Oops, I thought my fix was your intended use. A useful feature either
On Mar 2, 11:16 am, Vance Lucas <
va...@vancelucas.com> wrote:
> This is an interesting idea. What you're actually suggesting is a new
> use-case. Using the Plugin method as currently designed will always attempt
> to load the plugin, and throw an exception when it can't. This is a recent
> change, as it would previously only return false when it could not load the
> plugin (which is probably where the confusion is now).
>
> What you need is a way to test if a Plugin is loaded or not, and return
> boolean true/false. That sounds like a good use-case that justifies a new
> method or a change in the existing one to support it. I'll take a look at it
> and see what I can do - the desired functionality will require more changes
> than your pull request.
>
> --
> Vance
Lucaswww.vancelucas.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Chris Boden <
cbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Vance,
>
> > I'm new go git/github and I can't seen to accomplish what I'm trying
> > to do in a pull request. I'm trying to request 1 commit I made, bug
> > GitHub keeps sending every commit I made to my fork (which mostly just
> > includes re-basing from your master).
>