RustyHinge <
rusty...@foobar.girolle.co.uk> wrote:
> On 19/10/2023 23:27, Sn!pe wrote:
> > RustyHinge <
rusty...@foobar.girolle.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On 19/10/2023 22:39, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>> RustyHinge <
rusty...@foobar.girolle.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>> On 19/10/2023 21:48, Sn!pe wrote:
> >>>>> RustyHinge <
rusty...@foobar.girolle.co.uk> wrote:
> >>> [...]
> >>>>>> Either Infernal Septober or Thunderguts is telling porkies. Timed-out,
> >>>>>> my foot...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's been posting but not sending an ack; if you tried to send your
> >>>>> article again it was rejected as a duplicate. Dunno if it's fixed yet
> >>>>> (I'm about to find out with this.)
> >>>>
> >>>> It's also pretendng to be not receiving until timeout period is reached.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, exactly that, although the article was posted OK. I guess if your
> >>> 'reader times out before the ack, that causes the posted article to
> >>> stick in the outbox. I think it's probably a server load issue; anyway
> >>> it seems OK now.
> >>
> >> 'Snot, it's still playing silly-hooters.
> >
> > YMMV...
> >
> whatever *that* means...
Your Mileage May Vary.