Neil
I have a dual PIII 600 ms NT at work and 700 ms Athlon at home
The NT ain't bad but, ...the Athlon is VERY good.
regards,
steve
Neil
"neil" <nei...@swbell.net> wrote in message
news:iwii5.183$_%2.1...@nnrp3.sbc.net...
Jordan Walsh
Steve Whittet <whi...@shore.net> wrote in message
news:HYci5.1$pu....@news.shore.net...
name wrote:
>
> with a dual mb you will have to run nt or linux to get anything out of the
> second processor
>
> "neil" ?nei...@swbell.net? wrote in message
> news:iwii5.183$_%2.1...@nnrp3.sbc.net...
> ? Thanks fellas.... I think Ill go with the athlon (800 Mhz maybe?)... I
> ? just didnt know how it compared to a dual PII...
> ? it would probably be hard (and more expensive) to find another PII chip,
> and
> ? then buy a dual board...
> ?
> ? Neil
> ?
> ?
I've been using a dual PII 350 system and WinNT5.0 for 2 years now. I
think it speaks worlds about the system that I haven't had to upgrade
anything in my CPU for 2 years. The only thing changed was a CD-ROM
drive that died; that's it.
Of course, this system runs Windows NT. I like WinNt in that I can see
errors before they lead to fatal system crashes (thanks to the Event
Viewer), but NT's pickiness when it comes to non Microsoft software, and
its seeming inability to cope with DirectX, has led me to get another
computer, a laptop, that runs Windows 98 (I wish I was enough of a
computer geek to try dual booting, but the sad truth is that I'm not).
--
Adam Weiss
w...@whazo.com
--
People in stone houses shouldn't throw glass.
--
Many thanks!
"jordan walsh" <flo...@ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:VBhj5.72985$N4.19...@ozemail.com.au...