2012/5/8, Jukka Lehtosalo <
jleht...@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Xan <
xanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> First of all, thanks for creating alore. Python is good, but perhaps
>> for bug avoid, we need fixing types and now it's not possible. Alore
>> does.
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
Nice to meet you. Really the optional type explicitily set is the
fault of python.
I'm very glad about alore: it's simple like python but with strong
(oiptional) typing.
>
>> Secondly, I want to know if there is a possibility of using python (2
>> or 3) libraries. If it's, we have a bunch of libraries avaliable.
>
> Such functionality is not available at the moment (other than by
> manually writing wrappers using the Alore C API), but it is something
> that would certainly be very useful. I have actually started work on a
> prototype of an Alore-Python bridge, but it is in a very early stage
> and I can't say when it will be usable.
Please, when it's done, please say to me. I think it's a "key".
Overall if you support also python 3. Eventually all python 2
libraries will be ported to python 3.
>
>> Ah!, is there any "success stories" of users of alore?
>
> The most complex piece of software written in Alore is probably the
> Alore type checker (the source code is included in the Alore
> distribution).
>
I refered to "real projects" ;-)