I feel like I have written about Saxon Math more than any other topic in homeschooling. And I honestly feel like one of its defenders. John Saxon had plenty of detractors in his day. Now, after his passing, he has the very people who take his courses, modifying them in ways to fit other educational philosophies or personal preference.
John Saxon wanted his students to demonstrate mastery of the subject of math. He went about getting those results through a two-pronged approach: constant review and Incremental Development. These two concepts, to John Saxon, were inextricable.
After doing a little more research on this concept of Incremental Development, I found out it is considered an optimal way for computer programmers to create new projects. I found this article which states this benefit of Incremental Development:
Now imagine a teacher, who has placed her student with the placement test (always take the placement test when starting with Saxon Math), notices the early lessons of the level are concepts the student already knows. She decides to skip the first 30 lessons or so and drops the student right into lesson 31.
I will grant you that there are likely simple concepts in the first 30 lessons, your student could succeed. But if a parent/teacher chooses to skip the incremental development, the student is not getting enough time to marry new concepts to review concepts and not getting sufficient review.
And it may take a LONG time to notice the short-shrift given to the student. Years, in fact. The early years of math instruction are so foundational because the student will be using the math facts and concepts taught in those years as long as he is in a math program.
In Saxon K, the student is not challenged to even recognize a number until over halfway through the course. Really!! In many of the subsequent Saxon books, there are no new math concepts until a third, to half-way through the text.
What could possibly be going on in these courses if it is not math instruction? Well, the student is actually being taught how to learn. She is given ample opportunity to work through the development of the Grammar stage with emphasis on NAMES.
The student is encouraged to notice, to identify, to question, to reason. It starts in Saxon K, when the bulk of the course simply helps the student to practice following instructions. It continues in the next three years, where the student learns to accept instruction from the parent/teacher. Until, in 5/4, the student starts to learn how to take instruction from a book and how to check her work independently.
I contend, Saxon does all this in a very lean way. There is not a moment wasted on busy work. Not a bit of it. Everything in the lesson, from the morning meeting/warm-up to the last question on the worksheet is full of grammar stage development.
Could you skip some of this and still get the same results? Maybe. But once you see the beauty of it, do you really want to neglect to share it with your kids? I truly wish I had owned a measure of math confidence in my elementary, middle, and high school years! Instead, with Saxon Math, I am giving my students the gift of math confidence in their early years.
Behavioural specifications with constraints for the incremental development of algebraic specifications are presented. The behavioural constraints correspond to the completely defined subparts of a given incomplete behavioural specification. Moreover, the local observability criteria used within a behavioural constraint can differ from the global criteria used in the behavioural specification. This is absolutely needed because, otherwise, some constructions could involve only non-observable sorts and therefore have trivial semantics. Finally, the extension and completion operations for refining specifications are defined. The extension operations correspond to horizontal refinements and build larger specifications on top of existing ones in a conservative way. The completion operations correspond to vertical refinements, they add detail to an incomplete behavioural specification and they do restrict the class of models.
ACT will develop and study an innovative model for a coordinated program of undergraduate science and education courses that focus on prospective teachers as learners. The purpose will be to develop teachers who learn science in ways they are expected to teach science as articulated in reform documents such as Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Sciences in Grades K-8 and the Framework for K12 Science Education (National Research Council, 2007, 2011). Contact: Sue Ann Bottoms, Kathryn Ciechanowski, Matt Nyman & Emily van Zee
Algebra in Context addressed the achievement gap for low SES freshman studying Algebra I by applying research-based, mathematical teaching practices in three distinct contexts--mathematics, science, and career technical education classes. The project was conducted in the School of IDEAS, one of three Gates-supported small schools (< 400) at North Eugene High School, who deliver coordinated instruction in algebraic reasoning to approximately 300 freshmen in a non-tracked algebra program. Contact: Rebekah Elliott & Larry Flick
AMS centers on a premise that to learn skilled instructional practice that attends to ambitious learning goals for each and every student there are three essential components: (1) teachers need to examine teaching using student work, lesson plans, video of teaching/learning; (2) they need to engage in guided or scaffolded opportunities to teach; and (3) they need focused feedback and assessment on the quality of instruction. Participants include teacher candidates, teachers, and teacher leaders who work collaboratively in classroom embedded professional learning with tools that support the incremental improvement of science and mathematics instruction. Through research and dissemination of innovations the project informs the work of teacher education more broadly. Currently this project is supported via grants from the National Science Foundation and the Oregon Department of Education. Contact: Rebekah Elliott and Wendy Aaron
This research study seeks to broaden participation in computer science education by integrating CS into teaching education and K-12 mathematics. We leverage the collaboration between CS and mathematics education researchers from three different colleges (engineering, science, and education) to develop modules for secondary mathematics teachers in a pre-service mathematics capstone course and in a teacher candidate methods course, where students will also participate in creating and delivering their own modules for integrating CS into the K-12 classroom. The goal of this research is to uncover core CS concepts linked to key K-12 mathematics standards and contribute to the research on how to integrate these CS concepts into pre-service teacher and graduate teacher candidate mathematics education, as well as the K-12 mathematics classroom. The outcomes of this research impact the broader participation in K-12 CS education and the pipeline of CS educators. The project is generously funded by Google. Contact: Rebekah Elliott
An APLU-SMTI sponsored project that plays a significant role in furthering work already underway in Oregon. The Mathematics Teacher Education Partnership offers broad opportunities for the OMTEP to share strategic goals, new knowledge and strategies among institutions around the country in the critical area of mathematics teacher education. We take teacher education to mean both the academic preparation and internship experiences for new teachers and the professional development of professional teachers and university faculty in collaborative partnerships. As with all disciplined inquiry, partners will commit to observe critique, reflect, and debate the efficacy of their work in the light of high quality data collected in a variety of formats. The Common Core State Standards in Mathematics (CCSSM) imply a new way of doing business that requires a long-term view of changing how mathematics is taught. Contact: Rebekah Elliott
RMLL is a large-scale, multi-site, two-phased research cycle with WestEd and the University of Washington through a $2.2 million National Science Foundation research grant. RMLL is a qualitative and quantitative study of 70 leaders with a 40-leader comparison group and 13 video-based case studies of leaders working with more than 150 teachers. In addition to complex research design in sites distributed across the United States, as part of the study, we have written two series of video and narrative case-based modules and developed over 100 hours of materials for leaders. Contact: Rebekah Elliott
A partnership with Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Science Media Group, Chemeketa and Rogue Community Colleges, and Vernier Software & Technology. The project has produced a website (release Summer 2013) containing video examples of how science is used in construction engineering contexts. The central principle is to explore science that students actually use or experience in everyday living. The activities, web links, and other resources are organized to explore the science topics of thermodynamics, electricity, and mechanics of materials. Contact: Larry Flick
Symmetries applies the improvement science process of networked improvement communities to the problem of student performance in mathematics and, eventually, to other STEM subjects from elementary to college within a K-16 partnership. The target of our work is supporting successful mathematics transitions from elementary school through college, i.e. math transitions from elementary school to middle school to high school to college. We argue that mathematics is a lynchpin for student academic success. Contact: Larry Flick
VISTA translates research-based best teaching practices into improved science teaching and student learning for all students at all levels. For elementary teachers, VISTA provides professional development and coaching to support inclusion of inquiry-based and explicit nature of science instruction in the context of problem-based learning. For early career middle and high school teachers, VISTA professional development and coaching emphasizes how to effectively teach inquiry-based science with and without technology, how to use student performance to drive future instruction, and how to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Contact: Randy Bell
4a15465005