Skip to first unread message
ron minnich
Oct 27, 2015, 4:56:33 PM10/27/15
to Akaros
Anybody got a reasonable mail tool for doing the code review process? I'm finding gmail and inbox, much as I like the, are the wrong tools for the job. It's just slow enough to be a distraction.
Suggestions? Ideas?
ron
Davide Libenzi
Oct 27, 2015, 4:58:33 PM10/27/15
to Akaros
alpine! 😀
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Akaros" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to akaros+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to aka...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
ron minnich
Oct 27, 2015, 5:00:03 PM10/27/15
to Akaros
I'll try it. Are you able to use it with some kind of SMTP to your gmail service?
ron
barret rhoden
Oct 27, 2015, 5:02:12 PM10/27/15
to aka...@googlegroups.com
i'm using claws-mail at the moment. there's a few things i don't like
about it, but it's been good enough for the last 8 years. i plan to
try out mutt and imap as well.
about it, but it's been good enough for the last 8 years. i plan to
try out mutt and imap as well.
Kevin Klues
Oct 27, 2015, 5:02:36 PM10/27/15
to aka...@googlegroups.com
If you're going to go that route, I'd suggest vmail since I know how
much you like vim.
http://danielchoi.com/software/vmail.html
~Kevin
much you like vim.
http://danielchoi.com/software/vmail.html
Davide Libenzi
Oct 27, 2015, 5:04:44 PM10/27/15
to Akaros
That was a joke ☺
I actually use it, for my xmailserver.org email, but it's not something I would suggest, if you aren't born with it.
I used to watch kernel patches floating around lkml with tkdiff, but after getting used to UIs, code reviews are just much better there.
Kevin Klues
Oct 27, 2015, 5:08:05 PM10/27/15
to aka...@googlegroups.com
> after getting used to UIs, code reviews are just much better there.
+1,000,000
Xiao Jia
Oct 27, 2015, 5:23:48 PM10/27/15
to aka...@googlegroups.com
To just read the patches, patchwork may help. But to reply, still
have to go back to the email client.
Probably patchwork can be extended so that one can compose a reply
(i.e. many comments) on the web UI, then get a plain text email in the
end to be copied and pasted into gmail.
From my own point of view, it will probably be nicer if patchwork can
organize email replies in a tree structure so it's easier to follow
the context. That would require each email reply has exactly one
email parent, which is usually the case.
have to go back to the email client.
Probably patchwork can be extended so that one can compose a reply
(i.e. many comments) on the web UI, then get a plain text email in the
end to be copied and pasted into gmail.
From my own point of view, it will probably be nicer if patchwork can
organize email replies in a tree structure so it's easier to follow
the context. That would require each email reply has exactly one
email parent, which is usually the case.
Dan Cross
Oct 28, 2015, 10:08:54 AM10/28/15
to aka...@googlegroups.com
Before Google, I used MH (really, nmh by that point). It never dealt particularly well with HTML-ified email (or for that matter, with attachments) though. Under Plan 9, I used acme mail with upas for a while, but that's a non-starter for obvious reasons....
In the last six or so months, I've seen people using Apple mail, thunderbird, and one person using claws-mail.
--
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages