On 10.09.2022 23.38, Sn!pe wrote:
> BeH <old...@wits.end> wrote:
>
>> On 09.09.2022 02.52, Sn!pe wrote:
>>> BeH <old...@wits.end> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06.09.2022 03.08, Sn!pe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Apologies, I put this thread on the back burner and then
>>>>> forgot about it. ≈:o(
>>>>>
>>>>> Alas, I very rarely see any of the old gang anywhere,
>>>>> although Merlyne, BED and Otter showed up there recently.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh - so that's where they are hiding. I should subscribe there as well.
>>>>
>>>>> I owe them a response too, I'd better get on that right away.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BeH
>>>
>>> Wundee is where it's at, don'tcher know. [xpoast to there]
>>
>> Yeah, it's like a train station compared to acme... *sigh*
>>
>> BeH
>
> It's a sign of the times; Usenet is nearly as old as we,
> the crumblies who still use it, are.
Yebbut it still has a "flavour" of it's own. I may be an old crank but
it's still not the same as all the wonder-apps that show up, is all the
rage for a couple of months/years - MySpace, F*cebook, Vine, Snapchat,
Second World, Instagr*m, tiktok and what have you.
Maybe it's just that all those others was tuned from the start to (or
very soon after was changed into) profitability as the primary design goal.
Or maybe the yout' of today just don't want to read... (They had better
keep off my lawn if they know what's good for them.)
> WTH, I vote for a disreputable old age. Wibble...
MEE TWO!!1!
BeH