--
--
Vic is right. The sensors usually require some kind of "babysitting" but the level of care depends on how "reliable" you want your data.
The AQE shield would be my recommendation to have something that will work and have a community behind.
Having said that, there are simpler (and less consistent) sensors out there (Parallax comes to mind) that are just "three wires" (gnd-vcc-sign/alrm). On the dust front, as far as I know, the Shinyei sensor is the simplest to use but the Sharp one is the smallest and cheapest. In the PACMAN I used those from Parallax and the Sharp dust sensor.
Keep posting your progress!
/El Gus
Am Dienstag, 1. Januar 2013 03:01:48 UTC+1 schrieb Gustavo Olivares:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Vic is right. The sensors usually require some kind of "babysitting" but the level of care depends on how "reliable" you want your data.
> The AQE shield would be my recommendation to have something that will work and have a community behind.
I understand, so the range of the resitance of the sensors is to big for a static wiring, but needs dynamic switching between different wirings.
The power source for the sensors heating I would have planned to use those "Current source" chips that deliver a constant current, and adjust the voltage as needed (within a range) Do you think that would work?
The problem that I have with the AQE-Shield, is that I would like to meassure a broader range of variables.