-----
Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:02 PM
Subject: Public Good vs Private Benefit
Congratulations to TAAI
& TAFI and in particular to the Acting President of TAAI, who has
successfully argued for the re-implementation of the Joint Bank
Guarantee.
The Acting President of
TAAI, has taken a lot of pain to explain, how this has been achieved and how
the APJC members (TAAI & TAFI representatives) have successfully persuaded
the Airlines to accept the Joint Bank Guarantee Scheme. Praise worthy indeed.
However, when you read
through the detailed circular, one cannot but notice that the beneficiaries of
this JBG scheme are no more than 200 in number against 1800 memberships in TAAI
itself. That is less than 10% of all the IATA Accredited Travel Agents in
India.
If only the representatives
of TAAI & TAFI had taken as much effort and interest to ensure that the
Weekly is reversed, the benefit would have been shared by all the 100% members
nearly about 3000 of us.
But alas, they would rather
BARTER THE PUBLIC GOOD (of reversing the weekly) FOR THE PRIVATE BENEFIT
(of Jt BG) of a few. It is a perennial conflict of Public Good against Private
Benefit. Public Good of reversing the Weekly is NOT in the interest of the
Airlines and their minions. Consequently, the vested interests, which had so
subtly brought it in, would not have it reversed.
On the contrary, the Joint
Bank Guarantee would certainly swell the coffers of the Associations and would
help a handful of those agents, who are always there to vote for the
leadership. Bravo well done. You must reward those who are with you and not the
AAM AGENT, who is invisible and is suffering silently.
When an Association collects
membership fees from over 3000, getting a benefit for merely a couple of
hundreds is a matter for concern. Further, it is also makes one wonder, why so
much effort was taken to ensure this - if not just to fill the coffers of the
Association.
One
also hears that there were occasions, where, the sum so collected was allegedly
used by some of the office bearers to pay off their liabilities !
It
is therefore, incumbent on the Office bearers to ensure, and safe guard the
interests of the maximum number - nay, all the members of the Association and
not just a selected few.
This goes to prove, that
TAAI & TAFI would only look after the welfare of a few agents and not of
the Industry. God Bless them.
Rgds
A4A
"agents4agents" is a place for travel agents in
India to come together to collectively assert our rights in the fight for fair
business practices within the industry. You are welcome to join the forum and
contribute for this movement by writing to "agents...@googlegroups.com"