Re: Ingorant And Dumbest Igbo Boy Called Patrick Nwakuba, God Chosen Igbo My Foot: Re: Breaking News:-- Does Justice Omotosho Think We Are All Stupid?
femi Olajide
You mean Justice Omotosho dropped the ball by 'not' giving Nnamdi Kanu a death sentence......
Regards,
Femi Olajide
On Dec 23, 2025, at 7:01 AM, Kayode Adebayo <kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Ignorant And Dumbest Igbo Boy Called Patrick Nwakuba:God chosen Igbo my foot. If your Igbo people were God chosen, you would not squatting on other people's land in Nigeria. You would not desert your Igboland to seek refuge elsewhere. Your Igboland would have developed by now, you idiot.Keep deceiving yourselves, calling yourselves God Chosen and claiming that you're from Israel, when the Israeli said they've never heard of you or your existence before. Instead of admitting that you originated from Futa Jallon and Futa Toro where your Fulani Herders' neighbors and nemesis drove you out of, before you migrated to the present day Nigeria, you're claiming where you don't belong. Only lost and dubious people claim where they don't belong.You're a shame and an utter disgrace to your Igboland.Kayode
On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 3:10 AM, Patrick Nwakuba<pnwa...@yahoo.com> wrote:During Mushood, Abiola, the entire Yoruba cried and begged until the Igbo came to your rescue. June 12th, the coward Yorubas yelled and begged until the Igbos came to rescue the cowards. Obasanjo versus Abacha, the cowards started crying again until the Mighty Igbo came in and quenched the fire. Keep antagonizing the Igbo but don’t forget that history has a way of repeating itself. Then and only then the Igbo will tell the cowards that we do remember and have not forgotten stupidity during the useless emilokan regime. Let’s you forget, the Igbo are the God chosen people.\\pen.Sent from my iPhoneOn Dec 23, 2025, at 12:59 AM, abiodun KOMOLAFE <ijebu...@gmail.com> wrote:Fellow Nigerians,I am abiodun KOMOLAFE.Well, the Abraham Madus of the now-rested Biafraland and Justice Omotosho sha???Na so dem take play push Nnamdi Kanu to prison.Rather that start begging Nigeria and Nigerians for forgiveness, dem still dey make mouth!O ma ke de ga ke!May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!abiodun KOMOLAFE, AMNIM+234 803 361 4419 | +234 809 861 4418 | ijeb...@yahoo.co.uk | Skype: KOMO2412 | O20, Okenisa Street, Ijebu-Jesa, Osun State----------------------------------Because He lives, the end is not now!On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 7:56 PM Abraham Madu <abraha...@yahoo.com> wrote:<1766429433687blob.jpg>BreakingNews:--
Does JusticeOmotosho Think We Are All Stupid?
The QuestionThat Destroys the Judgment
If theTerrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act (TPPA) “should be treated as though itdoes not exist,” as Justice Omotosho claims, how did he see it in the firstplace to rely on its section 98(3) of that same Act (TPPA) to reach hisconclusion?
JusticeOmotosho must answer the above question, because no sensible person can say,"hey! I am relying on a law that exists to say the same law does notexist." That is a clear sign of mental illness and incoherence ofreasoning of the highest order.
You cannotrely on a law that exists in order to argue that the same law does not exist.
That is notinterpretation. That is logical madness.
Section98(3) TPPA does not float in the air. It exists only because TPPA exists. Themoment the Omotosho cited section 98(3), it admitted—without escape—that TPPAis a living, operative statute. How then can you turn around to say the samestatute you cited, no longer exists? Its like saying, I am sitting on a chairbut the chair I am sitting on does not exist. Judicial insanity!
Law does notpermit a statute to be alive in one paragraph and dead in the next. Courts arenot allowed to switch laws on and off like a light bulb to suit a desiredoutcome.
So thejudgment traps itself:
× If TPPA exists, then it governs terrorism lawand it replaced the *repealed TPAA 2013* under which Kanu was wronglyconvicted.
× If TPPA does not exist, then section 98(3)could never have been there for Omotosho to see at all or invoke in hisjudgment.
JusticeOmotosho tried to occupy both positions simultaneously. That posture is unknownto law, unknown to common sense and fatal to his jurisdiction to try NnamdiKanu.
Once thiscontradiction is seen, everything else in the judgment collapses with it.
#viral#fypviral #fypシ゚viralシfypシ゚
Ntị ọdị kwa?
Ya kpọtuba!
Ya gazie.
Ụmụ nne Abrahamụọgụ Aṅụsịobi Madụ.
--
--abiodun KOMOLAFE, AMNIM+234 803 361 4419 | +234 809 861 4418 | ijeb...@yahoo.co.uk | Skype: KOMO2412 | O20, Okenisa Street, Ijebu-Jesa, Osun State----------------------------------Because He lives, the end is not now!
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "AfricanWorldForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to africanworldfo...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/africanworldforum/CA%2BgmhUfvJLswcmFf7a8pyQcXt%2Bsm2GOx6XRK3y%2BkP621XZva%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Corporate Nigeria" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to corporate-nige...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/corporate-nigeria/3BEAA4B4-A34D-415A-B08E-C0577295A11A%40aol.com.
Patrick Nwakuba
\\pen.
<1766429433687blob.jpg>Breaking News:--
Does Justice Omotosho Think We Are All Stupid?
The Question That Destroys the Judgment
If the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act (TPPA) “should be treated as though it does not exist,” as Justice Omotosho claims, how did he see it in the first place to rely on its section 98(3) of that same Act (TPPA) to reach his conclusion?
Justice Omotosho must answer the above question, because no sensible person can say, "hey! I am relying on a law that exists to say the same law does not exist." That is a clear sign of mental illness and incoherence of reasoning of the highest order.
You cannot rely on a law that exists in order to argue that the same law does not exist.
That is not interpretation. That is logical madness.
Section 98(3) TPPA does not float in the air. It exists only because TPPA exists. The moment the Omotosho cited section 98(3), it admitted—without escape—that TPPA is a living, operative statute. How then can you turn around to say the same statute you cited, no longer exists? Its like saying, I am sitting on a chair but the chair I am sitting on does not exist. Judicial insanity!
Law does not permit a statute to be alive in one paragraph and dead in the next. Courts are not allowed to switch laws on and off like a light bulb to suit a desired outcome.
So the judgment traps itself:
× If TPPA exists, then it governs terrorism law and it replaced the *repealed TPAA 2013* under which Kanu was wrongly convicted.
× If TPPA does not exist, then section 98(3) could never have been there for Omotosho to see at all or invoke in his judgment.
Justice Omotosho tried to occupy both positions simultaneously. That posture is unknown to law, unknown to common sense and fatal to his jurisdiction to try Nnamdi Kanu.
Once this contradiction is seen, everything else in the judgment collapses with it.
#viral #fypviral #fypシ゚viralシfypシ゚
Ntị ọdị kwa?
Ya kpọtuba!
Ya gazie.
Ụmụ nne Abrahamụọgụ Aṅụsịobi Madụ.