Appeals court sides with EPA over Spruce Mine veto!

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Rob Goodwin

unread,
Apr 23, 2013, 12:14:22 PM4/23/13
to FOM list, alliance-fed...@googlegroups.com, alliance-e...@googlegroups.com

Appeals court sides with EPA over Spruce Mine veto

This just in: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has reversed a lower court ruling that overturned EPA’s veto of the Spruce Mine mountaintop removal permit in Logan County, W.Va.

I’ve posted a copy of the ruling here.

Readers may recall that EPA vetoed the Clean Water Act permit, prompting an appeal by Arch Coal, which led to a ruling by U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson that overruled the agency’s action. EPA appealed, and today’s decision by Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson concludes:

… The Congress made plain its intent to grant the Administrator authority to prohibit/deny/restrict/withdraw a specification at any time … Thus, the unambiguous language of subsection 404(c) manifests the Congress’s intent to confer on EPA a broad veto power extending beyond the permit issuance.

Mary Love

unread,
Apr 23, 2013, 12:18:51 PM4/23/13
to alliance-fed...@googlegroups.com, FOM list, alliance-e...@googlegroups.com
The higher courts have given us several good victories lately. Great news!


From: Rob Goodwin <rooster...@gmail.com>
To: FOM list <f...@lists.riseup.net>; alliance-fed...@googlegroups.com; alliance-e...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:14 PM
Subject: Appeals court sides with EPA over Spruce Mine veto!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alliance-federal strategy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to alliance-federal-s...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages