Missing tags at OT contract-samples

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Desperado PEREZ

unread,
May 21, 2013, 7:35:41 AM5/21/13
to agile-...@googlegroups.com

Dear fellow-traveler

In your GitHub you offer some sample-contracts at https://github.com/FellowTraveler/Open-Transactions/tree/master/sample-data/sample-contracts . You say with the purpose to get feedback of tags needed.

I miss two tags:

<Definitions name=" "> </Definitions>

The definitions tags would describe the legal terms used in the <conditions> tag.  It could eventually refer to published, agreed, legal definitions available on the web. If law changes the definition of "son", or "wife", the contract would automatically change. It would also be a tool for localisation. You could have a list of definitions valid for each country.

<Merchandise included="true/false" pictureURL=" "></Merchandise>

Many community currencies will follow Paul Grignon approach, that is, they are currencies to be redeemed against a concrete subset of goods or services. You may always include the descriptions of the goods in the <conditions> tag. However it would be much more handy to have a separate tag. A pictureURL attribute  or the URL attribute would mean a link towards the shop where this merchandise is sold, directly from the currency.

Here some examples of what I mean:

https://sites.google.com/site/desperadostheory/currencies/pimeco-cc-contract

https://sites.google.com/site/desperadostheory/currencies/citizens-salary-contract

The schema:

https://sites.google.com/site/desperadostheory/files/voucher.xsd

Sample XML:

https://sites.google.com/site/desperadostheory/files/PEMICO.xml

Desperado PEREZ

unread,
May 23, 2013, 1:10:37 AM5/23/13
to agile-...@googlegroups.com
These fields were there in the original INTERNET-DRAFT: Ko Fujimura XML Voucher: Generic Voucher Language

I dont know why systemics took the out in the Ricardian contract



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages