Our flying in the coming months

24 views
Skip to first unread message

Kieran Campbell

unread,
Mar 18, 2020, 2:29:52 PM3/18/20
to AHPC
Are you fit and safe to fly?

As we approach the first potentially flyable days in Scotland since COVID-19 has started to have significant effects on our daily lives, we must carefully consider our individual responsibilities, both as recreational users of the sky and potential health service users, before venturing out to fly.

Many of us will have flown rarely over the last 3-6 months, some of us fly rarely throughout the year, some of us are in our first years of being pilots, and all of us are facing the start of spring conditions in Scotland. No matter who you are, if you choose to fly in the following weeks and months, you will be at higher risk of injuring yourself, potentially diverting health care from those who are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19.

No matter if we are gently soaring a grassy hill, sand dunes, or simply ground handling, we put ourselves at risk EVERY time we put our harnesses on. Our greatest skill is to judge when the potential risk does not justify the reward of flight. At the moment, the consequences of misjudging our risk are far greater than normal. Free-flight is a completely non-essential activity, therefore every first responder, search and rescue member, ambulance, helicopter, hospital bed, nurse, doctor, and surgeon utilised because of a flying incident is a completely avoidable waste of resources, and this is exactly how it will be seen by the general public, who often only know about paragliding through accidents that reach the news.

Any incident during the COVID-19 response period will carry far greater negative consequences for the entire free-flying community. One or two poor judgements could carry enough negative press, induce enough public disappointment, and attract enough interest from the authorities to result in a hard ban on free-flight for the foreseeable future. If the general public opinion of free-flight drifts towards the 'unnecessarily risky' end of the scale, this could have dire consequences for the survival of the sport in a future where use of the sky becomes increasingly regulated.

If you do head out to fly over the coming weeks and months, please, for the sake of everyone else, ask yourself some hard questions:

Have I had little or no flying in the past months?
Am I unfamiliar with the site?
Is the launch difficult, daunting, or unforgiving of mistakes?
Have others ever been concerned about my attitude, competency, or safety? (Be particularly honest with yourself on this one)
Are the forecast or actual conditions even slightly concerning to me?

Now is not the time to be doing anything fancy with your free-flying, to be pushing your limits, nor to be drawn off the hill just because others are flying and you don't want to miss out. If you answered yes to any of the above questions, don't fly.

On the other hand, if you can objectively prove to yourself that it's safe for you to fly, go for it, enjoy, and please don't sneak under the radar. Continue to let someone know your intentions, discuss conditions with other pilots (while adhering to all government advice on safe physical separation), use your SPOT or InReach, and fly with others.

Safe flights, and happy landings.
Kieran Campbell
AHPC Sites Officer

Simon Lucas

unread,
Mar 20, 2020, 3:54:35 AM3/20/20
to Kieran Campbell, AHPC
Morning Kieran

Good note and timely, I was thinking about the same issues myself.
I guess another way the club could help is organise around providing its own “mountain rescue” support to a degree.
If there’s several folk out then identify focal point to phone to confirm safe landing.

Regards

Simon Lucas
(former AHPC Safety Office!)
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AHPC" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ahpc+uns...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ahpc/95de2bc3-7cdd-415f-9542-68b6ed15a02f%40googlegroups.com.

richardvereker77

unread,
Mar 20, 2020, 4:45:11 AM3/20/20
to Simon Lucas, Kieran Campbell, AHPC, ll...@googlegroups.com, scottishmountainparagliding
I also think Kieran made some really good points. I think if we are flying in a situation where we may require to provide 'mountain rescue ' we probably should not be flying re the additional burden on the emergency services.  

I could also detail all the WHO guidance that we would go against if we were to car share or need to assist someone. 

I would suspect that if there was an emergency then Mountain rescue would prefer to be called.  I would guess they would have made some action plan for a rescue in the current environment but perhaps Mark or someone could answer that? But better them lifting one casualty off than more because we got ourselves into a worse situation because we have neither the training nor the equipment. 


I am more than happy for people to debate this point of view it's only an opinion.  

PS I have included this in the other groups as well as I think it involves all of us.

R



Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages