forrtl: error (65): floating invalid

25 views
Skip to first unread message

waikik...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 11, 2020, 11:26:03 AM12/11/20
to AGWA Support
Hi Shea;
I try to make new simulations to compare future scenarios with the current situation but each time I get the first error message attached.
Even when i try to replace the the K2.exe model file (Version 25-Oct-2019) in the directory of each scenario, and also in the \AGWA\models\ directory. That doesn't work. (second  error message attached).
Can you help me on this error?
Thanks  
Waikiki(1)error message.jpg(2) error message.jpg

Shea

unread,
Dec 16, 2020, 6:45:22 PM12/16/20
to AGWA Support
Do you have working simulations from the same discretization? Can you attach the parameter file, kin.fil file, and precip file from a working and a non-working simulation?

Shea

waikik...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 19, 2020, 7:08:12 AM12/19/20
to AGWA Support
Hi Shea;
Yes,  I have working simulations from the same discretization.
I attached the file for Working and non-Working simulation
Thanks
Waikiki  

Simulations WinRAR ZIP.zip

Shea

unread,
Jan 20, 2021, 1:36:40 PM1/20/21
to AGWA Support
Hi Waikiki, First, apologies for the delayed response! Second, I'm not certain why/how it happened, but you have duplicate slope values in the plane elements. It's unclear whether these duplicates were created during parameterization and are present in the slope parameterization table (slope_disk2 in your delineation/discretization geodatabase) or if they were created when writing the simulation parameter file. The parameter file is also incomplete and stops in the middle of channel element 34, which should be unrelated to the slope issue. It's less clear why it stopped writing mid-file, but typically it occurs when an unexpected null value  is encountered in one of the parameterization look-up tables.

It looks like the working simulation you sent is from a different discretization (but maybe the same delineation?). The discretization names were disk2 (non-working simulation) and di2k2 (working simulation). Perhaps try your parameterization with a different land cover on the di2k2 discretization. If you getting a working simulation, then you'll be able to directly compare the results from different scenarios more easily than if you used different discretizations to make the comparison.

Shea



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages