Nike and Apple legal defeat underlines fitness trackers' dirty little secret | VentureBeat | Gadgets | by Mark Sullivan

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Madhur Kotharay

unread,
Jul 26, 2015, 4:49:44 PM7/26/15
to Maillist IIT Runner, Maillist Friends of IIT Runner, Maillist Aimless Runners

P. Venkatraman

unread,
Jul 28, 2015, 2:36:31 AM7/28/15
to aimless...@googlegroups.com, Maillist IIT Runner, Maillist Friends of IIT Runner
Madhur,

This is typical US consumer law at work. A country where it is necessary to mention that the coffee could be hot. 

The personal wearables HAVE to necessarily work on approximations. Where the measurements are not possible with a certain degree of precision the wearables try to bring some measure of approximation and thus influence human behaviour in healthier directions. 

To expect a degree of precision that is not possible in nature is calling for what cannot be achieved. 

Take a simple case of trying to measure the calorie consumption in running one KM

- How much do you weigh?
- What is the weather and humidty?
- What is the gradient?
- What is the pace for which you are trained? How much fat / glycogen in the fuel mix?
- Which direction is the wind blowing?

And so on...each one of these variables will have a measure on the calorie consumed.

How can a personal wearable device measure this without some assumptions and some approximations?

Can I sue Garmin for giving me a wrong calorie consumption figure for each km run?

Venkat


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Aimless Runners" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to aimless-runne...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
P. Venkatraman ( Kanna )
++91 98210 27556
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages