alianzalati...@gmail.com
unread,Apr 9, 2009, 4:14:37 PM4/9/09Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to ALDI llamado urgente
By JULIA PRESTON
Published: April 8, 2009
While acknowledging that the recession makes the political battle more
difficult, President Obama plans to begin addressing the country’s
immigration system this year, including looking for a path for illegal
immigrants to become legal, a senior administration official said on
Wednesday.
Mr. Obama will frame the new effort — likely to rouse passions on all
sides of the highly divisive issue — as “policy reform that controls
immigration and makes it an orderly system,” said the official,
Cecilia Muñoz, deputy assistant to the president and director of
intergovernmental affairs in the White House.
Mr. Obama plans to speak publicly about the issue in May,
administration officials said, and over the summer he will convene
working groups, including lawmakers from both parties and a range of
immigration groups, to begin discussing possible legislation for as
early as this fall.
Some White House officials said that immigration would not take
precedence over the health care and energy proposals that Mr. Obama
has identified as priorities. But the timetable is consistent with
pledges Mr. Obama made to Hispanic groups in last year’s campaign.
He said then that comprehensive immigration legislation, including a
plan to make legal status possible for an estimated 12 million illegal
immigrants, would be a priority in his first year in office. Latino
voters turned out strongly for Mr. Obama in the election.
“He intends to start the debate this year,” Ms. Muñoz said.
But with the economy seriously ailing, advocates on different sides of
the debate said that immigration could become a polarizing issue for
Mr. Obama in a year when he has many other major battles to fight.
Opponents, mainly Republicans, say they will seek to mobilize popular
outrage against any effort to legalize unauthorized immigrant workers
while so many Americans are out of jobs.
Democratic legislative aides said that opening a full-fledged debate
this year on immigration, particularly with health care as a looming
priority, could weigh down the president’s domestic agenda.
Debate is still under way among administration officials about the
precise timing and strategy. For example, it is unclear who will take
up the Obama initiative in Congress.
No serious legislative talks on the issue are expected until after
some of Mr. Obama’s other priorities have been debated, Congressional
aides said.
Just last month, Mr. Obama openly recognized that immigration is a
potential minefield.
"I know this is an emotional issue; I know it’s a controversial
issue,” he told an audience at a town meeting on March 18 in Costa
Mesa, Calif. “I know that the people get real riled up politically
about this."
But, he said, immigrants who are long-time residents but lack legal
status “have to have some mechanism over time to get out of the
shadows.”
The White House is calculating that public support for fixing the
immigration system, which is widely acknowledged to be broken, will
outweigh opposition from voters who argue that immigrants take jobs
from Americans. A groundswell among voters opposed to legal status for
illegal immigrants led to the defeat in 2007 of a bipartisan
immigration bill that was strongly supported by President George W.
Bush.
Administration officials said that Mr. Obama’s plan would not add new
workers to the American work force, but that it would recognize
millions of illegal immigrants who have already been working here.
Despite the deep recession, there is no evidence of any wholesale
exodus of illegal immigrant workers, independent studies of census
data show.
Opponents of legalization legislation were incredulous at the idea
that Mr. Obama would take on immigration when economic pain for
Americans is so widespread.
“It just doesn’t seem rational that any political leader would say,
let’s give millions of foreign workers permanent access to U.S. jobs
when we have millions of Americans looking for jobs,” said Roy Beck,
executive director of NumbersUSA, a group that favors reduced
immigration. Mr. Beck predicted that Mr. Obama would face “an
explosion” if he proceeded this year.
“It’s going to be, ‘You’re letting them keep that job, when I could
have that job,’ ” he said.
In broad outlines, officials said, the Obama administration favors
legislation that would bring illegal immigrants into the legal system
by recognizing that they violated the law, and imposing fines and
other penalties to fit the offense. The legislation would seek to
prevent future illegal immigration by strengthening border enforcement
and cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants, while
creating a national system for verifying the legal immigration status
of new workers.
But administration officials emphasized that many details remained to
be debated.
Opponents of a legalization effort said that if the Obama
administration maintained the enforcement pressure initiated by Mr.
Bush, the recession would force many illegal immigrants to return
home. Dan Stein, the president of the Federation for American
Immigration Reform, said it would be “politically disastrous” for Mr.
Obama to begin an immigration initiative at this time.
Anticipating opposition, Mr. Obama has sought to shift some of the
political burden to advocates for immigrants, by encouraging them to
build support among voters for when his proposal goes to Congress.
That is why Representative Luis V. Gutierrez, a Democrat from Mr.
Obama’s hometown, Chicago, has been on the road most weekends since
last December, traveling far outside his district to meetings in
Hispanic churches, hoping to generate something like a civil rights
movement in favor of broad immigration legislation.
Mr. Gutierrez was in Philadelphia on Saturday at the Iglesia
Internacional, a big Hispanic evangelical church in a former
warehouse, the 17th meeting in a tour that has included cities as far
flung as Providence, R.I.; Atlanta; Miami; and San Francisco. Greeted
with cheers and amens by a full house of about 350 people, Mr.
Gutierrez, shifting fluidly between Spanish and English, called for
immigration policies to preserve family unity, the strategic theme of
his campaign.
At each meeting, speakers from the community, mainly citizens, tell
stories of loved ones who were deported or of delays and setbacks in
the immigration system. Illegal immigrants have not been invited to
speak.
Mr. Gutierrez’s meetings have all been held in churches, both
evangelical and Roman Catholic, with clergy members from various
denominations, including in several places Muslim imams. At one
meeting in Chicago, Cardinal Francis George, president of the United
States Conference of Catholic Bishops, officiated.
One speaker on Saturday, Jill Flores, said that her husband, Felix, an
immigrant from Mexico who crossed the border illegally, had applied
for legal status five years ago but had not been able to gain it even
though she is an American citizen, as are their two children. Now, Ms.
Flores said, she fears that her husband will have to leave for Mexico
and will not be permitted to return for many years.
In an interview, Mr. Gutierrez rejected the idea that the timing is
bad for an immigration debate. “There is never a wrong time for us,”
he said. “Families are being divided and destroyed, and they need help
now.”