Re: Issue 104 in alembic: Write Alembic Python Bindings

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Labels: -Type-Enhancement -Priority-P1 -FoundBy-NA -EstimateInDays-NULL
Type-FeatureRequest Priority-P0 EstimateInDays-10

Comment #2 on issue 104 by ard...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

(No comment was entered for this change.)

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Accepted

Comment #3 on issue 104 by ard...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Labels: -WorkOrder-NULL WorkOrder-1

Comment #4 on issue 104 by scottmmorrissey: Write Alembic Python Bindings

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Labels: -WorkOrder-1 WorkOrder-3

Comment #5 on issue 104 by scottmmorrissey: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

just changing this to work order 3 real quick to fall in line after 1 and 2.

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Labels: -WorkOrder-3 WorkOrder-1

Comment #6 on issue 104 by ard...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

(No comment was entered for this change.)

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: InProgress

Comment #7 on issue 104 by scottmmorrissey: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

If it's okay, just changing this to 'in progress.'

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Labels: -Priority-P0 Priority-P2

Comment #8 on issue 104 by ard...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

Right now, most of the Abc layer, on the 'I' side, is wrapped. This allows
one to open an Alembic Archive and examine its structure (object and
property hierarchy), which is useful for a lot of stuff. For various
reasons, we want to defer providing bindings that allow you to get at
sampled values in an Alembic Archive, and for the same various reasons, we
want to defer providing bindings for the 'O' side.

See
http://code.google.com/r/ardent-embic/source/browse?r=python#hg%2Fpython%2Falembic
for what we currently have.

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Comment #9 on issue 104 by stephan....@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python
Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

I've been playing with the bindings so far and with the limitations noted
in comment #8 I think the rest of it is looking pretty good.

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Comment #10 on issue 104 by ble...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

Just noting that we need to talk with RnD about effort needed to add the
python-ilmbase math bindings for pythong into OpenEXR.

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-1.0 Milestone-1.1

Comment #11 on issue 104 by ble...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

(No comment was entered for this change.)

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Owner: ble...@gmail.com
Labels: -Priority-P2 Priority-P1

Comment #12 on issue 104 by ble...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

Internal PyIMath bindings in pretty good shape. To be open sourced (and
some merging with coretex api) soon.

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Comment #14 on issue 104 by evolutio...@gmail.com: Write Alembic Python
Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

Another option for an open source python Imath binding you should consider
is this one - http://code.google.com/p/pimath/ - it's probably the most
complete Python binding available for imath - and even corrects for
inconsistencies in the C++ original code.

[ale...@googlecode.com]

Updates:
Status: Verified

Comment #15 on issue 104 by miller.lucas: Write Alembic Python Bindings
http://code.google.com/p/alembic/issues/detail?id=104

Python bindings are in the newly released 1.1