Rice University fired Patrick "Humpboys" Humphrey for stalking
Nomen Nescio
University, an investigation into Humphrey's activities wouldn't
of happened. The investigation started in the summer of 2001 after
numerous complaints by Bradbury to Malcom Gillis and others at
Rice University.
After a few months of investigating, Rice University did indeed find
out that Humphrey had been stalking, posting, and surfing during
university time along for posting in singles newsgroups (Humphrey is
married) on Rice time.
When the University confronted Patrick with the evidence, Patrick
chose to lie and blame that others had set him up. The University didn't
believe him and his lying lead to the University firing Patrick L Humphrey
in early February of 2002 despite the fact Patrick had worked over 12
years for the University.
The University currently has his rice.edu on lockout still collecting
evidence to support their termination of Patrick L Humphrey
Patrick L. Humphrey's current profile even complains that Scott
Bradbury tried to get him fired. Scott Bradbury succeeded
finger pat...@io.com
Login: patrick Name: Patrick L. Humphrey
Directory: /home/p/patrick Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
Office: West of Eden, 713 348-4989 Home Phone: 713 266-7764
Last login Sun Apr 7 13:23 (CDT) on pts/24 from hs1
New mail received Sun Apr 7 20:28 2002 (CDT)
Unread since Sun Apr 7 18:26 2002 (CDT)
Plan:
Guess what? Those of you who have stalked me here from my other
address aren't going to find anything you don't already know about me.
I can be reached at the usual work and home numbers, if you can figure
out how to access the web page mentioned below.
(For those of you trying to get me in trouble with my employers (that
means Scott "Doc Tavish" Bradbury, for the most part, at the moment), this
address belongs to an ISP that has nothing to do with where I work. The
closest connection you'll find is that one of this ISP's owners is an alumnus
of the university I work for.)
As always, I reserve the right to deal with e-mail as I see fit -- w
Thanks to Scott Bradbury and Patrick L Humphrey's stupidity, he no
longer works for Rice.
--
Pat
From Peter Nyikos
The sleazeball Patrick simulates sinks to new lows. I'm supposed to
infere a disgusting, vulgar comment from Susan Garvin's hateful ones
which nevertheless are nothing like the words I used above.
Patrick, do me a favor, will you? Show this post to Dale Ann,
including the following words:
Dale Ann, I'm truly sorry to expose you to this bickering, but Patrick
is doing things that naive people like Chaney think reflect very badly
on you, whereas I realize that (1) he is probably spinning tall tales
about you and (2) he is also spinning tall tales about his true
attitudes about things. He probably has you convinced that Usenet is a
silly game having nothing to do with real life, and for your peace of
mind I suggest that you continue to take him at face value on this.
For if you had the attitude that a lot of us here have, namely that
lies spoken here are real lies, you might be tempted to sue him for
divorce, and that is not something I would like to encourage. He needs
to keep at least one foot in the real world.
Peter Nyikos -- standard disclaimer --
Check Back Often...More to Come
Hylander
> Had it not been for Doc Tavish (Scott Bradbury) contacting Rice
> University, an investigation into Humphrey's activities wouldn't of
> happened. The investigation started in the summer of 2001 after numerous
> complaints by Bradbury to Malcom Gillis and others at Rice University.
He still posts here and threatens us and broadcasts other people's known
details without permission. He is a known "squealer". You need to use an
anonymizer when dealing with him or else he will stalk you.
http://www.rackjite.com/humphrey.htm
You can see his picture here as well. This page apparently lists a
stalking incident with him riding his bike up to someone's driveway and
then posting about the appearance of the person's home ie: what toys were
in the driveway, etc..
As someone who appears pro-life (based on the fact that a pro-choice site
hosts his page), he has been very rude to myself who is a moderate
pro-life (limited to legal restrictions as opposed to banning and
recognizant of emergency/rape/incest cases being exceptions as determined
by the signed and documented decision of the *woman* not a doctor or
statesman.).
Houston resident.
Nomen Nescio
The odds are against Patty because the more people he pisses off and
the more bizarre he acts it won't be too long before someone blows his
friggin heart out rapid fire to his chest with a hi-cap handgun. With
Patty's record of stalking no grand jury would file charges for what
would be an obvious act of self defense from a known stalker. He likes
peeping into windows too. I would love to catch him peeping into my windows
because I would put a slug between his eyes and the world would be less
one psychotic personality.
Pat Winstanley
jo...@spameater.com says...
> Subject: Re: Rice University fired Patrick "Humpboys" Humphrey for stalking
> From: Hylander <jo...@spameater.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, alt.abortion, houston.general
>
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 04:20:01 -0600, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> > Had it not been for Doc Tavish (Scott Bradbury) contacting Rice
> > University, an investigation into Humphrey's activities wouldn't of
> > happened. The investigation started in the summer of 2001 after numerous
> > complaints by Bradbury to Malcom Gillis and others at Rice University.
>
> He still posts here
>
You've been scammed!
Don't be so stupidly gullible - the posting you are responding to is a
total lie!
Tarapia Tapioco
Are you Humpboys gay lover? What was posted was true. Your lover got
fired from Rice University for stalking people on their time and using
their facilities.
Patrick L. Humphrey
>On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 04:20:01 -0600, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> Had it not been for Doc Tavish (Scott Bradbury) contacting Rice
>> University, an investigation into Humphrey's activities wouldn't of
>> happened. The investigation started in the summer of 2001 after numerous
>> complaints by Bradbury to Malcom Gillis and others at Rice University.
>He still posts here and threatens us and broadcasts other people's known
>details without permission. He is a known "squealer". You need to use an
>anonymizer when dealing with him or else he will stalk you.
You'll believe anything because it's "on the Internet", eh? YOU broadcast the
detail that you're using SBC DSL in Houston, kid. You're a gutless coward of
a thug. I've posted using my real name as long as I've had Usenet access, but
that's because I believe in what I write enough to put my real name on it.
If you're so "threatened", you *do* have the right to ignore me -- no one's
making you read anything I post.
>http://www.rackjite.com/humphrey.htm
*yawn*
>You can see his picture here as well. This page apparently lists a
>stalking incident with him riding his bike up to someone's driveway and
>then posting about the appearance of the person's home ie: what toys were
>in the driveway, etc..
You apparently don't remember what you read very well. (Funny how Dave keeps
"forgetting" that I never made any more specific mention of where he is than
that he was, like me, in the greater Houston area -- which didn't stop some of
his friends from posting my address and phone anywhere they could find, for a
while. That's a real respectable bunch of people you're brown-nosing, son.)
>As someone who appears pro-life (based on the fact that a pro-choice site
>hosts his page),
What are you smoking, child? Are you that simple-minded as to assume that if
I'm a parent, I must be pro-life? How do you determine whether an ISP is
pro-choice or not? Last time I looked, it was more concerned with that First
Amendment issue that you'd rather not deal with.
>he has been very rude to myself who is a moderate pro-life (limited to legal
>restrictions as opposed to banning and recognizant of emergency/rape/incest
>cases being exceptions as determined by the signed and documented decision of
>the *woman* not a doctor or statesman.).
Poor baby -- if I'm so offensive to you, you have the right to killfile me.
I suggest you consider that option. (Free clue: there's no right to be not
offended...anywhere.)
>Houston resident.
Good for you...I've been one for going on four-fifths of my life. For all you
know, we've already crossed paths.
--PLH, not losing any sleep
Patrick L. Humphrey
>> He still posts here
>You've been scammed!
You know that, and I know that...but "Hylander" isn't concerned about whether
it has anything to do with reality or not -- it's a convenient excuse for him
to strut about like the little banty rooster he is. He'll brown-nose a
two-time convicted felon and then preen himself for being so righteous.
--PLH, who's dealt with enough of such fools in the thirteen years I've been
posting here...and I'm still here, while a lot of them aren't
DemocRAT
What a reply, that is one way to lose all credibility. Do you expect
people to take you seriously when you reply like a 10 year old?
Hylander
> You know that, and I know that...but "Hylander" isn't concerned about
> whether it has anything to do with reality or not -- it's a convenient
> excuse for him to strut about like the little banty rooster he is. He'll
> brown-nose a two-time convicted felon and then preen himself for being
> so righteous.
>
> --PLH, who's dealt with enough of such fools in the thirteen years I've
> been
> posting here...and I'm still here, while a lot of them aren't
Well, I will try to judge you for myself. I totally disregarded the first
post that had you arrested for going to other states and picking up girls
and boys and had a Humphrey 101 and 102 in it. However, when you try to
post information that would lead to my location, that can be considered
violation of my privacy. That is very threatening. If someone were to
stalk me down and do any violence, that would be a HATE crime. There are
laws that protect people from discrimination, let alone violence based on
creed. Is this what you represent? If so, I applaud your exposure be it
how grandiose as it may be.
I'd ask you to tell me convicted of "what" but that is also a violation of
someone's privacy. It seems that this ng is a dangerous one. I am not for
that. I would also like to know how you know this person. Obviously there
was smoke and fire at one time. I will be reading the google history of
all this. I suppose I will be a "convicted felon" too in your book. How do
I know that this is the truth? I'm not so naive though, I can smell idiocy
for miles away. I would be willing to bet that there are lies on both
sides....including convicted felon on your part and your abducting little
girls off their bikes off someone else's part. Don't worry, time will
tell.
Hylander
Pat might just be his wife or "gay lover".....who knows.
Hylander
> You'll believe anything because it's "on the Internet", eh? YOU
> broadcast the detail that you're using SBC DSL in Houston, kid. You're
> a gutless coward of a thug. I've posted using my real name as long as
> I've had Usenet access, but that's because I believe in what I write
> enough to put my real name on it. If you're so "threatened", you *do*
> have the right to ignore me -- no one's making you read anything I post.
>
>>http://www.rackjite.com/humphrey.htm
>
> *yawn*
Try http://www.rackjite.com
I know the issue isn't simply divided as you say but I'd like to know if
for a fact you were NOT fired from Rice University for your online
activity. Can you answer that one question? The answer is easily
verifiable.
I myself do not have such a record and do not mix my work into posting
here as would be obvious.
> That's a real respectable bunch
> of people you're brown-nosing, son.)
I would suggest as a rule of thumb, a heuristic, if you will that calling
people son is not respectful of those with age older than your own. It is
also confusing to mix your Southern lingo in with the common usage of
English found on the internet if that's the case. I asked you before not
to use such language but as you are disrespectful of other people, then
it doesn't surprise me that, among other things, you have continued to do
this.
>
> What are you smoking, child? Are you that simple-minded as to assume
> that if I'm a parent, I must be pro-life? How do you determine whether
> an ISP is pro-choice or not? Last time I looked, it was more concerned
> with that First Amendment issue that you'd rather not deal with.
It looks to poke fun at conservatives is all. Even as a conservative, I
can appreciate a little humour. I actually like reading both sides of
issues.
>
> Poor baby -- if I'm so offensive to you, you have the right to killfile
> me. I suggest you consider that option. (Free clue: there's no right
> to be not offended...anywhere.)
And I never have claimed a right to not be offended. I won't tolerate the
likes of you getting your last pathetic lies in at the end.
Patrick L. Humphrey
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:02:30 -0600, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> You know that, and I know that...but "Hylander" isn't concerned about
>> whether it has anything to do with reality or not -- it's a convenient
>> excuse for him to strut about like the little banty rooster he is. He'll
>> brown-nose a two-time convicted felon and then preen himself for being
>> so righteous.
>>
>> --PLH, who's dealt with enough of such fools in the thirteen years I've been
>> posting here...and I'm still here, while a lot of them aren't
> Well, I will try to judge you for myself. I totally disregarded the first
> post that had you arrested for going to other states and picking up girls
> and boys and had a Humphrey 101 and 102 in it. However, when you try to
> post information that would lead to my location, that can be considered
> violation of my privacy. That is very threatening. If someone were to
> stalk me down and do any violence, that would be a HATE crime. There are
> laws that protect people from discrimination, let alone violence based on
> creed. Is this what you represent? If so, I applaud your exposure be it
> how grandiose as it may be.
You're full of shit, as usual. I have no idea of what your nationality is, or
your race or religion, for that matter. I couldn't care less about knowing
them, either. All I've done is point out a fact that YOU provided, numbnuts:
that you're accessing SBC's DSL facilities here in Houston, nothing more,
nothing less. That means, like it or not, that we're just going to have to
get along in the same city. You're a coward who only wants any excuse to try
and get back at me for hurting your little feelings.
> I'd ask you to tell me convicted of "what" but that is also a violation of
> someone's privacy.
From a look at the court records in the applicable state, it would appear that
the person you're busy brown-nosing has been convicted twice, and one of them
appears to involve children.
> It seems that this ng is a dangerous one. I am not for that.
You're entitled to your opinion, but don't judge at first sight.
> I would also like to know how you know this person. Obviously there
> was smoke and fire at one time. I will be reading the google history of
> all this.
Your "friend" is one of those nice people who think there was no organized
effort to kill as many Jews as possible on the part of the Third Reich. That
should give you an idea of what kind of alleged mentality you're dealing with,
in his case. Take a look at alt.revisionism, which is where this caricature
still hides out.
> I suppose I will be a "convicted felon" too in your book.
If you don't carry out your thinly-veiled threats, you won't be. Simple, no?
> How do I know that this is the truth? I'm not so naive though, I can smell
> idiocy for miles away. I would be willing to bet that there are lies on both
> sides....including convicted felon on your part and your abducting little
> girls off their bikes off someone else's part. Don't worry, time will tell.
I'm sure it will...the $64,000 question is, will YOU tell?
--PLH, that's more important
Patrick L. Humphrey
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 08:25:43 -0600, Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 12:19:22 -0000,
>> <MPG.187261298...@News.CIS.DFN.DE> Pat Winstanley
>> <ng_...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
>>>You've been scammed!
>>>Don't be so stupidly gullible - the posting you are responding to is a
>>>total lie!
>> Are you Humpboys gay lover? What was posted was true. Your lover got
>> fired from Rice University for stalking people on their time and using
>> their facilities.
> Pat might just be his wife or "gay lover".....who knows.
You obviously don't, son...considering that she (Pat, not my wife) doesn't
even live in this hemisphere. I hope you don't spend much time in Sugar Land,
though -- you might have crossed paths with my wife, for all you know.
--PLH, not today, though -- she's headed home by now
The Chief Instigator
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 08:58:31 -0600, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> You'll believe anything because it's "on the Internet", eh? YOU
>> broadcast the detail that you're using SBC DSL in Houston, kid. You're
>> a gutless coward of a thug. I've posted using my real name as long as
>> I've had Usenet access, but that's because I believe in what I write
>> enough to put my real name on it. If you're so "threatened", you *do*
>> have the right to ignore me -- no one's making you read anything I post.
>>>http://www.rackjite.com/humphrey.htm
>> *yawn*
> Try http://www.rackjite.com
Been there -- it's still the same slumgullion it's been since the day Dave
started putting it up.
> I know the issue isn't simply divided as you say but I'd like to know if
> for a fact you were NOT fired from Rice University for your online
> activity. Can you answer that one question? The answer is easily
> verifiable.
I was fired for a reason that is the concern of the University and myself.
Said reason was not associated with criminal activity of any kind.
> I myself do not have such a record and do not mix my work into posting
> here as would be obvious.
Neither do I.
>> That's a real respectable bunch of people you're brown-nosing, son.)
> I would suggest as a rule of thumb, a heuristic, if you will that calling
> people son is not respectful of those with age older than your own.
Well, when you don't exactly make any effort to earn respect, it shouldn't
surprise you that you don't get it.
> It is also confusing to mix your Southern lingo in with the common usage of
> English found on the internet if that's the case. I asked you before not to
> use such language but as you are disrespectful of other people, then it
> doesn't surprise me that, among other things, you have continued to do this.
You're in Texas. We have our own version of English here. Might as well get
used to it, because 22 million of us aren't going to change just so you can be
a little less confused.
>> What are you smoking, child? Are you that simple-minded as to assume
>> that if I'm a parent, I must be pro-life? How do you determine whether
>> an ISP is pro-choice or not? Last time I looked, it was more concerned
>> with that First Amendment issue that you'd rather not deal with.
> It looks to poke fun at conservatives is all. Even as a conservative, I
> can appreciate a little humour. I actually like reading both sides of
> issues.
So do I, but evidently I tend to not assign "pro-choice" or "pro-life" (or
"anti-abort", which is distinct) to web sites unless they're pretty obvious
about it.
>> Poor baby -- if I'm so offensive to you, you have the right to killfile
>> me. I suggest you consider that option. (Free clue: there's no right
>> to be not offended...anywhere.)
> And I never have claimed a right to not be offended. I won't tolerate the
> likes of you getting your last pathetic lies in at the end.
In other words, you're choosing to read what I post, and whine at me. Now,
can you deal with the consequences?
--PLH, that's to be seen
Bob
news:pan.2002.12.24.13...@spameater.com:
Maybe it's because because Patrick doesn't respect you, hyneylicker?
Pat Winstanley
jo...@spameater.com says...
> However, when you try to
> post information that would lead to my location, that can be considered
> violation of my privacy.
>
Patrick hasn't posted anything that anyone anyone in the world cannot
get very simply just from the public headers of your posts.
What's your problem?
What do you think he has told the world that you had not *already* told
the world just by posting?
(Do you, in fact, have the faintest idea of what information is in your
headers?)
Pat Winstanley
comes...@ntani.firenze.linux.it says...
ROFL... yet another loser who hasn't a clue what they are talking about!
;-))
BTW, I have never met Patrick in my life, and even if I had and we had
become lovers it would be impossible to describe that as a homosexual
relationship. In any case his wife would probably bop me one - or
compare notes in girl-talk! ;-))
Patrick L. Humphrey
>> >> He still posts here
>> >You've been scammed!
What do you expect from rejects who still insist the Holocaust never happened?
> BTW, I have never met Patrick in my life, and even if I had and we had
> become lovers it would be impossible to describe that as a homosexual
> relationship. In any case his wife would probably bop me one - or
> compare notes in girl-talk! ;-))
I wouldn't worry too much -- Dale and I are still friends, even after all
these years together. :-) One of these days, we'll get over to the old
country...
--PLH, who still has more than a few distant cousins up in Scotland
Hylander
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:35:05 GMT, Hylander <jo...@spameater.com> wrote:
>
> You're full of shit, as usual. I have no idea of what your nationality
> is, or your race or religion, for that matter. I couldn't care less
> about knowing them, either. All I've done is point out a fact that YOU
> provided, numbnuts: that you're accessing SBC's DSL facilities here in
> Houston, nothing more, nothing less. That means, like it or not, that
> we're just going to have to get along in the same city. You're a coward
> who only wants any excuse to try and get back at me for hurting your
> little feelings.
Just becuase you *can* do something. ie: broadcast inferred information
and squealing doesn't mean it is good manners to do so. Given what is out
there on you, I don't see why you don't supress your manners more. It is
hard to believe you when you act that way. Your actions speak louder.
>
> Your "friend" is one of those nice people who think there was no
> organized effort to kill as many Jews as possible on the part of the
> Third Reich. That should give you an idea of what kind of alleged
> mentality you're dealing with, in his case. Take a look at
> alt.revisionism, which is where this caricature still hides out.
I don't know that but if I find that to be true, Trust me, I won't
support that. So let me ask you something. Do you support planned
parenthood? After all, they are NAZI! TRUE!
>> I suppose I will be a "convicted felon" too in your book.
> If you don't carry out your thinly-veiled threats, you won't be. Simple,
> no?
I doubt that. Your wishful thinking will probably go that far regardless
what I do. Are you and Pat lovers by the way? Every time you post, it
seems she/he/it does.
>> How do I know that this is the truth? I'm not so naive though, I can
>> smell idiocy for miles away. I would be willing to bet that there are
>> lies on both sides....including convicted felon on your part and your
>> abducting little girls off their bikes off someone else's part. Don't
>> worry, time will tell.
>
> I'm sure it will...the $64,000 question is, will YOU tell?
*sigh*. I don't think I have to do anything but watch you make a fool of
yourself to see how time will play out.
Hylander
> In article <pan.2002.12.24.13...@spameater.com>,
> jo...@spameater.com says...
>> However, when you try to
>> post information that would lead to my location, that can be considered
>> violation of my privacy.
>>
>>
> Patrick hasn't posted anything that anyone anyone in the world cannot
> get very simply just from the public headers of your posts.
The problem is that for someone accused of something, he hints at its
possibility. No one else does that. On average. Instead of acting decently
to cast doubt, he acts like a squealer and seemingly removes all doubt
about his stalking.
> What's your problem?
What's yours?
> What do you think he has told the world that you had not *already* told
> the world just by posting?
Nothing except that he worked further to grab information and imply a
location without consent.
> (Do you, in fact, have the faintest idea of what information is in your
> headers?)
Of course. I see on yours too: Path: From: Newsgroups: Subject: Date: Lines:
Message-ID: References: NNTP X-Trace, X-Newsreader, Xref: etc etc etc.
But reading this, I don't infer all your details which is what a stalker
does.
Hylander
> You're in Texas. We have our own version of English here. Might as
> well get used to it, because 22 million of us aren't going to change
> just so you can be a little less confused.
No one here has ever called me "son". Its your own egocentric world you
live in that is decades outdated, grampy. (disclaimer: grampy does not
imply blood or even animal kingdom relation)
Hylander
You need to learn to snip you big arse.
Patrick L. Humphrey
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:30:06 -0600, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 18:35:05 GMT, Hylander <jo...@spameater.com> wrote:
>> You're full of shit, as usual. I have no idea of what your nationality
>> is, or your race or religion, for that matter. I couldn't care less
>> about knowing them, either. All I've done is point out a fact that YOU
>> provided, numbnuts: that you're accessing SBC's DSL facilities here in
>> Houston, nothing more, nothing less. That means, like it or not, that
>> we're just going to have to get along in the same city. You're a coward
>> who only wants any excuse to try and get back at me for hurting your
>> little feelings.
> Just becuase you *can* do something. ie: broadcast inferred information
> and squealing doesn't mean it is good manners to do so. Given what is out
> there on you, I don't see why you don't supress your manners more. It is
> hard to believe you when you act that way. Your actions speak louder.
Your belief doesn't exactly qualify as a high priority for me.
>> Your "friend" is one of those nice people who think there was no
>> organized effort to kill as many Jews as possible on the part of the
>> Third Reich. That should give you an idea of what kind of alleged
>> mentality you're dealing with, in his case. Take a look at
>> alt.revisionism, which is where this caricature still hides out.
> I don't know that but if I find that to be true, Trust me, I won't
> support that. So let me ask you something. Do you support planned
> parenthood? After all, they are NAZI! TRUE!
Bullshit, boy. You're just vomiting the same anti-abort crap you're being
spoonfed from some kook site. That lie's been debunked many a time. How did
you, in all your alleged wisdom, manage to avoid any of the debunkings?
>>> I suppose I will be a "convicted felon" too in your book.
>> If you don't carry out your thinly-veiled threats, you won't be. Simple,
>> no?
> I doubt that. Your wishful thinking will probably go that far regardless
> what I do. Are you and Pat lovers by the way? Every time you post, it
> seems she/he/it does.
So, you're an IQ 150 guy with no common sense or attention to details -- I
could be right down the block from you, for all you know, and she's 8000
kilometers away from here...and we've never met. I trust you have a few
friends like that who you only know from being online.
>>> How do I know that this is the truth? I'm not so naive though, I can
>>> smell idiocy for miles away. I would be willing to bet that there are
>>> lies on both sides....including convicted felon on your part and your
>>> abducting little girls off their bikes off someone else's part. Don't
>>> worry, time will tell.
>> I'm sure it will...the $64,000 question is, will YOU tell?
> *sigh*. I don't think I have to do anything but watch you make a fool of
> yourself to see how time will play out.
If you're busy obsessing over me, that's less time you can spend to annoy
people in real life (including me, since I occasionally volunteer to help
defend one of the clinics around here that provide abortion among their
services). See? You're actually doing someone some good, for once!
--PLH, it wasn't all that painful, was it?
Patrick L. Humphrey
Hey, if you're going to hide at home, that's YOUR problem.
Get the bloody fuck over yourself, already.
--PLH, and quit annoying the rest of us
Patrick L. Humphrey
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:59:41 -0600, Bob wrote:
[nothing, because Mr. Piranha deleted it all]
> You need to learn to snip you big arse.
Piss off, you stupid git.
--PLH, oh, you want abuse? That's Room 12A.
Hylander
> Your belief doesn't exactly qualify as a high priority for me.
Then neither does supporting/defending your claim that you are not a
stalker equal a high priority to me.
>> I don't know that but if I find that to be true, Trust me, I won't
>> support that. So let me ask you something. Do you support planned
>> parenthood? After all, they are NAZI! TRUE!
>
> Bullshit, boy. You're just vomiting the same anti-abort crap you're
> being spoonfed from some kook site. That lie's been debunked many a
> time. How did you, in all your alleged wisdom, manage to avoid any of
> the debunkings?
Can you debunk that with a source somewhere? How long will it take....a
month?
> So, you're an IQ 150 guy with no common sense or attention to details --
> I could be right down the block from you, for all you know, and she's
> 8000 kilometers away from here...and we've never met. I trust you have
> a few friends like that who you only know from being online.
No, I know she has a uk account but probably in Germany. In any case, it
was a joke. As you said something about sarcasm not existing in my
world....? hmm?
Just have a Merry Christmas and don't reply k? I'm just defending myself
a little adamantly here.
Hylander
>
> Hey, if you're going to hide at home, that's YOUR problem.
>
> Get the bloody fuck over yourself, already.
>
> --PLH, and quit annoying the rest of us
Leave it to Patrick to be vulgur as can be about it. Are you a "bloody"
brit too?
Hylander
What makes you think this applies to you? Do you feel the guilt of
posting spam already?
Patrick L. Humphrey
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 19:51:57 -0600, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> Your belief doesn't exactly qualify as a high priority for me.
> Then neither does supporting/defending your claim that you are not a
> stalker equal a high priority to me.
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt, eh?
>>> I don't know that but if I find that to be true, Trust me, I won't
>>> support that. So let me ask you something. Do you support planned
>>> parenthood? After all, they are NAZI! TRUE!
>> Bullshit, boy. You're just vomiting the same anti-abort crap you're
>> being spoonfed from some kook site. That lie's been debunked many a
>> time. How did you, in all your alleged wisdom, manage to avoid any of
>> the debunkings?
> Can you debunk that with a source somewhere? How long will it take....a
> month?
It'll take until I get around to it.
>> So, you're an IQ 150 guy with no common sense or attention to details --
>> I could be right down the block from you, for all you know, and she's
>> 8000 kilometers away from here...and we've never met. I trust you have
>> a few friends like that who you only know from being online.
> No, I know she has a uk account but probably in Germany. In any case, it
> was a joke. As you said something about sarcasm not existing in my
> world....? hmm?
She's in the UK. Given the manner of your entrance, it's not surprising your
sarcasm might escape detection.
> Just have a Merry Christmas and don't reply k? I'm just defending myself
> a little adamantly here.
So quit defending yourself and have a happy holiday, already. All this is, is
pixels on a CRT...real life takes priority over that, in my opinion.
--PLH, and don't roll down any steep hills ;-)
Patrick L. Humphrey
You tell me. (Sorry to assault your tender sensitivities, but as I've said,
no one's making you read anything I post.)
--PLH, with more than a few distant cousins still in Scotland
Patrick L. Humphrey
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 20:00:14 -0600, Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
[zap!]
> What makes you think this applies to you? Do you feel the guilt of
> posting spam already?
What makes you think you have the right to decide who's allowed to respond to
you? Maybe you really should have someone explain how to operate a killfile
to you...and grasp the concept that if you're posting to a public unmoderated
newsgroup, anyone's free to reply.
--PLH, it ain't rocket science, you know
Bob
news:pan.2002.12.24.20...@spameater.com:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 13:59:41 -0600, Bob wrote:
>
> You need to learn to snip you big arse.
Snip this, hyneylicker.
Pat Winstanley
jo...@spameater.com says...
>
> Of course. I see on yours too: Path: From: Newsgroups: Subject: Date: Lines:
> Message-ID: References: NNTP X-Trace, X-Newsreader, Xref: etc etc etc.
>
> But reading this, I don't infer all your details which is what a stalker
> does.
>
And Patrick has posted NOTHING that is not already in your headers.
You are insane! ;-))
Pat Winstanley
>
> > In article <pan.2002.12.24.13...@spameater.com>,
> > jo...@spameater.com says...
> >> However, when you try to
> >> post information that would lead to my location, that can be considered
> >> violation of my privacy.
> >>
> >>
> > Patrick hasn't posted anything that anyone anyone in the world cannot
> > get very simply just from the public headers of your posts.
>
> The problem is that for someone accused of something, he hints at its
> possibility.
ROFL!
You definitely have a bad case of paranoia! ;-)))
Krisbam
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 04:20:01 -0600, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> > Had it not been for Doc Tavish (Scott Bradbury) contacting Rice
> > University, an investigation into Humphrey's activities wouldn't of
> > happened. The investigation started in the summer of 2001 after numerous
> > complaints by Bradbury to Malcom Gillis and others at Rice University.
>
Sucker.
[...]
Patrick L. Humphrey
>ROFL!
Evidently, he's more than a little concerned that Santa might have left him
all that Harlan County coal...:-)
--PLH, being paranoid doesn't necessarily mean they're out to get you ;-)
Ray Fischer
> Patrick L. Humphrey wrote:
>> Your belief doesn't exactly qualify as a high priority for me.
>
>Then neither does supporting/defending your claim that you are not a
>stalker equal a high priority to me.
Likewise your claim that you don't hate women.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net