Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Abortion mill shut down after 37-year-old mother dies in horrific botched abortion
0 views
Skip to first unread message
J
May 25, 2012, 10:44:25 PM5/25/12
to
The incompetence and callousness of these butchers is astonishing. Women
and children have become fodder for those who fill their coffers with
blood money.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/queens-abortion-mill-shut-down-after-37-year-old-mother-dies-in-botched-abo
QUEENS, NEW YORK, May 25, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) � Robert Hosty, who
ran the A-1 Women�s Center abortion clinic in Queens, New York, has had
his license revoked after Operation Rescue staff filed a complaint
against him for the death of Alexandra Nunez, a 37-year old single
mother of four. The revocation order, dated February 6, 2012, was only
recently obtained by Operation Rescue.
Nunez went to Hosty for an abortion when she was about 16-17 weeks
pregnant. She had a history of two C-Section deliveries and a condition
where the placenta was more deeply embedded in the wall of the uterus
than normal. Hosty spent nine minutes aborting her baby. Near the end of
the procedure, she began to bleed uncontrollably. Nunez went into
cardiac arrest from loss of blood, and no one bothered to administer
chest compressions. Hosty waited an hour before calling 911 for help.
The revocation documents stated the following:
Paramedics arrived at A-1 Women�s Center on Roosevelt Avenue at 4:58
p.m. (almost one hour after the surgery ended.) They say Patient B
[Nunez] on an exam table/chair with her legs open. They saw blood on the
floor and blood coming from Patient B. They also saw bloody clothes in
the corner. They noted that Patient B was grey and ashen, meaning that
she was likely dead. She was cold to the touch.
Paramedics never saw or interacted with Hosty. After the abortion, he
left it to his assistant to attempt to revive the patient, who was
pronounced dead on arrival at a nearby hospital.
--
J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com
BroilJAB
May 25, 2012, 10:51:35 PM5/25/12
to
No matter how many countless thousands of
(usually 'minority') women die at the hands of
Abortionists, the liberal media continues to
claim, "Abortion saves lives".
(usually 'minority') women die at the hands of
Abortionists, the liberal media continues to
claim, "Abortion saves lives".
J
May 25, 2012, 10:56:23 PM5/25/12
to
Uirgil
May 26, 2012, 12:05:12 AM5/26/12
to
In article
<66f6f1ed-16d2-400b...@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
Legal abortions save lives because desperate women will have their
abortions one way or the other.
And remember what happened when you Christers passed the prohibition
amendment when most people would not accept it.
You cannot enforce such unpopular religious bans by law without damaging
the society the way that prohibition did.
<66f6f1ed-16d2-400b...@s5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
abortions one way or the other.
And remember what happened when you Christers passed the prohibition
amendment when most people would not accept it.
You cannot enforce such unpopular religious bans by law without damaging
the society the way that prohibition did.
Message has been deleted
elizabeth
May 26, 2012, 12:43:28 PM5/26/12
to
On May 25, 11:00 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> of ALL kinds are botched - and how many die as a result.
> Abortions are barely a blip on the radar.
you got that right. The two worst offenders, as far as complications
and cost to women are the "assisted fertility" industry, which uses
women as lab rats, and the plastic surgery industry, which has a very
high morbidity and mortality rate. Now, since no woman ever died from
NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding) and looking your age
is NOT a disease, and since we do know that the morbidity/mortality
rate for pregnancy and childbirth is about 20X worse than abortion ...
it is very clear that antiabortniks have no interest in women's
health.
The plastic surgery quacks even advertise "financing" help, meaning
middle aged women are encouraged to spend money they don't have to try
and look younger, so they feel more "competitive" in the job market,
and let's be honest, there is a huge amount of age discrimination ..
but the fact is, the more plastic surgery you get, the more likely a
very serious complication will result, and guess what? you have to
pay to get it corrected. Read the fine print. So, these idiots will
face retirement with "picasso faces" and no money for food or
shelter.
Women can be as stupid as men.
> J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >The incompetence and callousness of these butchers is astonishing. Women
> >and children have become fodder for those who fill their coffers with
> >blood money.
>
> Maybe you should look into how many medical procedures
> >The incompetence and callousness of these butchers is astonishing. Women
> >and children have become fodder for those who fill their coffers with
> >blood money.
>
> of ALL kinds are botched - and how many die as a result.
> Abortions are barely a blip on the radar.
you got that right. The two worst offenders, as far as complications
and cost to women are the "assisted fertility" industry, which uses
women as lab rats, and the plastic surgery industry, which has a very
high morbidity and mortality rate. Now, since no woman ever died from
NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding) and looking your age
is NOT a disease, and since we do know that the morbidity/mortality
rate for pregnancy and childbirth is about 20X worse than abortion ...
it is very clear that antiabortniks have no interest in women's
health.
The plastic surgery quacks even advertise "financing" help, meaning
middle aged women are encouraged to spend money they don't have to try
and look younger, so they feel more "competitive" in the job market,
and let's be honest, there is a huge amount of age discrimination ..
but the fact is, the more plastic surgery you get, the more likely a
very serious complication will result, and guess what? you have to
pay to get it corrected. Read the fine print. So, these idiots will
face retirement with "picasso faces" and no money for food or
shelter.
Women can be as stupid as men.
Message has been deleted
SkyEyes
May 27, 2012, 2:23:37 AM5/27/12
to
On May 26, 9:43 am, elizabeth <elizabethfran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Now, since no woman ever died from
> NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding)
Tiny nitpick: Anne Boleyn didn't die from not having children; she
> Now, since no woman ever died from
> NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding)
died from not having *living* *male* children. Her first pregnancy
resulted in your namesake, the great Elizabeth I of England; her
second was a stillborn boy. Had he lived, Henry VIII would be nothing
but a footnote in a history book.
Other than that, you're right.
Brenda Nelson, A.A.#34
BAAWA Knight of the Golden Litterbox
EAC Professor of Feline Thermometrics and Cat-Herding
skyeyes nine at cox dot net OR
skyeyes nine at yahoo dot com
elizabeth
May 27, 2012, 5:11:14 AM5/27/12
to
elizabeth
May 27, 2012, 5:10:37 AM5/27/12
to
On May 26, 11:34 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> it IS a de-facto cultural 'disease'. Expect mass quantities
> of people - a slight majority being women - to risk all to
> look younger. It's become a youth-centric culture and that's
> that. 'Older' does NOT bring respect, only rejection.
>
> Complain all you want, won't change a thing.
Who;s complaining? Let those stupid bints waste all their money on
trying to look younger, it only means that they will face retirement
totally destitute. Their faces will look horrific, and when they
can't keep paying, those plastic surgeons will kick 'em to the curb.
But why envy youth, when it's clear that all the good times are
over? At least my generation had a blast wasting all the resources.
I have no regrets. Not my fault women are so stupid they think that
going along to get along will get them anyplace worth going to! I
knew better, they didn't. Not my fault, and they will have to pay for
their stupidity, sooner or later.
> elizabeth <elizabethfran...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 25, 11:00 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> >> J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >The incompetence and callousness of these butchers is astonishing. Women
> >> >and children have become fodder for those who fill their coffers with
> >> >blood money.
>
> >> Maybe you should look into how many medical procedures
> >> of ALL kinds are botched - and how many die as a result.
> >> Abortions are barely a blip on the radar.
>
> >you got that right. The two worst offenders, as far as complications
> >and cost to women are the "assisted fertility" industry, which uses
> >women as lab rats, and the plastic surgery industry, which has a very
> >high morbidity and mortality rate. Now, since no woman ever died from
> >NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding) and looking your age
> >is NOT a disease, and since we do know that the morbidity/mortality
> >rate for pregnancy and childbirth is about 20X worse than abortion ...
> >it is very clear that antiabortniks have no interest in women's
> >health.
>
> Well, 'looking your age' is not an OFFICIAL disease, but
> >On May 25, 11:00 pm, Mr.B1ack <b...@barrk.net> wrote:
> >> J <jdyou...@ymail.com> wrote:
> >> >The incompetence and callousness of these butchers is astonishing. Women
> >> >and children have become fodder for those who fill their coffers with
> >> >blood money.
>
> >> Maybe you should look into how many medical procedures
> >> of ALL kinds are botched - and how many die as a result.
> >> Abortions are barely a blip on the radar.
>
> >you got that right. The two worst offenders, as far as complications
> >and cost to women are the "assisted fertility" industry, which uses
> >women as lab rats, and the plastic surgery industry, which has a very
> >high morbidity and mortality rate. Now, since no woman ever died from
> >NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding) and looking your age
> >is NOT a disease, and since we do know that the morbidity/mortality
> >rate for pregnancy and childbirth is about 20X worse than abortion ...
> >it is very clear that antiabortniks have no interest in women's
> >health.
>
> it IS a de-facto cultural 'disease'. Expect mass quantities
> of people - a slight majority being women - to risk all to
> look younger. It's become a youth-centric culture and that's
> that. 'Older' does NOT bring respect, only rejection.
>
> Complain all you want, won't change a thing.
Who;s complaining? Let those stupid bints waste all their money on
trying to look younger, it only means that they will face retirement
totally destitute. Their faces will look horrific, and when they
can't keep paying, those plastic surgeons will kick 'em to the curb.
But why envy youth, when it's clear that all the good times are
over? At least my generation had a blast wasting all the resources.
I have no regrets. Not my fault women are so stupid they think that
going along to get along will get them anyplace worth going to! I
knew better, they didn't. Not my fault, and they will have to pay for
their stupidity, sooner or later.
linuxgal
May 27, 2012, 10:36:37 AM5/27/12
to
SkyEyes wrote:
> On May 26, 9:43 am, elizabeth <elizabethfran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Now, since no woman ever died from
>> NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding)
>
> Tiny nitpick: Anne Boleyn didn't die from not having children; she
> died from not having *living* *male* children.
Actually, she died from not having a head.
> On May 26, 9:43 am, elizabeth <elizabethfran...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Now, since no woman ever died from
>> NOT having children (Anne Boleyn notwithstanding)
>
> Tiny nitpick: Anne Boleyn didn't die from not having children; she
> died from not having *living* *male* children.
Free Lunch
May 27, 2012, 10:54:44 AM5/27/12
to
On Sun, 27 May 2012 07:36:37 -0700, linuxgal <linu...@cleanposts.com>
wrote in alt.atheism:
In modern medical terminology, wouldn't she have died from not having a
body below her head?
wrote in alt.atheism:
body below her head?
elizabeth
May 27, 2012, 11:43:33 AM5/27/12
to
On May 27, 7:54 am, Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 07:36:37 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com>
hhmmmm ... seems to me that the actual cause of death could well be
loss of blood due to the head-ectomy!
> On Sun, 27 May 2012 07:36:37 -0700, linuxgal <linux...@cleanposts.com>
loss of blood due to the head-ectomy!
Message has been deleted
J
May 27, 2012, 2:26:53 PM5/27/12
to
kill some poor, gullible woman.
--
J Young
jdyo...@ymail.com
elizabeth
May 27, 2012, 3:23:41 PM5/27/12
to
I'm sure if you took your meds you wouldn't have such bizarre and
morbid sexual fantasies.
HVAC
May 28, 2012, 8:58:35 AM5/28/12
to
On 5/27/2012 2:26 PM, J wrote:
>
> I'm sure the abortionists you support have a good laugh every time they
> kill some poor, gullible woman.
J, let me lay out MY plan for abortion.
>
> I'm sure the abortionists you support have a good laugh every time they
> kill some poor, gullible woman.
We pay every woman that comes in for an abortion, $500.00.
No limit, we keep the fetus.
How do you like me now?
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo
0 new messages