JDK7

[Drakmail]

Does we need it at this state?

[Bogdan "aix27249" Kokorev]

В Пнд, 22/08/2011 в 14:51 -0700, Drakmail пишет:

> Does we need it at this state?

I think we should package it as a separate package (for example, jdk7),
and leave mainline with jdk6 until Java 7 will become standard de-facto.

[Drakmail]

Hmm, and put it into the testing repo...

[Stanislav N.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

23.08.2011 02:26, Drakmail пишет:

> Hmm, and put it into the testing repo...

It will be great, some software already want JDK7 for unknown reasons...
And +1 for putting in testing, it is not so stable ATM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5S254ACgkQiMjGl4G6v+qhGACeLy4eO37bB4h+JjUbz3oiJCq5
KZkAn0DECh6hdJKATQKnbmIVgVyzQBhh
=eNLh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Alexander Maslov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

23.08.2011 02:43, Stanislav N. пишет:

> 23.08.2011 02:26, Drakmail пишет:
>> Hmm, and put it into the testing repo...
>
> It will be great, some software already want JDK7 for unknown
> reasons... And +1 for putting in testing, it is not so stable ATM
>

Ok, I'll try to do it at this week.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5S21oACgkQx03NaC5+PXF1dACdEBBldmas3Ez3iw3URFPCPn1p
M60AnRj1oBshxP/V8FAEj1vJx/YdNV3s
=oO+A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Stanislav N.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

23.08.2011 02:42, Alexander Maslov пишет:

> 23.08.2011 02:43, Stanislav N. пишет:
>> 23.08.2011 02:26, Drakmail пишет:
>>> Hmm, and put it into the testing repo...
>
>> It will be great, some software already want JDK7 for unknown
>> reasons... And +1 for putting in testing, it is not so stable
>> ATM
>
>
> Ok, I'll try to do it at this week.

And report here if succeeded :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5S3BQACgkQiMjGl4G6v+qZuwCgs08bhULLD2aoBr21EO1NvrDz
GwsAoM89GpmCEP3FyBiuiQD9OYRQ2HQJ
=dcPI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Alexander Maslov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

23.08.2011 02:45, Stanislav N. пишет:

> 23.08.2011 02:42, Alexander Maslov пишет:
>> 23.08.2011 02:43, Stanislav N. пишет:
>>> 23.08.2011 02:26, Drakmail пишет:
>>>> Hmm, and put it into the testing repo...
>
>>> It will be great, some software already want JDK7 for unknown
>>> reasons... And +1 for putting in testing, it is not so stable
>>> ATM
>
>
>> Ok, I'll try to do it at this week.
> And report here if succeeded :)
>

I'll try to do this too.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5S2+MACgkQx03NaC5+PXFDcgCfdLfnU8P22ozE1oSlQ7JDck3O
KsIAn2pUHC+5tcfWlv1FjXVdwO+As4r5
=qkhd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Stanislav N.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

23.08.2011 01:51, Drakmail пишет:

> Does we need it at this state?

This will be OpenJDK7? Cuz today Oracle dismissed DJL (Java license
for linux distros)...

- --
Stanislav N. aka pztrn <pz...@pztrn.ru>
Blog: http://pztrn.ru/
Jabber: pz...@pztrn.ru
Key ID: 81BABFEA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5cgEkACgkQiMjGl4G6v+pQcwCfalBU9KfvYJ5kTas7xWmqicDi
geIAn0Cj3383SWb0554yj7tR7yoScPkk
=BWyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Bogdan "aix27249" Kokorev]

30.08.2011 10:16, Stanislav N. пишет:

btw, what that dismission means to us? Should we remove jdk6, or that
change applies only to jdk7?
Anyway, due to these licensing changes, we definitely should switch to
openjdk in near future (or, maybe, immediately - java maintainers,
please find out what's happening there)

[Bogdan "aix27249" Kokorev]

30.08.2011 10:16, Stanislav N. пишет:

Did some lookaround. License dismission applies only to JDK7, since they
think it isn't required now, bcoz openjdk is ok.
So: leave jdk6 for now, and prepare for openjdk7.

[Alexander Maslov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

30.08.2011 12:57, Bogdan "aix27249" Kokorev пишет:

> Did some lookaround. License dismission applies only to JDK7, since
> they think it isn't required now, bcoz openjdk is ok. So: leave
> jdk6 for now, and prepare for openjdk7.
>

Yes, I'll prepare to maintain the OpenJDK7.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5c2HoACgkQx03NaC5+PXHwYgCfZf9v+a1Eb/Ax4T+fJIOecije
sn8An0rrEWi/jALYaqn4vgQi20VffH5B
=BrCw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[K900]

Just in case anyone is still following this thread: all openjdk7 abuilds are available here: https://github.com/K900/abuilds/tree/master/wip/openjdk7
I've been using it for a couple of weeks already and it feels quite nice, but there are still a few packaging issues I want to get sorted out and some apps (e.g. IDEA) that don't play nice with OpenJDK at all. Building it takes a load of time even with ccache, so I'll probably be updating it at weekends.

[K900]

Also I don't really know if we need IcedTea stable tarballs, as hg compiles are somewhat stable and I have no idea when are they actually releasing IcedTea 2.0 we use now.