Hi Nathan,
In this example, the slight change I don't think would make much difference. The biggest problem tends to arise from a change in the camera's pitch (up/down), as this shifts the horizon line and the distance from the camera forms an exponential curve, leading to a large change in distance estimation, particularly for animals further from the camera.
When we've got cameras that've been knocked more severely than in your example, we tend to annotate the side of the knock that contains the most observations, where there's reasonable calibration, and annotate the rest without tracking points. Another option, if you have multiple calibrations (e.g., deployment and collection), is to split them into multiple deployments at the same location, on either side of the displacement.
We've (Institute of Zoology, ZSL) been working on methods to automatically correct for minor knocks. We haven't finalised a process to share right now, but if you'd be happy to contribute your data, we'd greatly appreciate it! -
Benjami...@ioz.ac.uk.
Hope that's somewhat helpful, though, in the meantime.
Best wishes,
Ben
On Monday, June 1, 2026 at 8:00:03 PM UTC+1 NATHAN THAVARAJAH wrote: