On 18/11/2023 10:58, vickiebee wrote:
> Wow John, you really sound like you know what you're talking about. I
> went to Google for more:
>
> "There are paradigmatic differences between the sound quality of vinyl
> records and digital formats. The former tends to be deeper, richer,
> warmer, and of a more rounded quality. The latter tends to be more
> clean, polished, and slick, of a more trebly, high-end quality."
>
I can get a deeper, richer, and warmer sound off my CDs by using the
tone controls. I can't get the brighter, more detailed sound of a CD off
vinyl, as the information is not there on the disc. I prefer accurate,
though for a lot of the stuff I listen to, accurate is an illusion, as
it has been recorded over a period of weeks, and, often the musicians
haven't even met each other in the studio. Then the engineer uses
effects on the mix, including, on occasion, an old tape recorder or
simulator thereof to get that warm, mellow, distorted sound that
analogue tape inevitably has.
I know a lot of people prefer analogue, but the figures back me up when
I say CD is a more accurate reproduction. The major distortion in both
cases is where the original sound is turned into an electrical signal
and vice versa. For real High Fidelity, you need excellent speakers (
Allow a couple of grand a pair, minimum) and an acoustically treated
room. (Allow for things like patches of sound absorbing foam in just the
right places on the ceiling and walls, as well as just the right balance
between soft furnishings, and rugs on the uncarpeted floor. Having the
floor and ceiling parallel is not a good idea, not is having airs of
parallel walls. Even then, to hear all the detail on a well recorded CD,
you need to put up with the unnatural listening experience of a pair of
what the professionals call "in ear monitors", which makes the listening
room irrelevant. There is one studio, in New York if I remember
correctly, where on decent equipment, you can hear the subway rumbling
past, and that's a good fifty feet down below the soundproofed,
suspended studio floor in solid rock. Oddly enough, you only hear it on
CDs, not vinyl, and they are using the same master tapes for both.
Some early CDs did have a brittle sound, as well as oddities in quiet
passages, but that was due to the poor quality of even the best analogue
to digital converters of the time.
The one thing I can't understand is that they are stocking cassettes in
supermarkets again, and they aren't even the Chrome Dioxide types, just
plain iron oxide. Presumably, people are using them for some unknown
reason. Maybe they have hearing problems, and the HF response of the
digital stuff hurts their ears?
> That word "paradigmatic" almost stopped me in my tracks... but the rest
> of it sums up how I feel.
>
> v - stocked up on enough stylusses - styli? - to last my lifetime
>
They don't last long, do they? Cartridges also have a limited life.