> You are stepping on thin ice.
>> You're busted, Wentzky.
>Busted, for what?
Presuming you have any authority over anyone else, especially online.
>> You don't have a rap sheet as long as you're
>> tall, but DUI isn't what I'd call something to be proud of.
>I wasn't DUI.
>> Your neighbors deserve better than that.
>I don't drive DUI.
We'll see about that as the trial proceeds.
>> You might as well get used to
>> the fact that you're likely going to be doing time.
>I won't.
>I am never used to that idea.
You'd better get used to it, then.
>You, your family, your children, your parents, your entire ancestry and
>decendants will be cursed if I do time.
Why should they worry about being "cursed" by some looney toon in South
Carolina, who's going to be doing a bit of time for assaulting a cop?
The Chief Instigator
>John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>Hey, idiot.
>>You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>Wrong again, idiot. Arrest records are public information.
>>Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>
>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>>> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
>>> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>
>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>
>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>
>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>
>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>
>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>
>>They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>Drunken driving is "no reason"?
In WentzkyWorld, it is, apparently.
>>All those charges are false charges.
>Tell it to the judge. But if you're nice and lucky he won't send you
>to jail and will only fine you a few thousand dollars and give you
>probation.
He got a suspended sentence of a year for the indecent exposure act in 1996,
plus a year probation and a $600 payment to the Police Department Fund. (Had
he gone to trial, I suspect no one would have ever heard of him in Usenet.)
The Chief Instigator
It'll snow in Houston in July before that happens.
>The longer it goes the more weight there is to my case.
The longer it goes, the longer you're going to be away.
No One
> In news:szkslbq...@eris.io.com,
> The Chief Instigator <pat...@eris.io.com> typed:
>
> > Why did you plead guilty to it, if you (supposedly) didn't do it?
>
> The asst DA advised me to. I trusted him. That was something I
> learned was not reliable.
As a defendent, you trusted a person whose job performance rating
depends on how many people he convicts?
Or did he advise you to plead guilty if you wanted some other
charges dropped?
Dionisio
> How did you pull up all that information?
<LOL!>
--
And the Thought of the Moment (TM) is:
Nobody "becomes" gay from the enticing propaganda -- there ISN'T any. Being gay is painful
and difficult in our society BECAUSE of other people who hate. But even if it was made to
seem glamorous and fun, either you have the orientation or you don't... you are gay (or
bisexual) or you are not. Nobody's kid will become homosexual from reading the Advocate --
the real danger is that they might become more tolerant and loving than their parents from
finally realizing that gays are no different from themselves, except in one tiny
insignificant way.
-- slba...@bu.edu (Sherry Bailey), 25 Jan 1995
(Brought to you by SigChanger. http://www.phranc.nl)
Andrealphus
johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
> Hey, idiot.
> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
Unless sealed by a judge, arrest records are public domain.
> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> All those charges are false charges.
Riiiiggghhhht....
Andrealphus
johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
> In news:46094ecc$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
> Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
>> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>>>> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>>
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>>
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>>
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>> thought. Mark Sebree
>>>
>>> How did you pull up all that information?
>>
>> Your county clerk puts arrest record up on the web. Search by name
>> and your conviction and indictments come up.
>
> I saw them.
>
>>> You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up
>>> without anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
>>
>> Or the idiot is you.
>
> So, why is it sebree didn't confess yet how he obtained the
> information all on his own independtly without the aid of any person
> from Anderson, SC?
Confess to what? Pulling up public information from a public website? No
law against that.
Andrealphus
johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
> So, idiot,.
> You once again show the work of darkness in secret by going against
> me. The identitied of every person who was involved in this incident are
> required to be posted online.
> WHere are the names of the arresting officer and judge who levied
> these charges against me?
> WHere are the names of the offiocers who attacked me and beat me?
> LOL!
> YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
> Your total agenda is criminal gang violence and lies and secrecy in
> this case that go against one innocent member of the public. me.
> I am now requiring Anderson County to produce all the identities of
> all the parties involved in each and every step of this case for the
> public;s perusal.
> They have violated my right to privacy while shielding the identities
> of the accusers and the identities of those who committed crimes
> against me.
LOL! Go for it.
Andrealphus
johndw...@alumni.furman.edu, typed this:
> A violation of equal protections.
> They are guilty of violating the 14th Amendment.
No, each person arrested is treated the same.
bobandcarole
Mark Sebree wrote:
> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>
> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> Mark Sebree
this is bad news. they will kill john in prison. he hates niggers.
maybe they will let him live if he lets them fuck him in the butt.
The Chief Instigator
>In news:46094db7$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
>Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
>> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>> All of those warrants are sworn documents that contain false charges
>>> against me.
>> That will be determined by trial.
>There is no need for trial.
You don't decide that, Defendant Wentzky.
>>> None of them can be proven.
>> Oh, I'm pretty sure that every one of them can be proven.
>None of them can be proven.
>All of them are flase charges sworn to by one officer who assaulted me. and
>affirmed by a negro judge who lied to me at the bond hearing.
>All of the cirmes committed against me are recorded.
>It isn't my fault that none of the people involved, that I know of, did not
>graduate from Furman University.
>They are practicing lies and crimes against me.
I assume you'll (ahem) prove that at the trial.
>>> The arresting officer named Giovannia has committed fraud against me
>>> on a swron document.
>> The sworn testimony of a police office is vastly more credible than
>> the drunken ravings of an asshole.
>I wasn't drunk.
>The evidence shows that quite clearly.
> It is my opinion that some of the officers involved were under the
>influence of alcohol.
That will go over really well with APD, I bet.
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>> There is no proof of any of the charges against me.
>> That will be determined by trial.
>I am not required to stand trial.
The state of South Carolina doesn't agree with you.
>The officers and the judge who committed crimes against me are required to
>stand trial.
>The County itself is required to stand trial since they violated my
>fourteenth amendment rights.
> I am sure they will be happy to find the person or persons who engaged in
>violating my constitutional rights.
Better hope your county DA doesn't see this proclamation of yours.
>>> I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the
>>> crime of RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>> Unless you were drunk and don't even remember.
>I wasn't drunk, and I remember every crime that was committed against me.
>Destruction of evidence is a crime as well.
>There is no escape for the criminals who committed their cirms against me.
Another one to pass on...
Andrealphus
pat...@eris.io.com, typed this:
I've e-mailed all of Wentzky's posts tonight to the Anderson Clerk's office.
They haven't responded, but I figured they'd find his posts quite
interesting.
bobandcarole
> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
>
>
> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>
> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
>
> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>
> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>
> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>
> All those charges are false charges.
i heard that your going to prison. see you when you get back if the
niggers dont kill you first.
bobandcarole
wrote:
> Innews:1175015575.1...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 12:40 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> > wrote:
> >> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
> >> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
> >>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
> >>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> >>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
> >>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
> >>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> >>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
someone pushed a button eh john? LMAO
The Chief Instigator
>In news:46094ecc$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
>Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
>> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>>
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>>>
>>>> Mark Sebree
>>> How did you pull up all that information?
>> Your county clerk puts arrest record up on the web. Search by name
>> and your conviction and indictments come up.
>I saw them.
>>> You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up
>>> without anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
>> Or the idiot is you.
>So, why is it sebree didn't confess yet how he obtained the information all
>on his own independtly without the aid of any person from Anderson, SC?
Well, this might be news to you, but there's this World Wide Web thing where
some city, county, and state governments put up all sorts of information.
Your county is one of those who make warrant, charge and trial data available
to the public. You should remember some of that, since you had incomeasap.com
for a couple of years, at least - even if the only bid on a share of your
"company" was yours...
The Chief Instigator
>So, idiot,.
>You once again show the work of darkness in secret by going against me.
>The identitied of every person who was involved in this incident are
>required to be posted online.
>WHere are the names of the arresting officer and judge who levied these
>charges against me?
>WHere are the names of the offiocers who attacked me and beat me?
>LOL!
>YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
>Your total agenda is criminal gang violence and lies and secrecy in this
>case that go against one innocent member of the public. me.
>I am now requiring Anderson County to produce all the identities of all the
>parties involved in each and every step of this case for the public;s
>perusal.
>They have violated my right to privacy while shielding the identities of the
>accusers and the identities of those who committed crimes against me.
Feel free to head downtown to the county courthouse and demand that
information. Evidently, you've decided to see how many more warrants you can
collect.
The Chief Instigator
>In News szk1wja...@eris.io.com,, The Chief Instigator at
>pat...@eris.io.com, typed this:
>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>>> In news:46094db7$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
>>> Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
>>>> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
[...]
>>>>> I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the
>>>>> crime of RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>>>> Unless you were drunk and don't even remember.
>>> I wasn't drunk, and I remember every crime that was committed
>>> against me. Destruction of evidence is a crime as well.
>>> There is no escape for the criminals who committed their cirms
>>> against me.
>> Another one to pass on...
>I've e-mailed all of Wentzky's posts tonight to the Anderson Clerk's office.
>They haven't responded, but I figured they'd find his posts quite
>interesting.
Indeed...I'm collecting some to pass on to the Anderson County DA, as well.
Andrealphus
pat...@eris.io.com, typed this:
> "Andrealphus" <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> writes:
>
>> In News szk1wja...@eris.io.com,, The Chief Instigator at
>> pat...@eris.io.com, typed this:
>
>>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
>>>> In news:46094db7$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
>>>> Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
>>>>> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>>>> I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the
>>>>>> crime of RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>
>>>>> Unless you were drunk and don't even remember.
>
>>>> I wasn't drunk, and I remember every crime that was committed
>>>> against me. Destruction of evidence is a crime as well.
>>>> There is no escape for the criminals who committed their cirms
>>>> against me.
>
>>> Another one to pass on...
>
>> I've e-mailed all of Wentzky's posts tonight to the Anderson Clerk's
>> office. They haven't responded, but I figured they'd find his posts
>> quite interesting.
>
> Indeed...I'm collecting some to pass on to the Anderson County DA, as
> well.
LOL! Great! I was sort of shocked to see the sex/indecent exposure
charge. The DUI didn't surprise me much, It's amazing about the number of
his family members that have run afoul of the law. I don't think there's
been that many of my family members arrested in the entire 350 years they've
been in the U.S.
Ray Fischer
>Pinch <pi...@cheerful.com> typed:
>> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
>> have done anything like this.
>
>I wasn't guilty of that crime.
That's what they all say.
>The assistant DA advised me to plead guilty.
Didn't you have your own attorny?
>I trusted him.
>That was something I should not have done.
But it's hardly the last time you were an idiot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>"ScottyFLL" <1sc...@lycos.com> writes:
>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
>> > Innews:87ircmv...@nospam.pacbell.net,
>
>> > >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>> > >> All those charges are false charges.
>> >
>> > > Care to post what the urine or blood-alchohol test showed,
>> >
>> > Zero. Nada. Nil. Zilch. No presence of alcohol was detected in my system.
>>
>> What did they find then? They can't really arrest some for driving
>> under the influence when the influence does not exist.
>
>Don't know about where he lives, but in California you can refuse to
>take a urine or blood test when the police set up checkpoints. If
>you refuse to take the test, the DMV can suspend your license and
>probably will.
And it still won't automatically get you out of a DUI conviction.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>In news:46094d49$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>>
>>
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>>
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>>
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>>
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>>
>>
>
Hmmm. Who am I going to believe. The police officer, or some lying
nutcase who has no control over himself?
>>> All those charges are false charges.
>>
>> Tell it to the judge.
>
>Why?
Because you're going to trial.
>It is best that these charges be dropped, and that I be compensated for the
>many cirmes that have been committed against me already.
And that's the sort of lying bullshit that cause me to consider almost
everything you write to be worthless.
>> But if you're nice and lucky he won't send you
>> to jail
>
>There is no evidence to send me to jail.
Unless you're lying like you did just a few lines up.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
John D. Wentzky
> In News szkodme84tp....@eris.io.com,, The Chief Instigator at
> patr...@eris.io.com, typed this:
>
>
>
> > "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> writes:
>
> >> In News szk1wja9lc6....@eris.io.com,, The Chief Instigator at
> >> patr...@eris.io.com, typed this:
>
> >>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
> >>>> Innews:46094db7$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,
> >>>> Ray Fischer <rfisc...@sonic.net> typed:
> >>>>> John D.Wentzky <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> >>>>>> I was not DUI, I did not resist arrest, and I did not commit the
> >>>>>> crime of RESIST/ ASSAULT, BEAT, WOUND.
>
> >>>>> Unless you were drunk and don't even remember.
>
> >>>> I wasn't drunk, and I remember every crime that was committed
> >>>> against me. Destruction of evidence is a crime as well.
> >>>> There is no escape for the criminals who committed their cirms
> >>>> against me.
>
> >>> Another one to pass on...
>
> >> I've e-mailed all of Wentzky's posts tonight to the Anderson Clerk's
> >> office. They haven't responded, but I figured they'd find his posts
> >> quite interesting.
>
> > Indeed...I'm collecting some to pass on to the Anderson County DA, as
> > well.
>
> LOL! Great! I was sort of shocked to see the sex/indecent exposure
> charge. The DUI didn't surprise me much, It's amazing about the number of
> his family members that have run afoul of the law. I don't think there's
> been that many of my family members arrested in the entire 350 years they've
> been in the U.S.
I only got an indecent exposure conviction
because of a problem I have keeping my penis in my pants.
It isn't fair. 14th Amendment. My penis
is guilty, not me.
Ray Fischer
>In news:46094ecc$0$14116$742e...@news.sonic.net,>>> In news:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>>>> simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>>
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested. http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>>
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>>
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How did you pull up all that information?
>>
>> Your county clerk puts arrest record up on the web. Search by name
>> and your conviction and indictments come up.
>
>I saw them.
>
>>> You must be quite idiotic to think that you coulda pulled that up
>>> without anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
>>
>> Or the idiot is you.
>
>So, why is it sebree didn't confess
He's not the criminal. You are.
>yet how he obtained the information all
>on his own independtly without the aid of any person from Anderson, SC?
Because, you stupid dumbshit, it's public information. Once you tell
us all your name and where you live, the rest is easy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>On Mar 27, 12:48 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
>wrote:
>> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>> > record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has been
>> > complaining about. I am also consolidating the information for
>> > simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>> > All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina County
>> > Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is interested.
>> >http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>
>> > Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> > Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>> > Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>> > Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>> > Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>> > Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>> > Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>>
>> > Mark Sebree
>>
>> How did you pull up all that information?
>> anmy aid from someone in Anderson.
>
>
>Let me know. I'll do that for ya.
Too bad somebody doesn't live in S. Carolina - that mug shot would be
something to see.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Andrealphus
Wentzky at johndw...@ifrance.com, typed this:
Well maybe they'll only put your penis in prison then. Good luck with that.
ScottyFLL
> "ScottyFLL" <1sc...@lycos.com> writes:
> > On Mar 27, 1:16 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > Innews:87ircmv...@nospam.pacbell.net,
> > > >> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>
>
> > > Zero. Nada. Nil. Zilch. No presence of alcohol was detected in my system.
>
> > What did they find then? They can't really arrest some for driving
> > under the influence when the influence does not exist.
>
> Don't know about where he lives, but in California you can refuse to
> take a urine or blood test when the police set up checkpoints. If
> you refuse to take the test, the DMV can suspend your license and
> probably will.
Here in Florida there's a penalty too, but the charge is "refusing to
submit", not "DUI".
spar...@my-deja.com
> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
> >Hey, idiot.
> >You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
> Take it up with Anderson County, since your warrants are public information.
If he had been arrested for soliciting prostitution in St. Paul,
Minnesota, his mug shot would have been posted on the St. Paul Police
Dept's web site. Like this:
http://www.stpaul.gov/depts/police/prostitution_photos_current.html
Seems to be working - the number of pictures is way down.
> >Why did you become accesory to that crime?
> You're the one that did the crime. July 3, 1996, eh?
Since there was an agreement with the DA, it's reasonable to assume
there were other charges that were dropped. Like... soliciting for
prostitution?
> >Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
> >> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest record
> >> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
> >> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
> >> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
> >> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
> >> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
> >> interested.
> >>
> >>http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
> >> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
> >> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
> >>
> >> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
> >>
> >> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
> >>
> >> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
> >>
> >> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
> >>
> >> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
> >They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
> >All those charges are false charges.
> Looks like you'll be taking an unscheduled vacation in the next couple of
> months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as the sex/indecent
> exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
Alcohol rehab. Anger management counseling. Wentzky is going to have
a full plate for a while.
The Chief Instigator
>> "Andrealphus" <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> writes:
>>>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>> [...]
I'd expect both sides of my ancestry haven't picked up that many all the way
back to when they started coming ashore after getting run out of Ireland...
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
> On Mar 27, 1:10 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> wrote:
>> Innews:1175015200.1...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com,
>> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 27, 12:59 pm, "Pinch" <p...@cheerful.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 27, 12:50 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
>>>> <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Innews:1175013279.7...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
>>>>> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>>
>>>>>> On Mar 27, 12:32 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
>>>>>> <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hey, idiot.
>>>>>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>>>>>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>
>>>>>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the
>>>>>>>> he was has been complaining about. I am also consolidating
>>>>>>>> the information for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no
>>>>>>>> case.
>>
>>>>>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>>>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>
>>>>>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>>>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>>>>>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>>>>>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>>>>>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>>>>>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>>>>>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>>>>>> thought.
>>
>>>>>>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>>
>>>>>> You're toast.
>>
>>>>> Nah, proud criminal.
>>>>> You're destined for a fall.
>>
>>>>>> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled
>>>>>> guilty?
>>
>>>>> What about it?
>>
>>>> And you called US perverts?
>>
>>> Yep. That's my point. Hypocrisy is lovely, until you're found out.
>>
>> I'm not a pervert
>
> But you have a record as a sexual pervert.
No, I don't.
> It says you pled guilty to and were convicted of indecent exposure.
1996 is today in your mind.
You are an idiot.
> I presume this isn't because you were running around in the cold without a
> shirt on.
I presume that you are a hypocrite when it comes to enforcing such a law,
you idiot.
I really wasn't guilty of the code against indecent exposure.
I plead guilty upon the advice of the asst DA.
That was something I should not have done.
>> and I am not a hypcorite.
>
> Ah, but you are.
Nah.
Your girls gone wild movies getting dust on them?
> See, on this ng, you've been trying to present
> yourself as a man of the highest moral character.
When?
> But now we see a conviction for sexual perversion, and new charges of
> drunk driving and assault!
So what?
I am innocent of all charges.
> So, you are actual a man of substantial IMMORAL character, trying to
> present yourself as a man of moral character, and that provides us
> with a diagnosis of "HYPOCRITE".
Nah.
Your accusations are without merit.
>>> If you go to that site and look for the OTHER Wentzkys who've been
>>> charged with felonies, you'll get a good picture of what the family
>>> is like.
>>
>> You would get a picture of people who have been denied their right
>> to due process of law.
>
> THE WHOLE FUCKING FAMILY!?!?!??!?!
Plenty of persons have been criminally wronged since roevwade become policy.
> Larry Wentzky has multiple convictions for DUI.
So?
Are you now going to berate a loved one of our family who was orphaned at
~10 years of age after his mother and father both died prematurely?
You sideshow freaks are totally without love or compassion and your wolfish
tendencies to rey upon the weak are daming you.
> Christopher Wentzky has a DUI conviction too.
So?
I bet you never knew that there were more name than Wentzky on the books.
Look up your last name, idiot.
I just checked the Humphrey page, you looney bin case.
There are plenty of them listed.
> This DOES run in the family!
Nah.
What is the case is that MADD pussy whipped assholes such as yourself are a
cinch to figure.
> Paul Eric, who apparently also goes by Eric Paul, has numerous forgery
> convictions.
So?
No case that has been settled is relevant to the present.
> Even Jennifer Wentzky has a conviction of assault and battery!
So?
What are you trying to say?
> PLEASE GIVE ME SOME ADVICE ON MORALS, JOHN D. WENTZKY!! LOL!
Do you need some?
>> All the crimes can be blamed on you roevwade drug pushers.
>
> Ah. But I'm not in your "jurisdiction", so how can I be held
> responsible for the criminality evident in your family?
It isn't hard to do at all.
> Perhaps you should all be sterilized in order to stop the cycle of
> felonious
> behavior.
I carry no dieases, you anti-human freak.
John D.Wentzky
LOL!
Don't lie either.
The Chief Instigator
>> > "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> writes:
>> >>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>> > [...]
Be sure and bring *that* up in court. That will insure a long vacation from
Usenet for you.
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
> On Mar 27, 2:07 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> wrote:
>> Innews:1175017905.4...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 27, 1:08 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
>>> <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>>> Innews:1175014741.5...@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com,
>>>> Pinch <p...@cheerful.com> typed:
>>
>>>>> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
>>>>> have done anything like this.
>>
>>>> I wasn't guilty of that crime.
>>
>>> Two choices:
>>
>>> 1. You are even dumber than I thought
>>
>> You mean in 1996.
>>
>>> 2. You are lying
>>
>> Not a character trait of mine.
>>
>>> Now, Number 1 is impossible, so the correct answer is Number 2: You
>>> are lying.
>>
>> Nah.
>> I'm not lying.
>> The law supports me in my lack of guilt.-
>
> The law accepted your admission of guilt, and convicted you.
The criminal incarceration for dollars system coerced me into it.
> Pervert!
Nah, idiot.
That case was disposed of years ago.
They even transgressed my constitutional not to be subject to double
jeopardy in that case.
They are guilty.
John D.Wentzky
Ray Fischer <rfis...@sonic.net> typed:
> John D.Wentzky <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>> Pinch <pi...@cheerful.com> typed:
>
>>> Sheesh, I never thought for a moment you'd
>>> have done anything like this.
>>
>> I wasn't guilty of that crime.
>
> That's what they all say.
>
>> The assistant DA advised me to plead guilty.
>
> Didn't you have your own attorny?
Public defender's office.
>> I trusted him.
>> That was something I should not have done.
>
> But it's hardly the last time you were an idiot.
I wasn't an idiot then.
John D.Wentzky
The Chief Instigator <pat...@eris.io.com> typed:
> "John D.Wentzky" <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
>> In news:szkslbq...@eris.io.com,
>> The Chief Instigator <pat...@eris.io.com> typed:
>>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
>>>> In news:1175013279.7...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com,
>>>> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>>>>> On Mar 27, 12:32 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
>>>>> <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> Hey, idiot.
>>>>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>>>>>> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
>>>>>> Innews:1175008815.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com,
>>>>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
>>>>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>>>>>>> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
>>>>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>
>>>>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>
>>>>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>
>>>>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>>>>> thought.
>
>>>>>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>>>>>> All those charges are false charges.-
>
>>>>> You're toast.
>
>>>> Nah, proud criminal.
>>>> You're destined for a fall.
>
>>>>> What about that indecent exposure charge to which you pled guilty?
>
>>>> What about it?
>
>>> Why did you plead guilty to it, if you (supposedly) didn't do it?
>
>> The asst DA advised me to.
>> I trusted him.
>> That was something I learned was not reliable.
>
> Stupidity becomes you.
How did I know they were setting me up for what they did after that plea?
>>>> What about your illicit actions?
>>>> You are stepping on thin ice.
>
>>> You're busted, Wentzky.
>
>> Busted, for what?
>
> Presuming you have any authority over anyone else, especially online.
>
>>> You don't have a rap sheet as long as you're
>>> tall, but DUI isn't what I'd call something to be proud of.
>
>> I wasn't DUI.
>
>>> Your neighbors deserve better than that.
>
>> I don't drive DUI.
>
> We'll see about that as the trial proceeds.
There is no evidence of DUI.
>>> You might as well get used to
>>> the fact that you're likely going to be doing time.
>
>> I won't.
>> I am never used to that idea.
>
> You'd better get used to it, then.
I won't.
>> You, your family, your children, your parents, your entire ancestry
>> and decendants will be cursed if I do time.
>
> Why should they worry about being "cursed" by some looney toon in
> South Carolina, who's going to be doing a bit of time for assaulting
> a cop?
Look at all those Humphreys on that search page, lol!
to use your phrase "Some family, huh?"
John D.Wentzky
No One <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> typed:
> "John D.Wentzky" <johndw...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
>> In news:szkslbq...@eris.io.com,
>> The Chief Instigator <pat...@eris.io.com> typed:
>>
>>
>> The asst DA advised me to. I trusted him. That was something I
>> learned was not reliable.
>
> depends on how many people he convicts?
He sounded trustworthy, and my life was very bad at the time.
It hadn't been very long since my brother had passed on.
That charge is almost 11 years ago now.
> Or did he advise you to plead guilty if you wanted some other
> charges dropped?
There were no other charges.
The Chief Instigator
>The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>> >Hey, idiot.
>> >You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>> Take it up with Anderson County, since your warrants are public information.
>If he had been arrested for soliciting prostitution in St. Paul,
>Minnesota, his mug shot would have been posted on the St. Paul Police
>Dept's web site. Like this:
>http://www.stpaul.gov/depts/police/prostitution_photos_current.html
>Seems to be working - the number of pictures is way down.
Here's to that taking root in South Carolina, as well.
>> >Why did you become accesory to that crime?
>> You're the one that did the crime. July 3, 1996, eh?
>Since there was an agreement with the DA, it's reasonable to assume
>there were other charges that were dropped. Like... soliciting for
>prostitution?
It's enough to make me wonder.
>> >Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>> >> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest record
>> >> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>> >> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>> >> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>> >> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>> >> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>> >> interested.
>> >>
>> >>http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>> >> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>> >> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>> >> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>> >>
>> >> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>> >>
>> >> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>> >>
>> >> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>> >> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have thought.
>> >They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>> >All those charges are false charges.
>> Looks like you'll be taking an unscheduled vacation in the next couple of
>> months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as the sex/indecent
>> exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
>Alcohol rehab. Anger management counseling. Wentzky is going to have
>a full plate for a while.
To put it in terms he'll never understand, he'll be skating 1-on-5 for a full
five minutes...
No One
Yes, but it would let someone make a misleading claim about what was
not detected without formally lying.
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <zmssc...@yahoo.com> typed:
> On Mar 27, 2:29 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> wrote:
>> Innews:1175016755....@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>> ScottyFLL <1sc...@lycos.com> typed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 27, 1:16 pm, "John D.Wentzky"
>>> <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> wrote:
>>>> Innews:87ircmv...@nospam.pacbell.net,
>>>> No One <n...@nospam.pacbell.net> typed:
>>
>>>>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>>
>>>>>> Hey, idiot.
>>>>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>>>>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>>>>>>> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>>>>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>
>>>>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>>>>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>>>>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>>>>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>>>>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>>>>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>>>>> thought.
>>
>>>>>> All those charges are false charges.
>>
>>>>> Care to post what the urine or blood-alchohol test showed,
>>
>>>> Zero. Nada. Nil. Zilch. No presence of alcohol was detected in my
>>>> system.
>>
>>> What did they find then? They can't really arrest some for driving
>>> under the influence when the influence does not exist.
>>
>> They pulled me over, beat me and hauled me to the station and wrote
>> false charges against me.
>> I am innocent.
>>
>>>>> or should we wait until the trial after which that will be in a
>>>>> public record?
>>
>>>> There is no record of any blood alcohol content.
>>
>>> Was it some other drug? Heroin or benzos, maybe? A little bit of
>>> crack?
>>
>> Are you an idiot?
>> I wasn't under the influence of any illegal drug(s).
>> And, I wasn't drunk or DUI.
>
> Sure ya were.
Case dismissed.
Badgering the witness.
No proof, no case.
>>>> The DUI charge is erroneous.-
>>
>>> Naw.
>>
>> God damn.
>> They did not detect any BAC on me at all.
>
> Then why did they charge you with DUI?
Because the idiot cop named Giovanni got bested after he assaulted me.
>>> Even the judge saw probable cause that the charge is true.
>>
>> Bullshit.
>> He lied to me during the bond hearing.
>
> The judge knows you're a liar,
Not at all.
He is who lied, not me.
> because the judge found probable cause
> for the charges that you deny.
He found no probable cause because the warrants were issued after the
incident.
There wasn't any evidence of BAC for him to review.
You think cops are supposed to go out and attack members of the public and
then swear out false warrants after they committed crimes against the
public?
>>> Otherwise, it would have been dismissed.
>>
>> Idiot.
>> There is no charge against me that is not false.
>
> What you meant is that there are no false charges against you.
Nah, criminal, anti-liberty, perverted scumbag, dishonest, incarceration for
dollars idiot.
> The true charges are DUI, resisting arrest, and assault or assault and
> battery.
Those are all false charges to which there is no proof for any of them, and
the evidence, in full and in part, is against the false accusers who
attacked me and stole my personal belongings.
> You will be found guilty by a jury of your peers on all
> counts.
No, I won't.
I will be paid a very nice sum of money to cover the crimes that were
committed against me on the days of jan 8-10.
It is entirely possible that I will make television appearances to describe
my experience.
John D.Wentzky
Me.
You have no choice to believe anyone other than me.
Without evidence against me, everything I say is taken as truth.
> The police officer, or some lying
> nutcase who has no control over himself?
Me.
>>>> All those charges are false charges.
>>>
>>> Tell it to the judge.
>>
>> Why?
>
> Because you're going to trial.
You think so?
>> It is best that these charges be dropped, and that I be compensated
>> for the many cirmes that have been committed against me already.
>
> And that's the sort of lying bullshit that cause me to consider almost
> everything you write to be worthless.
Nah. It causes you to switch positions, if you are a judge, so you can
profit off of doing justice rather than particpating in crimes against the
people.
>>> But if you're nice and lucky he won't send you
>>> to jail
>>
>> There is no evidence to send me to jail.
>
> Unless you're lying like you did just a few lines up.
Where did I lie?
John D.Wentzky
ScottyFLL <zmssc...@yahoo.com> typed:
> On Mar 27, 2:31 pm, "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu>
> wrote:
>> Innews:szkwt12...@eris.io.com,
>> The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> typed:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>>
>>>> Hey, idiot.
>>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>>
>>> information.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>>>>> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>
>>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>
>>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>
>>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>
>>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>
>>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>
>>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>
>>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>>> thought.
>>
>>>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>>
>>> couple of months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as
>>> the sex/indecent exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
>>
>
> That's not gonna happen.
You gotta be kidding.
I will never plead guilty to any of the charges against me.
> The cops don't like it when civilians assault them,
Tough shit, idiot.
The people do not like it when they are attacked by cops, you idiot.
Neither do judges or lawyers.
Attack someone from behind on the street and see how much they like it,
idiot, if you are so unsure in this matter.
Giovanni attacked me from behind.
I had to defend myself.
> and the rest of society hates drunk drivers.
I'm not a drunk driver.
> You're
> gonna hang.
Nah.
I told the judge what my plans were and he released me, and I have performed
up to expectations regarding what I told him I was going to do.
I am no threat to any member of society.
John D.Wentzky
>
>> In news:szkwt12...@eris.io.com,
>
>>>> Hey, idiot.
>>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>
>>> Take it up with Anderson County, since your warrants are public
>>> information.
>
>>>> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
>
>>> You're the one that did the crime. July 3, 1996, eh?
>
>>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>>> record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he was has
>>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>>>>> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>
>>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>
>>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>>>
>>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>>
>>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>>
>>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>>
>>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>>> thought.
>
>>>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>>>> All those charges are false charges.
>
>>> Looks like you'll be taking an unscheduled vacation in the next
>>> couple of months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as
>>> the sex/indecent exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
>
>> by paying me for the damages I incurred as a result of the illicit
>> actions of Anderson County.
>
> It'll snow in Houston in July before that happens.
It doesn't matter if it snows in houston in july or not.
>> The longer it goes the more weight there is to my case.
>
> The longer it goes, the longer you're going to be away.
Nah.
The longer it goes the less weight their case has.
If they destroy any evidence they may have it turns them into the fraud
purveyors that they are in this case.
And, that is a fact that can not be disputed.
LOL!
If they fail to turn over any and all evidence to me for inspection they
have also committed another crime against me.
John D.Wentzky
spar...@my-deja.com <spar...@my-deja.com> typed:
> The Chief Instigator <patr...@eris.io.com> wrote:
>> "John D.Wentzky" <johndwent...@alumni.furman.edu> writes:
>
>>> Hey, idiot.
>>> You know someone has vilated my right to privacy now, don't you?
>
>> Take it up with Anderson County, since your warrants are public
>> information.
>
> If he had been arrested for soliciting prostitution in St. Paul,
> Minnesota, his mug shot would have been posted on the St. Paul Police
> Dept's web site. Like this:
>
> http://www.stpaul.gov/depts/police/prostitution_photos_current.html
>
> Seems to be working - the number of pictures is way down.
Seems that all you roevwade people are hypocritical liars.
>>> Why did you become accesory to that crime?
>
>> You're the one that did the crime. July 3, 1996, eh?
>
> Since there was an agreement with the DA, it's reasonable to assume
> there were other charges that were dropped. Like... soliciting for
> prostitution?
Shows how much of an idiot you are.
There were no other charges, you fool.
>>> Mark Sebree <seb...@infionline.net> typed:
>
>>>> OK folks. I did a little bit of digging, and I found the arrest
>>>> record record and docket info for John Wentzky's arrest that he
>>>> was has
>>>> been complaining about. I am also consolidating the information
>>>> for simplicity. By the looks of it, he has no case.
>>>> All the information is from the Anderson County, South Carolina
>>>> County Clerk's website. Here is the web portal if anyone is
>>>> interested.
>>>>
>>>> http://acpass.andersoncountysc.org/welcome.shtml
>>>> Indictment Number:0000GS0400000
>>>> Warrant Numbers: J410220 - J410222
>>>>
>>>> Arrest Date: Jan 9, 2007
>>>>
>>>> Charge 1: DUI / DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE - 2N 56-05-2930(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 2: RESISTING / RESISTING ARREST; OPPOSE, 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Charge 3: RESISTING / ASSAULT, BEAT, OR WOUND PO 16-09-0320(
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, they DID have a reason to stop him, as many have
>>>> thought.
>
>>> They had no reason to stop me whatsoever.
>>> All those charges are false charges.
>
>> Looks like you'll be taking an unscheduled vacation in the next
>> couple of months, if the disposition of this case takes as long as
>> the sex/indecent exposure arrest did, a decade ago.
>
> Alcohol rehab.
Unneeded.
> Anger management counseling.
Unneeded.
> Wentzky is going to have
> a full plate for a while.
I am a free man.
I expect a very nice sum of money to compensate me for the damages and the
fraud and theft that was performed against me in this matter.