Kinda... I think there's some genuine desire there though to promote
innovative IT firms. But by trying to make the process self-funding, I
think they've lost the incentives you'd need for that to happen. They
had set up a framework to help small firms get through procurement -
Pygmalion - but I can't find mention of that anywhere now.
CIOs are important here, and if the format of the current meetings is
a barrier, then we should suggest to them (we have some friendly
contacts there, right?) what might be needed.
Intellect: as a trade body, they do already do some work to facilitate
requirements-gathering, pre-tender sessions with government clients
and suppliers - the fact is that government work is not a walk in the
park for either side, even if the bottom line is that it turns out to
be quite profitable for the big consultancies. I think Intellect could
be friends here, since they understand many of the issues and players
even if their membership doesn't reflect the whole marketplace.
Having met with them, I definitely wouldn't call them a big
consultancy.
Steph
> The Key? Sorry, read this:
>
> *Therefore, in order for a supplier to showcase their product or solution at
> The Key, they are required to have gone through this partnering process and
> have been deemed to be an approved partner. This standard is outlined in the
> Government Gateway Partner Approval document, which is available on request
> from EDT.*
>
> *In addition, The Key provides exhibiting companies with access to support
> and mentoring services enabling them to showcase their innovative products
> and solutions across the public sector. *