On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 11:47 AM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:Pastor Emeka Okala:Welcome to Part Two of ADC's political travails and turmoils, beginning tomorrow Monday playing near you, featuring Atiku, Amaechi, Peter Obidiot, Kwankwaso, Makinde, Aregbesola, the Obidiots, the Kwakasuyas and others in-between, including the original owners of ADC.It's a long and interesting movie with several parts, like never before that will transverse several months, through the ADC National Convention to January 2027 Presidential Election.Get your popcorn ready. It's a movie of a lifetime and you're in the movie too.Enjoy!Kayode
On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 6:55 PM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:Congratulations, Pastor Emeka Okala:The partyless Kwankwaso is joining the structureless ADC on Monday. Unfortunately, he has no assets to bring to ADC, but liabilities. He has been expelled from NNPP. He will now join your Peter Obidiot with no delegates to counter Atiku with plenty of delegates at ADC Convention.Congratulations!Kayode
The commission also said it would not recognise Nafiu Bala Gombe, who is seeking to be declared national chairman through the courts.
INEC announced on Wednesday that it would suspend recognition of all factions within the party and refrain from monitoring any conventions or congresses organised by groups aligned with the affected leaders.
The decision, it said, will remain in place pending the final determination of a substantive suit before the Federal High Court.
The development follows a leadership crisis within the ADC and a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Suit No. CA/ABJ/145/2026, which has further complicated the dispute.
In a statement, the National Commissioner and Chairman of the Information and Voter Education Committee, Mallam Mohammed Kudu Haruna, said the Commission remains committed to neutrality.
He urged political stakeholders to avoid actions that could disrupt preparations for the 2027 general elections.
INEC disclosed that it had received a letter dated March 16, 2026, from Suleiman Usman SAN & Co, warning against any recognition of Nafiu Bala Gombe as acting national chairman while legal proceedings are ongoing.
The Commission also confirmed receiving a separate “Demand for Enforcement” from Summit Law Chambers, representing Gombe, which called for the removal of Mark and Aregbesola from INEC’s records and urged the Commission to stop engaging with them or recognising any activities conducted under their authority.
The conflicting legal demands from the rival factions have deepened the party’s internal crisis, prompting INEC to halt all official dealings with the contending groups until the courts resolve the matter.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 7:40 AM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:Pastor Emeka Okala:According to your postulation and logic:1. Tinubu pushed Atiku to bribe Nwosu, in order to illegally hijack ADC from the original owrners, instead of registering a new political party like APC did in 2013.2. According to your postulation and logic, Tinubu made your dumb and witless Peter Obidiot to create crises in a non crisis Labor Party handed over to him by Pat Utomi in 2022.3. According to your postulation and logic, it was Tinubu who made Atiku to insist on making Iyocha Ayu chairman of PDP, which led to PDP crisis, instead of appointing or electing someone from the South as the majority of the members wanted in 2018.4. According to your postulation and logic, it was Tinubu who made Peter Obidiot lack crisis management skills and leadership skill necessary to be the leader of Labor Party.5. According to your postulation and logic, it was Tinubu who forced Peter Obidiot to join ADC, instead of resolving LP internal crises, or register a new political party.6. According to your postulation and logic, it was Tinubu that made Peter Obidiot to chase after celebrities in Nigeria like the P-Square or P-Squad musical group or whatever they are called in Nigeria for photo ops, instead of facing and resolving Labor Party crises he unwittingly created.7. According to your postulation and logic, it was Tinubu that caused your selfish homeboy called Wike who contributed to PDP factionalization and division, because he wants to be President of Nigeria after Tinubu.It's time you wake up from too much Kaikai drinking and hallucinations, aka Emu Mimon, aka Apeteshi, aka Ogogoro, aka Pito, aka 4.30pm, aka Umqombothi, aka Sapele Water, aka Oguro, aka Push Me I Push You and aka Holy Water Must Flow In London Tonight.Kayode
The Cable
The decision of the Comment (INEC) not to recognise any faction of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has deepened the party’s leadership crisis, with conflicting claims and counter-claims continuing to trail a recent court ruling.
At the centre of the dispute are David Mark, former senate president; and Nafiu Bala, who was one of the deputy national chairmen of the party — with both men laying claim to the leadership structure of the party.
The current crisis is rooted in efforts by opposition figures to build a broader political coalition ahead of the 2027 elections.
In a move aimed at consolidating forces against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), political leaders across different platforms began pitching tent with the ADC in 2025.
Aside from Mark, some of the coalition members include ex-Vice-President Atiku Abubakar; Uche Secondus, former PDP national chairman; Babangida Aliyu, former governor of Niger state; Sam Egwu, former governor of Ebonyi; Aminu Tambuwal, ex-governor of Sokoto; and Liyel Imoke, former governor of Cross River.
Others are Nasir el-Rufai, former governor of Kaduna; Peter Obi, presidential candidate of the LP in 2023; Rauf Aregbesola, former minister of interior; Rotimi Amaechi, former minister of transportation; Solomon Dalung, ex-minister of sports; Odigie Oyegun, former chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC); Bolaji Abdullahi, a former minister of sports; among others.
On July 2, Ralph Nwosu, the party’s founder and former national chairman, announced the resignation of the national working committee (NWC), paving the way for an interim leadership structure headed by Mark.
However, the arrangement was soon contested by a faction within the ADC.
Bala, who was the vice-national chairman of the party, maintained that he never resigned his position and argued that, following the exit of the party chairman, he ought to have assumed leadership in line with the party’s constitution.
He then declared himself party chairman, vowing to go against the Mark leadership in court.
On September 2, 2025, Bala approached a federal high court in Abuja (Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025), seeking to stop Mark’s team members from parading themselves as party leaders.
He also sought an order to restrain INEC from recognising them and to compel recognition of himself as acting national chairman.
He further filed motions seeking to stop the party from holding meetings, congresses, or conventions pending the determination of the suit.
The motion ex parte was heard on September 4, 2025, and Emeka Nwite, the trial judge, directed that the respondents, including INEC, be put on notice to show cause why the motion ex parte should not be granted.
Dissatisfied with an interim ruling, David Mark filed an appeal challenging the jurisdiction of the federal high court to continue to hear Bala’s suit.
However, on March 12, 2026, the court of appeal dismissed Mark’s case in its entirety, holding that it was incompetent and unmeritorious.
A three-member panel of the appellate court, led by Uchechukwu Onyemenam, found that there was no substantive ruling by the federal high court on the ex parte application, as the trial judge merely ordered that parties be put on notice.
As such, there was no valid decision upon which an appeal could properly be anchored.
The court further faulted Mark for relying on an enrolled order rather than the actual proceedings and ruling of the trial court, noting that only the judge’s pronouncement constitutes the authentic record of the court.
It also held that the appeal arose from an interlocutory step, for which Mark failed to obtain the required leave before approaching the appellate court.
On the issue of jurisdiction, the court of appeal noted that the question was still pending before the federal high court and could not be determined at the appellate level at that stage, describing the appeal as premature.
Having dismissed the appeal, the court proceeded to make preservatory orders aimed at safeguarding the subject matter of the dispute.
It directed parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum and refrain from taking any action capable of undermining the proceedings before the trial court.
The court also ordered an accelerated hearing of the substantive suit and awarded costs of N2 million against Mark.
In effect, while the court of appeal rejected Mark’s procedural challenge, it did not resolve the underlying question of who is the legitimate leader of the ADC, leaving that determination to the federal high court.
In a press release dated April 1, 2026, INEC said it had received conflicting demands from both sides.
After reviewing the court judgment and filings, Mohammed Haruna, INEC commissioner for information and voter education, said the commission will refrain from engaging with both groups or monitoring their meetings, congresses, and conventions.
The commission said at its meeting on Tuesday, it resolved “to maintain the status quo ante bellum as directed by the court of appeal based on the facts and position of the parties existing before 2nd September 2025, when the case was filed by the plaintiff”.
INEC added that it would “refrain from taking any step or doing any act capable of foisting a fait accompli on the court or otherwise rendering nugatory the proceedings before the trial court”, in line with the appellate court’s directive.
Meanwhile, Bolaji Abdullahi, national publicity secretary of ADC, has said the party will go ahead with its congresses and convention whether INEC shows up to monitor the events or not.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 12:26 PM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:Pastor Emeka Okala:By the way, I meant to write 'status quo' not 'status quo ante'. 'Status quo' means the way things currently are in Law, while 'status quo ante' means the way things were and 'status quo ante bellum' means the way things were before the conflict or crisis.Kayode
On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 11:57 AM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:Pastor Emeka Okala:Continue to give your own interpretation to please yourself. Law is not Business communication. It's Law.Allow me to lecture you on Law, you discombobulated Pastor of London. The legal phrase 'status quo ante bellum' in law, means the state or status of things before the conflict or crisis started in Law. We also have what we call 'status quo' which denotes the state or status of things the way they currently are.The crisis in ADC started when the hijackers called Atiku, David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola without invitation, forced themselves on ADC from PDP and orchestrated a coup d'etat, bribing and using Nwosu to dismantle the Executive Council of ADC to which Bala Gombe was the Vice-National Chairman and Nwosu the National Chairman, by asking them to resign, instead of registering a new political party.According Bala Gombe, he was not party to the Executive Council dissolution. He did not give his consent, but Nwosu went ahead anyway, forging his signature. To apply the legal phrase 'status quo ante bellum' to this legal issue, it means the state of affairs at ADC when Nwosu was the National Chairman and Bala Gombe was the Vice-National Chairman which was before the hijackers hijacked the Executive Council of ADC without invitation. Your half-baked interpretation would only apply, if the court had asked the parties to maintain 'status quo' which means the way things currently are.Pastor Emeka Okala, it's not too late to go back to school and study Law. Studying Law will expand your horizon and stop your discombobulation. There is a difference between Business Communication and Law.Kayode
On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 12:26 PM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Pastor Emeka Okala:By the way, I meant to write 'status quo' not 'status quo ante'. 'Status quo' means the way things currently are in Law, while 'status quo ante' means the way things were and 'status quo ante bellum' means the way things were before the conflict or crisis.
Kayode
On Fri, Apr 3, 2026 at 11:57 AM, Kayode Adebayo<kayu...@yahoo.com> wrote:Pastor Emeka Okala:
>>.... Before 2nd September 2025, ADC has been superintended by Hon David Mark as its National Chairman and Rauf Aregbesola as its National Secretary - including all other functionaries of the party. The maintenance of that existing structure before Nafiu Bala approached the court on 2nd September 2025 is what the Court means by reverting the situation to a status quo ante bellum. << (Chukwuemeka Ọkala)
Bwala said Obi lacks the characteristics of a person who wants to be president of Nigeria.
Featuring on News Central TV’s 60 Minutes with Mr Kay on Friday, Bwala said: “Peter Obi will never be president. He will never cross the central business district that will lead Aso Villa.
Anybody that would be a president, there are characteristics that you will see.
“The person must be visionary, the person must be grassrooted, organic grassrooted, not manipulation, and the person must be sincere for whatever he is but won’t present a picture for what he is totally the opposite for who he is, Peter Obi will never be.”
The presidential aide also noted that the former Anambra State governor lacks grassroot support.
He also accused Obi of selling fake narrative to the Nigerian church during the past administration of the late former president Muhammadu Buhari.
“Peter Obi does not have a grassroot, what Peter Obi did is that he went to the church with a narrative when Buhari was in government that the church is being disenfranchised and it’s time for the church to take back their country.