I've only rarely noticed interesting-seeming things with Ceres in the
past.
In a post to aamod last year, I interpreted a chart which had Ceres
(and also Eris) rising:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.astrology.moderated/browse_thread/thread/2b6da1b08c829e69/a0748dcaaadbdd0c?lnk=gst&
It was an event chart, for the date/time/location I posted a reply on
a website to refute someone who was arguing with me and had made some
rather amusing, quite off-base assumptions about me. :-)
It seemed like Ceres in Aries opp. mean lunar apogee Lilith in Libra
in that chart might correlate with the fact that my opponent assumed
for no good reason that I was some kind of empty-headed, hedonistic
(Libra) lowlife floozy (Lilith), with "a couple of kids on the
way" (Ceres). :-)
> but that opposition sounds like it's worth following
> up on.
I agree.
> As far as the naming of Pluto goes - and all the nonsense about
> degrading it for astrology. It will serve one very useful purpose in
> the tropical astrology community - if anyone is not using Pluto the
> way it has been used for decades we'll know who's making it and who's
> faking it.
>
> Ray
Could be. I've always been astonished whenever I've encountered
anyone who doesn't use Pluto, or thinks it's weakening, etc., though I
guess it does happen that the astrological planets' meanings/
rulerships shift around a bit as new ones are discovered. For
instance, ever since Pluto was found and delineated, I'm guessing
Saturn and Mars are probably not associated with death nearly as much
as they used to be, etc.
A while back I noticed that in a short booklet dating from 1930 on the
topic of astrology and financial speculation which I found (and typed
and put on my site:
http://astroblahhh.com/astrology/etexts/speculation/speculation.shtml
), there was even an interpretation of Neptune which sounded like it
might go better with Pluto: "Neptune rules the Rich, the large
Capitalist and the ruler of the Nations."
I don't think I'd associate most rulers of nations with Pluto _or_
Neptune, except maybe horrible dictators (Pluto), and I suppose I
might associate the Dalai Lama with Neptune. But, plutocrats
definitely seem to me like they ought to be associated with Pluto
rather than Neptune (though I also associate wealth with Jupiter).
But before 1930, perhaps plutocrats really were associated more with
Neptune? I haven't read too many old astrology books, though, so
maybe that interpretation is just one lone author's opinion.